d/freebsd-nq
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
1fa5c7af33
freebsd-nq/module/zfs/vdev_raidz_math_aarch64_neonx2.c

233 lines
5.4 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
/*
* CDDL HEADER START
*
* The contents of this file are subject to the terms of the
* Common Development and Distribution License (the "License").
* You may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
*
* You can obtain a copy of the license at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE
* or http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions
* and limitations under the License.
*
* When distributing Covered Code, include this CDDL HEADER in each
* file and include the License file at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE.
* If applicable, add the following below this CDDL HEADER, with the
* fields enclosed by brackets "[]" replaced with your own identifying
* information: Portions Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
*
* CDDL HEADER END
*/
/*
* Copyright (C) 2016 Romain Dolbeau. All rights reserved.
*/
#include <sys/isa_defs.h>
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#if defined(__aarch64__)
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
#include "vdev_raidz_math_aarch64_neon_common.h"
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define SYN_STRIDE 4
#define ZERO_STRIDE 8
#define ZERO_DEFINE() \
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_4_5() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_6_7()
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define ZERO_D 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define COPY_STRIDE 8
#define COPY_DEFINE() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_4_5() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_6_7()
#define COPY_D 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
#define ADD_STRIDE 8
#define ADD_DEFINE() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_4_5() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_6_7()
#define ADD_D 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
#define MUL_STRIDE 4
#define MUL_DEFINE() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_33_36()
#define MUL_D 0, 1, 2, 3
#define GEN_P_DEFINE() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_33_36()
#define GEN_P_STRIDE 4
#define GEN_P_P 0, 1, 2, 3
#define GEN_PQ_DEFINE() \
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_4_5() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_6_7() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_16() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_17() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_33_36()
#define GEN_PQ_STRIDE 4
#define GEN_PQ_D 0, 1, 2, 3
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define GEN_PQ_C 4, 5, 6, 7
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
#define GEN_PQR_DEFINE() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_4_5() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_6_7() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_16() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_17() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_33_36()
#define GEN_PQR_STRIDE 4
#define GEN_PQR_D 0, 1, 2, 3
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define GEN_PQR_C 4, 5, 6, 7
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define SYN_Q_DEFINE() \
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
GEN_X_DEFINE_4_5() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_6_7() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_16() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_17() \
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
GEN_X_DEFINE_33_36()
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define SYN_Q_STRIDE 4
#define SYN_Q_D 0, 1, 2, 3
#define SYN_Q_X 4, 5, 6, 7
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define SYN_R_DEFINE() \
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
GEN_X_DEFINE_4_5() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_6_7() \
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
GEN_X_DEFINE_16() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_17() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_33_36()
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define SYN_R_STRIDE 4
#define SYN_R_D 0, 1, 2, 3
#define SYN_R_X 4, 5, 6, 7
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define SYN_PQ_DEFINE() \
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
GEN_X_DEFINE_4_5() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_6_7() \
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
GEN_X_DEFINE_16() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_17() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_33_36()
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define SYN_PQ_STRIDE 4
#define SYN_PQ_D 0, 1, 2, 3
#define SYN_PQ_X 4, 5, 6, 7
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
#define REC_PQ_DEFINE() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_4_5() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_6_7() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_8_9() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_22_23() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_33_36()
#define REC_PQ_STRIDE 4
#define REC_PQ_X 0, 1, 2, 3
#define REC_PQ_Y 4, 5, 6, 7
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define REC_PQ_T 8, 9, 22, 23
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define SYN_PR_DEFINE() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_4_5() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_6_7() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_16() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_17() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_33_36()
#define SYN_PR_STRIDE 4
#define SYN_PR_D 0, 1, 2, 3
#define SYN_PR_X 4, 5, 6, 7
#define REC_PR_DEFINE() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_4_5() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_6_7() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_8_9() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_22_23() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_33_36()
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
#define REC_PR_STRIDE 4
#define REC_PR_X 0, 1, 2, 3
#define REC_PR_Y 4, 5, 6, 7
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define REC_PR_T 8, 9, 22, 23
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define SYN_QR_DEFINE() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_4_5() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_6_7() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_16() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_17() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_33_36()
#define SYN_QR_STRIDE 4
#define SYN_QR_D 0, 1, 2, 3
#define SYN_QR_X 4, 5, 6, 7
#define REC_QR_DEFINE() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_4_5() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_6_7() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_8_9() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_22_23() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_33_36()
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
#define REC_QR_STRIDE 4
#define REC_QR_X 0, 1, 2, 3
#define REC_QR_Y 4, 5, 6, 7
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define REC_QR_T 8, 9, 22, 23
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define SYN_PQR_DEFINE() \
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_4_5() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_6_7() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_16() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_17() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_33_36()
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define SYN_PQR_STRIDE 4
#define SYN_PQR_D 0, 1, 2, 3
#define SYN_PQR_X 4, 5, 6, 7
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
ABD raidz NEON support Port NEON implementation of RAID-Z functions to ABD. Signed-off-by: Roomain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net>
2016-11-22 07:38:34 +00:00
#define REC_PQR_DEFINE() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_0_3() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_4_5() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_6_7() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_8_9() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_31() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_32() \
GEN_X_DEFINE_33_36()
#define REC_PQR_STRIDE 2
#define REC_PQR_X 0, 1
#define REC_PQR_Y 2, 3
#define REC_PQR_Z 4, 5
#define REC_PQR_XS 6, 7
#define REC_PQR_YS 8, 9
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
#include <sys/vdev_raidz_impl.h>
#include "vdev_raidz_math_impl.h"
DEFINE_GEN_METHODS(aarch64_neonx2);
/*
* If compiled with -O0, gcc doesn't do any stack frame coalescing
* and -Wframe-larger-than=1024 is triggered in debug mode.
