svr4 code: this code would call centralized sysctl code that does
these checks also.
MFC after: 1 week
Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project
Sponsored by: nCircle Network Security, Inc.
osf1_signal.c:1.41, amd64/amd64/trap.c:1.291, linux_socket.c:1.60,
svr4_fcntl.c:1.36, svr4_ioctl.c:1.23, svr4_ipc.c:1.18, svr4_misc.c:1.81,
svr4_signal.c:1.34, svr4_stat.c:1.21, svr4_stream.c:1.55,
svr4_termios.c:1.13, svr4_ttold.c:1.15, svr4_util.h:1.10,
ext2_alloc.c:1.43, i386/i386/trap.c:1.279, vm86.c:1.58,
unaligned.c:1.12, imgact_elf.c:1.164, ffs_alloc.c:1.133:
Now that Giant is acquired in uprintf() and tprintf(), the caller no
longer leads to acquire Giant unless it also holds another mutex that
would generate a lock order reversal when calling into these functions.
Specifically not backed out is the acquisition of Giant in nfs_socket.c
and rpcclnt.c, where local mutexes are held and would otherwise violate
the lock order with Giant.
This aligns this code more with the eventual locking of ttys.
Suggested by: bde
as they both interact with the tty code (!MPSAFE) and may sleep if the
tty buffer is full (per comment).
Modify all consumers of uprintf() and tprintf() to hold Giant around
calls into these functions. In most cases, this means adding an
acquisition of Giant immediately around the function. In some cases
(nfs_timer()), it means acquiring Giant higher up in the callout.
With these changes, UFS no longer panics on SMP when either blocks are
exhausted or inodes are exhausted under load due to races in the tty
code when running without Giant.
NB: Some reduction in calls to uprintf() in the svr4 code is probably
desirable.
NB: In the case of nfs_timer(), calling uprintf() while holding a mutex,
or even in a callout at all, is a bad idea, and will generate warnings
and potential upset. This needs to be fixed, but was a problem before
this change.
NB: uprintf()/tprintf() sleeping is generally a bad ideas, as is having
non-MPSAFE tty code.
MFC after: 1 week
the semantics in that the returned filename to use is now a kernel
pointer rather than a user space pointer. This required changing the
arguments to the CHECKALT*() macros some and changing the various system
calls that used pathnames to use the kern_foo() functions that can accept
kernel space filename pointers instead of calling the system call
directly.
- Use kern_open(), kern_access(), kern_msgctl(), kern_execve(),
kern_mkfifo(), kern_mknod(), kern_statfs(), kern_fstatfs(),
kern_setitimer(), kern_stat(), kern_lstat(), kern_fstat(), kern_utimes(),
kern_pathconf(), and kern_unlink().
general cleanup of the API. The entire API now consists of two functions
similar to the pre-KSE API. The suser() function takes a thread pointer
as its only argument. The td_ucred member of this thread must be valid
so the only valid thread pointers are curthread and a few kernel threads
such as thread0. The suser_cred() function takes a pointer to a struct
ucred as its first argument and an integer flag as its second argument.
The flag is currently only used for the PRISON_ROOT flag.
Discussed on: smp@
Note ALL MODULES MUST BE RECOMPILED
make the kernel aware that there are smaller units of scheduling than the
process. (but only allow one thread per process at this time).
This is functionally equivalent to teh previousl -current except
that there is a thread associated with each process.
Sorry john! (your next MFC will be a doosie!)
Reviewed by: peter@freebsd.org, dillon@freebsd.org
X-MFC after: ha ha ha ha
their svr4_stat64 structures with old dev_t values instead of udev_t's.
Panic was caused when major() and minor() were called with args which
weren't pointers. The panic was probably introduced in rev 1.51 of
kern_conf.c
1:
s/suser/suser_xxx/
2:
Add new function: suser(struct proc *), prototyped in <sys/proc.h>.
3:
s/suser_xxx(\([a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)->p_ucred, \&\1->p_acflag)/suser(\1)/
The remaining suser_xxx() calls will be scrutinized and dealt with
later.
There may be some unneeded #include <sys/cred.h>, but they are left
as an exercise for Bruce.
More changes to the suser() API will come along with the "jail" code.
