The actual overflow occured in the ReadAhead.readahead test.
Surprisingly it has never segfaulted or resulted in any bad behavior.
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Axcient
Reviewed by: emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D38718
When the user specifies SEEK_END, unlike SEEK_CUR, VOP_ADVLOCK must
adjust lock offsets itself.
Sort-of related to bug 266886.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D37040
* If during FUSE_CREATE, FUSE_MKDIR, etc the server returns the same
inode number for the new file as for its parent directory, reject it.
Previously this would triggers a recurse-on-non-recursive lock panic.
* If during FUSE_LINK the server returns a different inode number for
the new name as for the old one, reject it. Obviously, that can't be
a hard link.
* If during FUSE_LOOKUP the server returns the same inode number for the
new file as for its parent directory, reject it. Nothing good can
come of this.
PR: 263662
Reported by: Robert Morris <rtm@lcs.mit.edu>
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D35128
The fusefs tests intentionally leak file descriptors. Annotate all of
the leakages in order to hopefully pacify Coverity.
Reported by: Coverity (20 different CIDs)
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: Axcient
The daemon can specify fsname=XXX in its mount options. If so, the file
system should report f_mntfromname as XXX during statfs. This will show
up in the output of commands like mount and df.
Submitted by: Ali Abdallah <ali.abdallah@suse.com>
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D35090
At mount time server can set, for example, "subtype=xfs", so that
mount(8) will later show the mountpoint's file system as "fusefs.xfs".
fusefs has had this feature ever since the original GSoC commit in 2012,
but there's never been a test for it.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Prior to fuse protocol version 7.9, the fuse_entry_out structure had a
smaller size. But fuse_vnop_create did not take that into account when
working with servers that use older protocols. The bug does not matter
for servers which don't use file handles or open flags (the only fields
affected).
PR: 263625
Submitted by: Ali Abdallah <ali.abdallah@suse.com>
MFC after: 2 weeks
During a FUSE_WRITE, the kernel requests the server to write a certain
amount of data, and the server responds with the amount that it actually
did write. It is obviously an error for the server to write more than
it was provided, and we always treated it as such, but there were two
problems:
* If the server responded with a huge amount, greater than INT_MAX, it
would trigger an integer overflow which would cause a panic.
* When extending the file, we wrongly set the file's size before
validing the amount written.
PR: 263263
Reported by: Robert Morris <rtm@lcs.mit.edu>
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: Axcient
Reviewed by: emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D34955
Formerly fusefs would pass up the stack any error value returned by the
fuse server. However, some values aren't valid for userland, but have
special meanings within the kernel. One of these, EJUSTRETURN, could
cause a kernel page fault if the server returned it in response to
FUSE_LOOKUP. Fix by validating all errors returned by the server.
Also, fix a data lifetime bug in the FUSE_DESTROY test.
PR: 263220
Reported by: Robert Morris <rtm@lcs.mit.edu>
MFC after: 3 weeks
Sponsored by: Axcient
Reviewed by: emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D34931
* We never send FUSE_LOOKUP for the root inode, since its inode number
is hard-coded to 1. Therefore, we should not send FUSE_FORGET for it,
lest the server see its lookup count fall below 0.
* During VOP_RECLAIM, if we are reclaiming the root inode, we must clear
the file system's vroot pointer. Otherwise it will be left pointing
at a reclaimed vnode, which will cause future VOP_LOOKUP operations to
fail. Previously we only cleared that pointer during VFS_UMOUNT. I
don't know of any real-world way to trigger this bug.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D34753
When renaming a directory into a different parent directory, invalidate
the cached attributes of the new parent. Otherwise, stat will show the
wrong st_nlink value.
MFC after: 1 week
Reviewed by: ngie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D34336
In libc++'s __threading_support header the semaphore.h header was
implicitly included, but from version 14 onwards, this is no longer the
case, resulting in compile errors:
tests/sys/fs/fusefs/setattr.cc:740:8: error: variable has incomplete type 'sem_t' (aka '_sem')
sem_t sem;
^
tests/sys/fs/fusefs/utils.hh:33:8: note: forward declaration of '_sem'
struct _sem;
^
MFC after: 3 days
Now posix_fallocate will be correctly forwarded to fuse file system
servers, for those that support it.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33389
By default, FUSE file systems are assumed not to support lookups for "."
and "..". They must opt-in to that. To cope with this limitation, the
fusefs kernel module caches every fuse vnode's parent's inode number,
and uses that during VOP_LOOKUP for "..". But if the parent's vnode has
been reclaimed that won't be possible. Previously we paniced in this
situation. Now, we'll return ESTALE instead. Or, if the file system
has opted into ".." lookups, we'll just do that instead.
This commit also fixes VOP_LOOKUP to respect the cache timeout for ".."
lookups, if the FUSE file system specified a finite timeout.
PR: 259974
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33239
In an earlier version of the revision that created that sysctl (D20519)
the sysctl was gated by INVARIANTS, so the test had to check for it.
But in the committed version it is always available.
MFC after: 2 weeks
If FUSE_COPY_FILE_RANGE returns successfully, update the atime of the
source and the mtime and ctime of the destination.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewers: pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33159
VOPs like VOP_SETATTR can change a file's size, with the vnode
exclusively locked. But VOPs like VOP_LOOKUP look up the file size from
the server without the vnode locked. So a race is possible. For
example:
1) One thread calls VOP_SETATTR to truncate a file. It locks the vnode
and sends FUSE_SETATTR to the server.
2) A second thread calls VOP_LOOKUP and fetches the file's attributes from
the server. Then it blocks trying to acquire the vnode lock.
3) FUSE_SETATTR returns and the first thread releases the vnode lock.
