650 lines
29 KiB
Plaintext
650 lines
29 KiB
Plaintext
Internet Software Consortium DHCP Distribution
|
|
Version 3.0.1
|
|
Release Candidate 6
|
|
January 17, 2002
|
|
|
|
README FILE
|
|
|
|
You should read this file carefully before trying to install or use
|
|
the ISC DHCP Distribution.
|
|
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
1 WHERE TO FIND DOCUMENTATION
|
|
2 RELEASE STATUS
|
|
3 BUILDING THE DHCP DISTRIBUTION
|
|
3.1 UNPACKING IT
|
|
3.2 CONFIGURING IT
|
|
3.2.1 DYNAMIC DNS UPDATES
|
|
3.2.2 LOCALLY DEFINED OPTIONS
|
|
3.3 BUILDING IT
|
|
4 INSTALLING THE DHCP DISTRIBUTION
|
|
5 USING THE DHCP DISTRIBUTION
|
|
5.1 FIREWALL RULES
|
|
5.2 LINUX
|
|
5.2.1 IF_TR.H NOT FOUND
|
|
5.2.2 SO_ATTACH_FILTER UNDECLARED
|
|
5.2.3 PROTOCOL NOT CONFIGURED
|
|
5.2.4 BROADCAST
|
|
5.2.6 IP BOOTP AGENT
|
|
5.2.7 MULTIPLE INTERFACES
|
|
5.3 SCO
|
|
5.4 HP-UX
|
|
5.5 ULTRIX
|
|
5.6 FreeBSD
|
|
5.7 NeXTSTEP
|
|
5.8 SOLARIS
|
|
6 SUPPORT
|
|
6.1 HOW TO REPORT BUGS
|
|
|
|
WHERE TO FIND DOCUMENTATION
|
|
|
|
Documentation for this software includes this README file, the
|
|
RELNOTES file, and the manual pages, which are in the server, common,
|
|
client and relay subdirectories. The README file (this file) includes
|
|
late-breaking operational and system-specific information that you
|
|
should read even if you don't want to read the manual pages, and that
|
|
you should *certainly* read if you run into trouble. Internet
|
|
standards relating to the DHCP protocol are stored in the doc
|
|
subdirectory. You will have the best luck reading the manual pages if
|
|
you build this software and then install it, although you can read
|
|
them directly out of the distribution if you need to.
|
|
|
|
DHCP server documentation is in the dhcpd man page. Information about
|
|
the DHCP server lease database is in the dhcpd.leases man page.
|
|
Server configuration documentation is in the dhcpd.conf man page as
|
|
well as the dhcp-options man page. A sample DHCP server
|
|
configuration is in the file server/dhcpd.conf. The source for the
|
|
dhcpd, dhcpd.leases and dhcpd.conf man pages is in the server/ sub-
|
|
directory in the distribution. The source for the dhcp-options.5
|
|
man page is in the common/ subdirectory.
|
|
|
|
DHCP Client documentation is in the dhclient man page. DHCP client
|
|
configuration documentation is in the dhclient.conf man page and the
|
|
dhcp-options man page. The DHCP client configuration script is
|
|
documented in the dhclient-script man page. The format of the DHCP
|
|
client lease database is documented in the dhclient.leases man page.
|
|
The source for all these man pages is in the client/ subdirectory in
|
|
the distribution. In addition, the dhcp-options man page should be
|
|
referred to for information about DHCP options.
|
|
|
|
DHCP relay agent documentation is in the dhcrelay man page, the source
|
|
for which is distributed in the relay/ subdirectory.
|
|
|
|
To read installed manual pages, use the man command. Type "man page"
|
|
where page is the name of the manual page. This will only work if
|
|
you have installed the ISC DHCP distribution using the ``make install''
|
|
command (described later).
|
|
|
|
If you want to read manual pages that aren't installed, you can type
|
|
``nroff -man page |more'' where page is the filename of the
|
|
unformatted manual page. The filename of an unformatted manual page
|
|
is the name of the manual page, followed by '.', followed by some
|
|
number - 5 for documentation about files, and 8 for documentation
|
|
about programs. For example, to read the dhcp-options man page,
|
|
you would type ``nroff -man common/dhcp-options.5 |more'', assuming
|
|
your current working directory is the top level directory of the ISC
|
|
DHCP Distribution.
