966 lines
33 KiB
Plaintext
966 lines
33 KiB
Plaintext
=head1 NAME
|
|
|
|
perlfaq7 - Perl Language Issues ($Revision: 1.28 $, $Date: 1999/05/23 20:36:18 $)
|
|
|
|
=head1 DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
|
This section deals with general Perl language issues that don't
|
|
clearly fit into any of the other sections.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Can I get a BNF/yacc/RE for the Perl language?
|
|
|
|
There is no BNF, but you can paw your way through the yacc grammar in
|
|
perly.y in the source distribution if you're particularly brave. The
|
|
grammar relies on very smart tokenizing code, so be prepared to
|
|
venture into toke.c as well.
|
|
|
|
In the words of Chaim Frenkel: "Perl's grammar can not be reduced to BNF.
|
|
The work of parsing perl is distributed between yacc, the lexer, smoke
|
|
and mirrors."
|
|
|
|
=head2 What are all these $@%&* punctuation signs, and how do I know when to use them?
|
|
|
|
They are type specifiers, as detailed in L<perldata>:
|
|
|
|
$ for scalar values (number, string or reference)
|
|
@ for arrays
|
|
% for hashes (associative arrays)
|
|
& for subroutines (aka functions, procedures, methods)
|
|
* for all types of that symbol name. In version 4 you used them like
|
|
pointers, but in modern perls you can just use references.
|
|
|
|
A couple of others that you're likely to encounter that aren't
|
|
really type specifiers are:
|
|
|
|
<> are used for inputting a record from a filehandle.
|
|
\ takes a reference to something.
|
|
|
|
Note that <FILE> is I<neither> the type specifier for files
|
|
nor the name of the handle. It is the C<< <> >> operator applied
|
|
to the handle FILE. It reads one line (well, record - see
|
|
L<perlvar/$/>) from the handle FILE in scalar context, or I<all> lines
|
|
in list context. When performing open, close, or any other operation
|
|
besides C<< <> >> on files, or even talking about the handle, do
|
|
I<not> use the brackets. These are correct: C<eof(FH)>, C<seek(FH, 0,
|
|
2)> and "copying from STDIN to FILE".
|
|
|
|
=head2 Do I always/never have to quote my strings or use semicolons and commas?
|
|
|
|
Normally, a bareword doesn't need to be quoted, but in most cases
|
|
probably should be (and must be under C<use strict>). But a hash key
|
|
consisting of a simple word (that isn't the name of a defined
|
|
subroutine) and the left-hand operand to the C<< => >> operator both
|
|
count as though they were quoted:
|
|
|
|
This is like this
|
|
------------ ---------------
|
|
$foo{line} $foo{"line"}
|
|
bar => stuff "bar" => stuff
|
|
|
|
The final semicolon in a block is optional, as is the final comma in a
|
|
list. Good style (see L<perlstyle>) says to put them in except for
|
|
one-liners:
|
|
|
|
if ($whoops) { exit 1 }
|
|
@nums = (1, 2, 3);
|
|
|
|
if ($whoops) {
|
|
exit 1;
|
|
}
|
|
@lines = (
|
|
"There Beren came from mountains cold",
|
|
"And lost he wandered under leaves",
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
=head2 How do I skip some return values?
|
|
|
|
One way is to treat the return values as a list and index into it:
|
|
|
|
$dir = (getpwnam($user))[7];
|
|
|
|
Another way is to use undef as an element on the left-hand-side:
|
|
|
|
($dev, $ino, undef, undef, $uid, $gid) = stat($file);
|
|
|
|
=head2 How do I temporarily block warnings?
|
|
|
|
If you are running Perl 5.6.0 or better, the C<use warnings> pragma
|
|
allows fine control of what warning are produced.
|
|
See L<perllexwarn> for more details.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
no warnings; # temporarily turn off warnings
|
|
$a = $b + $c; # I know these might be undef
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
If you have an older version of Perl, the C<$^W> variable (documented
|
|
in L<perlvar>) controls runtime warnings for a block:
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
local $^W = 0; # temporarily turn off warnings
|
|
$a = $b + $c; # I know these might be undef
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Note that like all the punctuation variables, you cannot currently
|
|
use my() on C<$^W>, only local().
|
|
|
|
=head2 What's an extension?
|
|
|
|
A way of calling compiled C code from Perl. Reading L<perlxstut>
|
|
is a good place to learn more about extensions.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Why do Perl operators have different precedence than C operators?
|
|
|
|
Actually, they don't. All C operators that Perl copies have the same
|
|
precedence in Perl as they do in C. The problem is with operators that C
|
|
doesn't have, especially functions that give a list context to everything
|
|
on their right, eg print, chmod, exec, and so on. Such functions are
|
|
called "list operators" and appear as such in the precedence table in
|
|
L<perlop>.
