Previously the main pfsync lock and the bucket locks shared the same name. This lead to spurious warnings from WITNESS like this: acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "pfsync" 1st pfsync @ /usr/src/sys/netpfil/pf/if_pfsync.c:1402 2nd pfsync @ /usr/src/sys/netpfil/pf/if_pfsync.c:1429 It's perfectly okay to grab both the main pfsync lock and a bucket lock at the same time. We don't need different names for each bucket lock, because we should always only acquire a single one of those at a time. MFC after: 1 week |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
ipfw | ||
pf |