(described in ACPICA source code).
- Move intr_disable() and intr_restore() from acpi_wakeup.c to acpi.c
and call AcpiLeaveSleepStatePrep() in interrupt disabled context.
- Add acpi_wakeup_machdep() to execute wakeup MD procedures and call
it twice in interrupt disabled/enabled context (ia64 version is
just dummy).
- Rename wakeup_cpus variable in acpi_sleep_machdep() to suspcpus in
order to be shared by acpi_sleep_machdep() and acpi_wakeup_machdep().
- Move identity mapping related code to acpi_install_wakeup_handler()
(i386 version) for preparation of x86/acpica/acpi_wakeup.c
(MFC candidate).
Reviewed by: jkim@
MFC after: 2 days
DEVICE_RESUME() should be done before AcpiLeaveSleepState() because
PCI config space evaluation can be occurred during control method
executions.
This should fix one of the hang up problems on resuming.
MFC after: 3 days
processor objects. Instead of forcing the new-bus CPU objects to use
a unit number equal to pc_cpuid, adjust acpi_pcpu_get_id() to honor the
MADT IDs by default. As with the previous change, setting
debug.acpi.cpu_unordered to 1 in the loader will revert to the old
behavior.
Tested by: jimharris
MFC after: 1 month
disabled or the system is in shutdown procedure.
This should fix the problem which kernel never response to the sleep
button press events after the message `suspend request ignored (not
ready yet)'.
MFC after: 3 days
Use MADT to match ACPI Processor objects to CPUs. MADT and DSDT/SSDTs may
list CPUs in different orders, especially for disabled logical cores. Now
we match ACPI IDs from the MADT with Processor objects, strictly order CPUs
accordingly, and ignore disabled cores. This prevents us from executing
methods for other CPUs, e. g., _PSS for disabled logical core, which may not
exist. Unfortunately, it is known that there are a few systems with buggy
BIOSes that do not have unique ACPI IDs for MADT and Processor objects. To
work around these problems, 'debug.acpi.cpu_unordered' tunable is added.
Set this to a non-zero value to restore the old behavior.
Many thanks to jhb for pointing me to the right direction and the manual
page change.
Reported by: Harris, James R (james dot r dot harris at intel dot com)
Tested by: Harris, James R (james dot r dot harris at intel dot com)
Reviewed by: jhb
MFC after: 1 month
list CPUs in different orders, especially for disabled logical cores. Now
we match ACPI IDs from the MADT with Processor objects, strictly order CPUs
accordingly, and ignore disabled cores. This prevents us from executing
methods for other CPUs, e. g., _PSS for disabled logical core, which may not
exist. Unfortunately, it is known that there are a few systems with buggy
BIOSes that do not have unique ACPI IDs for MADT and Processor objects. To
work around these problems
- Increase probing order for ECDT table to match HID-based probing.
- Decrease probing order for HPET table to match HID-based probing.
- Decrease probing order for CPUs and system resources.
- Fix ACPI_DEV_BASE_ORDER to reflect the reality.
a decoded range for an ACPI Host-PCI bridge, try to allocate it from the
ACPI system resource range. If that works, permit the resource allocation
regardless.
MFC after: 1 week
ACPI Device() objects that do not have any device IDs available via the
_HID or _CID methods. Without a device ID a device driver cannot attach
to the device anyway. Namespace objects that are devices but not of
type ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE are not affected.
A few BIOSes have also attached a _CRS method to a PCI device to
allocate resources that are not managed via a BAR. With the previous
code those resources are allocated from acpi0 directly which can interfere
with the new PCI-PCI bridge driver (since the PCI device in question may
be behind a bridge and its resources should be allocated from that
bridge's windows instead). The resources were also orphaned and
and would end up associated with some other random device whose device_t
reused the pointer of the original ACPI-enumerated device (after it was
free'd by the ACPI PCI bus driver) in devinfo output which was confusing.
If we want to handle _CRS on PCI devices we can adjust the ACPI PCI bus
driver to do that in the future and associate the resources with the
proper device object respecting PCI-PCI bridges, etc.
Note that with this change the ACPI PCI bus driver no longer has to
delete ACPI-enumerated device_t devices that mirror PCI devices since
they should in general not exist. There are rare cases when a BIOS
will give a PCI device a _HID (e.g. I've seen a PCI-ISA bridge given
a _HID for a system resource device). In that case we leave both the
ACPI and PCI-enumerated device_t objects around just as in the previous
code.
table is present, then the acpi_ec(4) driver will allocate its resources
from nexus0 before the acpi0 device reserves resources for child devices.
Reviewed by: jkim
'hw.acpi.remove_interface'. hw.acpi.install_interface lets you install new
interfaces. Conversely, hw.acpi.remove_interface lets you remove OS
interfaces from the pre-defined list in ACPICA. For example,
hw.acpi.install_interface="FreeBSD"
lets _OSI("FreeBSD") method to return 0xffffffff (or success) and
hw.acpi.remove_interface="Windows 2009"
lets _OSI("Windows 2009") method to return zero (or failure). Both are
comma-separated lists and leading white spaces are ignored. For example,
the following examples are valid:
hw.acpi.install_interface="Linux, FreeBSD"
hw.acpi.remove_interface="Windows 2006, Windows 2006.1"
added with hw.pci.do_powerstate but the PCI version was splitted into two
separate tunables later and now this is completely stale. To make it worse,
PCI devices enumerated in ACPI tree ignore this tunable as it is handled by
a function in acpi_pci.c instead.
knowledges from the file. All PCI devices enumerated in ACPI tree must use
correct one from acpi_pci.c any way. Reduce duplicate codes as we did for
pci.c in r213905. Do not return ESRCH from PCIB_POWER_FOR_SLEEP method.
When the method is not found, just return zero without modifying the given
default value as it is completely optional. As a side effect, the return
state must not be NULL. Note there is actually no functional change by
removing ESRCH because acpi_pcib_power_for_sleep() always returns zero.
Adjust debugging messages and add new ones under bootverbose to help
debugging device power state related issues.
Reviewed by: jhb, imp (earlier versions)
address spaces
There has been no need to do that starting with ACPICA 20040427 as
AcpiEnableSubsystem() installs the handlers automatically.
Additionaly, explicitly calling AcpiInstallAddressSpaceHandler before
AcpiEnableSubsystem is not supported by ACPICA and leads to too early
execution of _REG methods in some DSDTs, which may result in problems.
Big thanks to Robert Moore of ACPICA/Intel for explaining the above.
Reported by: Daniel Bilik <daniel.bilik@neosystem.cz>
Tested by: Daniel Bilik <daniel.bilik@neosystem.cz>
Reviewed by: jkim
Suggested by: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
MFC after: 1 week
This reflects actual type used to store and compare child device orders.
Change is mostly done via a Coccinelle (soon to be devel/coccinelle)
semantic patch.
Verified by LINT+modules kernel builds.
Followup to: r212213
MFC after: 10 days
method is used by the PCI bus driver to query the power management system
to determine the proper device state to be used for a device during suspend
and resume. For the ACPI PCI bridge drivers this calls
acpi_device_pwr_for_sleep(). This removes ACPI-specific knowledge from
the PCI and PCI-PCI bridge drivers.
Reviewed by: jkim
device, make sure we have no real HPET device entry with same ID.
As side effect, it potentially allows several HPETs to be attached.
Use first of them for timecounting, rest (if ever present) could later
be used as event sources.