|
|
|
|
A common mistake is to write:
|
|
|
|
unlink $file || die "snafu";
|
|
|
|
This gets interpreted as:
|
|
|
|
unlink ($file || die "snafu");
|
|
|
|
To avoid this problem, either put in extra parentheses or use the
|
|
super low precedence C<or> operator:
|
|
|
|
(unlink $file) || die "snafu";
|
|
unlink $file or die "snafu";
|
|
|
|
The "English" operators (C<and>, C<or>, C<xor>, and C<not>)
|
|
deliberately have precedence lower than that of list operators for
|
|
just such situations as the one above.
|
|
|
|
Another operator with surprising precedence is exponentiation. It
|
|
binds more tightly even than unary minus, making C<-2**2> product a
|
|
negative not a positive four. It is also right-associating, meaning
|
|
that C<2**3**2> is two raised to the ninth power, not eight squared.
|
|
|
|
Although it has the same precedence as in C, Perl's C<?:> operator
|
|
produces an lvalue. This assigns $x to either $a or $b, depending
|
|
on the trueness of $maybe:
|
|
|
|
($maybe ? $a : $b) = $x;
|
|
|
|
=head2 How do I declare/create a structure?
|
|
|
|
In general, you don't "declare" a structure. Just use a (probably
|
|
anonymous) hash reference. See L<perlref> and L<perldsc> for details.
|
|
Here's an example:
|
|
|
|
$person = {}; # new anonymous hash
|
|
$person->{AGE} = 24; # set field AGE to 24
|
|
$person->{NAME} = "Nat"; # set field NAME to "Nat"
|
|
|
|
If you're looking for something a bit more rigorous, try L<perltoot>.
|
|
|
|
=head2 How do I create a module?
|
|
|
|
A module is a package that lives in a file of the same name. For
|
|
example, the Hello::There module would live in Hello/There.pm. For
|
|
details, read L<perlmod>. You'll also find L<Exporter> helpful. If
|
|
you're writing a C or mixed-language module with both C and Perl, then
|
|
you should study L<perlxstut>.
|
|
|
|
Here's a convenient template you might wish you use when starting your
|
|
own module. Make sure to change the names appropriately.
|
|
|
|
package Some::Module; # assumes Some/Module.pm
|
|
|
|
use strict;
|
|
use warnings;
|
|
|
|
BEGIN {
|
|
use Exporter ();
|
|
our ($VERSION, @ISA, @EXPORT, @EXPORT_OK, %EXPORT_TAGS);
|
|
|
|
## set the version for version checking; uncomment to use
|
|
## $VERSION = 1.00;
|
|
|
|
# if using RCS/CVS, this next line may be preferred,
|
|
# but beware two-digit versions.
|
|
$VERSION = do{my@r=q$Revision: 1.28 $=~/\d+/g;sprintf '%d.'.'%02d'x$#r,@r};
|
|
|
|
@ISA = qw(Exporter);
|
|
@EXPORT = qw(&func1 &func2 &func3);
|
|
%EXPORT_TAGS = ( ); # eg: TAG => [ qw!name1 name2! ],
|
|
|
|
# your exported package globals go here,
|
|
# as well as any optionally exported functions
|
|
@EXPORT_OK = qw($Var1 %Hashit);
|
|
}
|
|
our @EXPORT_OK;
|
|
|
|
# non-exported package globals go here
|
|
our @more;
|
|
our $stuff;
|
|
|
|
# initialize package globals, first exported ones
|
|
$Var1 = '';
|
|
%Hashit = ();
|
|
|
|
# then the others (which are still accessible as $Some::Module::stuff)
|
|
$stuff = '';
|
|
@more = ();
|
|
|
|
# all file-scoped lexicals must be created before
|
|
# the functions below that use them.
|
|
|
|
# file-private lexicals go here
|
|
my $priv_var = '';
|
|
my %secret_hash = ();
|
|
|
|
# here's a file-private function as a closure,
|
|
# callable as &$priv_func; it cannot be prototyped.
|
|
my $priv_func = sub {
|
|
# stuff goes here.
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
# make all your functions, whether exported or not;
|
|
# remember to put something interesting in the {} stubs
|
|
sub func1 {} # no prototype
|
|
sub func2() {} # proto'd void
|
|
sub func3($$) {} # proto'd to 2 scalars
|
|
|
|
# this one isn't exported, but could be called!
|
|
sub func4(\%) {} # proto'd to 1 hash ref
|
|
|
|
END { } # module clean-up code here (global destructor)
|
|
|
|
1; # modules must return true
|
|
|
|
The h2xs program will create stubs for all the important stuff for you:
|
|
|
|
% h2xs -XA -n My::Module
|
|
|
|
=head2 How do I create a class?
