libunwind and openmp to the upstream release_80 branch r363030
(effectively, 8.0.1 rc2). The 8.0.1 release should follow this within a
week or so.
MFC after: 2 weeks
To facilitate experimentation with LTO we require an ar that supports
LLVM IR, and to a lesser degree also an nm. As a first step always
install llvm-ar and llvm-nm.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
ASAN reports become a lot more useful with llvm-symbolizer in $PATH, and the
build is not much more time-consuming. The added benefit is that the
resulting reports will actually include symbol information; without, thread
trace information includes a bunch of addresses that immediately resolve to
an inline function in
^/contrib/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.h and take a
little more effort to examine.
Reviewed by: emaste
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20484
CXXSTD was added as the C++ analogue to CSTD.
CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.
This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.
As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.
Notes:
This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.
Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:
Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```
After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345203, r345704, r345705
Relnotes: yes
Tested with: make tinderbox
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732
When a review is closed via Phabricator it updates the patch attached to the
review. I downloaded the raw patch from Phabricator, applied it, and repeated
my mistake from r345704 by accident mixing content from D19732 and D19738.
For my own personal sanity, I will try not to mix reviews like this in the
future.
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345706
Approved by: emaste (mentor, implicit)
CXXSTD was added as the C++ analogue to CSTD.
CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.
This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.
As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.
Notes:
This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.
Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:
Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```
After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345203, r345704, r345705
Relnotes: yes
Tested with: make tinderbox
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732
I accidentally committed code from two reviews. I will reintroduce the code to
bsd.progs.mk as part of a separate commit from r345704.
Approved by: emaste (mentor, implicit)
MFC after: 2 months
MFC with: r345704
CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.
This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.
As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.
Notes:
This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.
Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:
Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```
After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
Relnotes: yes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732
[ELF] Support --{,no-}allow-shlib-undefined
Summary:
In ld.bfd/gold, --no-allow-shlib-undefined is the default when
linking an executable. This patch implements a check to error on
undefined symbols in a shared object, if all of its DT_NEEDED entries
are seen.
Our approach resembles the one used in gold, achieves a good balance
to be useful but not too smart (ld.bfd traces all DSOs and emulates
the behavior of a dynamic linker to catch more cases).
The error is issued based on the symbol table, different from
undefined reference errors issued for relocations. It is most
effective when there are DSOs that were not linked with -z defs (e.g.
when static sanitizers runtime is used).
gold has a comment that some system libraries on GNU/Linux may have
spurious undefined references and thus system libraries should be
excluded (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6811). The
story may have changed now but we make --allow-shlib-undefined the
default for now. Its interaction with -shared can be discussed in the
future.
Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, pcc, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: joerg, emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57385
Pull in r352943 from upstream lld trunk (by Fangrui Song):
[ELF] Default to --no-allow-shlib-undefined for executables
Summary:
This follows the ld.bfd/gold behavior.
The error check is useful as it captures a common type of ld.so
undefined symbol errors as link-time errors:
// a.cc => a.so (not linked with -z defs)
void f(); // f is undefined
void g() { f(); }
// b.cc => executable with a DT_NEEDED entry on a.so
void g();
int main() { g(); }
// ld.so errors when g() is executed (lazy binding) or when the program is started (-z now)
// symbol lookup error: ... undefined symbol: f
Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, pcc, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: llvm-commits, emaste, arichardson
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57569
Together, these add support for --no-allow-shlib-undefined, and make it
the default for executables, so they will fail to link if any symbols
from needed shared libraries are undefined.
Reported by: jbeich
PR: 236062, 236141
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r344779
clang and various other executables will fail to link with undefined
symbols.
Reported by: O. Hartmann <ohartmann@walstatt.org>
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r344779
The armv6 build failed in CI due to missing symbols (from these two
source files) in the bootstrap Clang.
This affected only armv6 because other Clang-using archs are using LLD
as the bootstrap linker, and thus include SRCS_MIW via LLD_BOOTSTRAP.
Reported by: CI, via lwhsu
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Building binaries as PIE allows the executable itself to be loaded at a
random address when ASLR is enabled (not just its shared libraries).
