freebsd-dev/lib/msun/ld128/s_expl.c
Warner Losh a8197ad3aa Remove sparc64 specific parts of libm and fix comments
Once upon a time, sparc64 was the only ld128 architecture. However,
both aarch64 and riscv are now such architectures. Many of the
comments about how slow multiplication was on old sparc64 processors
are now no longer true. However, since no evaluation has been done for
aarch64 yet, it's unclear if they are still relevant or not. If not,
the code should be changed. If so, the comments should remove the
uncertainty.

Reviewed by: emaste@
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23658
2020-02-26 18:55:03 +00:00

327 lines
10 KiB
C

/*-
* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD
*
* Copyright (c) 2009-2013 Steven G. Kargl
* All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
* are met:
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
* notice unmodified, this list of conditions, and the following
* disclaimer.
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
*
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES
* OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED.
* IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT,
* INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT
* NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
* DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
* THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
* (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF
* THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*
* Optimized by Bruce D. Evans.
*/
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
__FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
/*
* ld128 version of s_expl.c. See ../ld80/s_expl.c for most comments.
*/
#include <float.h>
#include "fpmath.h"
#include "math.h"
#include "math_private.h"
#include "k_expl.h"
/* XXX Prevent compilers from erroneously constant folding these: */
static const volatile long double
huge = 0x1p10000L,
tiny = 0x1p-10000L;
static const long double
twom10000 = 0x1p-10000L;
static const long double
/* log(2**16384 - 0.5) rounded towards zero: */
/* log(2**16384 - 0.5 + 1) rounded towards zero for expm1l() is the same: */
o_threshold = 11356.523406294143949491931077970763428L,
/* log(2**(-16381-64-1)) rounded towards zero: */
u_threshold = -11433.462743336297878837243843452621503L;
long double
expl(long double x)
{
union IEEEl2bits u;
long double hi, lo, t, twopk;
int k;
uint16_t hx, ix;
DOPRINT_START(&x);
/* Filter out exceptional cases. */
u.e = x;
hx = u.xbits.expsign;
ix = hx & 0x7fff;
if (ix >= BIAS + 13) { /* |x| >= 8192 or x is NaN */
if (ix == BIAS + LDBL_MAX_EXP) {
if (hx & 0x8000) /* x is -Inf or -NaN */
RETURNP(-1 / x);
RETURNP(x + x); /* x is +Inf or +NaN */
}
if (x > o_threshold)
RETURNP(huge * huge);
if (x < u_threshold)
RETURNP(tiny * tiny);
} else if (ix < BIAS - 114) { /* |x| < 0x1p-114 */
RETURN2P(1, x); /* 1 with inexact iff x != 0 */
}
ENTERI();
twopk = 1;
__k_expl(x, &hi, &lo, &k);
t = SUM2P(hi, lo);
/* Scale by 2**k. */
/*
* XXX sparc64 multiplication was so slow that scalbnl() is faster,
* but performance on aarch64 and riscv hasn't yet been quantified.
*/
if (k >= LDBL_MIN_EXP) {
if (k == LDBL_MAX_EXP)
RETURNI(t * 2 * 0x1p16383L);
SET_LDBL_EXPSIGN(twopk, BIAS + k);
RETURNI(t * twopk);
} else {
SET_LDBL_EXPSIGN(twopk, BIAS + k + 10000);
RETURNI(t * twopk * twom10000);
}
}
/*
* Our T1 and T2 are chosen to be approximately the points where method
* A and method B have the same accuracy. Tang's T1 and T2 are the
* points where method A's accuracy changes by a full bit. For Tang,
* this drop in accuracy makes method A immediately less accurate than
* method B, but our larger INTERVALS makes method A 2 bits more
* accurate so it remains the most accurate method significantly
* closer to the origin despite losing the full bit in our extended
* range for it.
*
* Split the interval [T1, T2] into two intervals [T1, T3] and [T3, T2].
* Setting T3 to 0 would require the |x| < 0x1p-113 condition to appear
* in both subintervals, so set T3 = 2**-5, which places the condition
* into the [T1, T3] interval.
*
* XXX we now do this more to (partially) balance the number of terms
* in the C and D polys than to avoid checking the condition in both
* intervals.
*
* XXX these micro-optimizations are excessive.
