d0615c64a5
beneath it. Reviewed by: rwatson
219 lines
9.2 KiB
Plaintext
219 lines
9.2 KiB
Plaintext
.\"
|
|
.\" $FreeBSD$
|
|
.\"
|
|
.NH
|
|
Managing Jails and the Jail File System Environment
|
|
.NH 2
|
|
Creating a Jail Environment
|
|
.PP
|
|
While the jail(2) call could be used in a number of ways, the expected
|
|
configuration creates a complete FreeBSD installation for each jail.
|
|
This includes copies of all relevant system binaries, data files, and its
|
|
own \fC/etc\fP directory.
|
|
Such a configuration maximises the independence of various jails,
|
|
and reduces the chances of interference between jails being possible,
|
|
especially when it is desirable to provide root access within a jail to
|
|
a less trusted user.
|
|
.PP
|
|
On a box making use of the jail facility, we refer to two types of
|
|
environment: the host environment, and the jail environment.
|
|
The host environment is the real operating system environment, which is
|
|
used to configure interfaces, and start up the jails.
|
|
There are then one or more jail environments, effectively virtual
|
|
FreeBSD machines.
|
|
When configuring Jail for use, it is necessary to configure both the
|
|
host and jail environments to prevent overlap.
|
|
.PP
|
|
As jailed virtual machines are generally bound to an IP address configured
|
|
using the normal IP alias mechanism, those jail IP addresses are also
|
|
accessible to host environment applications to use.
|
|
If the accessibility of some host applications in the jail environment is
|
|
not desirable, it is necessary to configure those applications to only
|
|
listen on appropriate addresses.
|
|
.PP
|
|
In most of the production environments where jail is currently in use,
|
|
one IP address is allocated to the host environment, and then a number
|
|
are allocated to jail boxes, with each jail box receiving a unique IP.
|
|
In this situation, it is sufficient to configure the networking applications
|
|
on the host to listen only on the host IP.
|
|
Generally, this consists of specifying the appropriate IP address to be
|
|
used by inetd and SSH, and disabling applications that are not capable
|
|
of limiting their address scope, such as sendmail, the port mapper, and
|
|
syslogd.
|
|
Other third party applications that have been installed on the host must also be
|
|
configured in this manner, or users connecting to the jailbox will
|
|
discover the host environment service, unless the jailbox has
|
|
specifically bound a service to that port.
|
|
In some situations, this can actually be the desirable behaviour.
|
|
.PP
|
|
The jail environments must also be custom-configured.
|
|
This consists of building and installing a miniature version of the
|
|
FreeBSD file system tree off of a subdirectory in the host environment,
|
|
usually \fC/usr/jail\fP, or \fC/data/jail\fP, with a subdirectory per jail.
|
|
Appropriate instructions for generating this tree are included in the
|
|
jail(8) man page, but generally this process may be automated using the
|
|
FreeBSD build environment.
|
|
.PP
|
|
One notable difference from the default FreeBSD install is that only
|
|
a limited set of device nodes should be created.
|
|
MAKEDEV(8) has been modified to accept a ``jail'' argument that creates
|
|
the correct set of nodes.
|
|
.PP
|
|
To improve storage efficiency, a fair number of the binaries in the system tree
|
|
may be deleted, as they are not relevant in a jail environment.
|
|
This includes the kernel, boot loader, and related files, as well as
|
|
hardware and network configuration tools.
|
|
.PP
|
|
After the creation of the jail tree, the easiest way to configure it is
|
|
to start up the jail in single-user mode.
|
|
The sysinstall admin tool may be used to help with the task, although
|
|
it is not installed by default as part of the system tree.
|
|
These tools should be run in the jail environment, or they will affect
|
|
the host environment's configuration.
|
|
.DS
|
|
.ft C
|
|
.ps -2
|
|
# mkdir /data/jail/192.168.11.100/stand
|
|
# cp /stand/sysinstall /data/jail/192.168.11.100/stand
|
|
# jail /data/jail/192.168.11.100 testhostname 192.168.11.100 \e
|
|
/bin/sh
|
|
.ps +2
|
|
.R
|
|
.DE
|
|
.PP
|
|
After running the jail command, the shell is now within the jail environment,
|
|
and all further commands
|
|
will be limited to the scope of the jail until the shell exits.
|
|
If the network alias has not yet been configured, then the jail will be
|
|
unable to access the network.
|
|
.PP
|
|
The startup configuration of the jail environment may be configured so
|
|
as to quell warnings from services that cannot run in the jail.
|
|
Also, any per-system configuration required for a normal FreeBSD system
|
|
is also required for each jailbox.
|
|
Typically, this includes:
|
|
.IP "" 5n
|
|
\(bu Create empty /etc/fstab
|
|
.IP
|
|
\(bu Disable portmapper
|
|
.IP
|
|
\(bu Run newaliases
|
|
.IP
|
|
\(bu Disabling interface configuration
|
|
.IP
|
|
\(bu Configure the resolver
|
|
.IP
|
|
\(bu Set root password
|
|
.IP
|
|
\(bu Set timezone
|
|
.IP
|
|
\(bu Add any local accounts
|
|
.IP
|
|
\(bu Install any packets
|
|
.NH 2
|
|
Starting Jails
|
|
.PP
|
|
Jails are typically started by executing their /etc/rc script in much
|
|
the same manner a shell was started in the previous section.