*/
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wframe-larger-than="
DEFINE_REC_METHODS(aarch64_neonx2);
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
static boolean_t
raidz_will_aarch64_neonx2_work(void)
{
Linux 5.0 compat: SIMD compatibility Restore the SIMD optimization for 4.19.38 LTS, 4.14.120 LTS, and 5.0 and newer kernels. This is accomplished by leveraging the fact that by definition dedicated kernel threads never need to concern themselves with saving and restoring the user FPU state. Therefore, they may use the FPU as long as we can guarantee user tasks always restore their FPU state before context switching back to user space. For the 5.0 and 5.1 kernels disabling preemption and local interrupts is sufficient to allow the FPU to be used. All non-kernel threads will restore the preserved user FPU state. For 5.2 and latter kernels the user FPU state restoration will be skipped if the kernel determines the registers have not changed. Therefore, for these kernels we need to perform the additional step of saving and restoring the FPU registers. Invalidating the per-cpu global tracking the FPU state would force a restore but that functionality is private to the core x86 FPU implementation and unavailable. In practice, restricting SIMD to kernel threads is not a major restriction for ZFS. The vast majority of SIMD operations are already performed by the IO pipeline. The remaining cases are relatively infrequent and can be handled by the generic code without significant impact. The two most noteworthy cases are: 1) Decrypting the wrapping key for an encrypted dataset, i.e. `zfs load-key`. All other encryption and decryption operations will use the SIMD optimized implementations. 2) Generating the payload checksums for a `zfs send` stream. In order to avoid making any changes to the higher layers of ZFS all of the `*_get_ops()` functions were updated to take in to consideration the calling context. This allows for the fastest implementation to be used as appropriate (see kfpu_allowed()). The only other notable instance of SIMD operations being used outside a kernel thread was at module load time. This code was moved in to a taskq in order to accommodate the new kernel thread restriction. Finally, a few other modifications were made in order to further harden this code and facilitate testing. They include updating each implementations operations structure to be declared as a constant. And allowing "cycle" to be set when selecting the preferred ops in the kernel as well as user space. Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #8754 Closes #8793 Closes #8965
2019-07-12 16:31:20 +00:00
return (kfpu_allowed());
Add parity generation/rebuild using 128-bits NEON for Aarch64 This re-use the framework established for SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2. However, GCC is using FP registers on Aarch64, so unlike SSE/AVX2 we can't rely on the registers being left alone between ASM statements. So instead, the NEON code uses C variables and GCC extended ASM syntax. Note that since the kernel explicitly disable vector registers, they have to be locally re-enabled explicitly. As we use the variable's number to define the symbolic name, and GCC won't allow duplicate symbolic names, numbers have to be unique. Even when the code is not going to be used (e.g. the case for 4 registers when using the macro with only 2). Only the actually used variables should be declared, otherwise the build will fails in debug mode. This requires the replacement of the XOR(X,X) syntax by a new ZERO(X) macro, which does the same thing but without repeating the argument. And perhaps someday there will be a machine where there is a more efficient way to zero a register than XOR with itself. This affects scalar, SSE2, SSSE3 and AVX2 as they need the new macro. It's possible to write faster implementations (different scheduling, different unrolling, interleaving NEON and scalar, ...) for various cores, but this one has the advantage of fitting in the current state of the code, and thus is likely easier to review/check/merge. The only difference between aarch64-neon and aarch64-neonx2 is that aarch64-neonx2 unroll some functions some more. Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@atos.net> Closes #4801
2016-10-03 16:44:00 +00:00
}
const raidz_impl_ops_t vdev_raidz_aarch64_neonx2_impl = {
.init = NULL,
.fini = NULL,
.gen = RAIDZ_GEN_METHODS(aarch64_neonx2),
.rec = RAIDZ_REC_METHODS(aarch64_neonx2),
.is_supported = &raidz_will_aarch64_neonx2_work,
.name = "aarch64_neonx2"
};
#endif /* defined(__aarch64__) */
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink