# This appears to not break X11, but I'm having problems compiling the
# glide part of the server with or without this patch, so I can't tell
# for sure.
associated changes that had to happen to make this possible as well as
bugs fixed along the way.
Bring in required TLI library routines to support this.
Since we don't support TLI we've essentially copied what NetBSD
has done, adding a thin layer to emulate direct the TLI calls
into BSD socket calls.
This is mostly from Sun's tirpc release that was made in 1994,
however some fixes were backported from the 1999 release (supposedly
only made available after this porting effort was underway).
The submitter has agreed to continue on and bring us up to the
1999 release.
Several key features are introduced with this update:
Client calls are thread safe. (1999 code has server side thread
safe)
Updated, a more modern interface.
Many userland updates were done to bring the code up to par with
the recent RPC API.
There is an update to the pthreads library, a function
pthread_main_np() was added to emulate a function of Sun's threads
library.
While we're at it, bring in NetBSD's lockd, it's been far too
long of a wait.
New rpcbind(8) replaces portmap(8) (supporting communication over
an authenticated Unix-domain socket, and by default only allowing
set and unset requests over that channel). It's much more secure
than the old portmapper.
Umount(8), mountd(8), mount_nfs(8), nfsd(8) have also been upgraded
to support TI-RPC and to support IPV6.
Umount(8) is also fixed to unmount pathnames longer than 80 chars,
which are currently truncated by the Kernel statfs structure.
Submitted by: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch>
Manpage review: ru
Secure RPC implemented by: wpaul
is generated. It must be installed in both /usr/include/rpc/ and
/usr/include/rpcsvc/ for historical reasons. The generated version
was once missing ANSI prototypes because the wrong flags were passed
to rpcgen, but that is fixed now. The committed version had `#pragma
indent' which gratuitously broke K&R support. Apart from this, all
versions before and after this commit are identical.
Note: this may cause some problems in a few cases. With very old versions
of rpcgen, if you defined a procedure called foo, then rpcen would create
client stubs for function foo_1() and server stubs _also_ with function
foo_1(). This only worked because of the lack of ANSI prototypes: the
client side stub takes different arguments than the server side stub.
(The client side takes a CLIENT * handle, while the server side wants
an svc_req *.)
To fix this conflict, rpcgen in ANSI mode generates foo_1() for the client
and foo_1_svc() for the server. RPC server code that depends on the old
behavior might break because of this. (Fixing it is just a matter of
adding the _svc suffix onto the server procedure names.)
isn't gratuitously broken. This also prevents ANSI compilers from
recognizing the pragma as a request to run /usr/games/hack...
FreeBSD Ids should be in comments or rcsids, not in `#pragma ident's
(which are equivalent to comments when compiled by gcc), and the
only FreeBSD change in this file seems to be adding the Id.
Secure RPC import I've been threatening.
This step adds some necessary protocol definition files and headers to
rpcsvc, including the ones needed for NIS+.
Reviewed by: Mark Murray
This will make a number of things easier in the future, as well as (finally!)
avoiding the Id-smashing problem which has plagued developers for so long.
Boy, I'm glad we're not using sup anymore. This update would have been
insane otherwise.
easier to use in mixed environments:
- Add three new members to the request structure:
- a filename specification
- a database type specification
- a system byte prder specification
These allow the client to ask the server for a particular type of
database (Berkeley DB hash/btree/recno, GNU GDBM, dbm, ndbm, etc...)
and get back a meaningful error if the server doesn't support it.
The byte order spec is needed if the database type is byte order
sensntive. You don't, for example, want to read an ndbm database
from a big endian machine on a little endian machine (the ndbm code
will explode). The filename spec lets the client handle things like
ndbm which uses two seperate files per database (foo.dir and foo.pag).
The client can ask for each half, one at a time.
- Add a list of database types and byte order values. Each list has
a wildcard 'ANY' entry which lets the client ask for whatever the
server supports. (XFR_ENDIAN_ANY is useful with the Berkeley DB hash
method for instance, since it isn't byte order sensitive.)
- Add two newserver failure codes: XFR_DB_TYPE_MISMATCH and
XFR_DB_ENDIAN_MISMATCH. The server uses these to tell the client
that it doesn't support the requested type/byte order.
These changes were made at the suggestion of Thorsten Kukuk, the
current maintainer of the Linux ypserv distribution. This allows
Linux and FreeBSD NIS servers to use the same ypxfrd protocol and
avoid accidentally exchanging incompatible map files.
Import a my own little ypxfrd protocol. Note that this protocol is
_NOT_ the same as Sun's, which is proprietary.
This basically impliments an RPC-based file transfer protocol which
lets a slave server suck over a raw map database file from the master.
This is many times faster than the normal method, which requires reading
the records from ypserv via yp_all() and then creating a new database
on the fly, particularly when you have many tens of thousands of
records in a map (e.g. a huge passwd database).
The protocol number I chose falls within the 'user-specified' range.
Maybe we should register it with Sun so we can get an official vendor
number for it. :)
and real life. YPPUSHPROC_XFRRESP is supposed to return void and take
an argument of type yppushresp_xfr, not the other way around as yp.x seems
to imply. (I spent two hours today staring intensely at my prototype ypxfr
code and scratching my head before I finally figured this out.)
taking an argument of type ypresp_key. This is incorrect: it should be
ypresp_nokey. (yp_first() is supposed to return the first key in a
given map; the server doesn't need any client-specified key to handle
such a request.)