*/
static const double
T1 = -0.1659, /* ~-30.625/128 * log(2) */
T2 = 0.1659, /* ~30.625/128 * log(2) */
T3 = 0.03125;
/*
* Domain [-0.1659, 0.03125], range ~[2.9134e-44, 1.8404e-37]:
* |(exp(x)-1-x-x**2/2)/x - p(x)| < 2**-122.03
*
* XXX none of the long double C or D coeffs except C10 is correctly printed.
* If you re-print their values in %.35Le format, the result is always
* different. For example, the last 2 digits in C3 should be 59, not 67.
* 67 is apparently from rounding an extra-precision value to 36 decimal
* places.
*/
static const long double
C3 = 1.66666666666666666666666666666666667e-1L,
C4 = 4.16666666666666666666666666666666645e-2L,
C5 = 8.33333333333333333333333333333371638e-3L,
C6 = 1.38888888888888888888888888891188658e-3L,
C7 = 1.98412698412698412698412697235950394e-4L,
C8 = 2.48015873015873015873015112487849040e-5L,
C9 = 2.75573192239858906525606685484412005e-6L,
C10 = 2.75573192239858906612966093057020362e-7L,
C11 = 2.50521083854417203619031960151253944e-8L,
C12 = 2.08767569878679576457272282566520649e-9L,
C13 = 1.60590438367252471783548748824255707e-10L;
/*
* XXX this has 1 more coeff than needed.
* XXX can start the double coeffs but not the double mults at C10.
* With my coeffs (C10-C17 double; s = best_s):
* Domain [-0.1659, 0.03125], range ~[-1.1976e-37, 1.1976e-37]:
* |(exp(x)-1-x-x**2/2)/x - p(x)| ~< 2**-122.65
*/
static const double
C14 = 1.1470745580491932e-11, /* 0x1.93974a81dae30p-37 */
C15 = 7.6471620181090468e-13, /* 0x1.ae7f3820adab1p-41 */
C16 = 4.7793721460260450e-14, /* 0x1.ae7cd18a18eacp-45 */
C17 = 2.8074757356658877e-15, /* 0x1.949992a1937d9p-49 */
C18 = 1.4760610323699476e-16; /* 0x1.545b43aabfbcdp-53 */
/*
* Domain [0.03125, 0.1659], range ~[-2.7676e-37, -1.0367e-38]:
* |(exp(x)-1-x-x**2/2)/x - p(x)| < 2**-121.44
*/
static const long double
D3 = 1.66666666666666666666666666666682245e-1L,
D4 = 4.16666666666666666666666666634228324e-2L,
D5 = 8.33333333333333333333333364022244481e-3L,
D6 = 1.38888888888888888888887138722762072e-3L,
D7 = 1.98412698412698412699085805424661471e-4L,
D8 = 2.48015873015873015687993712101479612e-5L,
D9 = 2.75573192239858944101036288338208042e-6L,
D10 = 2.75573192239853161148064676533754048e-7L,
D11 = 2.50521083855084570046480450935267433e-8L,
D12 = 2.08767569819738524488686318024854942e-9L,
D13 = 1.60590442297008495301927448122499313e-10L;
/*
* XXX this has 1 more coeff than needed.
* XXX can start the double coeffs but not the double mults at D11.
* With my coeffs (D11-D16 double):
* Domain [0.03125, 0.1659], range ~[-1.1980e-37, 1.1980e-37]:
* |(exp(x)-1-x-x**2/2)/x - p(x)| ~< 2**-122.65
*/
static const double
D14 = 1.1470726176204336e-11, /* 0x1.93971dc395d9ep-37 */
D15 = 7.6478532249581686e-13, /* 0x1.ae892e3D16fcep-41 */
D16 = 4.7628892832607741e-14, /* 0x1.ad00Dfe41feccp-45 */
D17 = 3.0524857220358650e-15; /* 0x1.D7e8d886Df921p-49 */
long double
expm1l(long double x)
{
union IEEEl2bits u, v;
long double hx2_hi, hx2_lo, q, r, r1, t, twomk, twopk, x_hi;
long double x_lo, x2;
double dr, dx, fn, r2;
int k, n, n2;
uint16_t hx, ix;
DOPRINT_START(&x);
/* Filter out exceptional cases. */
u.e = x;
hx = u.xbits.expsign;
ix = hx & 0x7fff;
if (ix >= BIAS + 7) { /* |x| >= 128 or x is NaN */
if (ix == BIAS + LDBL_MAX_EXP) {
if (hx & 0x8000) /* x is -Inf or -NaN */
RETURNP(-1 / x - 1);
RETURNP(x + x); /* x is +Inf or +NaN */
}
if (x > o_threshold)
RETURNP(huge * huge);
/*
* expm1l() never underflows, but it must avoid
* unrepresentable large negative exponents. We used a
* much smaller threshold for large |x| above than in
* expl() so as to handle not so large negative exponents
* in the same way as large ones here.
