1314 lines
47 KiB
Plaintext
1314 lines
47 KiB
Plaintext
=head1 NAME
|
|
|
|
Pumpkin - Notes on handling the Perl Patch Pumpkin
|
|
|
|
=head1 SYNOPSIS
|
|
|
|
There is no simple synopsis, yet.
|
|
|
|
=head1 DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
|
This document attempts to begin to describe some of the
|
|
considerations involved in patching and maintaining perl.
|
|
|
|
This document is still under construction, and still subject to
|
|
significant changes. Still, I hope parts of it will be useful,
|
|
so I'm releasing it even though it's not done.
|
|
|
|
For the most part, it's a collection of anecdotal information that
|
|
already assumes some familiarity with the Perl sources. I really need
|
|
an introductory section that describes the organization of the sources
|
|
and all the various auxiliary files that are part of the distribution.
|
|
|
|
=head1 Where Do I Get Perl Sources and Related Material?
|
|
|
|
The Comprehensive Perl Archive Network (or CPAN) is the place to go.
|
|
There are many mirrors, but the easiest thing to use is probably
|
|
http://www.perl.com/CPAN/README.html , which automatically points you to a
|
|
mirror site "close" to you.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Perl5-porters mailing list
|
|
|
|
The mailing list perl5-porters@perl.org
|
|
is the main group working with the development of perl. If you're
|
|
interested in all the latest developments, you should definitely
|
|
subscribe. The list is high volume, but generally has a
|
|
fairly low noise level.
|
|
|
|
Subscribe by sending the message (in the body of your letter)
|
|
|
|
subscribe perl5-porters
|
|
|
|
to perl5-porters-request@perl.org .
|
|
|
|
Archives of the list are held at:
|
|
|
|
http://www.rosat.mpe-garching.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl-porters/
|
|
|
|
=head1 How are Perl Releases Numbered?
|
|
|
|
Perl version numbers are floating point numbers, such as 5.004.
|
|
(Observations about the imprecision of floating point numbers for
|
|
representing reality probably have more relevance than you might
|
|
imagine :-) The major version number is 5 and the '004' is the
|
|
patchlevel. (Questions such as whether or not '004' is really a minor
|
|
version number can safely be ignored.:)
|
|
|
|
The version number is available as the magic variable $],
|
|
and can be used in comparisons, e.g.
|
|
|
|
print "You've got an old perl\n" if $] < 5.002;
|
|
|
|
You can also require particular version (or later) with
|
|
|
|
use 5.002;
|
|
|
|
At some point in the future, we may need to decide what to call the
|
|
next big revision. In the .package file used by metaconfig to
|
|
generate Configure, there are two variables that might be relevant:
|
|
$baserev=5.0 and $package=perl5. At various times, I have suggested
|
|
we might change them to $baserev=5.1 and $package=perl5.1 if want
|
|
to signify a fairly major update. Or, we might want to jump to perl6.
|
|
Let's worry about that problem when we get there.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Subversions
|
|
|
|
In addition, there may be "developer" sub-versions available. These
|
|
are not official releases. They may contain unstable experimental
|
|
features, and are subject to rapid change. Such developer
|
|
sub-versions are numbered with sub-version numbers. For example,
|
|
version 5.003_04 is the 4'th developer version built on top of
|
|
5.003. It might include the _01, _02, and _03 changes, but it
|
|
also might not. Sub-versions are allowed to be subversive. (But see
|
|
the next section for recent changes.)
|
|
|
|
These sub-versions can also be used as floating point numbers, so
|
|
you can do things such as
|
|
|
|
print "You've got an unstable perl\n" if $] == 5.00303;
|
|
|
|
You can also require particular version (or later) with
|
|
|
|
use 5.003_03; # the "_" is optional
|
|
|
|
Sub-versions produced by the members of perl5-porters are usually
|
|
available on CPAN in the F<src/5.0/unsupported> directory.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Maintenance and Development Subversions
|
|
|
|
As an experiment, starting with version 5.004, subversions _01 through
|
|
_49 will be reserved for bug-fix maintenance releases, and subversions
|
|
_50 through _99 will be available for unstable development versions.
|
|
|
|
The separate bug-fix track is being established to allow us an easy
|
|
way to distribute important bug fixes without waiting for the
|
|
developers to untangle all the other problems in the current
|
|
developer's release.
|
|
|
|
Trial releases of bug-fix maintenance releases are announced on
|
|
perl5-porters. Trial releases use the new subversion number (to avoid
|
|
testers installing it over the previous release) and include a 'local
|
|
patch' entry in patchlevel.h.
|
|
|
|
Watch for announcements of maintenance subversions in
|
|
comp.lang.perl.announce.
|
|
|
|
The first rule of maintenance work is "First, do no harm."
|
|
|
|
=head2 Why such a complicated scheme?
|
|
|
|
Two reasons, really. At least.
|
|
|
|
First, we need some way to identify and release collections of patches
|
|
that are known to have new features that need testing and exploration. The
|
|
subversion scheme does that nicely while fitting into the
|
|
C<use 5.004;> mold.
|
|
|
|
Second, since most of the folks who help maintain perl do so on a
|
|
free-time voluntary basis, perl development does not proceed at a
|
|
precise pace, though it always seems to be moving ahead quickly.
|
|
We needed some way to pass around the "patch pumpkin" to allow
|
|
different people chances to work on different aspects of the
|
|
distribution without getting in each other's way. It wouldn't be
|
|
constructive to have multiple people working on incompatible
|
|
implementations of the same idea. Instead what was needed was
|
|
some kind of "baton" or "token" to pass around so everyone knew
|
|
whose turn was next.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Why is it called the patch pumpkin?
|
|
|
|
Chip Salzenberg gets credit for that, with a nod to his cow orker,
|
|
David Croy. We had passed around various names (baton, token, hot
|
|
potato) but none caught on. Then, Chip asked:
|
|
|
|
[begin quote]
|
|
|
|
Who has the patch pumpkin?
|
|
|
|
To explain: David Croy once told me once that at a previous job,
|
|
there was one tape drive and multiple systems that used it for backups.
|
|
But instead of some high-tech exclusion software, they used a low-tech
|
|
method to prevent multiple simultaneous backups: a stuffed pumpkin.
|
|
No one was allowed to make backups unless they had the "backup pumpkin".
|
|
|
|
[end quote]
|
|
|
|
The name has stuck.
|
|
|
|
=head1 Philosophical Issues in Patching Perl
|
|
|
|
There are no absolute rules, but there are some general guidelines I
|
|
have tried to follow as I apply patches to the perl sources.
|
|
(This section is still under construction.)
|
|
|
|
=head2 Solve problems as generally as possible
|
|
|
|
Never implement a specific restricted solution to a problem when you
|
|
can solve the same problem in a more general, flexible way.
