freebsd-dev/module/zfs/multilist.c
Richard Yao fdc2d30371
Cleanup: Specify unsignedness on things that should not be signed
In #13871, zfs_vdev_aggregation_limit_non_rotating and
zfs_vdev_aggregation_limit being signed was pointed out as a possible
reason not to eliminate an unnecessary MAX(unsigned, 0) since the
unsigned value was assigned from them.

There is no reason for these module parameters to be signed and upon
inspection, it was found that there are a number of other module
parameters that are signed, but should not be, so we make them unsigned.
Making them unsigned made it clear that some other variables in the code
should also be unsigned, so we also make those unsigned. This prevents
users from setting negative values that could potentially cause bad
behaviors. It also makes the code slightly easier to understand.

Mostly module parameters that deal with timeouts, limits, bitshifts and
percentages are made unsigned by this. Any that are boolean are left
signed, since whether booleans should be considered signed or unsigned
does not matter.

Making zfs_arc_lotsfree_percent unsigned caused a
`zfs_arc_lotsfree_percent >= 0` check to become redundant, so it was
removed. Removing the check was also necessary to prevent a compiler
error from -Werror=type-limits.

Several end of line comments had to be moved to their own lines because
replacing int with uint_t caused us to exceed the 80 character limit
enforced by cstyle.pl.

The following were kept signed because they are passed to
taskq_create(), which expects signed values and modifying the
OpenSolaris/Illumos DDI is out of scope of this patch:

	* metaslab_load_pct
	* zfs_sync_taskq_batch_pct
	* zfs_zil_clean_taskq_nthr_pct
	* zfs_zil_clean_taskq_minalloc
	* zfs_zil_clean_taskq_maxalloc
	* zfs_arc_prune_task_threads

Also, negative values in those parameters was found to be harmless.

The following were left signed because either negative values make
sense, or more analysis was needed to determine whether negative values
should be disallowed:

	* zfs_metaslab_switch_threshold
	* zfs_pd_bytes_max
	* zfs_livelist_min_percent_shared

zfs_multihost_history was made static to be consistent with other
parameters.

A number of module parameters were marked as signed, but in reality
referenced unsigned variables. upgrade_errlog_limit is one of the
numerous examples. In the case of zfs_vdev_async_read_max_active, it was
already uint32_t, but zdb had an extern int declaration for it.

Interestingly, the documentation in zfs.4 was right for
upgrade_errlog_limit despite the module parameter being wrongly marked,
while the documentation for zfs_vdev_async_read_max_active (and friends)
was wrong. It was also wrong for zstd_abort_size, which was unsigned,
but was documented as signed.

Also, the documentation in zfs.4 incorrectly described the following
parameters as ulong when they were int:

	* zfs_arc_meta_adjust_restarts
	* zfs_override_estimate_recordsize

They are now uint_t as of this patch and thus the man page has been
updated to describe them as uint.

dbuf_state_index was left alone since it does nothing and perhaps should
be removed in another patch.

If any module parameters were missed, they were not found by `grep -r
'ZFS_MODULE_PARAM' | grep ', INT'`. I did find a few that grep missed,
but only because they were in files that had hits.

This patch intentionally did not attempt to address whether some of
these module parameters should be elevated to 64-bit parameters, because
the length of a long on 32-bit is 32-bit.

Lastly, it was pointed out during review that uint_t is a better match
for these variables than uint32_t because FreeBSD kernel parameter
definitions are designed for uint_t, whose bit width can change in
future memory models.  As a result, we change the existing parameters
that are uint32_t to use uint_t.

Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa <ngompa@datto.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu>
Closes #13875
2022-09-27 16:42:41 -07:00