*/
if (hx & 0x8000) /* x <= -128 */
RETURN2P(tiny, -1); /* good for x < -114ln2 - eps */
}
ENTERI();
if (T1 < x && x < T2) {
x2 = x * x;
dx = x;
if (x < T3) {
if (ix < BIAS - 113) { /* |x| < 0x1p-113 */
/* x (rounded) with inexact if x != 0: */
RETURNPI(x == 0 ? x :
(0x1p200 * x + fabsl(x)) * 0x1p-200);
}
q = x * x2 * C3 + x2 * x2 * (C4 + x * (C5 + x * (C6 +
x * (C7 + x * (C8 + x * (C9 + x * (C10 +
x * (C11 + x * (C12 + x * (C13 +
dx * (C14 + dx * (C15 + dx * (C16 +
dx * (C17 + dx * C18))))))))))))));
} else {
q = x * x2 * D3 + x2 * x2 * (D4 + x * (D5 + x * (D6 +
x * (D7 + x * (D8 + x * (D9 + x * (D10 +
x * (D11 + x * (D12 + x * (D13 +
dx * (D14 + dx * (D15 + dx * (D16 +
dx * D17)))))))))))));
}
x_hi = (float)x;
x_lo = x - x_hi;
hx2_hi = x_hi * x_hi / 2;
hx2_lo = x_lo * (x + x_hi) / 2;
if (ix >= BIAS - 7)
RETURN2PI(hx2_hi + x_hi, hx2_lo + x_lo + q);
else
RETURN2PI(x, hx2_lo + q + hx2_hi);
}
/* Reduce x to (k*ln2 + endpoint[n2] + r1 + r2). */
fn = rnint((double)x * INV_L);
n = irint(fn);
n2 = (unsigned)n % INTERVALS;
k = n >> LOG2_INTERVALS;
r1 = x - fn * L1;
r2 = fn * -L2;
r = r1 + r2;
/* Prepare scale factor. */
v.e = 1;
v.xbits.expsign = BIAS + k;
twopk = v.e;
/*
* Evaluate lower terms of
* expl(endpoint[n2] + r1 + r2) = tbl[n2] * expl(r1 + r2).
*/
dr = r;
q = r2 + r * r * (A2 + r * (A3 + r * (A4 + r * (A5 + r * (A6 +
dr * (A7 + dr * (A8 + dr * (A9 + dr * A10))))))));
t = tbl[n2].lo + tbl[n2].hi;
if (k == 0) {
t = SUM2P(tbl[n2].hi - 1, tbl[n2].lo * (r1 + 1) + t * q +
tbl[n2].hi * r1);
RETURNI(t);
}
if (k == -1) {
t = SUM2P(tbl[n2].hi - 2, tbl[n2].lo * (r1 + 1) + t * q +
tbl[n2].hi * r1);
RETURNI(t / 2);
}
if (k < -7) {
t = SUM2P(tbl[n2].hi, tbl[n2].lo + t * (q + r1));
RETURNI(t * twopk - 1);
}
if (k > 2 * LDBL_MANT_DIG - 1) {
t = SUM2P(tbl[n2].hi, tbl[n2].lo + t * (q + r1));
if (k == LDBL_MAX_EXP)
RETURNI(t * 2 * 0x1p16383L - 1);
RETURNI(t * twopk - 1);
}
v.xbits.expsign = BIAS - k;
twomk = v.e;
if (k > LDBL_MANT_DIG - 1)
t = SUM2P(tbl[n2].hi, tbl[n2].lo - twomk + t * (q + r1));
else
t = SUM2P(tbl[n2].hi - twomk, tbl[n2].lo + t * (q + r1));
RETURNI(t * twopk);
}