|
|
|
|
For example, for dynamic loading to work on some SVR4 systems, we had
|
|
to build a shared libperl.so library. In order to build "FAT" binaries
|
|
on NeXT 4.0 systems, we had to build a special libperl library. Rather
|
|
than continuing to build a contorted nest of special cases, I
|
|
generalized the process of building libperl so that NeXT and SVR4 users
|
|
could still get their work done, but others could build a shared
|
|
libperl if they wanted to as well.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Seek consensus on major changes
|
|
|
|
If you are making big changes, don't do it in secret. Discuss the
|
|
ideas in advance on perl5-porters.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Keep the documentation up-to-date
|
|
|
|
If your changes may affect how users use perl, then check to be sure
|
|
that the documentation is in sync with your changes. Be sure to
|
|
check all the files F<pod/*.pod> and also the F<INSTALL> document.
|
|
|
|
Consider writing the appropriate documentation first and then
|
|
implementing your change to correspond to the documentation.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Avoid machine-specific #ifdef's
|
|
|
|
To the extent reasonable, try to avoid machine-specific #ifdef's in
|
|
the sources. Instead, use feature-specific #ifdef's. The reason is
|
|
that the machine-specific #ifdef's may not be valid across major
|
|
releases of the operating system. Further, the feature-specific tests
|
|
may help out folks on another platform who have the same problem.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Allow for lots of testing
|
|
|
|
We should never release a main version without testing it as a
|
|
subversion first.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Test popular applications and modules.
|
|
|
|
We should never release a main version without testing whether or not
|
|
it breaks various popular modules and applications. A partial list of
|
|
such things would include majordomo, metaconfig, apache, Tk, CGI,
|
|
libnet, and libwww, to name just a few. Of course it's quite possible
|
|
that some of those things will be just plain broken and need to be fixed,
|
|
but, in general, we ought to try to avoid breaking widely-installed
|
|
things.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Automate generation of derivative files
|
|
|
|
The F<embed.h>, F<keywords.h>, F<opcode.h>, and F<perltoc.pod> files
|
|
are all automatically generated by perl scripts. In general, don't
|
|
patch these directly; patch the data files instead.
|
|
|
|
F<Configure> and F<config_h.SH> are also automatically generated by
|
|
B<metaconfig>. In general, you should patch the metaconfig units
|
|
instead of patching these files directly. However, very minor changes to
|
|
F<Configure> may be made in between major sync-ups with the metaconfig
|
|
units, which tends to be complicated operations. But be careful, this
|
|
can quickly spiral out of control. Running metaconfig is not really
|
|
hard.
|
|
|
|
Finally, the sample files in the F<Porting/> subdirectory are
|
|
generated automatically by the script F<U/mksample> included
|
|
with the metaconfig units. See L<"run metaconfig"> below for
|
|
information on obtaining the metaconfig units.
|
|
|
|
=head1 How to Make a Distribution
|
|
|
|
There really ought to be a 'make dist' target, but there isn't.
|
|
The 'dist' suite of tools also contains a number of tools that I haven't
|
|
learned how to use yet. Some of them may make this all a bit easier.
|
|
|
|
Here are the steps I go through to prepare a patch & distribution.
|
|
|
|
Lots of it could doubtless be automated but isn't. The Porting/makerel
|
|
(make release) perl script does now help automate some parts of it.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Announce your intentions
|
|
|
|
First, you should volunteer out loud to take the patch pumpkin. It's
|
|
generally counter-productive to have multiple people working in secret
|
|
on the same thing.
|
|
|
|
At the same time, announce what you plan to do with the patch pumpkin,
|
|
to allow folks a chance to object or suggest alternatives, or do it for
|
|
you. Naturally, the patch pumpkin holder ought to incorporate various
|
|
bug fixes and documentation improvements that are posted while he or
|
|
she has the pumpkin, but there might also be larger issues at stake.
|
|
|
|
One of the precepts of the subversion idea is that we shouldn't give
|
|
the patch pumpkin to anyone unless we have some idea what he or she
|
|
is going to do with it.
|
|
|
|
=head2 refresh pod/perltoc.pod
|
|
|
|
Presumably, you have done a full C<make> in your working source
|
|
directory. Before you C<make spotless> (if you do), and if you have
|
|
changed any documentation in any module or pod file, change to the
|
|
F<pod> directory and run C<make toc>.
|
|
|
|
=head2 run installhtml to check the validity of the pod files
|
|
|
|
=head2 update patchlevel.h
|
|
|
|
Don't be shy about using the subversion number, even for a relatively
|
|
modest patch. We've never even come close to using all 99 subversions,
|
|
and it's better to have a distinctive number for your patch. If you
|
|
need feedback on your patch, go ahead and issue it and promise to
|
|
incorporate that feedback quickly (e.g. within 1 week) and send out a
|
|
second patch.
|
|
|
|
=head2 run metaconfig
|
|
|
|
If you need to make changes to Configure or config_h.SH, it may be best to
|
|
change the appropriate metaconfig units instead, and regenerate Configure.
|
|
|
|
metaconfig -m
|
|
|
|
will regenerate Configure and config_h.SH. Much more information
|
|
on obtaining and running metaconfig is in the F<U/README> file
|
|
that comes with Perl's metaconfig units. Perl's metaconfig units
|
|
should be available on CPAN. A set of units that will work with
|
|
perl5.005 is in the file F<mc_units-5.005_00-01.tar.gz> under
|
|
http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/id/ANDYD/ . The mc_units tar file
|
|
should be unpacked in your main perl source directory. Note: those
|
|
units were for use with 5.005. There may have been changes since then.
|
|
Check for later versions or contact perl5-porters@perl.org to obtain a
|
|
pointer to the current version.