|
|
|
|
If you do not have the nroff command, you can type ``more catpage''
|
|
where catpage is the filename of the catted man page. Catted man
|
|
pages names are the name of the manual page followed by ".cat"
|
|
followed by 5 or 8, as with unformatted manual pages.
|
|
|
|
Please note that until you install the manual pages, the pathnames of
|
|
files to which they refer will not be correct for your operating
|
|
system.
|
|
|
|
RELEASE STATUS
|
|
|
|
This is the second beta release of version 3.0 of the ISC DHCP
|
|
Distribution. Development of this release is approaching the point at
|
|
which it will be frozen, and no significant new features will be
|
|
added.
|
|
|
|
In this release, the server and relay agent are currently fully
|
|
functional on NetBSD, Linux systems with kernel version 2.2 or later,
|
|
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, BSD/OS, Digital Tru64 Unix and Solaris. The
|
|
software will also run on HP-UX, but only supports a single network
|
|
interface. Ports also exist for QNX, SCO, NeXTStep, and MacOS X, but
|
|
are not in wide use, with all that implies. We are not aware of an
|
|
easy way to get this software running on HP-UX.
|
|
|
|
The DHCP client currently only knows how to configure the network on
|
|
NetBSD, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, BSD/os, Linux, Solaris and NextStep. The
|
|
client depends on a system-dependent shell script to do network
|
|
configuration - support for other operating systems is simply a matter
|
|
of porting this shell script to the new platform.
|
|
|
|
If you are running the DHCP distribution on a machine which is a
|
|
firewall, or if there is a firewall between your DHCP server(s) and
|
|
DHCP clients, please read the section on firewalls which appears later
|
|
in this document.
|
|
|
|
If you wish to run the DHCP Distribution on Linux, please see the
|
|
Linux-specific notes later in this document. If you wish to run on an
|
|
SCO release, please see the SCO-specific notes later in this document.
|
|
You particularly need to read these notes if you intend to support
|
|
Windows 95 clients. If you are running a version of FreeBSD prior to
|
|
2.2, please read the note on FreeBSD. If you are running HP-UX or
|
|
Ultrix, please read the notes for those operating systems below. If
|
|
you are running NeXTSTEP, please see the notes on NeXTSTEP below.
|
|
|
|
If you start dhcpd and get a message, "no free bpf", that means you
|
|
need to configure the Berkeley Packet Filter into your operating
|
|
system kernel. On NetBSD, FreeBSD and BSD/os, type ``man bpf'' for
|
|
information. On Digital Unix, type ``man pfilt''.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUILDING THE DHCP DISTRIBUTION
|
|
|
|
UNPACKING IT
|
|
|
|
To build the DHCP Distribution, unpack the compressed tar file using
|
|
the tar utility and the gzip command - type something like:
|
|
|
|
zcat dhcp-3.0.1rc6.tar.gz |tar xvf -
|
|
|
|
On BSD/OS, you have to type gzcat, not zcat, and you may run into
|
|
similar problems on other operating systems.
|
|
|
|
CONFIGURING IT
|
|
|
|
Now, cd to the dhcp-3.0.1rc6 subdirectory that you've just
|
|
created and configure the source tree by typing:
|
|
|
|
./configure
|
|
|
|
If the configure utility can figure out what sort of system you're
|
|
running on, it will create a custom Makefile for you for that
|
|
system; otherwise, it will complain. If it can't figure out what
|
|
system you are using, that system is not supported - you are on
|
|
your own.
|
|
|
|
DYNAMIC DNS UPDATES
|
|
|
|
A fully-featured implementation of dynamic DNS updates is included in
|
|
this release. There are no build dependencies with any BIND version
|
|
- this version can and should just use the resolver in your C library.
|
|
|
|
There is documentation for the DDNS support in the dhcpd.conf manual
|
|
page - see the beginning of this document for information on finding
|
|
manual pages.
