They are unused today and cannot be safely used in the face of unlocked
lookup, in which pages may be busied without the object lock held.
Obtained from: jeff (object_concurrency patches)
Reviewed by: kib
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32948
- Modify vm_page_busy_sleep() and vm_page_busy_sleep_unlocked() to take
a VM_ALLOC_* flag indicating whether to sleep on shared-busy, and fix
up callers.
- Modify vm_page_busy_sleep() to return a status indicating whether the
object lock was dropped, and fix up callers.
- Convert callers of vm_page_sleep_if_busy() to use vm_page_busy_sleep()
instead.
- Remove vm_page_sleep_if_(x)busy().
No functional change intended.
Obtained from: jeff (object_concurrency patches)
Reviewed by: kib
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32947
Unify the 2 concept into a real, minimal, sxlock where the shared
acquisition represent the soft busy and the exclusive acquisition
represent the hard busy.
The old VPO_WANTED mechanism becames the hard-path for this new lock
and it becomes per-page rather than per-object.
The vm_object lock becames an interlock for this functionality:
it can be held in both read or write mode.
However, if the vm_object lock is held in read mode while acquiring
or releasing the busy state, the thread owner cannot make any
assumption on the busy state unless it is also busying it.
Also:
- Add a new flag to directly shared busy pages while vm_page_alloc
and vm_page_grab are being executed. This will be very helpful
once these functions happen under a read object lock.
- Move the swapping sleep into its own per-object flag
The KPI is heavilly changed this is why the version is bumped.
It is very likely that some VM ports users will need to change
their own code.
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon storage division
Discussed with: alc
Reviewed by: jeff, kib
Tested by: gavin, bapt (older version)
Tested by: pho, scottl