430 lines
12 KiB
C

/*
* CDDL HEADER START
*
* This file and its contents are supplied under the terms of the
* Common Development and Distribution License ("CDDL"), version 1.0.
* You may only use this file in accordance with the terms of version
* 1.0 of the CDDL.
*
* A full copy of the text of the CDDL should have accompanied this
* source. A copy of the CDDL is also available via the Internet at
* http://www.illumos.org/license/CDDL.
*
* CDDL HEADER END
*/
/*
* Copyright (c) 2013, 2017 by Delphix. All rights reserved.
*/
#include <sys/zfs_context.h>
#include <sys/multilist.h>
#include <sys/trace_zfs.h>
/*
* This overrides the number of sublists in each multilist_t, which defaults
* to the number of CPUs in the system (see multilist_create()).
*/
uint_t zfs_multilist_num_sublists = 0;
/*
* Given the object contained on the list, return a pointer to the
* object's multilist_node_t structure it contains.
*/
#ifdef ZFS_DEBUG
static multilist_node_t *
multilist_d2l(multilist_t *ml, void *obj)
{
return ((multilist_node_t *)((char *)obj + ml->ml_offset));
}
#else
#define multilist_d2l(ml, obj) ((void) sizeof (ml), (void) sizeof (obj), NULL)
#endif
/*
* Initialize a new mutlilist using the parameters specified.
*
* - 'size' denotes the size of the structure containing the
* multilist_node_t.
* - 'offset' denotes the byte offset of the mutlilist_node_t within
* the structure that contains it.
* - 'num' specifies the number of internal sublists to create.
* - 'index_func' is used to determine which sublist to insert into
* when the multilist_insert() function is called; as well as which
* sublist to remove from when multilist_remove() is called. The
* requirements this function must meet, are the following:
*
* - It must always return the same value when called on the same
* object (to ensure the object is removed from the list it was
* inserted into).
*
* - It must return a value in the range [0, number of sublists).
* The multilist_get_num_sublists() function may be used to
* determine the number of sublists in the multilist.
*
* Also, in order to reduce internal contention between the sublists
* during insertion and removal, this function should choose evenly
* between all available sublists when inserting. This isn't a hard
* requirement, but a general rule of thumb in order to garner the
* best multi-threaded performance out of the data structure.
*/
static void
multilist_create_impl(multilist_t *ml, size_t size, size_t offset,
uint_t num, multilist_sublist_index_func_t *index_func)
{
ASSERT3U(size, >, 0);
ASSERT3U(size, >=, offset + sizeof (multilist_node_t));
ASSERT3U(num, >, 0);
ASSERT3P(index_func, !=, NULL);
ml->ml_offset = offset;
ml->ml_num_sublists = num;
ml->ml_index_func = index_func;
ml->ml_sublists = kmem_zalloc(sizeof (multilist_sublist_t) *
ml->ml_num_sublists, KM_SLEEP);
ASSERT3P(ml->ml_sublists, !=, NULL);
for (int i = 0; i < ml->ml_num_sublists; i++) {
multilist_sublist_t *mls = &ml->ml_sublists[i];
mutex_init(&mls->mls_lock, NULL, MUTEX_NOLOCKDEP, NULL);
list_create(&mls->mls_list, size, offset);
}
}
/*
* Allocate a new multilist, using the default number of sublists (the number
* of CPUs, or at least 4, or the tunable zfs_multilist_num_sublists). Note
* that the multilists do not expand if more CPUs are hot-added. In that case,
* we will have less fanout than boot_ncpus, but we don't want to always
* reserve the RAM necessary to create the extra slots for additional CPUs up
* front, and dynamically adding them is a complex task.
*/
void
multilist_create(multilist_t *ml, size_t size, size_t offset,
multilist_sublist_index_func_t *index_func)
{
uint_t num_sublists;
if (zfs_multilist_num_sublists > 0) {
num_sublists = zfs_multilist_num_sublists;
} else {
num_sublists = MAX(boot_ncpus, 4);
}
multilist_create_impl(ml, size, offset, num_sublists, index_func);
}
/*
* Destroy the given multilist object, and free up any memory it holds.
*/
void
multilist_destroy(multilist_t *ml)
{
ASSERT(multilist_is_empty(ml));
for (int i = 0; i < ml->ml_num_sublists; i++) {
multilist_sublist_t *mls = &ml->ml_sublists[i];