|
|
|
|
See L<perltoot> for an introduction to classes and objects, as well as
|
|
L<perlobj> and L<perlbot>.
|
|
|
|
=head2 How can I tell if a variable is tainted?
|
|
|
|
See L<perlsec/"Laundering and Detecting Tainted Data">. Here's an
|
|
example (which doesn't use any system calls, because the kill()
|
|
is given no processes to signal):
|
|
|
|
sub is_tainted {
|
|
return ! eval { join('',@_), kill 0; 1; };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
This is not C<-w> clean, however. There is no C<-w> clean way to
|
|
detect taintedness - take this as a hint that you should untaint
|
|
all possibly-tainted data.
|
|
|
|
=head2 What's a closure?
|
|
|
|
Closures are documented in L<perlref>.
|
|
|
|
I<Closure> is a computer science term with a precise but
|
|
hard-to-explain meaning. Closures are implemented in Perl as anonymous
|
|
subroutines with lasting references to lexical variables outside their
|
|
own scopes. These lexicals magically refer to the variables that were
|
|
around when the subroutine was defined (deep binding).
|
|
|
|
Closures make sense in any programming language where you can have the
|
|
return value of a function be itself a function, as you can in Perl.
|
|
Note that some languages provide anonymous functions but are not
|
|
capable of providing proper closures; the Python language, for
|
|
example. For more information on closures, check out any textbook on
|
|
functional programming. Scheme is a language that not only supports
|
|
but encourages closures.
|
|
|
|
Here's a classic function-generating function:
|
|
|
|
sub add_function_generator {
|
|
return sub { shift + shift };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
$add_sub = add_function_generator();
|
|
$sum = $add_sub->(4,5); # $sum is 9 now.
|
|
|
|
The closure works as a I<function template> with some customization
|
|
slots left out to be filled later. The anonymous subroutine returned
|
|
by add_function_generator() isn't technically a closure because it
|
|
refers to no lexicals outside its own scope.
|
|
|
|
Contrast this with the following make_adder() function, in which the
|
|
returned anonymous function contains a reference to a lexical variable
|
|
outside the scope of that function itself. Such a reference requires
|
|
that Perl return a proper closure, thus locking in for all time the
|
|
value that the lexical had when the function was created.
|
|
|
|
sub make_adder {
|
|
my $addpiece = shift;
|
|
return sub { shift + $addpiece };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
$f1 = make_adder(20);
|
|
$f2 = make_adder(555);
|
|
|
|
Now C<&$f1($n)> is always 20 plus whatever $n you pass in, whereas
|
|
C<&$f2($n)> is always 555 plus whatever $n you pass in. The $addpiece
|
|
in the closure sticks around.
|
|
|
|
Closures are often used for less esoteric purposes. For example, when
|
|
you want to pass in a bit of code into a function:
|
|
|
|
my $line;
|
|
timeout( 30, sub { $line = <STDIN> } );
|
|
|
|
If the code to execute had been passed in as a string,
|
|
C<< '$line = <STDIN>' >>, there would have been no way for the
|
|
hypothetical timeout() function to access the lexical variable
|
|
$line back in its caller's scope.
|
|
|
|
=head2 What is variable suicide and how can I prevent it?
|
|
|
|
Variable suicide is when you (temporarily or permanently) lose the
|
|
value of a variable. It is caused by scoping through my() and local()
|
|
interacting with either closures or aliased foreach() iterator
|
|
variables and subroutine arguments. It used to be easy to
|
|
inadvertently lose a variable's value this way, but now it's much
|
|
harder. Take this code:
|
|
|
|
my $f = "foo";
|
|
sub T {
|
|
while ($i++ < 3) { my $f = $f; $f .= "bar"; print $f, "\n" }
|
|
}
|
|
T;
|
|
print "Finally $f\n";
|
|
|
|
The $f that has "bar" added to it three times should be a new C<$f>
|
|
(C<my $f> should create a new local variable each time through the loop).
|
|
It isn't, however. This was a bug, now fixed in the latest releases
|
|
(tested against 5.004_05, 5.005_03, and 5.005_56).
|
|
|
|
=head2 How can I pass/return a {Function, FileHandle, Array, Hash, Method, Regex}?
|
|
|
|
With the exception of regexes, you need to pass references to these
|
|
objects. See L<perlsub/"Pass by Reference"> for this particular
|
|
question, and L<perlref> for information on references.
