643 lines
15 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*-
* Copyright (c) 2004 Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
* All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
* are met:
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
*
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHORS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
* ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
* ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
* FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
* DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
* OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
* HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
* LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
* OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
* SUCH DAMAGE.
*
* $FreeBSD$
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <libgen.h>
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
#include <pthread.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <err.h>
#include <errno.h>
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
#include <assert.h>
#include <sys/param.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/sysctl.h>
#include <sys/syslog.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <sys/bio.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <netinet/tcp.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#include <geom/gate/g_gate.h>
#include "ggate.h"
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
enum { UNSET, CREATE, DESTROY, LIST, RESCUE } action = UNSET;
static const char *path = NULL;
static const char *host = NULL;
static int unit = -1;
static unsigned flags = 0;
static int force = 0;
static unsigned queue_size = G_GATE_QUEUE_SIZE;
static unsigned port = G_GATE_PORT;
static off_t mediasize;
static unsigned sectorsize = 0;
static unsigned timeout = G_GATE_TIMEOUT;
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
static int sendfd, recvfd;
static uint32_t token;
static pthread_t sendtd, recvtd;
static int reconnect;
static void
usage(void)
{
fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s create [-nv] [-o <ro|wo|rw>] [-p port] "
"[-q queue_size] [-R rcvbuf] [-S sndbuf] [-s sectorsize] "
"[-t timeout] [-u unit] <host> <path>\n", getprogname());
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
fprintf(stderr, " %s rescue [-nv] [-o <ro|wo|rw>] [-p port] "
"[-R rcvbuf] [-S sndbuf] <-u unit> <host> <path>\n", getprogname());
fprintf(stderr, " %s destroy [-f] <-u unit>\n", getprogname());
fprintf(stderr, " %s list [-v] [-u unit]\n", getprogname());
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
static void *
send_thread(void *arg __unused)
{
struct g_gate_ctl_io ggio;
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
struct g_gate_hdr hdr;
char buf[MAXPHYS];
ssize_t data;
int error;
g_gate_log(LOG_NOTICE, "%s: started!", __func__);
ggio.gctl_version = G_GATE_VERSION;
ggio.gctl_unit = unit;
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
ggio.gctl_data = buf;
for (;;) {
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
ggio.gctl_length = sizeof(buf);
ggio.gctl_error = 0;
g_gate_ioctl(G_GATE_CMD_START, &ggio);
error = ggio.gctl_error;
switch (error) {
case 0:
break;
case ECANCELED:
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
if (reconnect)
break;
/* Exit gracefully. */
g_gate_close_device();
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
#if 0
case ENOMEM:
/* Buffer too small. */
ggio.gctl_data = realloc(ggio.gctl_data,
ggio.gctl_length);
if (ggio.gctl_data != NULL) {
bsize = ggio.gctl_length;
goto once_again;
}
/* FALLTHROUGH */
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
#endif
case ENXIO:
default:
g_gate_xlog("ioctl(/dev/%s): %s.", G_GATE_CTL_NAME,
strerror(error));
}
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
if (reconnect)
break;
switch (ggio.gctl_cmd) {
case BIO_READ:
hdr.gh_cmd = GGATE_CMD_READ;
break;
case BIO_WRITE:
hdr.gh_cmd = GGATE_CMD_WRITE;
break;
}
hdr.gh_seq = ggio.gctl_seq;
hdr.gh_offset = ggio.gctl_offset;
hdr.gh_length = ggio.gctl_length;
hdr.gh_error = 0;
g_gate_swap2n_hdr(&hdr);
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
data = g_gate_send(sendfd, &hdr, sizeof(hdr), MSG_NOSIGNAL);
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Sent hdr packet.");
g_gate_swap2h_hdr(&hdr);
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
if (reconnect)
break;
if (data != sizeof(hdr)) {
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
g_gate_log(LOG_ERR, "Lost connection 1.");
reconnect = 1;
pthread_kill(recvtd, SIGUSR1);
break;
}
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
if (hdr.gh_cmd == GGATE_CMD_WRITE) {
data = g_gate_send(sendfd, ggio.gctl_data,
ggio.gctl_length, MSG_NOSIGNAL);
if (reconnect)
break;
if (data != ggio.gctl_length) {
