apm_setup.s was storing apm_cs16_base and apm_cs32_base addresses in
each others slots, and apm.c was reversing the result so the bugs
cancelled out, but the code looked wrong.
No functional differences unfortunately.
Submitted by: dave edmondson <davided@sco.com>
briefly over it, and see some serious architectural issues in this stuff.
On the other hand, I doubt that we will have any solution to these issues
before 2.1, so we might as well leave this in.
Most of the stuff is bracketed by #ifdef's so it shouldn't matter too much
in the normal case.
Reviewed by: phk
Submitted by: HOSOKAWA, Tatsumi <hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp>