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, do consider if the F<*ish.h> files might be a better
|
|
place for your changes.
|
|
|
|
=head2 MANIFEST
|
|
|
|
Make sure the MANIFEST is up-to-date. You can use dist's B<manicheck>
|
|
program for this. You can also use
|
|
|
|
perl -w -MExtUtils::Manifest=fullcheck -e fullcheck
|
|
|
|
Both commands will also list extra files in the directory that are not
|
|
listed in MANIFEST.
|
|
|
|
The MANIFEST is normally sorted.
|
|
|
|
If you are using metaconfig to regenerate Configure, then you should note
|
|
that metaconfig actually uses MANIFEST.new, so you want to be sure
|
|
MANIFEST.new is up-to-date too. I haven't found the MANIFEST/MANIFEST.new
|
|
distinction particularly useful, but that's probably because I still haven't
|
|
learned how to use the full suite of tools in the dist distribution.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Check permissions
|
|
|
|
All the tests in the t/ directory ought to be executable. The
|
|
main makefile used to do a 'chmod t/*/*.t', but that resulted in
|
|
a self-modifying distribution--something some users would strongly
|
|
prefer to avoid. The F<t/TEST> script will check for this
|
|
and do the chmod if needed, but the tests still ought to be
|
|
executable.
|
|
|
|
In all, the following files should probably be executable:
|
|
|
|
Configure
|
|
configpm
|
|
configure.gnu
|
|
embed.pl
|
|
installperl
|
|
installman
|
|
keywords.pl
|
|
myconfig
|
|
opcode.pl
|
|
perly.fixer
|
|
t/TEST
|
|
t/*/*.t
|
|
*.SH
|
|
vms/ext/Stdio/test.pl
|
|
vms/ext/filespec.t
|
|
x2p/*.SH
|
|
|
|
Other things ought to be readable, at least :-).
|
|
|
|
Probably, the permissions for the files could be encoded in MANIFEST
|
|
somehow, but I'm reluctant to change MANIFEST itself because that
|
|
could break old scripts that use MANIFEST.
|
|
|
|
I seem to recall that some SVR3 systems kept some sort of file that listed
|
|
permissions for system files; something like that might be appropriate.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Run Configure
|
|
|
|
This will build a config.sh and config.h. You can skip this if you haven't
|
|
changed Configure or config_h.SH at all. I use the following command
|
|
|
|
sh Configure -Dprefix=/opt/perl -Doptimize=-O -Dusethreads \
|
|
-Dcf_by='yourname' \
|
|
-Dcf_email='yourname@yourhost.yourplace.com' \
|
|
-Dperladmin='yourname@yourhost.yourplace.com' \
|
|
-Dmydomain='.yourplace.com' \
|
|
-Dmyhostname='yourhost' \
|
|
-des
|
|
|
|
=head2 Update Porting/config.sh and Porting/config_H
|
|
|
|
[XXX
|
|
This section needs revision. We're currently working on easing
|
|
the task of keeping the vms, win32, and plan9 config.sh info
|
|
up-to-date. The plan is to use keep up-to-date 'canned' config.sh
|
|
files in the appropriate subdirectories and then generate 'canned'
|
|
config.h files for vms, win32, etc. from the generic config.sh file.
|
|
This is to ease maintenance. When Configure gets updated, the parts
|
|
sometimes get scrambled around, and the changes in config_H can
|
|
sometimes be very hard to follow. config.sh, on the other hand, can
|
|
safely be sorted, so it's easy to track (typically very small) changes
|
|
to config.sh and then propoagate them to a canned 'config.h' by any
|
|
number of means, including a perl script in win32/ or carrying
|
|
config.sh and config_h.SH to a Unix system and running sh
|
|
config_h.SH.)
|
|
XXX]
|
|
|
|
The Porting/config.sh and Porting/config_H files are provided to
|
|
help those folks who can't run Configure. It is important to keep
|
|
them up-to-date. If you have changed config_h.SH, those changes must
|
|
be reflected in config_H as well. (The name config_H was chosen to
|
|
distinguish the file from config.h even on case-insensitive file systems.)
|
|
Simply edit the existing config_H file; keep the first few explanatory
|
|
lines and then copy your new config.h below.
|
|
|
|
It may also be necessary to update win32/config.?c, vms/config.vms and
|
|
plan9/config.plan9, though you should be quite careful in doing so if
|
|
you are not familiar with those systems. You might want to issue your
|
|
patch with a promise to quickly issue a follow-up that handles those
|
|
directories.
|
|
|
|
=head2 make run_byacc
|
|
|
|
If you have byacc-1.8.2 (available from CPAN), and if there have been
|
|
changes to F<perly.y>, you can regenerate the F<perly.c> file. The
|
|
run_byacc makefile target does this by running byacc and then applying
|
|
some patches so that byacc dynamically allocates space, rather than
|
|
having fixed limits. This patch is handled by the F<perly.fixer>
|
|
script. Depending on the nature of the changes to F<perly.y>, you may
|
|
or may not have to hand-edit the patch to apply correctly. If you do,
|
|
you should include the edited patch in the new distribution. If you
|
|
have byacc-1.9, the patch won't apply cleanly. Changes to the printf
|
|
output statements mean the patch won't apply cleanly. Long ago I
|
|
started to fix F<perly.fixer> to detect this, but I never completed the
|
|
task.
|
|
|
|
Some additional notes from Larry on this:
|
|
|
|
Don't forget to regenerate perly_c.diff.
|
|
|
|
byacc -d perly.y
|
|
mv y.tab.c perly.c
|
|
patch perly.c <perly_c.diff
|
|
# manually apply any failed hunks
|
|
diff -c2 perly.c.orig perly.c >perly_c.diff
|
|
|
|
One chunk of lines that often fails begins with
|
|
|
|
#line 29 "perly.y"
|
|
|
|
and ends one line before
|
|
|
|
#define YYERRCODE 256
|
|
|
|
This only happens when you add or remove a token type. I suppose this
|
|
could be automated, but it doesn't happen very often nowadays.
|
|
|
|
Larry
|
|
|
|
=head2 make regen_headers
|
|
|
|
The F<embed.h>, F<keywords.h>, and F<opcode.h> files are all automatically
|
|
generated by perl scripts. Since the user isn't guaranteed to have a
|
|
working perl, we can't require the user to generate them. Hence you have
|
|
to, if you're making a distribution.
|
|
|
|
I used to include rules like the following in the makefile:
|
|
|
|
# The following three header files are generated automatically
|
|
# The correct versions should be already supplied with the perl kit,
|
|
# in case you don't have perl or 'sh' available.
|
|
# The - is to ignore error return codes in case you have the source
|
|
# installed read-only or you don't have perl yet.
|
|
keywords.h: keywords.pl
|
|
@echo "Don't worry if this fails."
|
|
- perl keywords.pl
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, I got B<lots> of mail consisting of people worrying because the
|
|
command failed. I eventually decided that I would save myself time
|
|
and effort by manually running C<make regen_headers> myself rather
|
|
than answering all the questions and complaints about the failing
|
|
command.
|
|
|
|
=head2 global.sym, interp.sym and perlio.sym
|
|
|
|
Make sure these files are up-to-date. Read the comments in these
|
|
files and in perl_exp.SH to see what to do.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Binary compatibility
|
|
|
|
If you do change F<global.sym> or F<interp.sym>, think carefully about
|
|
what you are doing. To the extent reasonable, we'd like to maintain
|
|
souce and binary compatibility with older releases of perl. That way,
|
|
extensions built under one version of perl will continue to work with
|
|
new versions of perl.