With this change PIE objects have a .pieo extension and INTERNALLIB
libraries libXXX_pie.a.
MK_PIE is disabled for some kerberos5 tools, Clang, and Subversion, as
they explicitly reference .a libraries in their Makefiles. These can
be addressed on an individual basis later. MK_PIE is also disabled for
rtld-elf because it is already position-independent using bespoke
Makefile rules.
Currently only dynamically linked binaries will be built as PIE.
Discussed with: dim
Reviewed by: kib
MFC after: 1 month
Relnotes: Yes
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18423
[X86] Add FPSW as a Def on some FP instructions that were missing it.
Pull in r353141 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):
[X86] Connect the default fpsr and dirflag clobbers in inline
assembly to the registers we have defined for them.
Summary:
We don't currently map these constraints to physical register numbers
so they don't make it to the MachineIR representation of inline
assembly.
This could have problems for proper dependency tracking in the
machine schedulers though I don't have a test case that shows that.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57641
Pull in r353489 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):
[X86] Add FPCW as a register and start using it as an implicit use on
floating point instructions.
Summary:
FPCW contains the rounding mode control which we manipulate to
implement fp to integer conversion by changing the roudning mode,
storing the value to the stack, and then changing the rounding mode
back. Because we didn't model FPCW and its dependency chain, other
instructions could be scheduled into the middle of the sequence.
This patch introduces the register and adds it as an implciit def of
FLDCW and implicit use of the FP binary arithmetic instructions and
store instructions. There are more instructions that need to be
updated, but this is a good start. I believe this fixes at least the
reduced test case from PR40529.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, rnk, efriedma, andrew.w.kaylor
Subscribers: dim, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57735
These should fix a problem in clang 7.0 where it would sometimes emit
long double floating point instructions in a slightly wrong order,
leading to failures in our libm tests. In particular, the cbrt_test
test case 'cbrtl_powl' and the trig_test test case 'reduction'.
Also bump __FreeBSD_cc_version, to be able to detect this in our test
suite.
Reported by: lwhsu
PR: 234040
Upstream PR: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40206
MFC after: 1 week
7.0.1 release r349250. There were no functional changes since the 7.0.1
rc3 import.
PR: 230240, 230355
Relnotes: yes
MFC after: 2 months
X-MFC-With: r341825
It is required by llvm-profdata, now built by default under the
LLVM_COV knob. The additional complexity that would come from avoiding
building it if CLANG_EXTRAS and LLVM_COV are both disabled is not worth
the small savings in build time.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
from 12.0-ALPHA10 to 13.0-CURRENT. This edit was a mistake,
and should have been applied to stable/12 upon branching, not
head.
Reported by: jbeich, dim
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
ELF spec says that for SHT_REL and SHT_RELA sh_link should reference the
associated string table and sh_info should reference the "section to
which the relocation applies." ELF Tool Chain's elfcopy / strip use
this (in part) to control whether or not the relocation entry is copied
to the output.
LLVM PR 37538 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37538
Approved by: re (kib)
Obtained from: llvm r344226 (backported for 6.0)
Previously Clang required ifunc resolution functions to take no
arguments, presumably because GCC documented ifunc resolvers as taking
no arguments. However, GCC accepts resolvers accepting arguments, and
our rtld passes CPU ID information (cpuid, hwcap, etc.) to ifunc
resolvers. Just remove the check from the in-tree compiler for our in-
tree compiler; a different (per-OS) approach may be required upstream.
Reported by: mjg
Approved by: re (rgrimes)
MFC after: 1 week
Relnotes: Yes
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
BPF (eBPF) is an independent instruction set architecture which is
introduced in Linux a few years ago. Originally, eBPF execute
environment was only inside Linux kernel. However, recent years there
are some user space implementation (https://github.com/iovisor/ubpf,
https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/bpf_lib.html) and kernel space
implementation for FreeBSD is going on
(https://github.com/YutaroHayakawa/generic-ebpf).
The BPF target support can be enabled using WITH_LLVM_TARGET_BPF, as it
is not built by default.
Submitted by: Yutaro Hayakawa <yhayakawa3720@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: dim, bdrewery
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16033
