freebsd-nq/module/zfs/vdev_mirror.c

973 lines
27 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
* CDDL HEADER START
*
* The contents of this file are subject to the terms of the
* Common Development and Distribution License (the "License").
* You may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
*
* You can obtain a copy of the license at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE
* or http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions
* and limitations under the License.
*
* When distributing Covered Code, include this CDDL HEADER in each
* file and include the License file at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE.
* If applicable, add the following below this CDDL HEADER, with the
* fields enclosed by brackets "[]" replaced with your own identifying
* information: Portions Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
*
* CDDL HEADER END
*/
/*
* Copyright 2010 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
* Use is subject to license terms.
*/
/*
OpenZFS 7090 - zfs should throttle allocations OpenZFS 7090 - zfs should throttle allocations Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Alex Reece <alex@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Christopher Siden <christopher.siden@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <paul.dagnelie@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Approved by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Ported-by: Don Brady <don.brady@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> When write I/Os are issued, they are issued in block order but the ZIO pipeline will drive them asynchronously through the allocation stage which can result in blocks being allocated out-of-order. It would be nice to preserve as much of the logical order as possible. In addition, the allocations are equally scattered across all top-level VDEVs but not all top-level VDEVs are created equally. The pipeline should be able to detect devices that are more capable of handling allocations and should allocate more blocks to those devices. This allows for dynamic allocation distribution when devices are imbalanced as fuller devices will tend to be slower than empty devices. The change includes a new pool-wide allocation queue which would throttle and order allocations in the ZIO pipeline. The queue would be ordered by issued time and offset and would provide an initial amount of allocation of work to each top-level vdev. The allocation logic utilizes a reservation system to reserve allocations that will be performed by the allocator. Once an allocation is successfully completed it's scheduled on a given top-level vdev. Each top-level vdev maintains a maximum number of allocations that it can handle (mg_alloc_queue_depth). The pool-wide reserved allocations (top-levels * mg_alloc_queue_depth) are distributed across the top-level vdevs metaslab groups and round robin across all eligible metaslab groups to distribute the work. As top-levels complete their work, they receive additional work from the pool-wide allocation queue until the allocation queue is emptied. OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/7090 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/4756c3d7 Closes #5258 Porting Notes: - Maintained minimal stack in zio_done - Preserve linux-specific io sizes in zio_write_compress - Added module params and documentation - Updated to use optimize AVL cmp macros
2016-10-14 00:59:18 +00:00
* Copyright (c) 2012, 2015 by Delphix. All rights reserved.
*/
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
#include <sys/zfs_context.h>
#include <sys/spa.h>
OpenZFS 8473 - scrub does not detect errors on active spares Scrubbing is supposed to detect and repair all errors in the pool. However, it wrongly ignores active spare devices. The problem can easily be reproduced in OpenZFS at git rev 0ef125d with these commands: truncate -s 64m /tmp/a /tmp/b /tmp/c sudo zpool create testpool mirror /tmp/a /tmp/b spare /tmp/c sudo zpool replace testpool /tmp/a /tmp/c /bin/dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k count=63 oseek=1 conv=notrunc of=/tmp/c sync sudo zpool scrub testpool zpool status testpool # Will show 0 errors, which is wrong sudo zpool offline testpool /tmp/a sudo zpool scrub testpool zpool status testpool # Will show errors on /tmp/c, # which should've already been fixed FreeBSD head is partially affected: the first scrub will detect some errors, but the second scrub will detect more. This same test was run on Linux before applying the fix and the FreeBSD head behavior was observed. Authored by: asomers <asomers@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed by: Andy Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Sponsored by: Spectra Logic Corp OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8473 FreeBSD-commit: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/e20ec8879 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/554675ee Closes #8251