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
g_gate_log(LOG_ERR, "Lost connection 2 (%zd != %zd).", data, (ssize_t)ggio.gctl_length);
reconnect = 1;
pthread_kill(recvtd, SIGUSR1);
break;
}
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Sent %zd bytes (offset=%llu, "
"size=%u).", data, hdr.gh_offset, hdr.gh_length);
}
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
}
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "%s: Died.", __func__);
return (NULL);
}
static void *
recv_thread(void *arg __unused)
{
struct g_gate_ctl_io ggio;
struct g_gate_hdr hdr;
char buf[MAXPHYS];
ssize_t data;
g_gate_log(LOG_NOTICE, "%s: started!", __func__);
ggio.gctl_version = G_GATE_VERSION;
ggio.gctl_unit = unit;
ggio.gctl_data = buf;
for (;;) {
data = g_gate_recv(recvfd, &hdr, sizeof(hdr), MSG_WAITALL);
if (reconnect)
break;
g_gate_swap2h_hdr(&hdr);
if (data != sizeof(hdr)) {
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
if (data == -1 && errno == EAGAIN)
continue;
g_gate_log(LOG_ERR, "Lost connection 3.");
reconnect = 1;
pthread_kill(sendtd, SIGUSR1);
break;
}
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Received hdr packet.");
ggio.gctl_seq = hdr.gh_seq;
ggio.gctl_cmd = hdr.gh_cmd;
ggio.gctl_offset = hdr.gh_offset;
ggio.gctl_length = hdr.gh_length;
ggio.gctl_error = hdr.gh_error;
if (ggio.gctl_error == 0 && ggio.gctl_cmd == GGATE_CMD_READ) {
data = g_gate_recv(recvfd, ggio.gctl_data,
ggio.gctl_length, MSG_WAITALL);
if (reconnect)
break;
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Received data packet.");
if (data != ggio.gctl_length) {
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
g_gate_log(LOG_ERR, "Lost connection 4.");
reconnect = 1;
pthread_kill(sendtd, SIGUSR1);
break;
}
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Received %d bytes (offset=%ju, "
"size=%zu).", data, (uintmax_t)hdr.gh_offset,
(size_t)hdr.gh_length);
}
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
g_gate_ioctl(G_GATE_CMD_DONE, &ggio);
}
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "%s: Died.", __func__);
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
static int
handshake(int dir)
{
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
struct g_gate_version ver;
struct g_gate_cinit cinit;
struct g_gate_sinit sinit;
struct sockaddr_in serv;
int sfd;
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
/*
* Do the network stuff.
*/
bzero(&serv, sizeof(serv));
serv.sin_family = AF_INET;
serv.sin_addr.s_addr = g_gate_str2ip(host);
if (serv.sin_addr.s_addr == INADDR_NONE) {
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Invalid IP/host name: %s.", host);
return (-1);
}
serv.sin_port = htons(port);
sfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
if (sfd == -1) {
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Cannot open socket: %s.",
strerror(errno));
return (-1);
}
g_gate_socket_settings(sfd);
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
if (connect(sfd, (struct sockaddr *)&serv, sizeof(serv)) == -1) {
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Cannot connect to server: %s.",
strerror(errno));
close(sfd);
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
return (-1);
}
g_gate_log(LOG_INFO, "Connected to the server: %s:%d.", host, port);
/*
* Create and send version packet.
*/
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Sending version packet.");
assert(strlen(GGATE_MAGIC) == sizeof(ver.gv_magic));
bcopy(GGATE_MAGIC, ver.gv_magic, sizeof(ver.gv_magic));
ver.gv_version = GGATE_VERSION;
ver.gv_error = 0;
g_gate_swap2n_version(&ver);
if (g_gate_send(sfd, &ver, sizeof(ver), MSG_NOSIGNAL) == -1) {
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Error while sending version packet: %s.",
strerror(errno));
close(sfd);
return (-1);
}
bzero(&ver, sizeof(ver));
if (g_gate_recv(sfd, &ver, sizeof(ver), MSG_WAITALL) == -1) {
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Error while receiving data: %s.",
strerror(errno));
close(sfd);
return (-1);
}
if (ver.gv_error != 0) {
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Version verification problem: %s.",
strerror(errno));
close(sfd);
return (-1);
}
/*
* Create and send initial packet.
*/
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Sending initial packet.");
if (strlcpy(cinit.gc_path, path, sizeof(cinit.gc_path)) >=
sizeof(cinit.gc_path)) {
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Path name too long.");
close(sfd);
return (-1);
}
cinit.gc_flags = flags | dir;
cinit.gc_token = token;
cinit.gc_nconn = 2;
g_gate_swap2n_cinit(&cinit);
if (g_gate_send(sfd, &cinit, sizeof(cinit), MSG_NOSIGNAL) == -1) {
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Error while sending initial packet: %s.",
strerror(errno));
close(sfd);
return (-1);
}
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
g_gate_swap2h_cinit(&cinit);
/*
* Receiving initial packet from server.