|
|
|
|
LOCALLY DEFINED OPTIONS
|
|
|
|
In previous versions of the DHCP server there was a mechanism whereby
|
|
options that were not known by the server could be configured using
|
|
a name made up of the option code number and an identifier:
|
|
"option-nnn" This is no longer supported, because it is not future-
|
|
proof. Instead, if you want to use an option that the server doesn't
|
|
know about, you must explicitly define it using the method described
|
|
in the dhcp-options man page under the DEFINING NEW OPTIONS heading.
|
|
|
|
BUILDING IT
|
|
|
|
Once you've run configure, just type ``make'', and after a while
|
|
you should have a dhcp server. If you get compile errors on one
|
|
of the supported systems mentioned earlier, please let us know.
|
|
If you get warnings, it's not likely to be a problem - the DHCP
|
|
server compiles completely warning-free on as many architectures
|
|
as we can manage, but there are a few for which this is difficult.
|
|
If you get errors on a system not mentioned above, you will need
|
|
to do some programming or debugging on your own to get the DHCP
|
|
Distribution working.
|
|
|
|
INSTALLING THE DHCP DISTRIBUTION
|
|
|
|
Once you have successfully gotten the DHCP Distribution to build, you
|
|
can install it by typing ``make install''. If you already have an old
|
|
version of the DHCP Distribution installed, you may want to save it
|
|
before typing ``make install''.
|
|
|
|
USING THE DHCP DISTRIBUTION
|
|
|
|
FIREWALL RULES
|
|
|
|
If you are running the DHCP server or client on a computer that's also
|
|
acting as a firewall, you must be sure to allow DHCP packets through
|
|
the firewall. In particular, your firewall rules _must_ allow packets
|
|
from IP address 0.0.0.0 to IP address 255.255.255.255 from UDP port 68
|
|
to UDP port 67 through. They must also allow packets from your local
|
|
firewall's IP address and UDP port 67 through to any address your DHCP
|
|
server might serve on UDP port 68. Finally, packets from relay agents
|
|
on port 67 to the DHCP server on port 67, and vice versa, must be
|
|
permitted.
|
|
|
|
We have noticed that on some systems where we are using a packet
|
|
filter, if you set up a firewall that blocks UDP port 67 and 68
|
|
entirely, packets sent through the packet filter will not be blocked.
|
|
However, unicast packets will be blocked. This can result in strange
|
|
behaviour, particularly on DHCP clients, where the initial packet
|
|
exchange is broadcast, but renewals are unicast - the client will
|
|
appear to be unable to renew until it starts broadcasting its
|
|
renewals, and then suddenly it'll work. The fix is to fix the
|
|
firewall rules as described above.
|
|
|
|
PARTIAL SERVERS
|
|
|
|
If you have a server that is connected to two networks, and you only
|
|
want to provide DHCP service on one of those networks (e.g., you are
|
|
using a cable modem and have set up a NAT router), if you don't write
|
|
any subnet declaration for the network you aren't supporting, the DHCP
|
|
server will ignore input on that network interface if it can. If it
|
|
can't, it will refuse to run - some operating systems do not have the
|
|
capability of supporting DHCP on machines with more than one
|
|
interface, and ironically this is the case even if you don't want to
|
|
provide DHCP service on one of those interfaces.
|
|
|
|
LINUX
|
|
|
|
There are three big LINUX issues: the all-ones broadcast address,
|
|
Linux 2.1 ip_bootp_agent enabling, and operations with more than one
|
|
network interface. There are also two potential compilation/runtime
|
|
problems for Linux 2.1/2.2: the "SO_ATTACH_FILTER undeclared" problem
|
|
and the "protocol not configured" problem.
|
|
|
|
LINUX: IF_TR.H NOT FOUND
|
|
|
|
When you compile the distribution on Linux, you may get an error
|
|
message indicating that the include file if_tr.h could not be found.
|
|
If this happens, go into includes/cf/linux.h and delete the line that
|
|
defined HAVE_TR_SUPPORT, or look into installing a new version of libc
|
|
that includes the if_tr.h file. We will be working on removing this
|
|
problem in the future, but for now, if you run into it, this should be
|
|
a viable workaround.
