libunwind and openmp to the upstream release_80 branch r363030
(effectively, 8.0.1 rc2). The 8.0.1 release should follow this within a
week or so.
MFC after: 2 weeks
There's no reason why a special case needs to be added specifically for amd64,
arm, and i386, as the code is written in machine architecture agnostic C/C++.
This will make it possible for all supporting clang architectures to produce
runtime coverage with `--coverage`.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: dim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20003
CXXSTD was added as the C++ analogue to CSTD.
CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.
This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.
As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.
Notes:
This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.
Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:
Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```
After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345203, r345704, r345705
Relnotes: yes
Tested with: make tinderbox
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732
When a review is closed via Phabricator it updates the patch attached to the
review. I downloaded the raw patch from Phabricator, applied it, and repeated
my mistake from r345704 by accident mixing content from D19732 and D19738.
For my own personal sanity, I will try not to mix reviews like this in the
future.
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345706
Approved by: emaste (mentor, implicit)
CXXSTD was added as the C++ analogue to CSTD.
CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.
This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.
As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.
Notes:
This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.
Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:
Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```
After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345203, r345704, r345705
Relnotes: yes
Tested with: make tinderbox
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732
I accidentally committed code from two reviews. I will reintroduce the code to
bsd.progs.mk as part of a separate commit from r345704.
Approved by: emaste (mentor, implicit)
MFC after: 2 months
MFC with: r345704
CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.
This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.
As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.
Notes:
This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.
Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:
Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```
After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
Relnotes: yes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732
For now, the libraries can be built and installed using:
cd /usr/src/lib/libclang_rt/fuzzer && \
make obj && \
make depend && \
make && \
sudo make install
cd /usr/src/lib/libclang_rt/fuzzer_no_main && \
make obj && \
make depend && \
make && \
sudo make install
See https://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html for more information.
The lib32 build was already building the i386 version of
the clang sanitizers (libclang_rt) but they were not being
installed. This enables the installation.
MK_TOOLCHAIN=no was originally added to the install make
environment to disable includes so that NO_INCS could be
removed. The MK_TOOLCHAIN in bsd.incs.mk was subsequently
renamed to MK_INCLUDES, but bsd.lib.mk doesn't even include
bsd.incs.mk when LIBRARIES_ONLY is defined which the install
make environment for compat libs now defines. However,
setting MK_TOOLCHAIN=no forced MK_CLANG=no which disabled
libclang_rt during the install32 phase. Remove MK_TOOLCHAIN=no
since LIBRARIES_ONLY is now sufficient.
Since the libcompat environment overrides both LIBDIR and
SHLIBDIR, libclang_rt/Makefile.inc has to set both variables
to force the libraries to be installed to the location
expected by the compiler.
Reviewed by: bdrewery, dim
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16574
* Don't test MACHINE, it's irrelevant to userland and should never be
used in userland Makefiles.
* If we match armv[67] and CPUTYPE is undefined OR it doesn't have
'soft' in it, choose armhf.
* Add a note that the soft float on armv[67] may be broken.
Sponsored by: Netflix
:U:Mfoo expands to :Mfoo, apparently. Explicit check for CPUTYPE being
defined, and test for it's value not containing *soft* before calling CRTARCH
armhf.
Tested, somewhat. Unfortunately recent changes appear to have affected
cross-builds where it no longer works, per my tests after universe12a being
upgraded from 07/2017 to 11/2017 sources (DESTDIR isn't being used in WORLDTMP;
MK_SYSTEM_COMPILER might be causing issues right now).
MFC after: 1 week
MFC with: r325502
Reported by: imp
CPUTYPE (apparently) isn't defined in non-cross-builds, which caused
arm/armv[67] hosted/targeted builds to fail when evaluating CPUTYPE.
Add the :U modifier to CPUTYPE so it evaluates to "". This allows armv[67] to
get past the conditional successfully.
MFC after: 1 week
Reported by: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>
- MK_PROFILE is controlled in bsd.opts.mk, which is pulled in via bsd.own.mk,
which is pulled in via bsd.init.mk . All upstream Makefiles which build off
of this one use bsd.init.mk.
- COMPILER_{TYPE,VERSION} is set via bsd.compiler.mk .
This reduces the namespace pollution/complexity somewhat.
MFC after: 1 week
Despite the fact that it's a working solution, it doesn't follow the design
philosophy of only doing TARGET_* in Makefile.inc1 and special locations in
the source tree.
PR: 222925
Requested by: imp
- Define TARGET_CPUARCH and use in libclang_rt as the basis for CRTARCH
When cross-compiling, the wrong architecture was being embedded in the
libclang_rt binary filenames. It should be based on TARGET_ARCH (target), not
MACHINE_ARCH (host).
If TARGET_ARCH isn't defined (host-builds), fallback to MACHINE_ARCH.
- Define CRTARCH to armhf when TARGET/TARGET_ARCH are set to arm/armv[67]
TARGET_ABI/TARGET_CPU in Makefile.inc1 sets the ABI to gnueabihf, which
affects the clang lookup path per `getArchNameForCompilerRTLib(..)` in
contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChain.cpp, so chase clang and
Linux's assumed naming convention for hard-float arm architectures.
CROSSENV (in Makefile.inc1) sets CPUTYPE/MACHINE(_ARCH)? to the
TARGET*-relevant values when building the `libraries` target, so test
those variables instead.
- Add OLD_FILES/OLD_LIBS entries for TARGET/TARGET_ARCH == arm/armv[67]. This
impacts only arm/armv6 and arm/armv7.
PR: 222925
Several of the flags were being treated as CFLAGS, when they were actually
technically CXXFLAGS. Move them there.
Only apply -fno-sanitize=safe-stack with clang.
PR: 223179
TARGET_ABI/TARGET_CPU in Makefile.inc1 sets the ABI to gnueabihf, which affects
the clang lookup path per getArchNameForCompilerRTLib(..) in
contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChain.cpp .
This is a follow up to r324873.
PR: 222925
Several of the flags were being treated as CFLAGS, when they were actually
technically CXXFLAGS. Move them there.
Also, only apply -fno-sanitize=safe-stack with clang.
This is a draft diff.
PR: 223179
When cross-compiling, the wrong architecture was being embedded in the
libclang_rt binary filenames. It should be based on TARGET_ARCH (target), not
MACHINE_ARCH (host).
This is a draft commit against my project branch. Will fix on ^/head soon.
PR: 222925
The symbols currently hidden in libprofile_rt are needed for linking with
`clang --coverage` to add coverage counters at link time and produce
coverage numbers at runtime.
In collaboration with: dim
MFC after: 1 month
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
Differential Revision: D9168