|
|
|
|
Of course, some incompatible changes may well be necessary. I'm just
|
|
suggesting that we not make any such changes without thinking carefully
|
|
about them first. If possible, we should provide
|
|
backwards-compatibility stubs. There's a lot of XS code out there.
|
|
Let's not force people to keep changing it.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Changes
|
|
|
|
Be sure to update the F<Changes> file. Try to include both an overall
|
|
summary as well as detailed descriptions of the changes. Your
|
|
audience will include other developers and users, so describe
|
|
user-visible changes (if any) in terms they will understand, not in
|
|
code like "initialize foo variable in bar function".
|
|
|
|
There are differing opinions on whether the detailed descriptions
|
|
ought to go in the Changes file or whether they ought to be available
|
|
separately in the patch file (or both). There is no disagreement that
|
|
detailed descriptions ought to be easily available somewhere.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Todo
|
|
|
|
The F<Todo> file contains a roughly-catgorized unordered list of
|
|
aspects of Perl that could use enhancement, features that could be
|
|
added, areas that could be cleaned up, and so on. During your term as
|
|
pumpkin-holder, you will probably address some of these issues, and
|
|
perhaps identify others which, while you decide not to address them
|
|
this time around, may be tackled in the future. Update the file
|
|
reflect the situation as it stands when you hand over the pumpkin.
|
|
|
|
You might like, early in your pumpkin-holding career, to see if you
|
|
can find champions for partiticular issues on the to-do list: an issue
|
|
owned is an issue more likely to be resolved.
|
|
|
|
There are also some more porting-specific L<Todo> items later in this
|
|
file.
|
|
|
|
=head2 OS/2-specific updates
|
|
|
|
In the os2 directory is F<diff.configure>, a set of OS/2-specific
|
|
diffs against B<Configure>. If you make changes to Configure, you may
|
|
want to consider regenerating this diff file to save trouble for the
|
|
OS/2 maintainer.
|
|
|
|
You can also consider the OS/2 diffs as reminders of portability
|
|
things that need to be fixed in Configure.
|
|
|
|
=head2 VMS-specific updates
|
|
|
|
If you have changed F<perly.y>, then you may want to update
|
|
F<vms/perly_{h,c}.vms> by running C<perl vms/vms_yfix.pl>.
|
|
|
|
The Perl version number appears in several places under F<vms>.
|
|
It is courteous to update these versions. For example, if you are
|
|
making 5.004_42, replace "5.00441" with "5.00442".
|
|
|
|
=head2 Making the new distribution
|
|
|
|
Suppose, for example, that you want to make version 5.004_08. Then you can
|
|
do something like the following
|
|
|
|
mkdir ../perl5.004_08
|
|
awk '{print $1}' MANIFEST | cpio -pdm ../perl5.004_08
|
|
cd ../
|
|
tar cf perl5.004_08.tar perl5.004_08
|
|
gzip --best perl5.004_08.tar
|
|
|
|
These steps, with extra checks, are automated by the Porting/makerel
|
|
script.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Making a new patch
|
|
|
|
I find the F<makepatch> utility quite handy for making patches.
|
|
You can obtain it from any CPAN archive under
|
|
http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/Johan_Vromans/ . There are a couple
|
|
of differences between my version and the standard one. I have mine do
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
# Print a reassuring "End of Patch" note so people won't
|
|
# wonder if their mailer truncated patches.
|
|
print "\n\nEnd of Patch.\n";
|
|
|
|
at the end. That's because I used to get questions from people asking
|
|
if their mail was truncated.
|
|
|
|
It also writes Index: lines which include the new directory prefix
|
|
(change Index: print, approx line 294 or 310 depending on the version,
|
|
to read: print PATCH ("Index: $newdir$new\n");). That helps patches
|
|
work with more POSIX conformant patch programs.
|
|
|
|
Here's how I generate a new patch. I'll use the hypothetical
|
|
5.004_07 to 5.004_08 patch as an example.
|
|
|
|
# unpack perl5.004_07/
|
|
gzip -d -c perl5.004_07.tar.gz | tar -xof -
|
|
# unpack perl5.004_08/
|
|
gzip -d -c perl5.004_08.tar.gz | tar -xof -
|
|
makepatch perl5.004_07 perl5.004_08 > perl5.004_08.pat
|
|
|
|
Makepatch will automatically generate appropriate B<rm> commands to remove
|
|
deleted files. Unfortunately, it will not correctly set permissions
|
|
for newly created files, so you may have to do so manually. For example,
|
|
patch 5.003_04 created a new test F<t/op/gv.t> which needs to be executable,
|
|
so at the top of the patch, I inserted the following lines:
|
|
|
|
# Make a new test
|
|
touch t/op/gv.t
|
|
chmod +x t/opt/gv.t
|
|
|
|
Now, of course, my patch is now wrong because makepatch didn't know I
|
|
was going to do that command, and it patched against /dev/null.
|
|
|
|
So, what I do is sort out all such shell commands that need to be in the
|
|
patch (including possible mv-ing of files, if needed) and put that in the
|
|
shell commands at the top of the patch. Next, I delete all the patch parts
|
|
of perl5.004_08.pat, leaving just the shell commands. Then, I do the
|
|
following:
|
|
|
|
cd perl5.004_07
|
|
sh ../perl5.004_08.pat
|
|
cd ..
|
|
makepatch perl5.004_07 perl5.004_08 >> perl5.004_08.pat
|
|
|
|
(Note the append to preserve my shell commands.)
|
|
Now, my patch will line up with what the end users are going to do.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Testing your patch
|
|
|
|
It seems obvious, but be sure to test your patch. That is, verify that
|
|
it produces exactly the same thing as your full distribution.
|
|
|
|
rm -rf perl5.004_07
|
|
gzip -d -c perl5.004_07.tar.gz | tar -xf -
|
|
cd perl5.004_07
|
|
sh ../perl5.004_08.pat
|
|
patch -p1 -N < ../perl5.004_08.pat
|
|
cd ..
|
|
gdiff -r perl5.004_07 perl5.004_08
|
|
|
|
where B<gdiff> is GNU diff. Other diff's may also do recursive checking.
|
|
|
|
=head2 More testing
|
|
|
|
Again, it's obvious, but you should test your new version as widely as you
|
|
can. You can be sure you'll hear about it quickly if your version doesn't
|
|
work on both ANSI and pre-ANSI compilers, and on common systems such as
|
|
SunOS 4.1.[34], Solaris, and Linux.
|
|
|
|
If your changes include conditional code, try to test the different
|
|
branches as thoroughly as you can. For example, if your system
|
|
supports dynamic loading, you can also test static loading with
|
|
|
|
sh Configure -Uusedl
|
|
|
|
You can also hand-tweak your config.h to try out different #ifdef
|
|
branches.