|
|
|
|
LINUX: SO_ATTACH_FILTER UNDECLARED
|
|
|
|
In addition, there is a minor issue that we will mention here because
|
|
this release is so close on the heels of the Linux 2.2 release: there
|
|
is a symlink in /usr/include that points at the linux asm headers. It
|
|
appears to be not uncommon that this link won't be updated correctly,
|
|
in which case you'll get the following error when you try to build:
|
|
|
|
lpf.c: In function `if_register_receive':
|
|
lpf.c:152: `SO_ATTACH_FILTER' undeclared (first use this function)
|
|
lpf.c:152: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
|
|
lpf.c:152: for each function it appears in.)
|
|
|
|
The line numbers may be different, of course. If you see this
|
|
header, your linux asm header link is probably bad, and you should
|
|
make sure it's pointing to correct linux source directory.
|
|
|
|
LINUX: PROTOCOL NOT CONFIGURED
|
|
|
|
One additional Linux 2.1/2.2 issue: if you get the following message,
|
|
it's because your kernel doesn't have the linux packetfilter or raw
|
|
packet socket configured:
|
|
|
|
Make sure CONFIG_PACKET (Packet socket) and CONFIG_FILTER (Socket
|
|
Filtering) are enabled in your kernel configuration
|
|
|
|
If this happens, you need to configure your Linux kernel to support
|
|
Socket Filtering and the Packet socket. You can do this by typing
|
|
``make config'', ``make menuconfig'' or ``make xconfig'', and then
|
|
enabling the Packet socket and Socket Filtering options that you'll
|
|
see displayed on the menu or in the questionnaire. You can also edit
|
|
your linux kernel .config file directly: set CONFIG_FILTER=y and
|
|
CONFIG_PACKET=y. If you do this, make sure you run ``make oldconfig''
|
|
afterwards, so that the changes you've made are propogated to the
|
|
kernel header files. After you've reconfigured, you need to type
|
|
``make'' to build a new Linux kernel, and then install it in the
|
|
appropriate place (probably /linux). Make sure to save a copy of your
|
|
old /linux.
|
|
|
|
If the preceding paragraph made no sense to you, ask your Linux
|
|
vendor/guru for help - please don't ask us.
|
|
|
|
If you set CONFIG_PACKET=m or CONFIG_FILTER=m, then you must tell the
|
|
kernel module loader to load the appropriate modules. If this doesn't
|
|
make sense to you, don't use CONFIG_whatever=m - use CONFIG_whatever=y.
|
|
Don't ask for help with this on the DHCP mailing list - it's a Linux
|
|
kernel issue. This is probably not a problem with the most recent
|
|
Linux 2.2.x kernels.
|
|
|
|
LINUX: BROADCAST
|
|
|
|
If you are running a recent version of Linux, this won't be a problem,
|
|
but on older versions of Linux (kernel versions prior to 2.2), there
|
|
is a potential problem with the broadcast address being sent
|
|
incorrectly.
|
|
|
|
In order for dhcpd to work correctly with picky DHCP clients (e.g.,
|
|
Windows 95), it must be able to send packets with an IP destination
|
|
address of 255.255.255.255. Unfortunately, Linux changes an IP
|
|
destination of 255.255.255.255 into the local subnet broadcast address
|
|
(here, that's 192.5.5.223).
|
|
|
|
This isn't generally a problem on Linux 2.2 and later kernels, since
|
|
we completely bypass the Linux IP stack, but on old versions of Linux
|
|
2.1 and all versions of Linux prior to 2.1, it is a problem - pickier
|
|
DHCP clients connected to the same network as the ISC DHCP server or
|
|
ISC relay agent will not see messages from the DHCP server. It *is*
|
|
possible to run into trouble with this on Linux 2.2 and later if you
|
|
are running a verson of the DHCP server that was compiled on a Linux
|
|
2.0 system, though.