4) The second thread acquires the vnode lock and caches the file's
attributes, which are now out-of-date.
Fix this race by recording a timestamp in the vnode of the last time
that its filesize was modified. Check that timestamp during VOP_LOOKUP
and VFS_VGET. If it's newer than the time at which FUSE_LOOKUP was
issued to the server, ignore the attributes returned by FUSE_LOOKUP.
PR: 259071
Reported by: Agata <chogata@moosefs.pro>
Reviewed by: pfg
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33158
FUSE_COPY_FILE_RANGE instructs the server to write data to a file.
fusefs must invalidate any cached data within the written range.
PR: 260242
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33280
Correctly handle the situation where a FUSE server unlinks a file, then
creates a new file of a different type but with the same inode number.
Previously fuse_vnop_lookup in this situation would return EAGAIN. But
since it didn't call vgone(), the vnode couldn't be reused right away.
Fix this by immediately calling vgone() and reallocating a new vnode.
This problem can occur in three code paths, during VOP_LOOKUP,
VOP_SETATTR, or following FUSE_GETATTR, which usually happens during
VOP_GETATTR but can occur during other vops, too. Note that the correct
response actually doesn't depend on whether the entry cache has expired.
In fact, during VOP_LOOKUP, we can't even tell. Either it has expired
already, or else the vnode got reclaimed by vnlru.
Also, correct the error code during the VOP_SETATTR path.
PR: 258022
Reported by: chogata@moosefs.pro
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33283
When using cached attributes, whether or not the data cache is enabled,
fusefs must update a file's atime whenever it reads from it, so long as
it wasn't mounted with -o noatime. Update it in-kernel, and flush it to
the server on close or during the next setattr operation.
The downside is that close() will now frequently trigger a FUSE_SETATTR
upcall. But if you care about performance, you should be using
-o noatime anyway.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33145
When copy_file_range extends a file, it must update the cached file
size.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: rmacklem, pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33151
The DevFusePoll::access/select test would occasionally segfault. The
cause was a file descriptor that was shared between two threads. The
first thread would kill the second and close the file descriptor. But
it was possible that the second would read the file descriptor before it
shut down. That did not cause problems for kqueue, poll, or blocking
operation, but it triggered segfaults in select's macros.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32142
If the FUSE server tells the kernel that a file's size has changed, then
the kernel must invalidate any portion of that file in cache. But the
kernel can't do that during VOP_STRATEGY, because the file's buffers are
already locked. Instead, proceed with the write.
PR: 256937
Reported by: Agata <chogata@moosefs.pro>
Tested by: Agata <chogata@moosefs.pro>
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32332
fuse_vnop_bmap needs to know the file's size in order to calculate the
optimum amount of readahead. If the file's size is unknown, it must ask
the FUSE server. But if the file's data was previously cached and the
server reports that its size has shrunk, fusefs must invalidate the
cached data. That's not possible during VOP_BMAP because the buffer
object is already locked.
Fix the panic by not querying the FUSE server for the file's size during
VOP_BMAP if we don't need it. That's also a a slight performance
optimization.
PR: 256937
Reported by: Agata <chogata@moosefs.pro>
Tested by: Agata <chogata@moosefs.pro>
MFC after: 2 weeks
For file systems that allow it, fusefs will skip FUSE_OPEN,
FUSE_RELEASE, FUSE_OPENDIR, and FUSE_RELEASEDIR operations, a minor
optimization.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32141
There sig_atomic_t is shorter than void *.
As result, it cannot keep pointer.
Assigning to void * is actually safe for us in a signal handler.
Reviewed by: asomers
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after: 1 week
Fixes: 4f917847c9
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32064
During VOP_GETPAGES, fusefs needs to determine the file's length, which
could require a FUSE_GETATTR operation. If that fails, it's better to
SIGBUS than panic.
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Axcient
Reviewed by: markj, kib
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31994
Follow-up d396c67f26 by also silencing warnings about deprecated
implicit copy constructors in the fusefs tests, which use googletest.
Fixes: d396c67f26
MFC after: 3 days
During FUSE_SETLK, the owner field should uniquely identify the calling
process. The fusefs module now sets it to the process's pid.
Previously, it expected the calling process to set it directly, which
was wrong.
libfuse also apparently expects the owner field to be set during
FUSE_GETLK, though I'm not sure why.
PR: 256005
Reported by: Agata <chogata@moosefs.pro>
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30622
Every FUSE operation has a unique value in its header. As the name
implies, these values are supposed to be unique among all outstanding
operations. And since FUSE_INTERRUPT is asynchronous and racy, it is
desirable that the unique values be unique among all operations that are
"close in time".
Ensure that they are actually unique by incrementing them whenever we
reuse a fuse_dispatcher object, for example during fsync, write, and
listextattr.
PR: 244686
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30810
/dev/fuse is always ready for writing, so it's kind of dumb to poll it.
But some applications do it anyway. Better to return ready than EINVAL.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: emaste, pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30784
1) F_SETLKW (blocking) operations would be sent to the FUSE server as
F_SETLK (non-blocking).
2) Release operations, F_SETLK with lk_type = F_UNLCK, would simply
return EINVAL.
PR: 253500
Reported by: John Millikin <jmillikin@gmail.com>
MFC after: 2 weeks
This allows d_off to be used with lseek to position the file so that
getdirentries(2) will return the next entry. It is not used by
readdir(3).
PR: 253411
Reported by: John Millikin <jmillikin@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: cem
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28605
This updates the FUSE protocol to 7.28, though most of the new features
are optional and are not yet implemented.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27818
An order-of-operations problem caused an expectation intended for
FUSE_READ to instead match FUSE_ACCESS. Surprisingly, only one test
case was affected.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: cem
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27818