*/
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Receiving initial packet.");
if (g_gate_recv(sfd, &sinit, sizeof(sinit), MSG_WAITALL) == -1) {
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Error while receiving data: %s.",
strerror(errno));
close(sfd);
return (-1);
}
g_gate_swap2h_sinit(&sinit);
if (sinit.gs_error != 0) {
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Error from server: %s.",
strerror(sinit.gs_error));
close(sfd);
return (-1);
}
g_gate_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Received initial packet.");
mediasize = sinit.gs_mediasize;
if (sectorsize == 0)
sectorsize = sinit.gs_sectorsize;
return (sfd);
}
static void
mydaemon(void)
{
if (g_gate_verbose > 0)
return;
if (daemon(0, 0) == 0)
return;
if (action == CREATE)
g_gate_destroy(unit, 1);
err(EXIT_FAILURE, "Cannot daemonize");
}
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
static int
g_gatec_connect(void)
{
token = arc4random();
/*
* Our receive descriptor is connected to the send descriptor on the
* server side.
*/
recvfd = handshake(GGATE_FLAG_SEND);
if (recvfd == -1)
return (0);
/*
* Our send descriptor is connected to the receive descriptor on the
* server side.
*/
sendfd = handshake(GGATE_FLAG_RECV);
if (sendfd == -1)
return (0);
return (1);
}
static void
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
g_gatec_start(void)
{
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
int error;
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
reconnect = 0;
error = pthread_create(&recvtd, NULL, recv_thread, NULL);
if (error != 0) {
g_gate_destroy(unit, 1);
g_gate_xlog("pthread_create(recv_thread): %s.",
strerror(error));
}
sendtd = pthread_self();
send_thread(NULL);
/* Disconnected. */
close(sendfd);
close(recvfd);
}
static void
signop(int sig __unused)
{
/* Do nothing. */
}
static void
g_gatec_loop(void)
{
struct g_gate_ctl_cancel ggioc;
signal(SIGUSR1, signop);
for (;;) {
g_gatec_start();
g_gate_log(LOG_NOTICE, "Disconnected [%s %s]. Connecting...",
host, path);
while (!g_gatec_connect()) {
sleep(2);
g_gate_log(LOG_NOTICE, "Connecting [%s %s]...", host,
path);
}
ggioc.gctl_version = G_GATE_VERSION;
ggioc.gctl_unit = unit;
ggioc.gctl_seq = 0;
g_gate_ioctl(G_GATE_CMD_CANCEL, &ggioc);
}
}
static void
g_gatec_create(void)
{
struct g_gate_ctl_create ggioc;
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
if (!g_gatec_connect())
g_gate_xlog("Cannot connect: %s.", strerror(errno));
/*
* Ok, got both sockets, time to create provider.
*/
ggioc.gctl_version = G_GATE_VERSION;
ggioc.gctl_mediasize = mediasize;
ggioc.gctl_sectorsize = sectorsize;
ggioc.gctl_flags = flags;
ggioc.gctl_maxcount = queue_size;
ggioc.gctl_timeout = timeout;
ggioc.gctl_unit = unit;
snprintf(ggioc.gctl_info, sizeof(ggioc.gctl_info), "%s:%u %s", host,
port, path);
g_gate_ioctl(G_GATE_CMD_CREATE, &ggioc);
if (unit == -1) {
printf("%s%u\n", G_GATE_PROVIDER_NAME, ggioc.gctl_unit);
fflush(stdout);
}
unit = ggioc.gctl_unit;
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
mydaemon();
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
g_gatec_loop();
}
static void
g_gatec_rescue(void)
{
struct g_gate_ctl_cancel ggioc;
if (!g_gatec_connect())
g_gate_xlog("Cannot connect: %s.", strerror(errno));
ggioc.gctl_version = G_GATE_VERSION;
ggioc.gctl_unit = unit;
ggioc.gctl_seq = 0;
g_gate_ioctl(G_GATE_CMD_CANCEL, &ggioc);
mydaemon();
g_gatec_loop();
}
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
if (argc < 2)
usage();
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
if (strcasecmp(argv[1], "create") == 0)
action = CREATE;
else if (strcasecmp(argv[1], "destroy") == 0)
action = DESTROY;
else if (strcasecmp(argv[1], "list") == 0)
action = LIST;
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
else if (strcasecmp(argv[1], "rescue") == 0)
action = RESCUE;
else
usage();
argc -= 1;
argv += 1;
for (;;) {
int ch;
ch = getopt(argc, argv, "fno:p:q:R:S:s:t:u:v");
if (ch == -1)
break;
switch (ch) {
case 'f':
if (action != DESTROY)
usage();
force = 1;
break;
case 'n':
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
if (action != CREATE && action != RESCUE)
usage();
nagle = 0;
break;
case 'o':
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
if (action != CREATE && action != RESCUE)
usage();
if (strcasecmp("ro", optarg) == 0)
flags = G_GATE_FLAG_READONLY;
else if (strcasecmp("wo", optarg) == 0)