|
|
|
|
=head1 Common Gotcha's
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item #elif
|
|
|
|
The '#elif' preprocessor directive is not understood on all systems.
|
|
Specifically, I know that Pyramids don't understand it. Thus instead of the
|
|
simple
|
|
|
|
#if defined(I_FOO)
|
|
# include <foo.h>
|
|
#elif defined(I_BAR)
|
|
# include <bar.h>
|
|
#else
|
|
# include <fubar.h>
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
You have to do the more Byzantine
|
|
|
|
#if defined(I_FOO)
|
|
# include <foo.h>
|
|
#else
|
|
# if defined(I_BAR)
|
|
# include <bar.h>
|
|
# else
|
|
# include <fubar.h>
|
|
# endif
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
Incidentally, whitespace between the leading '#' and the preprocessor
|
|
command is not guaranteed, but is very portable and you may use it freely.
|
|
I think it makes things a bit more readable, especially once things get
|
|
rather deeply nested. I also think that things should almost never get
|
|
too deeply nested, so it ought to be a moot point :-)
|
|
|
|
=item Probably Prefer POSIX
|
|
|
|
It's often the case that you'll need to choose whether to do
|
|
something the BSD-ish way or the POSIX-ish way. It's usually not
|
|
a big problem when the two systems use different names for similar
|
|
functions, such as memcmp() and bcmp(). The perl.h header file
|
|
handles these by appropriate #defines, selecting the POSIX mem*()
|
|
functions if available, but falling back on the b*() functions, if
|
|
need be.
|
|
|
|
More serious is the case where some brilliant person decided to
|
|
use the same function name but give it a different meaning or
|
|
calling sequence :-). getpgrp() and setpgrp() come to mind.
|
|
These are a real problem on systems that aim for conformance to
|
|
one standard (e.g. POSIX), but still try to support the other way
|
|
of doing things (e.g. BSD). My general advice (still not really
|
|
implemented in the source) is to do something like the following.
|
|
Suppose there are two alternative versions, fooPOSIX() and
|
|
fooBSD().
|
|
|
|
#ifdef HAS_FOOPOSIX
|
|
/* use fooPOSIX(); */
|
|
#else
|
|
# ifdef HAS_FOOBSD
|
|
/* try to emulate fooPOSIX() with fooBSD();
|
|
perhaps with the following: */
|
|
# define fooPOSIX fooBSD
|
|
# else
|
|
# /* Uh, oh. We have to supply our own. */
|
|
# define fooPOSIX Perl_fooPOSIX
|
|
# endif
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
=item Think positively
|
|
|
|
If you need to add an #ifdef test, it is usually easier to follow if you
|
|
think positively, e.g.
|
|
|
|
#ifdef HAS_NEATO_FEATURE
|
|
/* use neato feature */
|
|
#else
|
|
/* use some fallback mechanism */
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
rather than the more impenetrable
|
|
|
|
#ifndef MISSING_NEATO_FEATURE
|
|
/* Not missing it, so we must have it, so use it */
|
|
#else
|
|
/* Are missing it, so fall back on something else. */
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
Of course for this toy example, there's not much difference. But when
|
|
the #ifdef's start spanning a couple of screen fulls, and the #else's
|
|
are marked something like
|
|
|
|
#else /* !MISSING_NEATO_FEATURE */
|
|
|
|
I find it easy to get lost.
|
|
|
|
=item Providing Missing Functions -- Problem
|
|
|
|
Not all systems have all the neat functions you might want or need, so
|
|
you might decide to be helpful and provide an emulation. This is
|
|
sound in theory and very kind of you, but please be careful about what
|
|
you name the function. Let me use the C<pause()> function as an
|
|
illustration.
|
|
|
|
Perl5.003 has the following in F<perl.h>
|
|
|
|
#ifndef HAS_PAUSE
|
|
#define pause() sleep((32767<<16)+32767)
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
Configure sets HAS_PAUSE if the system has the pause() function, so
|
|
this #define only kicks in if the pause() function is missing.
|
|
Nice idea, right?
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, some systems apparently have a prototype for pause()
|
|
in F<unistd.h>, but don't actually have the function in the library.
|
|
(Or maybe they do have it in a library we're not using.)
|
|
|
|
Thus, the compiler sees something like
|
|
|
|
extern int pause(void);
|
|
/* . . . */
|
|
#define pause() sleep((32767<<16)+32767)
|
|
|
|
and dies with an error message. (Some compilers don't mind this;
|
|
others apparently do.)
|
|
|
|
To work around this, 5.003_03 and later have the following in perl.h:
|
|
|
|
/* Some unistd.h's give a prototype for pause() even though
|
|
HAS_PAUSE ends up undefined. This causes the #define
|
|
below to be rejected by the compiler. Sigh.
|
|
*/
|
|
#ifdef HAS_PAUSE
|
|
# define Pause pause
|
|
#else
|
|
# define Pause() sleep((32767<<16)+32767)
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
This works.
|
|
|
|
The curious reader may wonder why I didn't do the following in
|
|
F<util.c> instead:
|
|
|
|
#ifndef HAS_PAUSE
|
|
void pause()
|
|
{
|
|
sleep((32767<<16)+32767);
|
|
}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
That is, since the function is missing, just provide it.
|
|
Then things would probably be been alright, it would seem.
|
|
|
|
Well, almost. It could be made to work. The problem arises from the
|
|
conflicting needs of dynamic loading and namespace protection.
|
|
|
|
For dynamic loading to work on AIX (and VMS) we need to provide a list
|
|
of symbols to be exported. This is done by the script F<perl_exp.SH>,
|
|
which reads F<global.sym> and F<interp.sym>. Thus, the C<pause>
|
|
symbol would have to be added to F<global.sym> So far, so good.
|
|
|
|
On the other hand, one of the goals of Perl5 is to make it easy to
|
|
either extend or embed perl and link it with other libraries. This
|
|
means we have to be careful to keep the visible namespace "clean".
|
|
That is, we don't want perl's global variables to conflict with
|
|
those in the other application library. Although this work is still
|
|
in progress, the way it is currently done is via the F<embed.h> file.
|
|
This file is built from the F<global.sym> and F<interp.sym> files,
|
|
since those files already list the globally visible symbols. If we
|
|
had added C<pause> to global.sym, then F<embed.h> would contain the
|
|
line
|
|
|
|
#define pause Perl_pause
|
|
|
|
and calls to C<pause> in the perl sources would now point to
|
|
C<Perl_pause>. Now, when B<ld> is run to build the F<perl> executable,
|
|
it will go looking for C<perl_pause>, which probably won't exist in any
|
|
of the standard libraries. Thus the build of perl will fail.
|
|
|
|
Those systems where C<HAS_PAUSE> is not defined would be ok, however,
|
|
since they would get a C<Perl_pause> function in util.c. The rest of
|
|
the world would be in trouble.