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item Passing Variables and Functions
|
|
|
|
Regular variables and functions are quite easy: just pass in a
|
|
reference to an existing or anonymous variable or function:
|
|
|
|
func( \$some_scalar );
|
|
|
|
func( \@some_array );
|
|
func( [ 1 .. 10 ] );
|
|
|
|
func( \%some_hash );
|
|
func( { this => 10, that => 20 } );
|
|
|
|
func( \&some_func );
|
|
func( sub { $_[0] ** $_[1] } );
|
|
|
|
=item Passing Filehandles
|
|
|
|
To pass filehandles to subroutines, use the C<*FH> or C<\*FH> notations.
|
|
These are "typeglobs" - see L<perldata/"Typeglobs and Filehandles">
|
|
and especially L<perlsub/"Pass by Reference"> for more information.
|
|
|
|
Here's an excerpt:
|
|
|
|
If you're passing around filehandles, you could usually just use the bare
|
|
typeglob, like *STDOUT, but typeglobs references would be better because
|
|
they'll still work properly under C<use strict 'refs'>. For example:
|
|
|
|
splutter(\*STDOUT);
|
|
sub splutter {
|
|
my $fh = shift;
|
|
print $fh "her um well a hmmm\n";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
$rec = get_rec(\*STDIN);
|
|
sub get_rec {
|
|
my $fh = shift;
|
|
return scalar <$fh>;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
If you're planning on generating new filehandles, you could do this:
|
|
|
|
sub openit {
|
|
my $name = shift;
|
|
local *FH;
|
|
return open (FH, $path) ? *FH : undef;
|
|
}
|
|
$fh = openit('< /etc/motd');
|
|
print <$fh>;
|
|
|
|
=item Passing Regexes
|
|
|
|
To pass regexes around, you'll need to be using a release of Perl
|
|
sufficiently recent as to support the C<qr//> construct, pass around
|
|
strings and use an exception-trapping eval, or else be very, very clever.
|
|
|
|
Here's an example of how to pass in a string to be regex compared
|
|
using C<qr//>:
|
|
|
|
sub compare($$) {
|
|
my ($val1, $regex) = @_;
|
|
my $retval = $val1 =~ /$regex/;
|
|
return $retval;
|
|
}
|
|
$match = compare("old McDonald", qr/d.*D/i);
|
|
|
|
Notice how C<qr//> allows flags at the end. That pattern was compiled
|
|
at compile time, although it was executed later. The nifty C<qr//>
|
|
notation wasn't introduced until the 5.005 release. Before that, you
|
|
had to approach this problem much less intuitively. For example, here
|
|
it is again if you don't have C<qr//>:
|
|
|
|
sub compare($$) {
|
|
my ($val1, $regex) = @_;
|
|
my $retval = eval { $val1 =~ /$regex/ };
|
|
die if $@;
|
|
return $retval;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
$match = compare("old McDonald", q/($?i)d.*D/);
|
|
|
|
Make sure you never say something like this:
|
|
|
|
return eval "\$val =~ /$regex/"; # WRONG
|
|
|
|
or someone can sneak shell escapes into the regex due to the double
|
|
interpolation of the eval and the double-quoted string. For example:
|
|
|
|
$pattern_of_evil = 'danger ${ system("rm -rf * &") } danger';
|
|
|
|
eval "\$string =~ /$pattern_of_evil/";
|
|
|
|
Those preferring to be very, very clever might see the O'Reilly book,
|
|
I<Mastering Regular Expressions>, by Jeffrey Friedl. Page 273's
|
|
Build_MatchMany_Function() is particularly interesting. A complete
|
|
citation of this book is given in L<perlfaq2>.
|
|
|
|
=item Passing Methods
|
|
|
|
To pass an object method into a subroutine, you can do this:
|
|
|
|
call_a_lot(10, $some_obj, "methname")
|
|
sub call_a_lot {
|
|
my ($count, $widget, $trick) = @_;
|
|
for (my $i = 0; $i < $count; $i++) {
|
|
$widget->$trick();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Or you can use a closure to bundle up the object and its method call
|
|
and arguments:
|
|
|
|
my $whatnot = sub { $some_obj->obfuscate(@args) };
|
|
func($whatnot);
|
|
sub func {
|
|
my $code = shift;
|
|
&$code();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
You could also investigate the can() method in the UNIVERSAL class
|
|
(part of the standard perl distribution).