flags = G_GATE_FLAG_WRITEONLY;
else if (strcasecmp("rw", optarg) == 0)
flags = 0;
else {
errx(EXIT_FAILURE,
"Invalid argument for '-o' option.");
}
break;
case 'p':
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
if (action != CREATE && action != RESCUE)
usage();
errno = 0;
port = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 10);
if (port == 0 && errno != 0)
errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "Invalid port.");
break;
case 'q':
if (action != CREATE)
usage();
errno = 0;
queue_size = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 10);
if (queue_size == 0 && errno != 0)
errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "Invalid queue_size.");
break;
case 'R':
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
if (action != CREATE && action != RESCUE)
usage();
errno = 0;
rcvbuf = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 10);
if (rcvbuf == 0 && errno != 0)
errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "Invalid rcvbuf.");
break;
case 'S':
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
if (action != CREATE && action != RESCUE)
usage();
errno = 0;
sndbuf = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 10);
if (sndbuf == 0 && errno != 0)
errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "Invalid sndbuf.");
break;
case 's':
if (action != CREATE)
usage();
errno = 0;
sectorsize = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 10);
if (sectorsize == 0 && errno != 0)
errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "Invalid sectorsize.");
break;
case 't':
if (action != CREATE)
usage();
errno = 0;
timeout = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 10);
if (timeout == 0 && errno != 0)
errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "Invalid timeout.");
break;
case 'u':
errno = 0;
unit = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
if (unit == 0 && errno != 0)
errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "Invalid unit number.");
break;
case 'v':
if (action == DESTROY)
usage();
g_gate_verbose++;
break;
default:
usage();
}
}
argc -= optind;
argv += optind;
switch (action) {
case CREATE:
if (argc != 2)
usage();
g_gate_load_module();
g_gate_open_device();
host = argv[0];
path = argv[1];
g_gatec_create();
break;
case DESTROY:
if (unit == -1) {
fprintf(stderr, "Required unit number.\n");
usage();
}
g_gate_verbose = 1;
g_gate_open_device();
g_gate_destroy(unit, force);
break;
case LIST:
g_gate_list(unit, g_gate_verbose);
break;
Reimplement ggatec/ggated applications. Change communication protocol to be much more resistant on network problems and to allow for much better performance. Better performance is achieved by creating two connections between ggatec and ggated one for sending the data and one for receiving it. Every connection is handled by separeted thread, so there is no more synchronous data flow (send and wait for response), now one threads sends all requests and another receives the data. Use two threads in ggatec(8): - sendtd, which takes I/O requests from the kernel and sends them to the ggated daemon on the other end; - recvtd, which waits for ggated responses and forwards them to the kernel. Use three threads in ggated(8): - recvtd, which waits for I/O requests and puts them onto incoming queue; - disktd, which takes requests from the incoming queue, does disk operations and puts finished requests onto outgoing queue; - sendtd, which takes finished requests from the outgoing queue and sends responses back to ggatec. Because there were major changes in communication protocol, there is no backward compatibility, from now on, both client and server has to run on 5.x or 6.x (or at least ggated should be from the same FreeBSD version on which ggatec is running). For Gbit networks some buffers need to be increased. I use those settings: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=8388608 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=8388608 and I use '-S 4194304 -R 4194304' options for both, ggatec and ggated. Approved by: re (scottl)
2005-07-08 21:28:26 +00:00
case RESCUE:
if (argc != 2)
usage();
if (unit == -1) {
fprintf(stderr, "Required unit number.\n");
usage();
}
g_gate_open_device();
host = argv[0];
path = argv[1];
g_gatec_rescue();
break;
case UNSET:
default:
usage();
}
g_gate_close_device();
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}