86 lines
3.7 KiB
Plaintext
86 lines
3.7 KiB
Plaintext
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# "THE BEER-WARE LICENSE" (Revision 42):
|
|
# <phk@FreeBSD.org> wrote this file. As long as you retain this notice you
|
|
# can do whatever you want with this stuff. If we meet some day, and you think
|
|
# this stuff is worth it, you can buy me a beer in return. Poul-Henning Kamp
|
|
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
#
|
|
# $FreeBSD$
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
What will I not find in this file ?
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
Instructions on how to obtain FreeBSD via CTM.
|
|
Contact <CTM@FreeBSD.org> for that.
|
|
|
|
What is CTM ?
|
|
-------------
|
|
CTM was originally "CVS Through eMail", but has since changed scope to be
|
|
much more general.
|
|
CTM is now meant to be the definitive way to make and apply a delta between
|
|
two versions of a directory tree.
|
|
There are two parts to this, making the delta and applying it. These are two
|
|
entirely different things. CTM concentrates the computation-burden on the
|
|
generation of the deltas, as a delta very often is applied more times than
|
|
it is made. Second CTM tries to make the minimal size delta.
|
|
|
|
Why not use diff/patch ?
|
|
------------------------
|
|
Good question. Primarily because diff and patch doesn't do their job very
|
|
well. They don't deal with binary files (in this case files with '\0' or
|
|
'\0377' characters in them or files that doesn't end in '\n') which isn't
|
|
a big surprise: they were made to deal with text-files only. As a second
|
|
gripe, with patch you send the entire file to delete it. Not particular
|
|
efficient.
|
|
|
|
So what does CTM do exactly ?
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
CTM will produce a file, (a delta) containing the instructions and data needed
|
|
to take another copy of the tree from the old to the new status. CTM means to
|
|
do this in the exact sense, and therefore the delta contains MD5 checksums to
|
|
verify that the tree it is applied to is indeed in the state CTM expects.
|
|
|
|
This means that if you have modified the tree locally, CTM might not be able
|
|
to upgrade your copy.
|
|
|
|
How do I make a CTM-delta ?
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
Read the source, and be prepared to have 2 copies of the tree; One is
|
|
the reference ("From") tree, and the other is the delta ("To") tree.
|
|
The mkCTM script will create the CTM diff of the differences between
|
|
the reference tree and the delta tree. A lot of scratch space is
|
|
required, and your machine will work hard.
|
|
|
|
How do I apply a CTM-delta ?
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
You pass it to the 'ctm' command. You can pass a CTM-delta on stdin, or
|
|
you can give the filename as an argument. If you do the latter, you make
|
|
life a lot easier for your self, since the program can accept gzip'ed files
|
|
and since it will not have to make a temporary copy of your file. You can
|
|
specify multiple deltas at one time, they will be processed one at a time.
|
|
|
|
The ctm command runs in a number of passes. It will process the entire
|
|
input file in each pass, before commencing with the next pass.
|
|
|
|
Pass 1 will validate that the input file is OK. The syntax, the data and
|
|
the global MD5 checksum will be checked. If any of these fail, ctm will
|
|
never be able to do anything with the file, so it will simply reject it.
|
|
|
|
Pass 2 will validate that the directory tree is in the state expected by
|
|
the CTM-delta. This is done by looking for files and directories which
|
|
should/should not exists and by checking the MD5 checksums of files.
|
|
|
|
Pass 3 will actually apply the delta.
|
|
|
|
Should I delete the delta when I have applied it ?
|
|
--------------------------------------------------
|
|
No. You might want to selectively reconstruct a file latter on.
|
|
|
|
Why is CTM not being maintained?
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
Because CVSUP has improved on the concept quite a bit, and is now
|
|
the method of choice.
|
|
|
|
Poul-Henning
|