|
|
|
|
It is possible to work around this problem on some versions of Linux
|
|
by creating a host route from your network interface address to
|
|
255.255.255.255. The command you need to use to do this on Linux
|
|
varies from version to version. The easiest version is:
|
|
|
|
route add -host 255.255.255.255 dev eth0
|
|
|
|
On some older Linux systems, you will get an error if you try to do
|
|
this. On those systems, try adding the following entry to your
|
|
/etc/hosts file:
|
|
|
|
255.255.255.255 all-ones
|
|
|
|
Then, try:
|
|
|
|
route add -host all-ones dev eth0
|
|
|
|
Another route that has worked for some users is:
|
|
|
|
route add -net 255.255.255.0 dev eth0
|
|
|
|
If you are not using eth0 as your network interface, you should
|
|
specify the network interface you *are* using in your route command.
|
|
|
|
LINUX: IP BOOTP AGENT
|
|
|
|
Some versions of the Linux 2.1 kernel apparently prevent dhcpd from
|
|
working unless you enable it by doing the following:
|
|
|
|
echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_bootp_agent
|
|
|
|
|
|
LINUX: MULTIPLE INTERFACES
|
|
|
|
Very old versions of the Linux kernel do not provide a networking API
|
|
that allows dhcpd to operate correctly if the system has more than one
|
|
broadcast network interface. However, Linux 2.0 kernels with version
|
|
numbers greater than or equal to 2.0.31 add an API feature: the
|
|
SO_BINDTODEVICE socket option. If SO_BINDTODEVICE is present, it is
|
|
possible for dhcpd to operate on Linux with more than one network
|
|
interface. In order to take advantage of this, you must be running a
|
|
2.0.31 or greater kernel, and you must have 2.0.31 or later system
|
|
headers installed *before* you build the DHCP Distribution.
|
|
|
|
We have heard reports that you must still add routes to 255.255.255.255
|
|
in order for the all-ones broadcast to work, even on 2.0.31 kernels.
|
|
In fact, you now need to add a route for each interface. Hopefully
|
|
the Linux kernel gurus will get this straight eventually.
|
|
|
|
Linux 2.1 and later kernels do not use SO_BINDTODEVICE or require the
|
|
broadcast address hack, but do support multiple interfaces, using the
|
|
Linux Packet Filter.
|
|
|
|
SCO
|
|
|
|
SCO has the same problem as Linux (described earlier). The thing is,
|
|
SCO *really* doesn't want to let you add a host route to the all-ones
|
|
broadcast address.
|
|
|
|
On more recent versions of SCO, you can do this:
|
|
|
|
ifconfig net0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 0xNNNNNNNN broadcast 255.255.255.255
|
|
|
|
If this doesn't work, you can also try the following strange hack:
|
|
|
|
ifconfig net0 alias 10.1.1.1 netmask 8.0.0.0
|
|
|
|
Apparently this works because of an interaction between SCO's support
|
|
for network classes and the weird netmask. The 10.* network is just a
|
|
dummy that can generally be assumed to be safe. Don't ask why this
|
|
works. Just try it. If it works for you, great. SCO has added
|
|
support for doing DHCP in a more sensible way, but I have not had the
|
|
time or cause to implement them. If you are interested in this, and
|
|
are able to hack your way out of a wet paper back without assistance,
|
|
we'd appreciate it if you'd give it a try, but don't expect too much
|
|
support from us (sorry!).
|
|
|
|
HP-UX
|
|
|
|
HP-UX has the same problem with the all-ones broadcast address that
|
|
SCO and Linux have. One user reported that adding the following to
|
|
/etc/rc.config.d/netconf helped (you may have to modify this to suit
|
|
your local configuration):
|
|
|
|
INTERFACE_NAME[0]=lan0
|
|
IP_ADDRESS[0]=1.1.1.1
|
|
SUBNET_MASK[0]=255.255.255.0
|
|
BROADCAST_ADDRESS[0]="255.255.255.255"
|
|
LANCONFIG_ARGS[0]="ether"
|
|
DHCP_ENABLE[0]=0
|
|
|
|
ULTRIX
|
|
|
|
Now that we have Ultrix packet filter support, the DHCP Distribution
|
|
on Ultrix should be pretty trouble-free. However, one thing you do
|
|
need to be aware of is that it now requires that the pfilt device be
|
|
configured into your kernel and present in /dev. If you type ``man
|
|
packetfilter'', you will get some information on how to configure your
|
|
kernel for the packet filter (if it isn't already) and how to make an
|
|
entry for it in /dev.
