runtime contain what is needed to boot in single user and repair a
system, bectl could be handy to have in this situation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27708
bootonce feature is temporary, one time boot, activated by
"bectl activate -t BE", "bectl activate -T BE" will reset the bootonce flag.
By default, the bootonce setting is reset on attempt to boot and the next
boot will use previously active BE.
By setting zfs_bootonce_activate="YES" in rc.conf, the bootonce BE will
be set permanently active.
bootonce dataset name is recorded in boot pool labels, bootenv area.
in case of nextboot, the nextboot_enable boolean variable is recorded in
freebsd:nvstore nvlist, also stored in boot pool label bootenv area.
On boot, the loader will process /boot/nextboot.conf if nextboot_enable
is "YES", and will set nextboot_enable to "NO", preventing /boot/nextboot.conf
processing on next boot.
bootonce and nextboot features are usable in both UEFI and BIOS boot.
To use bootonce/nextboot features, the boot loader needs to be updated on disk;
if loader.efi is stored on ESP, then ESP needs to be updated and
for BIOS boot, stage2 (zfsboot or gptzfsboot) needs to be updated
(gpart or other tools).
At this time, only lua loader is updated.
Sponsored by: Netflix, Klara Inc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25512
The primary benefit is maintaining a completely shared
code base with the community allowing FreeBSD to receive
new features sooner and with less effort.
I would advise against doing 'zpool upgrade'
or creating indispensable pools using new
features until this change has had a month+
to soak.
Work on merging FreeBSD support in to what was
at the time "ZFS on Linux" began in August 2018.
I first publicly proposed transitioning FreeBSD
to (new) OpenZFS on December 18th, 2018. FreeBSD
support in OpenZFS was finally completed in December
2019. A CFT for downstreaming OpenZFS support in
to FreeBSD was first issued on July 8th. All issues
that were reported have been addressed or, for
a couple of less critical matters there are
pull requests in progress with OpenZFS. iXsystems
has tested and dogfooded extensively internally.
The TrueNAS 12 release is based on OpenZFS with
some additional features that have not yet made
it upstream.
Improvements include:
project quotas, encrypted datasets,
allocation classes, vectorized raidz,
vectorized checksums, various command line
improvements, zstd compression.
Thanks to those who have helped along the way:
Ryan Moeller, Allan Jude, Zack Welch, and many
others.
Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25872
These tests operate on a file-backed zpool that gets created in the kyua
temp dir. root and ZFS support are both required for these tests. Current
tests cover create, destroy, export/import, jail, list (kind of), mount,
rename, and jail.
List tests should later be extended to cover formatting and the different
list flags, but for now only covers basic "are create/destroy actually
reflected properly"
MFC after: 3 days
These were previously necessary because the libnvpair and libzfs_core
includes were not installed into the SYSROOT, being a part of the copies
target in include/Makefile rather than being installed with the library.
This was fixed in r337696 and the headers are now installed properly, so we
may let go of the cruft.
- Missing include path
- Fully specify libzfs's dependencies (except for deps pulled in by other
deps) in Makefile.inc1
- Drop WARNS back down to 2 for libbe(3). I do this with much hesitation,
but the libzfs headers are apparently a hot warning-filled mess as far as
GCC 4.2 is concerned.
- Support passing arbitrary jail arguments via -o
- Split the related (and rewritten since the GSoC) jail bits out into a new
bectl_jail.c file, to reduce clutter in bectl.c
- Don't use RFC 1918 IP space [0]; we'll instead set no default IPv4 and let
the user pass in any address options they wish via -o
Reported by: rgrimes [0], Shawn Webb [0]
The given parameter may either be a jid, jail name, or a BE name. In all
cases, the parameter will be resolved to a jid and bectl(8) will
sanity-check that there's actually a BE mounted at the requested jail root
before invoking jail_remove(2).
Based on the idea that we shouldn't have all-new library and utility going
into base that need WARNS=1...
- Decent amount of constification
- Lots of parentheses
- Minor other nits
For the moment, this is a primitive nvlist dump of what we get back from
be_get_bootenv_props as a proof-of-concept and to make sure that we're
getting back the kind of information we want to see from list.