|
|
Before starting the jail, any relevant networking configuration
|
|
should also be performed.
|
|
Typically, this involves adding an additional IP address to the
|
|
appropriate network interface, setting network properties for the
|
|
IP address using IP filtering, forwarding, and bandwidth shaping,
|
|
and mounting a process file system for the jail, if the ability to
|
|
debug processes from within the jail is desired.
|
|
.DS
|
|
.ft C
|
|
.ps -2
|
|
# ifconfig ed0 inet add 192.168.11.100 netmask 255.255.255.255
|
|
# mount -t procfs proc /data/jail/192.168.11.100/proc
|
|
# jail /data/jail/192.168.11.100 testhostname 192.168.11.100 \e
|
|
/bin/sh /etc/rc
|
|
.ps +2
|
|
.ft P
|
|
.DE
|
|
.PP
|
|
A few warnings are generated for sysctl's that are not permitted
|
|
to be set within the jail, but the end result is a set of processes
|
|
in an isolated process environment, bound to a single IP address.
|
|
Normal procedures for accessing a FreeBSD machine apply: telneting in
|
|
through the network reveals a telnet prompt, login, and shell.
|
|
.DS
|
|
.ft C
|
|
.ps -2
|
|
% ps ax
|
|
PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND
|
|
228 ?? SsJ 0:18.73 syslogd
|
|
247 ?? IsJ 0:00.05 inetd -wW
|
|
249 ?? IsJ 0:28.43 cron
|
|
252 ?? SsJ 0:30.46 sendmail: accepting connections on port 25
|
|
291 ?? IsJ 0:38.53 /usr/local/sbin/sshd
|
|
93694 ?? SJ 0:01.01 sshd: rwatson@ttyp0 (sshd)
|
|
93695 p0 SsJ 0:00.06 -csh (csh)
|
|
93700 p0 R+J 0:00.00 ps ax
|
|
.ps +2
|
|
.ft P
|
|
.DE
|
|
.PP
|
|
It is immediately obvious that the environment is within a jailbox: there
|
|
is no init process, no kernel daemons, and a J flag is present beside all
|
|
processes indicating the presence of a jail.
|
|
.PP
|
|
As with any FreeBSD system, accounts may be created and deleted,
|
|
mail is delivered, logs are generated, packages may be added, and the
|
|
system may be hacked into if configured incorrectly, or running a buggy
|
|
version of a piece of software.
|
|
However, all of this happens strictly within the scope of the jail.
|
|
.NH 2
|
|
Jail Management
|
|
.PP
|
|
Jail management is an interesting prospect, as there are two perspectives
|
|
from which a jail environment may be administered: from within the jail,
|
|
and from the host environment.
|
|
From within the jail, as described above, the process is remarkably similar
|
|
to any regular FreeBSD install, although certain actions are prohibited,
|
|
such as mounting file systems, modifying system kernel properties, etc.
|
|
The only area that really differs are that of shutting
|
|
the system down: the processes within the jail may deliver signals
|
|
between them, allowing all processes to be killed, but bringing the
|
|
system back up requires intervention from outside of the jailbox.
|
|
.PP
|
|
From outside of the jail, there are a range of capabilities, as well
|
|
as limitations.
|
|
The jail environment is, in effect, a subset of the host environment:
|
|
the jail file system appears as part of the host file system, and may
|
|
be directly modified by processes in the host environment.
|
|
Processes within the jail appear in the process listing of the host,
|
|
and may likewise be signalled or debugged.
|
|
The host process file system makes the hostname of the jail environment
|
|
accessible in /proc/procnum/status, allowing utilities in the host
|
|
environment to manage processes based on jailname.
|
|
However, the default configuration allows privileged processes within
|
|
jails to set the hostname of the jail, which makes the status file less
|
|
useful from a management perspective if the contents of the jail are
|
|
malicious.
|
|
To prevent a jail from changing its hostname, the
|
|
"security.jail.set_hostname_allowed" sysctl may be set to 0 prior to
|
|
starting any jails.
|
|
.PP
|
|
One aspect immediately observable in an environment with multiple jails
|
|
is that uids and gids are local to each jail environment: the uid associated
|
|
with a process in one jail may be for a different user than in another
|
|
jail.
|
|
This collision of identifiers is only visible in the host environment,
|
|
as normally processes from one jail are never visible in an environment
|
|
with another scope for user/uid and group/gid mapping.
|
|
Managers in the host environment should understand these scoping issues,
|
|
or confusion and unintended consequences may result.
|
|
.PP
|
|
Jailed processes are subject to the normal restrictions present for
|
|
any processes, including resource limits, and limits placed by the network
|
|
code, including firewall rules.
|
|
By specifying firewall rules for the IP address bound to a jail, it is
|
|
possible to place connectivity and bandwidth limitations on individual
|
|
jails, restricting services that may be consumed or offered.
|
|
.PP
|
|
Management of jails is an area that will see further improvement in
|
|
future versions of FreeBSD. Some of these potential improvements are
|
|
discussed later in this paper.
|