|
|
|
|
FreeBSD
|
|
|
|
Versions of FreeBSD prior to 2.2 have a bug in BPF support in that the
|
|
ethernet driver swaps the ethertype field in the ethernet header
|
|
downstream from BPF, which corrupts the output packet. If you are
|
|
running a version of FreeBSD prior to 2.2, and you find that dhcpd
|
|
can't communicate with its clients, you should #define BROKEN_FREEBSD_BPF
|
|
in site.h and recompile.
|
|
|
|
NeXTSTEP
|
|
|
|
The NeXTSTEP support uses the NeXTSTEP Berkeley Packet Filter
|
|
extension, which is not included in the base NextStep system. You
|
|
must install this extension in order to get dhcpd or dhclient to work.
|
|
|
|
SOLARIS
|
|
|
|
One problem which has been observed and is not fixed in this
|
|
patchlevel has to do with using DLPI on Solaris machines. The symptom
|
|
of this problem is that the DHCP server never receives any requests.
|
|
This has been observed with Solaris 2.6 and Solaris 7 on Intel x86
|
|
systems, although it may occur with other systems as well. If you
|
|
encounter this symptom, and you are running the DHCP server on a
|
|
machine with a single broadcast network interface, you may wish to
|
|
edit the includes/site.h file and uncomment the #define USE_SOCKETS
|
|
line. Then type ``make clean; make''.
|
|
|
|
The DHCP client on Solaris will only work with DLPI. If you run it
|
|
and it just keeps saying it's sending DHCPREQUEST packets, but never
|
|
gets a response, you may be having DLPI trouble as described above.
|
|
If so, we have no solution to offer at this time. Also, because
|
|
Solaris requires you to "plumb" an interface before it can be detected
|
|
by the DHCP client, you must either specify the name(s) of the
|
|
interface(s) you want to configure on the command line, or must plumb
|
|
the interfaces prior to invoking the DHCP client. This can be done
|
|
with ``ifconfig iface plumb'', where iface is the name of the
|
|
interface (e.g., ``ifconfig hme0 plumb'').
|
|
|
|
It should be noted that Solaris versions from 2.6 onward include a
|
|
DHCP client that you can run with ``/sbin/ifconfig iface dhcp start''
|
|
rather than using the ISC DHCP client. The feature set of the Solaris
|
|
client is different (not necessarily better or worse) than that of the
|
|
ISC client, but in most cases it will be a lot easier for you to just
|
|
use that. Please do not ask for help in using the Solaris DHCP client
|
|
on Internet Software Consortium mailing lists - that's why you're
|
|
paying Sun the big bucks. If you're having a problem with the
|
|
Solaris client interoperating with the ISC dhcp server, that's another
|
|
matter, but please check with Sun first.
|
|
|
|
SUPPORT
|
|
|
|
The Internet Software Consortium DHCP server is not a commercial
|
|
product, and is not supported by the ISC. However, it has attracted a
|
|
fairly sizable following on the Internet, which means that there are a
|
|
lot of knowledgable users who may be able to help you if you get
|
|
stuck. These people generally read the dhcp-server@isc.org mailing
|
|
list.
|
|
|
|
If you are going to use dhcpd, you should probably subscribe to the
|
|
dhcp-server and dhcp-announce mailing lists. If you will be using
|
|
dhclient, you should subscribe to the dhcp-client mailing list.
|
|
|
|
If you need help, you should ask on the dhcp-server or dhcp-client
|
|
mailing list - whichever is appropriate to your application. Support
|
|
requests for the ISC DHCP client should go to dhcp-client@isc.org.
|
|
Support requests for the DHCP server should go to dhcp-server@isc.org.