|
|
|
|
And yes, this scenario has happened. On SCO, the function C<chsize>
|
|
is available. (I think it's in F<-lx>, the Xenix compatibility
|
|
library.) Since the perl4 days (and possibly before), Perl has
|
|
included a C<chsize> function that gets called something akin to
|
|
|
|
#ifndef HAS_CHSIZE
|
|
I32 chsize(fd, length)
|
|
/* . . . */
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
When 5.003 added
|
|
|
|
#define chsize Perl_chsize
|
|
|
|
to F<embed.h>, the compile started failing on SCO systems.
|
|
|
|
The "fix" is to give the function a different name. The one
|
|
implemented in 5.003_05 isn't optimal, but here's what was done:
|
|
|
|
#ifdef HAS_CHSIZE
|
|
# ifdef my_chsize /* Probably #defined to Perl_my_chsize in embed.h */
|
|
# undef my_chsize
|
|
# endif
|
|
# define my_chsize chsize
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
My explanatory comment in patch 5.003_05 said:
|
|
|
|
Undef and then re-define my_chsize from Perl_my_chsize to
|
|
just plain chsize if this system HAS_CHSIZE. This probably only
|
|
applies to SCO. This shows the perils of having internal
|
|
functions with the same name as external library functions :-).
|
|
|
|
Now, we can safely put C<my_chsize> in F<global.sym>, export it, and
|
|
hide it with F<embed.h>.
|
|
|
|
To be consistent with what I did for C<pause>, I probably should have
|
|
called the new function C<Chsize>, rather than C<my_chsize>.
|
|
However, the perl sources are quite inconsistent on this (Consider
|
|
New, Mymalloc, and Myremalloc, to name just a few.)
|
|
|
|
There is a problem with this fix, however, in that C<Perl_chsize>
|
|
was available as a F<libperl.a> library function in 5.003, but it
|
|
isn't available any more (as of 5.003_07). This means that we've
|
|
broken binary compatibility. This is not good.
|
|
|
|
=item Providing missing functions -- some ideas
|
|
|
|
We currently don't have a standard way of handling such missing
|
|
function names. Right now, I'm effectively thinking aloud about a
|
|
solution. Some day, I'll try to formally propose a solution.
|
|
|
|
Part of the problem is that we want to have some functions listed as
|
|
exported but not have their names mangled by embed.h or possibly
|
|
conflict with names in standard system headers. We actually already
|
|
have such a list at the end of F<perl_exp.SH> (though that list is
|
|
out-of-date):
|
|
|
|
# extra globals not included above.
|
|
cat <<END >> perl.exp
|
|
perl_init_ext
|
|
perl_init_fold
|
|
perl_init_i18nl14n
|
|
perl_alloc
|
|
perl_construct
|
|
perl_destruct
|
|
perl_free
|
|
perl_parse
|
|
perl_run
|
|
perl_get_sv
|
|
perl_get_av
|
|
perl_get_hv
|
|
perl_get_cv
|
|
perl_call_argv
|
|
perl_call_pv
|
|
perl_call_method
|
|
perl_call_sv
|
|
perl_requirepv
|
|
safecalloc
|
|
safemalloc
|
|
saferealloc
|
|
safefree
|
|
|
|
This still needs much thought, but I'm inclined to think that one
|
|
possible solution is to prefix all such functions with C<perl_> in the
|
|
source and list them along with the other C<perl_*> functions in
|
|
F<perl_exp.SH>.
|
|
|
|
Thus, for C<chsize>, we'd do something like the following:
|
|
|
|
/* in perl.h */
|
|
#ifdef HAS_CHSIZE
|
|
# define perl_chsize chsize
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
then in some file (e.g. F<util.c> or F<doio.c>) do
|
|
|
|
#ifndef HAS_CHSIZE
|
|
I32 perl_chsize(fd, length)
|
|
/* implement the function here . . . */
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, we could just always use C<chsize> everywhere and move
|
|
C<chsize> from F<global.sym> to the end of F<perl_exp.SH>. That would
|
|
probably be fine as long as our C<chsize> function agreed with all the
|
|
C<chsize> function prototypes in the various systems we'll be using.
|
|
As long as the prototypes in actual use don't vary that much, this is
|
|
probably a good alternative. (As a counter-example, note how Configure
|
|
and perl have to go through hoops to find and use get Malloc_t and
|
|
Free_t for C<malloc> and C<free>.)
|
|
|
|
At the moment, this latter option is what I tend to prefer.
|
|
|
|
=item All the world's a VAX
|
|
|
|
Sorry, showing my age:-). Still, all the world is not BSD 4.[34],
|
|
SVR4, or POSIX. Be aware that SVR3-derived systems are still quite
|
|
common (do you have any idea how many systems run SCO?) If you don't
|
|
have a bunch of v7 manuals handy, the metaconfig units (by default
|
|
installed in F</usr/local/lib/dist/U>) are a good resource to look at
|
|
for portability.
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
=head1 Miscellaneous Topics
|
|
|
|
=head2 Autoconf
|
|
|
|
Why does perl use a metaconfig-generated Configure script instead of an
|
|
autoconf-generated configure script?
|
|
|
|
Metaconfig and autoconf are two tools with very similar purposes.
|
|
Metaconfig is actually the older of the two, and was originally written
|
|
by Larry Wall, while autoconf is probably now used in a wider variety of
|
|
packages. The autoconf info file discusses the history of autoconf and
|
|
how it came to be. The curious reader is referred there for further
|
|
information.
|
|
|
|
Overall, both tools are quite good, I think, and the choice of which one
|
|
to use could be argued either way. In March, 1994, when I was just
|
|
starting to work on Configure support for Perl5, I considered both
|
|
autoconf and metaconfig, and eventually decided to use metaconfig for the
|
|
following reasons:
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item Compatibility with Perl4
|
|
|
|
Perl4 used metaconfig, so many of the #ifdef's were already set up for
|
|
metaconfig. Of course metaconfig had evolved some since Perl4's days,
|
|
but not so much that it posed any serious problems.
|
|
|
|
=item Metaconfig worked for me
|
|
|
|
My system at the time was Interactive 2.2, a SVR3.2/386 derivative that
|
|
also had some POSIX support. Metaconfig-generated Configure scripts
|
|
worked fine for me on that system. On the other hand, autoconf-generated
|
|
scripts usually didn't. (They did come quite close, though, in some
|
|
cases.) At the time, I actually fetched a large number of GNU packages
|
|
and checked. Not a single one configured and compiled correctly
|
|
out-of-the-box with the system's cc compiler.
