freebsd-dev/tests
Dmitry Chagin f8bc606aad tests: Handle SIGSEGV in the vm stack mprotect exec test
To exit gracefully handle SIGSEGV and mark the test as failed.

MFC after:		3 days
2023-08-24 21:02:52 +03:00
..
atf_python pf: test rules evaluation in the face of multiple IPv6 fragment headers 2023-08-04 15:24:16 +02:00
etc Remove $FreeBSD$: one-line sh pattern 2023-08-16 11:55:03 -06:00
examples Remove $FreeBSD$: one-line sh pattern 2023-08-16 11:55:03 -06:00
freebsd_test_suite Remove $FreeBSD$: two-line .h pattern 2023-08-16 11:54:16 -06:00
sys tests: Handle SIGSEGV in the vm stack mprotect exec test 2023-08-24 21:02:52 +03:00
Kyuafile Remove $FreeBSD$: one-line lua tag 2023-08-16 11:55:34 -06:00
Makefile Remove $FreeBSD$: one-line sh pattern 2023-08-16 11:55:03 -06:00
Makefile.depend Remove $FreeBSD$: one-line sh pattern 2023-08-16 11:55:03 -06:00
Makefile.inc0 Remove $FreeBSD$: one-line sh pattern 2023-08-16 11:55:03 -06:00
README Remove $FreeBSD$: one-line bare tag 2023-08-16 11:55:20 -06:00
__init__.py testing: Add basic atf support to pytest. 2022-06-25 19:25:15 +00:00
conftest.py Testing: add framework for the kernel unit tests. 2023-04-14 15:47:55 +00:00

README

src/tests: The FreeBSD test suite
=================================

Usage of the FreeBSD test suite:
(1)  Run the tests:
       kyua test -k /usr/tests/Kyuafile
(2)  See the test results:
       kyua report

For further information on using the test suite, read tests(7):
       man tests

Description of FreeBSD test suite
=================================
The build of the test suite is organized in the following manner:

* The build of all test artifacts is protected by the MK_TESTS knob.
  The user can disable these with the WITHOUT_TESTS setting in
  src.conf(5).

* The goal for /usr/tests/ (the installed test programs) is to follow
  the same hierarchy as /usr/src/ wherever possible, which in turn drives
  several of the design decisions described below.  This simplifies the
  discoverability of tests.  We want a mapping such as:

    /usr/src/bin/cp/      -> /usr/tests/bin/cp/
    /usr/src/lib/libc/    -> /usr/tests/lib/libc/
    /usr/src/usr.bin/cut/ -> /usr/tests/usr.bin/cut/
    ... and many more ...

* Test programs for specific utilities and libraries are located next
  to the source code of such programs.  For example, the tests for the
  src/lib/libcrypt/ library live in src/lib/libcrypt/tests/.  The tests/
  subdirectory is optional and should, in general, be avoided.

* The src/tests/ hierarchy (this directory) provides generic test
  infrastructure and glue code to join all test programs together into
  a single test suite definition.

* The src/tests/ hierarchy also includes cross-functional test programs:
  i.e. test programs that cover more than a single utility or library
  and thus don't fit anywhere else in the tree.  Consider this to follow
  the same rationale as src/share/man/: this directory contains generic
  manual pages while the manual pages that are specific to individual
  tools or libraries live next to the source code.

In order to keep the src/tests/ hierarchy decoupled from the actual test
programs being installed --which is a worthy goal because it simplifies
the addition of new test programs and simplifies the maintenance of the
tree-- the top-level Kyuafile does not know which subdirectories may
exist upfront.  Instead, such Kyuafile automatically detects, at
run-time, which */Kyuafile files exist and uses those directly.

Similarly, every directory in src/ that wants to install a Kyuafile to
just recurse into other subdirectories reuses this Kyuafile with
auto-discovery features.  As an example, take a look at src/lib/tests/
whose sole purpose is to install a Kyuafile into /usr/tests/lib/.
The goal in this specific case is for /usr/tests/lib/ to be generated
entirely from src/lib/.

--