.. | ||
IPA | ||
AliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
AliasAnalysisCounter.cpp | ||
AliasAnalysisEvaluator.cpp | ||
AliasDebugger.cpp | ||
AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
Analysis.cpp | ||
BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
BlockFrequencyInfo.cpp | ||
BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp | ||
CaptureTracking.cpp | ||
CFG.cpp | ||
CFGPrinter.cpp | ||
CMakeLists.txt | ||
CodeMetrics.cpp | ||
ConstantFolding.cpp | ||
CostModel.cpp | ||
Delinearization.cpp | ||
DependenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
DominanceFrontier.cpp | ||
DomPrinter.cpp | ||
InstCount.cpp | ||
InstructionSimplify.cpp | ||
Interval.cpp | ||
IntervalPartition.cpp | ||
IVUsers.cpp | ||
LazyValueInfo.cpp | ||
LibCallAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
LibCallSemantics.cpp | ||
Lint.cpp | ||
LLVMBuild.txt | ||
Loads.cpp | ||
LoopInfo.cpp | ||
LoopPass.cpp | ||
Makefile | ||
MemDepPrinter.cpp | ||
MemoryBuiltins.cpp | ||
MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
ModuleDebugInfoPrinter.cpp | ||
NoAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
PHITransAddr.cpp | ||
PostDominators.cpp | ||
PtrUseVisitor.cpp | ||
README.txt | ||
RegionInfo.cpp | ||
RegionPass.cpp | ||
RegionPrinter.cpp | ||
ScalarEvolution.cpp | ||
ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp | ||
ScalarEvolutionNormalization.cpp | ||
SparsePropagation.cpp | ||
TargetTransformInfo.cpp | ||
Trace.cpp | ||
TypeBasedAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
ValueTracking.cpp |
Analysis Opportunities: //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this: {1,+,3,+,2}<loop> Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n)) In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic, which is very inefficient when expanded into code. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll, ScalarEvolution is forming this expression: ((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))) This could be folded to (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)) //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//