freebsd-dev/tests
John Baldwin 9e0aaedd70 Split netinet shell tests into one per line.
This makes diffs when adding or removing tests easier to read.

While here, sort the list of tests.

Reviewed by:	kevans, melifaro, asomers, markj, emaste
Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36908
2022-10-28 13:36:12 -07:00
..
atf_python tests: add routing tests for switching between same prefixes 2022-08-07 19:45:25 +00:00
etc Add supporting changes for Add limited sandbox capability to "make check" 2017-08-14 19:21:37 +00:00
freebsd_test_suite testing: move atf-pytest-wrapper to /usr/libexec 2022-06-26 13:25:47 +00:00
sys Split netinet shell tests into one per line. 2022-10-28 13:36:12 -07:00
__init__.py testing: Add basic atf support to pytest. 2022-06-25 19:25:15 +00:00
conftest.py testing: pass ATF vars to pytest via env instead of arguments. 2022-06-28 12:20:16 +00:00
Kyuafile
Makefile testing: move atf-pytest-wrapper to /usr/libexec 2022-06-26 13:25:47 +00:00
Makefile.depend
Makefile.inc0 Use bsd.opts.mk, not src.opts.mk 2017-08-03 00:35:35 +00:00
README Revert "wpa: Import wpa 2.10." 2022-01-18 08:10:33 -08:00

src/tests: The FreeBSD test suite
=================================

Usage of the FreeBSD test suite:
(1)  Run the tests:
       kyua test -k /usr/tests/Kyuafile
(2)  See the test results:
       kyua report

For further information on using the test suite, read tests(7):
       man tests

Description of FreeBSD test suite
=================================
The build of the test suite is organized in the following manner:

* The build of all test artifacts is protected by the MK_TESTS knob.
  The user can disable these with the WITHOUT_TESTS setting in
  src.conf(5).

* The goal for /usr/tests/ (the installed test programs) is to follow
  the same hierarchy as /usr/src/ wherever possible, which in turn drives
  several of the design decisions described below.  This simplifies the
  discoverability of tests.  We want a mapping such as:

    /usr/src/bin/cp/      -> /usr/tests/bin/cp/
    /usr/src/lib/libc/    -> /usr/tests/lib/libc/
    /usr/src/usr.bin/cut/ -> /usr/tests/usr.bin/cut/
    ... and many more ...

* Test programs for specific utilities and libraries are located next
  to the source code of such programs.  For example, the tests for the
  src/lib/libcrypt/ library live in src/lib/libcrypt/tests/.  The tests/
  subdirectory is optional and should, in general, be avoided.

* The src/tests/ hierarchy (this directory) provides generic test
  infrastructure and glue code to join all test programs together into
  a single test suite definition.

* The src/tests/ hierarchy also includes cross-functional test programs:
  i.e. test programs that cover more than a single utility or library
  and thus don't fit anywhere else in the tree.  Consider this to follow
  the same rationale as src/share/man/: this directory contains generic
  manual pages while the manual pages that are specific to individual
  tools or libraries live next to the source code.

In order to keep the src/tests/ hierarchy decoupled from the actual test
programs being installed --which is a worthy goal because it simplifies
the addition of new test programs and simplifies the maintenance of the
tree-- the top-level Kyuafile does not know which subdirectories may
exist upfront.  Instead, such Kyuafile automatically detects, at
run-time, which */Kyuafile files exist and uses those directly.

Similarly, every directory in src/ that wants to install a Kyuafile to
just recurse into other subdirectories reuses this Kyuafile with
auto-discovery features.  As an example, take a look at src/lib/tests/
whose sole purpose is to install a Kyuafile into /usr/tests/lib/.
The goal in this specific case is for /usr/tests/lib/ to be generated
entirely from src/lib/.

-- 
$FreeBSD$