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
=head2 How do I create a static variable?
|
|
|
|
As with most things in Perl, TMTOWTDI. What is a "static variable" in
|
|
other languages could be either a function-private variable (visible
|
|
only within a single function, retaining its value between calls to
|
|
that function), or a file-private variable (visible only to functions
|
|
within the file it was declared in) in Perl.
|
|
|
|
Here's code to implement a function-private variable:
|
|
|
|
BEGIN {
|
|
my $counter = 42;
|
|
sub prev_counter { return --$counter }
|
|
sub next_counter { return $counter++ }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Now prev_counter() and next_counter() share a private variable $counter
|
|
that was initialized at compile time.
|
|
|
|
To declare a file-private variable, you'll still use a my(), putting
|
|
it at the outer scope level at the top of the file. Assume this is in
|
|
file Pax.pm:
|
|
|
|
package Pax;
|
|
my $started = scalar(localtime(time()));
|
|
|
|
sub begun { return $started }
|
|
|
|
When C<use Pax> or C<require Pax> loads this module, the variable will
|
|
be initialized. It won't get garbage-collected the way most variables
|
|
going out of scope do, because the begun() function cares about it,
|
|
but no one else can get it. It is not called $Pax::started because
|
|
its scope is unrelated to the package. It's scoped to the file. You
|
|
could conceivably have several packages in that same file all
|
|
accessing the same private variable, but another file with the same
|
|
package couldn't get to it.
|
|
|
|
See L<perlsub/"Persistent Private Variables"> for details.
|
|
|
|
=head2 What's the difference between dynamic and lexical (static) scoping? Between local() and my()?
|
|
|
|
C<local($x)> saves away the old value of the global variable C<$x>,
|
|
and assigns a new value for the duration of the subroutine, I<which is
|
|
visible in other functions called from that subroutine>. This is done
|
|
at run-time, so is called dynamic scoping. local() always affects global
|
|
variables, also called package variables or dynamic variables.
|
|
|
|
C<my($x)> creates a new variable that is only visible in the current
|
|
subroutine. This is done at compile-time, so is called lexical or
|
|
static scoping. my() always affects private variables, also called
|
|
lexical variables or (improperly) static(ly scoped) variables.
|
|
|
|
For instance:
|
|
|
|
sub visible {
|
|
print "var has value $var\n";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sub dynamic {
|
|
local $var = 'local'; # new temporary value for the still-global
|
|
visible(); # variable called $var
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sub lexical {
|
|
my $var = 'private'; # new private variable, $var
|
|
visible(); # (invisible outside of sub scope)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
$var = 'global';
|
|
|
|
visible(); # prints global
|
|
dynamic(); # prints local
|
|
lexical(); # prints global
|
|
|
|
Notice how at no point does the value "private" get printed. That's
|
|
because $var only has that value within the block of the lexical()
|
|
function, and it is hidden from called subroutine.
|
|
|
|
In summary, local() doesn't make what you think of as private, local
|
|
variables. It gives a global variable a temporary value. my() is
|
|
what you're looking for if you want private variables.
|
|
|
|
See L<perlsub/"Private Variables via my()"> and L<perlsub/"Temporary
|
|
Values via local()"> for excruciating details.
|
|
|
|
=head2 How can I access a dynamic variable while a similarly named lexical is in scope?
|
|
|
|
You can do this via symbolic references, provided you haven't set
|
|
C<use strict "refs">. So instead of $var, use C<${'var'}>.
|
|
|
|
local $var = "global";
|
|
my $var = "lexical";
|
|
|
|
print "lexical is $var\n";
|
|
|
|
no strict 'refs';
|
|
print "global is ${'var'}\n";
|
|
|
|
If you know your package, you can just mention it explicitly, as in
|
|
$Some_Pack::var. Note that the notation $::var is I<not> the dynamic
|
|
$var in the current package, but rather the one in the C<main>
|
|
package, as though you had written $main::var. Specifying the package
|
|
directly makes you hard-code its name, but it executes faster and
|
|
avoids running afoul of C<use strict "refs">.
|
|
|
|
=head2 What's the difference between deep and shallow binding?
|
|
|
|
In deep binding, lexical variables mentioned in anonymous subroutines
|
|
are the same ones that were in scope when the subroutine was created.
|
|
In shallow binding, they are whichever variables with the same names
|
|
happen to be in scope when the subroutine is called. Perl always uses
|
|
deep binding of lexical variables (i.e., those created with my()).
|
|
However, dynamic variables (aka global, local, or package variables)
|
|
are effectively shallowly bound. Consider this just one more reason
|
|
not to use them. See the answer to L<"What's a closure?">.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Why doesn't "my($foo) = <FILE>;" work right?
|
|
|
|
C<my()> and C<local()> give list context to the right hand side
|
|
of C<=>. The <FH> read operation, like so many of Perl's
|
|
functions and operators, can tell which context it was called in and
|
|
behaves appropriately. In general, the scalar() function can help.
|
|
This function does nothing to the data itself (contrary to popular myth)
|
|
but rather tells its argument to behave in whatever its scalar fashion is.
|
|
If that function doesn't have a defined scalar behavior, this of course
|
|
doesn't help you (such as with sort()).
