The -r flag is ignored by the FreeBSD implementation of bsdlabel(8)
(also called disklabel(8) in the past). Remove its use from examples
and tests in the tree.
This commit does not touch historical documentation under share/doc/smm
and files under contrib/netbsd-tests.
Reviewed by: imp
MFC after: 2 weeks
Approved by: imp (src)
Fixes: 57dfbec57b More axe-work:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D34585
Follow-up on r322318 and r322319 and remove the deprecated modules.
Shift some now-unused kernel files into userspace utilities that incorporate
them. Remove references to removed GEOM classes in userspace utilities.
Reviewed by: imp (earlier version)
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21249
This leverages CONFS to handle the install.
Approved by: re (blanket, pkgbase), will (mentor)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17217
Mainly focus on files that use BSD 3-Clause license.
The Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) group provides a specification
to make it easier for automated tools to detect and summarize well known
opensource licenses. We are gradually adopting the specification, noting
that the tags are considered only advisory and do not, in any way,
superceed or replace the license texts.
Special thanks to Wind River for providing access to "The Duke of
Highlander" tool: an older (2014) run over FreeBSD tree was useful as a
starting point.
The Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) group provides a specification
to make it easier for automated tools to detect and summarize well known
opensource licenses. We are gradually adopting the specification, noting
that the tags are considered only advisory and do not, in any way,
superceed or replace the license texts.
Special thanks to Wind River for providing access to "The Duke of
Highlander" tool: an older (2014) run over FreeBSD tree was useful as a
starting point.
Initially, only tag files that use BSD 4-Clause "Original" license.
RelNotes: yes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13133
Renumber cluase 4 to 3, per what everybody else did when BSD granted
them permission to remove clause 3. My insistance on keeping the same
numbering for legal reasons is too pedantic, so give up on that point.
Submitted by: Jan Schaumann <jschauma@stevens.edu>
Pull Request: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/pull/96
go asking what debug flags to set for GEOM to make it work. Advice
them to use gpart(8) instead.
Something similar should probably done with disklabel,
but I need to rewrite the disklabel examples first.
Reviewed by: wblock@
MFC after: 1 month
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3315
Off by default, build behaves normally.
WITH_META_MODE we get auto objdir creation, the ability to
start build from anywhere in the tree.
Still need to add real targets under targets/ to build packages.
Differential Revision: D2796
Reviewed by: brooks imp
This includes:
o All directories named *ia64*
o All files named *ia64*
o All ia64-specific code guarded by __ia64__
o All ia64-specific makefile logic
o Mention of ia64 in comments and documentation
This excludes:
o Everything under contrib/
o Everything under crypto/
o sys/xen/interface
o sys/sys/elf_common.h
Discussed at: BSDcan
The reasoning behind this, is that if we are consistent in our
documentation about the uint*_t stuff, people will be less tempted to
write new code that uses the non-standard types.
I am not going to bump the man page dates, as these changes can be
considered style nits. The meaning of the man pages is unaffected.
MFC after: 1 month
The index() and rindex() functions were marked LEGACY in the 2001
revision of POSIX and were subsequently removed from the 2008 revision.
The strchr() and strrchr() functions are part of the C standard.
This makes the source code a lot more consistent, as most of these C
files also call into other str*() routines. In fact, about a dozen
already perform strchr() calls.
writing label into a file image. The most common use - putting disklabel
into ISO file. Before this change the label would always go to
the offset 512, while geom_part code expects it to be in the 1st
sector (i.e. 2048 incase of ISO). BSD disklabels provide good and
lightweight way to logically split livecds. It is non-intrusive as
far as ISO9660 goes (both boot-wise and metadata-wise) and
completely transparent to anything but BSD, so you can have
BSD-specific area appended after regular ISO.
And with a little bit of GEOM trickery you can do even more
interesting stuff with it.
For example we make "hybrid" bootable CDs using this method.
We create bootable ISO with kernel and such and append UFS
image compressed with UZIP and it works like a charm. We put
label based on the offsef of the BSD part into the ISO. The kernel
boots off normal ISO9660 part, tastes label attaches it,
tastes UZIP, attaches it and finally mounts UFS using GEOM_LABEL.
This provides much better way of eliminating waste than doing
"crunched" build.
MFC after: 1 month
fields, but user could specify some of those fields when edits disklabel
with `bsdlabel -e`. But without -A flag these fields might be
overwritten with default values from the virgin disklabel.
So, don't overwrite such fields if they are not zero. Also add checks
to prevent creating disklabel with less than DEFPARTITIONS and more
than MAXPARTITIONS partitions.
PR: bin/162332
Tested by: Eugene Grosbein
MFC after: 1 week
This makes partitions between 50GiB and 2TiB (16TiB for 4k drives) print
correctly aligned.
While here, fix type of secsize. g_sectorsize() returns ssize_t, don't
store this in an unsigned var. Bump WARNS to 6.
MFC after: 4 weeks
- the default label now includes an a: partition by default
- the c: partition is no longer exported via devfs
- writing of the labels usually works in all cases, though the script
assumes half of them have to fail
not available. This improves error reporting when bsdlabel(8) is unable
to open a device for writing. If GEOM_BSD was unavailable, only a rather
obscure error message "Class not found" was printed.
PR: bin/58390
Reviewed by: ae
Discussed with: marcel
MFC after: 1 month