|
|
|
|
=item Configure can be interactive
|
|
|
|
With both autoconf and metaconfig, if the script works, everything is
|
|
fine. However, one of my main problems with autoconf-generated scripts
|
|
was that if it guessed wrong about something, it could be B<very> hard to
|
|
go back and fix it. For example, autoconf always insisted on passing the
|
|
-Xp flag to cc (to turn on POSIX behavior), even when that wasn't what I
|
|
wanted or needed for that package. There was no way short of editing the
|
|
configure script to turn this off. You couldn't just edit the resulting
|
|
Makefile at the end because the -Xp flag influenced a number of other
|
|
configure tests.
|
|
|
|
Metaconfig's Configure scripts, on the other hand, can be interactive.
|
|
Thus if Configure is guessing things incorrectly, you can go back and fix
|
|
them. This isn't as important now as it was when we were actively
|
|
developing Configure support for new features such as dynamic loading,
|
|
but it's still useful occasionally.
|
|
|
|
=item GPL
|
|
|
|
At the time, autoconf-generated scripts were covered under the GNU Public
|
|
License, and hence weren't suitable for inclusion with Perl, which has a
|
|
different licensing policy. (Autoconf's licensing has since changed.)
|
|
|
|
=item Modularity
|
|
|
|
Metaconfig builds up Configure from a collection of discrete pieces
|
|
called "units". You can override the standard behavior by supplying your
|
|
own unit. With autoconf, you have to patch the standard files instead.
|
|
I find the metaconfig "unit" method easier to work with. Others
|
|
may find metaconfig's units clumsy to work with.
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
=head2 @INC search order
|
|
|
|
By default, the list of perl library directories in @INC is the
|
|
following:
|
|
|
|
$archlib
|
|
$privlib
|
|
$sitearch
|
|
$sitelib
|
|
|
|
Specifically, on my Solaris/x86 system, I run
|
|
B<sh Configure -Dprefix=/opt/perl> and I have the following
|
|
directories:
|
|
|
|
/opt/perl/lib/i86pc-solaris/5.00307
|
|
/opt/perl/lib
|
|
/opt/perl/lib/site_perl/i86pc-solaris
|
|
/opt/perl/lib/site_perl
|
|
|
|
That is, perl's directories come first, followed by the site-specific
|
|
directories.
|
|
|
|
The site libraries come second to support the usage of extensions
|
|
across perl versions. Read the relevant section in F<INSTALL> for
|
|
more information. If we ever make $sitearch version-specific, this
|
|
topic could be revisited.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Why isn't there a directory to override Perl's library?
|
|
|
|
Mainly because no one's gotten around to making one. Note that
|
|
"making one" involves changing perl.c, Configure, config_h.SH (and
|
|
associated files, see above), and I<documenting> it all in the
|
|
INSTALL file.
|
|
|
|
Apparently, most folks who want to override one of the standard library
|
|
files simply do it by overwriting the standard library files.
|
|
|
|
=head2 APPLLIB
|
|
|
|
In the perl.c sources, you'll find an undocumented APPLLIB_EXP
|
|
variable, sort of like PRIVLIB_EXP and ARCHLIB_EXP (which are
|
|
documented in config_h.SH). Here's what APPLLIB_EXP is for, from
|
|
a mail message from Larry:
|
|
|
|
The main intent of APPLLIB_EXP is for folks who want to send out a
|
|
version of Perl embedded in their product. They would set the symbol
|
|
to be the name of the library containing the files needed to run or to
|
|
support their particular application. This works at the "override"
|
|
level to make sure they get their own versions of any library code that
|
|
they absolutely must have configuration control over.
|
|
|
|
As such, I don't see any conflict with a sysadmin using it for a
|
|
override-ish sort of thing, when installing a generic Perl. It should
|
|
probably have been named something to do with overriding though. Since
|
|
it's undocumented we could still change it... :-)
|
|
|
|
Given that it's already there, you can use it to override
|
|
distribution modules. If you do
|
|
|
|
sh Configure -Dccflags='-DAPPLLIB_EXP=/my/override'
|
|
|
|
then perl.c will put /my/override ahead of ARCHLIB and PRIVLIB.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Shared libperl.so location
|
|
|
|
Why isn't the shared libperl.so installed in /usr/lib/ along
|
|
with "all the other" shared libraries? Instead, it is installed
|
|
in $archlib, which is typically something like
|
|
|
|
/usr/local/lib/perl5/archname/5.00404
|
|
|
|
and is architecture- and version-specific.
|
|
|
|
The basic reason why a shared libperl.so gets put in $archlib is so that
|
|
you can have more than one version of perl on the system at the same time,
|
|
and have each refer to its own libperl.so.
|
|
|
|
Three examples might help. All of these work now; none would work if you
|
|
put libperl.so in /usr/lib.
|
|
|
|
=over
|
|
|
|
=item 1.
|
|
|
|
Suppose you want to have both threaded and non-threaded perl versions
|
|
around. Configure will name both perl libraries "libperl.so" (so that
|
|
you can link to them with -lperl). The perl binaries tell them apart
|
|
by having looking in the appropriate $archlib directories.
|
|
|
|
=item 2.
|
|
|
|
Suppose you have perl5.004_04 installed and you want to try to compile
|
|
it again, perhaps with different options or after applying a patch.
|
|
If you already have libperl.so installed in /usr/lib/, then it may be
|
|
either difficult or impossible to get ld.so to find the new libperl.so
|
|
that you're trying to build. If, instead, libperl.so is tucked away in
|
|
$archlib, then you can always just change $archlib in the current perl
|
|
you're trying to build so that ld.so won't find your old libperl.so.
|
|
(The INSTALL file suggests you do this when building a debugging perl.)
|
|
|
|
=item 3.
|
|
|
|
The shared perl library is not a "well-behaved" shared library with
|
|
proper major and minor version numbers, so you can't necessarily
|
|
have perl5.004_04 and perl5.004_05 installed simultaneously. Suppose
|
|
perl5.004_04 were to install /usr/lib/libperl.so.4.4, and perl5.004_05
|
|
were to install /usr/lib/libperl.so.4.5. Now, when you try to run
|
|
perl5.004_04, ld.so might try to load libperl.so.4.5, since it has
|
|
the right "major version" number. If this works at all, it almost
|
|
certainly defeats the reason for keeping perl5.004_04 around. Worse,
|
|
with development subversions, you certaily can't guarantee that
|
|
libperl.so.4.4 and libperl.so.4.55 will be compatible.
|
|
|
|
Anyway, all this leads to quite obscure failures that are sure to drive
|
|
casual users crazy. Even experienced users will get confused :-). Upon
|
|
reflection, I'd say leave libperl.so in $archlib.
