ipsec_getpolicybyaddr()
ipsec4_checkpolicy()
ip_ipsec_output()
ip6_ipsec_output()
The only flag used here was IP_FORWARDING.
Obtained from: Yandex LLC
Sponsored by: Yandex LLC
security policy. The changed block of code in ip*_ipsec_input() is
called when packet has ESP/AH header. Presence of
PACKET_TAG_IPSEC_IN_DONE mbuf tag in the same time means that
packet was already handled by IPSEC and reinjected in the netisr,
and it has another ESP/AH headers (encrypted twice?).
Since it was already processed by IPSEC code, the AH/ESP headers
was already stripped (and probably outer IP header was stripped too)
and security policy from the tdb_ident was applied to those headers.
It is incorrect to apply this security policy to current headers.
Also make ip_ipsec_input() prototype similar to ip6_ipsec_input().
Obtained from: Yandex LLC
Sponsored by: Yandex LLC
in OpenBSD. As it is now, there is no way for this to be useful, since IPsec
is free to forward packets via whatever interface it wants, so checking
capabilities of the interface passed from ip_output (fetched from the routing
table) serves no purpose.
Discussed with: sam@
ICMP unreach, frag needed. Up to now we only looked at the
interface MTU. Make sure to only use the minimum of the two.
In case IPSEC is compiled in, loop the mtu through ip_ipsec_mtu()
to avoid any further conditional maths.
Without this, PMTU was broken in those cases when there was a
route with a lower MTU than the MTU of the outgoing interface.
PR: kern/122338
Tested by: Mark Cammidge mark peralex.com
Reviewed by: silence on net@
MFC after: 2 weeks
Also rename the related functions in a similar way.
There are no functional changes.
For a packet coming in with IPsec tunnel mode, the default is
to only call into the firewall with the "outer" IP header and
payload.
With this option turned on, in addition to the "outer" parts,
the "inner" IP header and payload are passed to the
firewall too when going through ip_input() the second time.
The option was never only related to a gif(4) tunnel within
an IPsec tunnel and thus the name was very misleading.
Discussed at: BSDCan 2007
Best new name suggested by: rwatson
Reviewed by: rwatson
Approved by: re (bmah)
and signifincantly improve the readability of ip_input() and
ip_output() again.
The resulting IPSEC hooks in ip_input() and ip_output() may be
used later on for making IPSEC loadable.
This move is mostly mechanical and should preserve current IPSEC
behaviour as-is. Nothing shall prevent improvements in the way
IPSEC interacts with the IPv4 stack.
Discussed with: bz, gnn, rwatson; (earlier version)