|
|
|
|
To enforce scalar context in this particular case, however, you need
|
|
merely omit the parentheses:
|
|
|
|
local($foo) = <FILE>; # WRONG
|
|
local($foo) = scalar(<FILE>); # ok
|
|
local $foo = <FILE>; # right
|
|
|
|
You should probably be using lexical variables anyway, although the
|
|
issue is the same here:
|
|
|
|
my($foo) = <FILE>; # WRONG
|
|
my $foo = <FILE>; # right
|
|
|
|
=head2 How do I redefine a builtin function, operator, or method?
|
|
|
|
Why do you want to do that? :-)
|
|
|
|
If you want to override a predefined function, such as open(),
|
|
then you'll have to import the new definition from a different
|
|
module. See L<perlsub/"Overriding Built-in Functions">. There's
|
|
also an example in L<perltoot/"Class::Template">.
|
|
|
|
If you want to overload a Perl operator, such as C<+> or C<**>,
|
|
then you'll want to use the C<use overload> pragma, documented
|
|
in L<overload>.
|
|
|
|
If you're talking about obscuring method calls in parent classes,
|
|
see L<perltoot/"Overridden Methods">.
|
|
|
|
=head2 What's the difference between calling a function as &foo and foo()?
|
|
|
|
When you call a function as C<&foo>, you allow that function access to
|
|
your current @_ values, and you by-pass prototypes. That means that
|
|
the function doesn't get an empty @_, it gets yours! While not
|
|
strictly speaking a bug (it's documented that way in L<perlsub>), it
|
|
would be hard to consider this a feature in most cases.
|
|
|
|
When you call your function as C<&foo()>, then you I<do> get a new @_,
|
|
but prototyping is still circumvented.
|
|
|
|
Normally, you want to call a function using C<foo()>. You may only
|
|
omit the parentheses if the function is already known to the compiler
|
|
because it already saw the definition (C<use> but not C<require>),
|
|
or via a forward reference or C<use subs> declaration. Even in this
|
|
case, you get a clean @_ without any of the old values leaking through
|
|
where they don't belong.
|
|
|
|
=head2 How do I create a switch or case statement?
|
|
|
|
This is explained in more depth in the L<perlsyn>. Briefly, there's
|
|
no official case statement, because of the variety of tests possible
|
|
in Perl (numeric comparison, string comparison, glob comparison,
|
|
regex matching, overloaded comparisons, ...). Larry couldn't decide
|
|
how best to do this, so he left it out, even though it's been on the
|
|
wish list since perl1.
|
|
|
|
The general answer is to write a construct like this:
|
|
|
|
for ($variable_to_test) {
|
|
if (/pat1/) { } # do something
|
|
elsif (/pat2/) { } # do something else
|
|
elsif (/pat3/) { } # do something else
|
|
else { } # default
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Here's a simple example of a switch based on pattern matching, this
|
|
time lined up in a way to make it look more like a switch statement.
|
|
We'll do a multi-way conditional based on the type of reference stored
|
|
in $whatchamacallit:
|
|
|
|
SWITCH: for (ref $whatchamacallit) {
|
|
|
|
/^$/ && die "not a reference";
|
|
|
|
/SCALAR/ && do {
|
|
print_scalar($$ref);
|
|
last SWITCH;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/ARRAY/ && do {
|
|
print_array(@$ref);
|
|
last SWITCH;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/HASH/ && do {
|
|
print_hash(%$ref);
|
|
last SWITCH;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/CODE/ && do {
|
|
warn "can't print function ref";
|
|
last SWITCH;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
# DEFAULT
|
|
|
|
warn "User defined type skipped";
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
See C<perlsyn/"Basic BLOCKs and Switch Statements"> for many other
|
|
examples in this style.
|
|
|
|
Sometimes you should change the positions of the constant and the variable.
|
|
For example, let's say you wanted to test which of many answers you were
|
|
given, but in a case-insensitive way that also allows abbreviations.
|
|
You can use the following technique if the strings all start with
|
|
different characters, or if you want to arrange the matches so that
|
|
one takes precedence over another, as C<"SEND"> has precedence over
|
|
C<"STOP"> here:
|
|
|
|
chomp($answer = <>);
|
|
if ("SEND" =~ /^\Q$answer/i) { print "Action is send\n" }
|
|
elsif ("STOP" =~ /^\Q$answer/i) { print "Action is stop\n" }
|
|
elsif ("ABORT" =~ /^\Q$answer/i) { print "Action is abort\n" }
|
|
elsif ("LIST" =~ /^\Q$answer/i) { print "Action is list\n" }
|
|
elsif ("EDIT" =~ /^\Q$answer/i) { print "Action is edit\n" }
|
|
|
|
A totally different approach is to create a hash of function references.
