There is a race condition between ucma_close() and ucma_resolve_ip():
CPU0 CPU1
ucma_resolve_ip(): ucma_close():
ctx = ucma_get_ctx(file, cmd.id);
list_for_each_entry_safe(ctx, tmp, &file->ctx_list, list) {
mutex_lock(&mut);
idr_remove(&ctx_idr, ctx->id);
mutex_unlock(&mut);
...
mutex_lock(&mut);
if (!ctx->closing) {
mutex_unlock(&mut);
rdma_destroy_id(ctx->cm_id);
...
ucma_free_ctx(ctx);
}
ret = rdma_resolve_addr();
ucma_put_ctx(ctx);
Before idr_remove(), ucma_get_ctx() could still find the ctx
and after rdma_destroy_id(), rdma_resolve_addr() may still
access id_priv pointer. Also, ucma_put_ctx() may use ctx after
ucma_free_ctx() too.
ucma_close() should call ucma_put_ctx() too which tests the
refcnt and waits for the last one releasing it. The similar
pattern is already used by ucma_destroy_id().
Linux commit:
5fe23f262e0548ca7f19fb79f89059a60d087d22
MFC after: 1 week
Reviewed by: kib
Sponsored by: Mellanox Technologies // NVIDIA Networking
c6ccb08686