8a0edc914f
Add prng(9) as a replacement for random(9) in the kernel.
There are two major differences from random(9) and random(3):
- General prng(9) APIs (prng32(9), etc) do not guarantee an
implementation or particular sequence; they should not be used for
repeatable simulations.
- However, specific named API families are also exposed (for now: PCG),
and those are expected to be repeatable (when so-guaranteed by the named
algorithm).
Some minor differences from random(3) and earlier random(9):
- PRNG state for the general prng(9) APIs is per-CPU; this eliminates
contention on PRNG state in SMP workloads. Each PCPU generator in an
SMP system produces a unique sequence.
- Better statistical properties than the Park-Miller ("minstd") PRNG
(longer period, uniform distribution in all bits, passes
BigCrush/PractRand analysis).
- Faster than Park-Miller ("minstd") PRNG -- no division is required to
step PCG-family PRNGs.
For now, random(9) becomes a thin shim around prng32(). Eventually I
would like to mechanically switch consumers over to the explicit API.
Reviewed by: kib, markj (previous version both)
Discussed with: markm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25916
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| colldef | ||
| ctypedef | ||
| dict | ||
| doc | ||
| dtrace | ||
| examples | ||
| i18n | ||
| keys | ||
| man | ||
| misc | ||
| mk | ||
| monetdef | ||
| msgdef | ||
| numericdef | ||
| security | ||
| sendmail | ||
| skel | ||
| snmp | ||
| syscons | ||
| tabset | ||
| termcap | ||
| tests | ||
| timedef | ||
| vt | ||
| zoneinfo | ||
| Makefile | ||
| Makefile.inc | ||