|
|
|
|
my %commands = (
|
|
"happy" => \&joy,
|
|
"sad", => \&sullen,
|
|
"done" => sub { die "See ya!" },
|
|
"mad" => \&angry,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
print "How are you? ";
|
|
chomp($string = <STDIN>);
|
|
if ($commands{$string}) {
|
|
$commands{$string}->();
|
|
} else {
|
|
print "No such command: $string\n";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=head2 How can I catch accesses to undefined variables/functions/methods?
|
|
|
|
The AUTOLOAD method, discussed in L<perlsub/"Autoloading"> and
|
|
L<perltoot/"AUTOLOAD: Proxy Methods">, lets you capture calls to
|
|
undefined functions and methods.
|
|
|
|
When it comes to undefined variables that would trigger a warning
|
|
under C<-w>, you can use a handler to trap the pseudo-signal
|
|
C<__WARN__> like this:
|
|
|
|
$SIG{__WARN__} = sub {
|
|
|
|
for ( $_[0] ) { # voici un switch statement
|
|
|
|
/Use of uninitialized value/ && do {
|
|
# promote warning to a fatal
|
|
die $_;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
# other warning cases to catch could go here;
|
|
|
|
warn $_;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
=head2 Why can't a method included in this same file be found?
|
|
|
|
Some possible reasons: your inheritance is getting confused, you've
|
|
misspelled the method name, or the object is of the wrong type. Check
|
|
out L<perltoot> for details on these. You may also use C<print
|
|
ref($object)> to find out the class C<$object> was blessed into.
|
|
|
|
Another possible reason for problems is because you've used the
|
|
indirect object syntax (eg, C<find Guru "Samy">) on a class name
|
|
before Perl has seen that such a package exists. It's wisest to make
|
|
sure your packages are all defined before you start using them, which
|
|
will be taken care of if you use the C<use> statement instead of
|
|
C<require>. If not, make sure to use arrow notation (eg,
|
|
C<< Guru->find("Samy") >>) instead. Object notation is explained in
|
|
L<perlobj>.
|
|
|
|
Make sure to read about creating modules in L<perlmod> and
|
|
the perils of indirect objects in L<perlobj/"WARNING">.
|
|
|
|
=head2 How can I find out my current package?
|
|
|
|
If you're just a random program, you can do this to find
|
|
out what the currently compiled package is:
|
|
|
|
my $packname = __PACKAGE__;
|
|
|
|
But if you're a method and you want to print an error message
|
|
that includes the kind of object you were called on (which is
|
|
not necessarily the same as the one in which you were compiled):
|
|
|
|
sub amethod {
|
|
my $self = shift;
|
|
my $class = ref($self) || $self;
|
|
warn "called me from a $class object";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
=head2 How can I comment out a large block of perl code?
|
|
|
|
Use embedded POD to discard it:
|
|
|
|
# program is here
|
|
|
|
=for nobody
|
|
This paragraph is commented out
|
|
|
|
# program continues
|
|
|
|
=begin comment text
|
|
|
|
all of this stuff
|
|
|
|
here will be ignored
|
|
by everyone
|
|
|
|
=end comment text
|
|
|
|
=cut
|
|
|
|
This can't go just anywhere. You have to put a pod directive where
|
|
the parser is expecting a new statement, not just in the middle
|
|
of an expression or some other arbitrary yacc grammar production.
|
|
|
|
=head2 How do I clear a package?
|
|
|
|
Use this code, provided by Mark-Jason Dominus:
|
|
|
|
sub scrub_package {
|
|
no strict 'refs';
|
|
my $pack = shift;
|
|
die "Shouldn't delete main package"
|
|
if $pack eq "" || $pack eq "main";
|
|
my $stash = *{$pack . '::'}{HASH};
|
|
my $name;
|
|
foreach $name (keys %$stash) {
|
|
my $fullname = $pack . '::' . $name;
|
|
# Get rid of everything with that name.
|
|
undef $$fullname;
|
|
undef @$fullname;
|
|
undef %$fullname;
|
|
undef &$fullname;
|
|
undef *$fullname;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Or, if you're using a recent release of Perl, you can
|
|
just use the Symbol::delete_package() function instead.
|
|
|
|
=head2 How can I use a variable as a variable name?
|
|
|
|
Beginners often think they want to have a variable contain the name
|
|
of a variable.
|
|
|
|
$fred = 23;
|
|
$varname = "fred";
|
|
++$$varname; # $fred now 24
|
|
|
|
This works I<sometimes>, but it is a very bad idea for two reasons.
|
|
|
|
The first reason is that they I<only work on global variables>.
|
|
That means above that if $fred is a lexical variable created with my(),
|
|
that the code won't work at all: you'll accidentally access the global
|
|
and skip right over the private lexical altogether. Global variables
|
|
are bad because they can easily collide accidentally and in general make
|
|
for non-scalable and confusing code.
