UPAGES layout.. it was entirely too comfortable with reading and writing
the U area before. I've changed it to use PT_GETREGS/PT_PUTREGS
ptrace ops instead of READ_U etc. The code to read the registers from
core dumps is a bandaid at best. It seems to have problems reading
core dumps from dynamic linked executables still, but at least static
dumps work.
I desperately need help from a gdb/bfd expert. :-) HELP!!
space. (!)
Have each process use the kernel stack and pcb in the kvm space. Since
the stacks are at a different address, we cannot copy the stack at fork()
and allow the child to return up through the function call tree to return
to user mode - create a new execution context and have the new process
begin executing from cpu_switch() and go to user mode directly.
In theory this should speed up fork a bit.
Context switch the tss_esp0 pointer in the common tss. This is a lot
simpler since than swithching the gdt[GPROC0_SEL].sd.sd_base pointer
to each process's tss since the esp0 pointer is a 32 bit pointer, and the
sd_base setting is split into three different bit sections at non-aligned
boundaries and requires a lot of twiddling to reset.
The 8K of memory at the top of the process space is now empty, and unmapped
(and unmappable, it's higher than VM_MAXUSER_ADDRESS).
Simplity the pmap code to manage process contexts, we no longer have to
double map the UPAGES, this simplifies and should measuably speed up fork().
The following parts came from John Dyson:
Set PG_G on the UPAGES that are now in kernel context, and invalidate
them when swapping them out.
Move the upages object (upobj) from the vmspace to the proc structure.
Now that the UPAGES (pcb and kernel stack) are out of user space, make
rfork(..RFMEM..) do what was intended by sharing the vmspace
entirely via reference counting rather than simply inheriting the mappings.
convenient and makes life difficult for my next commit. We still need
an i386tss to point to for the tss slot in the gdt, so we use a common
tss shared between all processes.
Note that this is going to break debugging until this series of commits
is finished. core dumps will change again too. :-( we really need
a more modern core dump format that doesn't depend on the pcb/upages.
This change makes VM86 mode harder, but the following commits will remove
a lot of constraints for the VM86 system, including the possibility of
extending the pcb for an IO port map etc.
Obtained from: bde
The typo was detected once apon a time with the -Wunused compile option.
The result was that a block of code for implementing
madvise(.. MADV_SEQUENTIAL..) behavior was "dead" and unused, probably
negating the effect of activating the option.
Reviewed by: dyson
struct direct, not using UFS' definition of DIRBLKSIZ, using directory
seek cookies to make reading non-UFS directories reliable
(e.g. cd9660, ext2fs).
A special thanks to Robert Eckardt for providing an ISC binary of GNU
ls so that I could test these changes.
Use the name argument almost the same in all LKM types. Maintain
the current behavior for the external (e.g., modstat) name for DEV,
EXEC, and MISC types being #name ## "_mod" and SYCALL and VFS only
#name. This is a candidate for change and I vote just the name without
the "_mod".
Change the DISPATCH macro to MOD_DISPATCH for consistency with the
other macros.
Add an LKM_ANON #define to eliminate the magic -1 and associated
signed/unsigned warnings.
Add MOD_PRIVATE to support wcd.c's poking around in the lkm structure.
Change source in tree to use the new interface.
Reviewed by: Bruce Evans
Use the name argument almost the same in all LKM types. Maintain
the current behavior for the external (e.g., modstat) name for DEV,
EXEC, and MISC types being #name ## "_mod" and SYCALL and VFS only
#name. This is a candidate for change and I vote just the name without
the "_mod".
Change the DISPATCH macro to MOD_DISPATCH for consistency with the
other macros.
Add an LKM_ANON #define to eliminate the magic -1 and associated
signed/unsigned warnings.
Add MOD_PRIVATE to support wcd.c's poking around in the lkm structure.
Change source in tree to use the new interface.
Reviewed by: Bruce Evans
by Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu>, and his description of the problem.
The bug was primarily in procfs_mem, but the mistake likely happened
due to the lack of vm system support for the operation. I added
better support for selective marking of page dirty flags so that
vm_map_pageable(wiring) will not cause this problem again.
The code in procfs_mem is now less bogus (but maybe still a little
so.)
loop, test for them separately. The bug report from David Malone showed that
even though we had been reselected (SELDI was true), we sat in the poll for
work loop until the selection timeout timer expired. It may be that the
SSTAT0 register doesn't like to have more than one bit tested at a time.
I've seen stranger things than this on these parts.
selection loop was merged with the poll_for_work loop. We cannot assume
that the SCB for the selection timeout is the current SCB. Instead we
must look at the SCB at the head of the waiting for selection list.
This fixes part of a problem reported by David Malone, but does not explain
why he was getting selection timeouts in the first place.
"-pg" and gprof(1) instead. FreeBSD does not support plain "-p" or
prof(1).
Plain "-p" is still allowed when just compiling. In the compile
phase, "-p" is identical "-pg". It is used by <bsd.lib.mk> for
building profiled object files.
the directory format (ext2fs, cd9660). For these filesystems, it must use
cookies to find the correct offset to use for subsequent reads. Without it,
linux /bin/ls tends to loop re-reading the same block over and over again.
2.2 candidate.
(see LINT). There is a new low-level console type that is more suitable
for use with gdb-remote.
Fixed setting of speed at probe time for the serial console (if any).
Reviewed by: dfr
I got tired of not seeing my worm stats show up during a burn. :)
[Joerg, I just stapled in 1MB/sec for a bogus xfer rate and left seek = 1,
as suggested - I'm not going to dynamically calculate the xfer rate from
a known device spectable, OK? :-)]
Reviewed by: joerg