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
=head1 Upload Your Work to CPAN
|
|
|
|
You can upload your work to CPAN if you have a CPAN id. Check out
|
|
http://www.perl.com/CPAN/modules/04pause.html for information on
|
|
_PAUSE_, the Perl Author's Upload Server.
|
|
|
|
I typically upload both the patch file, e.g. F<perl5.004_08.pat.gz>
|
|
and the full tar file, e.g. F<perl5.004_08.tar.gz>.
|
|
|
|
If you want your patch to appear in the F<src/5.0/unsupported>
|
|
directory on CPAN, send e-mail to the CPAN master librarian. (Check
|
|
out http://www.perl.com/CPAN/CPAN.html ).
|
|
|
|
=head1 Help Save the World
|
|
|
|
You should definitely announce your patch on the perl5-porters list.
|
|
You should also consider announcing your patch on
|
|
comp.lang.perl.announce, though you should make it quite clear that a
|
|
subversion is not a production release, and be prepared to deal with
|
|
people who will not read your disclaimer.
|
|
|
|
=head1 Todo
|
|
|
|
Here, in no particular order, are some Configure and build-related
|
|
items that merit consideration. This list isn't exhaustive, it's just
|
|
what I came up with off the top of my head.
|
|
|
|
=head2 Good ideas waiting for round tuits
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item installprefix
|
|
|
|
I think we ought to support
|
|
|
|
Configure -Dinstallprefix=/blah/blah
|
|
|
|
Currently, we support B<-Dprefix=/blah/blah>, but the changing the install
|
|
location has to be handled by something like the F<config.over> trick
|
|
described in F<INSTALL>. AFS users also are treated specially.
|
|
We should probably duplicate the metaconfig prefix stuff for an
|
|
install prefix.
|
|
|
|
=item Configure -Dsrc=/blah/blah
|
|
|
|
We should be able to emulate B<configure --srcdir>. Tom Tromey
|
|
tromey@creche.cygnus.com has submitted some patches to
|
|
the dist-users mailing list along these lines. They have been folded
|
|
back into the main distribution, but various parts of the perl
|
|
Configure/build/install process still assume src='.'.
|
|
|
|
=item Hint file fixes
|
|
|
|
Various hint files work around Configure problems. We ought to fix
|
|
Configure so that most of them aren't needed.
|
|
|
|
=item Hint file information
|
|
|
|
Some of the hint file information (particularly dynamic loading stuff)
|
|
ought to be fed back into the main metaconfig distribution.
|
|
|
|
=item Catch GNU Libc "Stub" functions
|
|
|
|
Some functions (such as lchown()) are present in libc, but are
|
|
unimplmented. That is, they always fail and set errno=ENOSYS.
|
|
|
|
Thomas Bushnell provided the following sample code and the explanation
|
|
that follows:
|
|
|
|
/* System header to define __stub macros and hopefully few prototypes,
|
|
which can conflict with char FOO(); below. */
|
|
#include <assert.h>
|
|
/* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */
|
|
/* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2
|
|
builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply. */
|
|
char FOO();
|
|
|
|
int main() {
|
|
|
|
/* The GNU C library defines this for functions which it implements
|
|
to always fail with ENOSYS. Some functions are actually named
|
|
something starting with __ and the normal name is an alias. */
|
|
#if defined (__stub_FOO) || defined (__stub___FOO)
|
|
choke me
|
|
#else
|
|
FOO();
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
; return 0; }
|
|
|
|
The choice of <assert.h> is essentially arbitrary. The GNU libc
|
|
macros are found in <gnu/stubs.h>. You can include that file instead
|
|
of <assert.h> (which itself includes <gnu/stubs.h>) if you test for
|
|
its existence first. <assert.h> is assumed to exist on every system,
|
|
which is why it's used here. Any GNU libc header file will include
|
|
the stubs macros. If either __stub_NAME or __stub___NAME is defined,
|
|
then the function doesn't actually exist. Tests using <assert.h> work
|
|
on every system around.
|
|
|
|
The declaration of FOO is there to override builtin prototypes for
|
|
ANSI C functions.
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
=head2 Probably good ideas waiting for round tuits
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item GNU configure --options
|
|
|
|
I've received sensible suggestions for --exec_prefix and other
|
|
GNU configure --options. It's not always obvious exactly what is
|
|
intended, but this merits investigation.
|
|
|
|
=item make clean
|
|
|
|
Currently, B<make clean> isn't all that useful, though
|
|
B<make realclean> and B<make distclean> are. This needs a bit of
|
|
thought and documentation before it gets cleaned up.
|
|
|
|
=item Try gcc if cc fails
|
|
|
|
Currently, we just give up.
|
|
|
|
=item bypassing safe*alloc wrappers
|
|
|
|
On some systems, it may be safe to call the system malloc directly
|
|
without going through the util.c safe* layers. (Such systems would
|
|
accept free(0), for example.) This might be a time-saver for systems
|
|
that already have a good malloc. (Recent Linux libc's apparently have
|
|
a nice malloc that is well-tuned for the system.)
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
=head2 Vague possibilities
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item MacPerl
|
|
|
|
Get some of the Macintosh stuff folded back into the main distribution.
|
|
|
|
=item gconvert replacement
|
|
|
|
Maybe include a replacement function that doesn't lose data in rare
|
|
cases of coercion between string and numerical values.
|
|
|
|
=item Improve makedepend
|
|
|
|
The current makedepend process is clunky and annoyingly slow, but it
|
|
works for most folks. Alas, it assumes that there is a filename
|
|
$firstmakefile that the B<make> command will try to use before it uses
|
|
F<Makefile>. Such may not be the case for all B<make> commands,
|
|
particularly those on non-Unix systems.
|
|
|
|
Probably some variant of the BSD F<.depend> file will be useful.
|
|
We ought to check how other packages do this, if they do it at all.
|
|
We could probably pre-generate the dependencies (with the exception of
|
|
malloc.o, which could probably be determined at F<Makefile.SH>
|
|
extraction time.
|
|
|
|
=item GNU Makefile standard targets
|
|
|
|
GNU software generally has standardized Makefile targets. Unless we
|
|
have good reason to do otherwise, I see no reason not to support them.
|
|
|
|
=item File locking
|
|
|
|
Somehow, straighten out, document, and implement lockf(), flock(),
|
|
and/or fcntl() file locking. It's a mess.
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
=head1 AUTHORS
|
|
|
|
Original author: Andy Dougherty doughera@lafcol.lafayette.edu .
|
|
Additions by Chip Salzenberg chip@perl.com and
|
|
Tim Bunce Tim.Bunce@ig.co.uk .
|
|
|
|
All opinions expressed herein are those of the authorZ<>(s).
|
|
|
|
=head1 LAST MODIFIED
|
|
|
|
$Id: pumpkin.pod,v 1.22 1998/07/22 16:33:55 doughera Released $
|