ASSERT(list_is_empty(&mls->mls_list));
list_destroy(&mls->mls_list);
mutex_destroy(&mls->mls_lock);
}
ASSERT3P(ml->ml_sublists, !=, NULL);
kmem_free(ml->ml_sublists,
sizeof (multilist_sublist_t) * ml->ml_num_sublists);
ml->ml_num_sublists = 0;
ml->ml_offset = 0;
ml->ml_sublists = NULL;
}
/*
* Insert the given object into the multilist.
*
* This function will insert the object specified into the sublist
* determined using the function given at multilist creation time.
*
* The sublist locks are automatically acquired if not already held, to
* ensure consistency when inserting and removing from multiple threads.
*/
void
multilist_insert(multilist_t *ml, void *obj)
{
unsigned int sublist_idx = ml->ml_index_func(ml, obj);
multilist_sublist_t *mls;
boolean_t need_lock;
DTRACE_PROBE3(multilist__insert, multilist_t *, ml,
unsigned int, sublist_idx, void *, obj);
ASSERT3U(sublist_idx, <, ml->ml_num_sublists);
mls = &ml->ml_sublists[sublist_idx];
/*
* Note: Callers may already hold the sublist lock by calling
* multilist_sublist_lock(). Here we rely on MUTEX_HELD()
* returning TRUE if and only if the current thread holds the
* lock. While it's a little ugly to make the lock recursive in
* this way, it works and allows the calling code to be much
* simpler -- otherwise it would have to pass around a flag
* indicating that it already has the lock.
*/
need_lock = !MUTEX_HELD(&mls->mls_lock);
if (need_lock)
mutex_enter(&mls->mls_lock);
ASSERT(!multilist_link_active(multilist_d2l(ml, obj)));
multilist_sublist_insert_head(mls, obj);
if (need_lock)
mutex_exit(&mls->mls_lock);
}
/*
* Remove the given object from the multilist.
*
* This function will remove the object specified from the sublist
* determined using the function given at multilist creation time.
*
* The necessary sublist locks are automatically acquired, to ensure
* consistency when inserting and removing from multiple threads.
*/
void
multilist_remove(multilist_t *ml, void *obj)
{
unsigned int sublist_idx = ml->ml_index_func(ml, obj);
multilist_sublist_t *mls;
boolean_t need_lock;
DTRACE_PROBE3(multilist__remove, multilist_t *, ml,
unsigned int, sublist_idx, void *, obj);
ASSERT3U(sublist_idx, <, ml->ml_num_sublists);
mls = &ml->ml_sublists[sublist_idx];
/* See comment in multilist_insert(). */
need_lock = !MUTEX_HELD(&mls->mls_lock);
if (need_lock)
mutex_enter(&mls->mls_lock);
ASSERT(multilist_link_active(multilist_d2l(ml, obj)));
multilist_sublist_remove(mls, obj);
if (need_lock)
mutex_exit(&mls->mls_lock);
}
/*
* Check to see if this multilist object is empty.
*
* This will return TRUE if it finds all of the sublists of this
* multilist to be empty, and FALSE otherwise. Each sublist lock will be
* automatically acquired as necessary.
*
* If concurrent insertions and removals are occurring, the semantics
* of this function become a little fuzzy. Instead of locking all
* sublists for the entire call time of the function, each sublist is
* only locked as it is individually checked for emptiness. Thus, it's
* possible for this function to return TRUE with non-empty sublists at
* the time the function returns. This would be due to another thread
* inserting into a given sublist, after that specific sublist was check
* and deemed empty, but before all sublists have been checked.
*/
int
multilist_is_empty(multilist_t *ml)
{
for (int i = 0; i < ml->ml_num_sublists; i++) {
multilist_sublist_t *mls = &ml->ml_sublists[i];
/* See comment in multilist_insert(). */
boolean_t need_lock = !MUTEX_HELD(&mls->mls_lock);
if (need_lock)
mutex_enter(&mls->mls_lock);
if (!list_is_empty(&mls->mls_list)) {
if (need_lock)
mutex_exit(&mls->mls_lock);
return (FALSE);
}
if (need_lock)
mutex_exit(&mls->mls_lock);
}
return (TRUE);
}
/* Return the number of sublists composing this multilist */
unsigned int
multilist_get_num_sublists(multilist_t *ml)
{
return (ml->ml_num_sublists);
}
/* Return a randomly selected, valid sublist index for this multilist */
unsigned int
multilist_get_random_index(multilist_t *ml)
{
return (random_in_range(ml->ml_num_sublists));
}
/* Lock and return the sublist specified at the given index */