|
|
If you are having trouble with a combination of the client and server,
|
|
send the request to dhcp-server@isc.org. Please do not cross-post to
|
|
both lists under any circumstances.
|
|
|
|
WHERE TO REPORT BUGS: If you want the act of sending in a bug report
|
|
to result in you getting help in the form of a fixed piece of
|
|
software, you are asking for help. Your bug report is helpful to us,
|
|
but fundamentally you are making a support request, so please use the
|
|
addresses described in the previous paragraphs. If you are _sure_ that
|
|
your problem is a bug, and not user error, or if your bug report
|
|
includes a patch, you can send it to dhcp-bugs@isc.org without
|
|
subscribing. This mailing list goes into a bug tracking system, so
|
|
you don't need to check periodically to see if we still remember the
|
|
bug - if you haven't been notified that the bug has been closed, we
|
|
still consider it a bug, and still have it in the system.
|
|
|
|
PLEASE DO NOT REPORT BUGS IN OLD SOFTWARE RELEASES! Fetch the latest
|
|
release and see if the bug is still in that version of the software,
|
|
and if it's not, _then_ report it. It's okay to report bugs in the
|
|
latest patchlevel of a major version that's not the most recent major
|
|
version, though - for example, if you're running 2.0, you don't have
|
|
to upgrade to 3.0 before you can report bugs.
|
|
|
|
PLEASE DO NOT REPORT BUGS IF YOU ARE RUNNING A VERSION OF THE ISC
|
|
DHCP DISTRIBUTION THAT YOU DIDN'T GET FROM THE ISC! Free operating
|
|
system distributions are notorious for including outdated versions of
|
|
software, and also versions of software that were not compiled on your
|
|
particular version of the operating system. These versions
|
|
frequently do not work. Getting a source distribution from the ISC
|
|
and installing it frequently *does* work. Please try this *before*
|
|
asking for help.
|
|
|
|
PLEASE READ THIS README FILE CAREFULLY BEFORE REPORTING BUGS,
|
|
PARTICULARLY THE SECTION BELOW ON WHAT TO INCLUDE IN A BUG REPORT OR
|
|
HELP REQUEST.
|
|
|
|
PLEASE DO NOT SEND REQUESTS FOR SUPPORT DIRECTLY TO THE ENGINEERS WHO
|
|
WORK ON THE ISC DHCP DISTRIBUTION! *PARTICULARLY*, DO NOT SEND MAIL
|
|
TO THE ENGINEERS BECAUSE YOU AREN'T SURE TO WHOM YOU SHOULD SEND MAIL
|
|
- if you aren't sure, *ask* on the dhcp-server@isc.org or
|
|
dhcp-client@isc.org mailing list.
|
|
|
|
The number of people using the DHCP Distribution is sufficiently large
|
|
that if we take interrupts every time any one of those people runs
|
|
into trouble, we will never get any more coding done. If you send a
|
|
support request directly to any ISC or Nominum engineer, we will
|
|
forward it to the mailing list, or possibly ignore it, depending on
|
|
how much stress we are under at the time.
|
|
|
|
Please do not Cc: us on mail you send to these lists - we read both
|
|
mailing lists, so this just means we get two copies!
|
|
|
|
If your question can only be answered by one of the engineers, send it
|
|
to the appropriate public mailing list anyway - we will answer it
|
|
there. When we have time.
|
|
|
|
Please do not think "Oh, I don't want to bother the whole mailing list
|
|
with this question." If you are too embarrassed to ask publically,
|
|
get a support contract.
|
|
|
|
If you are concerned about bothering everybody on the list, that's
|
|
great, but that's what the list is there for. When you send mail to
|
|
one of the engineers, you are taking resources away from everybody on
|
|
the mailing list *anyway* - they just don't know it.
|
|
|
|
We're not writing this because we don't respect you - we really do
|
|
want to help you, and we appreciate your bug reports and comments.
|
|
But please use the mechanisms we have in place to provide you with
|
|
help, because otherwise you are almost certainly depriving someone
|
|
else of our help.
