Josh Paetzel f2be81e92c MFV 312436 ... 6569 large file delete can starve out write ops illumos/illumos-gate@ff5177ee8b ff5177ee8b https://www.illumos.org/issues/6569 The core issue I've found is that there is no throttle for how many deletes get assigned to one TXG. As a results when deleting large files we end up filling consecutive TXGs with deletes/frees, then write throttling other (more important) ops. There is an easy test case for this problem. Try deleting several large files (at least 1/2 TB) while you do write ops on the same pool. What we've seen is performance of these write ops (let's call it sideload I/O) would drop to zero. More specifically the problem is that dmu_free_long_range_impl() can/will fill up all of the dirty data in the pool "instantly", before many of the sideload ops can get in. So sideload performance will be impacted until all the files are freed. The solution we have tested at Nexenta (with positive results) creates a relatively simple throttle for how many "free" ops we let into one TXG. However this solution exposes other problems that should also be addressed. If we are to slow down freeing of data that means one has to wait even longer (assuming vnode ref count of 1) to get shell back after an rm or for NFS thread to finish the free-ing op. To avoid this the proposed solution is to call zfs_inactive() async for "large" files. Async freeing then begs for the reclaimed space to be accounted for in the zpool's "freeing" prop. The other issue with having a longer delete is the inability to export/unmount for a longer period of time. The proposed solution is to interrupt freeing of blocks when a fs is unmounted. Author: Alek Pinchuk <alek@nexenta.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Sanjay Nadkarni <sanjay.nadkarni@nexenta.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@omniti.com> Reviewed by: avg Differential Revision: D9008		2017-01-20 15:01:04 +00:00
..
zfs	MFV 312436	2017-01-20 15:01:04 +00:00
gfs.c	gfs_lookup_dot() does not have to acquire any locks	2016-05-16 15:13:16 +00:00
vnode.c	vfs: implement v_holdcnt/v_usecount manipulation using atomic ops	2015-07-16 13:57:05 +00:00