multilist_sublist_t *
multilist_sublist_lock(multilist_t *ml, unsigned int sublist_idx)
{
multilist_sublist_t *mls;
ASSERT3U(sublist_idx, <, ml->ml_num_sublists);
mls = &ml->ml_sublists[sublist_idx];
mutex_enter(&mls->mls_lock);
return (mls);
}
/* Lock and return the sublist that would be used to store the specified obj */
multilist_sublist_t *
multilist_sublist_lock_obj(multilist_t *ml, void *obj)
{
return (multilist_sublist_lock(ml, ml->ml_index_func(ml, obj)));
}
void
multilist_sublist_unlock(multilist_sublist_t *mls)
{
mutex_exit(&mls->mls_lock);
}
/*
* We're allowing any object to be inserted into this specific sublist,
* but this can lead to trouble if multilist_remove() is called to
* remove this object. Specifically, if calling ml_index_func on this
* object returns an index for sublist different than what is passed as
* a parameter here, any call to multilist_remove() with this newly
* inserted object is undefined! (the call to multilist_remove() will
* remove the object from a list that it isn't contained in)
*/
void
multilist_sublist_insert_head(multilist_sublist_t *mls, void *obj)
{
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&mls->mls_lock));
list_insert_head(&mls->mls_list, obj);
}
/* please see comment above multilist_sublist_insert_head */
void
multilist_sublist_insert_tail(multilist_sublist_t *mls, void *obj)
{
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&mls->mls_lock));
list_insert_tail(&mls->mls_list, obj);
}
/*
* Move the object one element forward in the list.
*
* This function will move the given object forward in the list (towards
* the head) by one object. So, in essence, it will swap its position in
* the list with its "prev" pointer. If the given object is already at the
* head of the list, it cannot be moved forward any more than it already
* is, so no action is taken.
*
* NOTE: This function **must not** remove any object from the list other
* than the object given as the parameter. This is relied upon in
* arc_evict_state_impl().
*/
void
multilist_sublist_move_forward(multilist_sublist_t *mls, void *obj)
{
void *prev = list_prev(&mls->mls_list, obj);
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&mls->mls_lock));
ASSERT(!list_is_empty(&mls->mls_list));
/* 'obj' must be at the head of the list, nothing to do */
if (prev == NULL)
return;
list_remove(&mls->mls_list, obj);
list_insert_before(&mls->mls_list, prev, obj);
}
void
multilist_sublist_remove(multilist_sublist_t *mls, void *obj)
{
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&mls->mls_lock));
list_remove(&mls->mls_list, obj);
}
int
multilist_sublist_is_empty(multilist_sublist_t *mls)
{
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&mls->mls_lock));
return (list_is_empty(&mls->mls_list));
}
int
multilist_sublist_is_empty_idx(multilist_t *ml, unsigned int sublist_idx)
{
multilist_sublist_t *mls;
int empty;
ASSERT3U(sublist_idx, <, ml->ml_num_sublists);
mls = &ml->ml_sublists[sublist_idx];
ASSERT(!MUTEX_HELD(&mls->mls_lock));
mutex_enter(&mls->mls_lock);
empty = list_is_empty(&mls->mls_list);
mutex_exit(&mls->mls_lock);
return (empty);
}
void *
multilist_sublist_head(multilist_sublist_t *mls)
{
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&mls->mls_lock));
return (list_head(&mls->mls_list));
}
void *
multilist_sublist_tail(multilist_sublist_t *mls)
{
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&mls->mls_lock));
return (list_tail(&mls->mls_list));
}
void *
multilist_sublist_next(multilist_sublist_t *mls, void *obj)
{
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&mls->mls_lock));
return (list_next(&mls->mls_list, obj));
}
void *
multilist_sublist_prev(multilist_sublist_t *mls, void *obj)
{
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&mls->mls_lock));
return (list_prev(&mls->mls_list, obj));
}
void
multilist_link_init(multilist_node_t *link)
{
list_link_init(link);
}
int
multilist_link_active(multilist_node_t *link)
{
return (list_link_active(link));
}
ZFS_MODULE_PARAM(zfs, zfs_, multilist_num_sublists, UINT, ZMOD_RW,
"Number of sublists used in each multilist");