|
|
|
|
PLEASE DO NOT CALL US ON THE PHONE FOR HELP! Answering the phone
|
|
takes a lot more of our time and attention than answering email. If
|
|
you do call us on the phone, we will tell you to send email to the
|
|
mailing list or buy a support contract, so please don't waste your
|
|
time or ours. If you have a support contract, please use the support
|
|
channel mentioned in the support contract - otherwise you probably
|
|
won't get timely support unless you happen to ask an interesting
|
|
question and we happen to have some time to kill, because we can't
|
|
tell you're a support customer if you send mail to the public mailing
|
|
lists.
|
|
|
|
HOW TO REPORT BUGS OR REQUEST HELP
|
|
|
|
When you report bugs or ask for help, please provide us complete
|
|
information. A list of information we need follows. Please read it
|
|
carefully, and put all the information you can into your initial bug
|
|
report, so that we don't have to ask you any questions in order to
|
|
figure out your problem. If you need handholding support, please
|
|
consider contacting a commercial provider of the ISC DHCP
|
|
Distribution.
|
|
|
|
1. The specific operating system name and version of the
|
|
machine on which the DHCP server or client is running.
|
|
2. The specific operating system name and version of the
|
|
machine on which the client is running, if you are having
|
|
trouble getting a client working with the server.
|
|
3. If you're running Linux, the version number we care about is
|
|
the kernel version and maybe the library version, not the
|
|
distribution version - e.g., while we don't mind knowing
|
|
that you're running Redhat version mumble.foo, we must know
|
|
what kernel version you're running, and it helps if you can
|
|
tell us what version of the C library you're running,
|
|
although if you don't know that off the top of your head it
|
|
may be hard for you to figure it out, so don't go crazy
|
|
trying.
|
|
4. The specific version of the DHCP distribution you're
|
|
running, for example "2.0b1pl19", not "2.0".
|
|
5. Please explain the problem carefully, thinking through what
|
|
you're saying to ensure that you don't assume we know
|
|
something about your situation that we don't know.
|
|
6. Include your dhcpd.conf and dhcpd.leases file if they're not
|
|
huge (if they are huge, we may need them anyway, but don't
|
|
send them until you're asked). Huge means more than 100
|
|
kilobytes each.
|
|
7. Include a log of your server or client running until it
|
|
encounters the problem - for example, if you are having
|
|
trouble getting some client to get an address, restart the
|
|
server with the -d flag and then restart the client, and
|
|
send us what the server prints. Likewise, with the client,
|
|
include the output of the client as it fails to get an
|
|
address or otherwise does the wrong thing. Do not leave
|
|
out parts of the output that you think aren't interesting.
|
|
8. If the client or server is dumping core, please run the
|
|
debugger and get a stack trace, and include that in your
|
|
bug report. For example, if your debugger is gdb, do the
|
|
following:
|
|
|
|
gdb dhcpd dhcpd.core
|
|
(gdb) where
|
|
[...]
|
|
(gdb) quit
|
|
|
|
This assumes that it's the dhcp server you're debugging, and
|
|
that the core file is in dhcpd.core.
|
|
9. If you know that the problem is an actual bug, and you can
|
|
reproduce the bug, you can skip steps 6 through 8 and instead
|
|
capture a trace file using the -tf flag (see the man page for
|
|
details). If you do this, and there is anything in your
|
|
dhcp configuration that you are not willing to make public,
|
|
please send the trace file to dhcp-bugs@isc.org and NOT to
|
|
dhcp-server@isc.org, because the tracefile contains your entire
|
|
dhcp configuration.
|
|
|
|
PLEASE DO NOT send queries about non-isc clients to the dhcp-client
|
|
mailing list. If you're asking about them on an ISC mailing list,
|
|
it's probably because you're using the ISC DHCP server, so ask there.
|
|
If you are having problems with a client whose executable is called
|
|
dhcpcd, this is _not_ the ISC DHCP client, and we probably can't help
|
|
you with it.
|
|
|
|
Please see http://www.isc.org/services/public/lists/dhcp-lists.html
|
|
for details on how to subscribe to the ISC DHCP mailing lists.
|
|
|
|
|