|
|
|
|
Symbolic references are forbidden under the C<use strict> pragma.
|
|
They are not true references and consequently are not reference counted
|
|
or garbage collected.
|
|
|
|
The other reason why using a variable to hold the name of another
|
|
variable a bad idea is that the question often stems from a lack of
|
|
understanding of Perl data structures, particularly hashes. By using
|
|
symbolic references, you are just using the package's symbol-table hash
|
|
(like C<%main::>) instead of a user-defined hash. The solution is to
|
|
use your own hash or a real reference instead.
|
|
|
|
$fred = 23;
|
|
$varname = "fred";
|
|
$USER_VARS{$varname}++; # not $$varname++
|
|
|
|
There we're using the %USER_VARS hash instead of symbolic references.
|
|
Sometimes this comes up in reading strings from the user with variable
|
|
references and wanting to expand them to the values of your perl
|
|
program's variables. This is also a bad idea because it conflates the
|
|
program-addressable namespace and the user-addressable one. Instead of
|
|
reading a string and expanding it to the actual contents of your program's
|
|
own variables:
|
|
|
|
$str = 'this has a $fred and $barney in it';
|
|
$str =~ s/(\$\w+)/$1/eeg; # need double eval
|
|
|
|
Instead, it would be better to keep a hash around like %USER_VARS and have
|
|
variable references actually refer to entries in that hash:
|
|
|
|
$str =~ s/\$(\w+)/$USER_VARS{$1}/g; # no /e here at all
|
|
|
|
That's faster, cleaner, and safer than the previous approach. Of course,
|
|
you don't need to use a dollar sign. You could use your own scheme to
|
|
make it less confusing, like bracketed percent symbols, etc.
|
|
|
|
$str = 'this has a %fred% and %barney% in it';
|
|
$str =~ s/%(\w+)%/$USER_VARS{$1}/g; # no /e here at all
|
|
|
|
Another reason that folks sometimes think they want a variable to contain
|
|
the name of a variable is because they don't know how to build proper
|
|
data structures using hashes. For example, let's say they wanted two
|
|
hashes in their program: %fred and %barney, and to use another scalar
|
|
variable to refer to those by name.
|
|
|
|
$name = "fred";
|
|
$$name{WIFE} = "wilma"; # set %fred
|
|
|
|
$name = "barney";
|
|
$$name{WIFE} = "betty"; # set %barney
|
|
|
|
This is still a symbolic reference, and is still saddled with the
|
|
problems enumerated above. It would be far better to write:
|
|
|
|
$folks{"fred"}{WIFE} = "wilma";
|
|
$folks{"barney"}{WIFE} = "betty";
|
|
|
|
And just use a multilevel hash to start with.
|
|
|
|
The only times that you absolutely I<must> use symbolic references are
|
|
when you really must refer to the symbol table. This may be because it's
|
|
something that can't take a real reference to, such as a format name.
|
|
Doing so may also be important for method calls, since these always go
|
|
through the symbol table for resolution.
|
|
|
|
In those cases, you would turn off C<strict 'refs'> temporarily so you
|
|
can play around with the symbol table. For example:
|
|
|
|
@colors = qw(red blue green yellow orange purple violet);
|
|
for my $name (@colors) {
|
|
no strict 'refs'; # renege for the block
|
|
*$name = sub { "<FONT COLOR='$name'>@_</FONT>" };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
All those functions (red(), blue(), green(), etc.) appear to be separate,
|
|
but the real code in the closure actually was compiled only once.
|
|
|
|
So, sometimes you might want to use symbolic references to directly
|
|
manipulate the symbol table. This doesn't matter for formats, handles, and
|
|
subroutines, because they are always global -- you can't use my() on them.
|
|
But for scalars, arrays, and hashes -- and usually for subroutines --
|
|
you probably want to use hard references only.
|
|
|
|
=head1 AUTHOR AND COPYRIGHT
|
|
|
|
Copyright (c) 1997-1999 Tom Christiansen and Nathan Torkington.
|
|
All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
When included as part of the Standard Version of Perl, or as part of
|
|
its complete documentation whether printed or otherwise, this work
|
|
may be distributed only under the terms of Perl's Artistic License.
|
|
Any distribution of this file or derivatives thereof I<outside>
|
|
of that package require that special arrangements be made with
|
|
copyright holder.
|
|
|
|
Irrespective of its distribution, all code examples in this file
|
|
are hereby placed into the public domain. You are permitted and
|
|
encouraged to use this code in your own programs for fun
|
|
or for profit as you see fit. A simple comment in the code giving
|
|
credit would be courteous but is not required.
|