2017-09-20 16:31:00 +00:00
#include <sys/spa_impl.h>
#include <sys/dsl_pool.h>
#include <sys/dsl_scan.h>
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
#include <sys/vdev_impl.h>
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
#include <sys/vdev_draid.h>
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
#include <sys/zio.h>
#include <sys/abd.h>
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
#include <sys/fs/zfs.h>
/*
* Vdev mirror kstats
*/
static kstat_t *mirror_ksp = NULL;
typedef struct mirror_stats {
kstat_named_t vdev_mirror_stat_rotating_linear;
kstat_named_t vdev_mirror_stat_rotating_offset;
kstat_named_t vdev_mirror_stat_rotating_seek;
kstat_named_t vdev_mirror_stat_non_rotating_linear;
kstat_named_t vdev_mirror_stat_non_rotating_seek;
kstat_named_t vdev_mirror_stat_preferred_found;
kstat_named_t vdev_mirror_stat_preferred_not_found;
} mirror_stats_t;
static mirror_stats_t mirror_stats = {
/* New I/O follows directly the last I/O */
{ "rotating_linear", KSTAT_DATA_UINT64 },
/* New I/O is within zfs_vdev_mirror_rotating_seek_offset of the last */
{ "rotating_offset", KSTAT_DATA_UINT64 },
/* New I/O requires random seek */
{ "rotating_seek", KSTAT_DATA_UINT64 },
/* New I/O follows directly the last I/O (nonrot) */
{ "non_rotating_linear", KSTAT_DATA_UINT64 },
/* New I/O requires random seek (nonrot) */
{ "non_rotating_seek", KSTAT_DATA_UINT64 },
/* Preferred child vdev found */
{ "preferred_found", KSTAT_DATA_UINT64 },
/* Preferred child vdev not found or equal load */
{ "preferred_not_found", KSTAT_DATA_UINT64 },
};
#define MIRROR_STAT(stat) (mirror_stats.stat.value.ui64)
#define MIRROR_INCR(stat, val) atomic_add_64(&MIRROR_STAT(stat), val)
#define MIRROR_BUMP(stat) MIRROR_INCR(stat, 1)
void
vdev_mirror_stat_init(void)
{
mirror_ksp = kstat_create("zfs", 0, "vdev_mirror_stats",
"misc", KSTAT_TYPE_NAMED,
sizeof (mirror_stats) / sizeof (kstat_named_t), KSTAT_FLAG_VIRTUAL);
if (mirror_ksp != NULL) {
mirror_ksp->ks_data = &mirror_stats;
kstat_install(mirror_ksp);
}
}
void
vdev_mirror_stat_fini(void)
{
if (mirror_ksp != NULL) {
kstat_delete(mirror_ksp);
mirror_ksp = NULL;
}
}
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
* Virtual device vector for mirroring.
*/
typedef struct mirror_child {
vdev_t *mc_vd;
uint64_t mc_offset;
int mc_error;
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
int mc_load;
uint8_t mc_tried;
uint8_t mc_skipped;
uint8_t mc_speculative;
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
uint8_t mc_rebuilding;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
} mirror_child_t;
typedef struct mirror_map {
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
int *mm_preferred;
int mm_preferred_cnt;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
int mm_children;
OpenZFS 8473 - scrub does not detect errors on active spares Scrubbing is supposed to detect and repair all errors in the pool. However, it wrongly ignores active spare devices. The problem can easily be reproduced in OpenZFS at git rev 0ef125d with these commands: truncate -s 64m /tmp/a /tmp/b /tmp/c sudo zpool create testpool mirror /tmp/a /tmp/b spare /tmp/c sudo zpool replace testpool /tmp/a /tmp/c /bin/dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k count=63 oseek=1 conv=notrunc of=/tmp/c sync sudo zpool scrub testpool zpool status testpool # Will show 0 errors, which is wrong sudo zpool offline testpool /tmp/a sudo zpool scrub testpool zpool status testpool # Will show errors on /tmp/c, # which should've already been fixed FreeBSD head is partially affected: the first scrub will detect some errors, but the second scrub will detect more. This same test was run on Linux before applying the fix and the FreeBSD head behavior was observed. Authored by: asomers <asomers@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed by: Andy Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Sponsored by: Spectra Logic Corp OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8473 FreeBSD-commit: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/e20ec8879 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/554675ee Closes #8251
2017-09-20 16:31:00 +00:00
boolean_t mm_resilvering;
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
boolean_t mm_rebuilding;
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
boolean_t mm_root;
mirror_child_t mm_child[];
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
} mirror_map_t;
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
static int vdev_mirror_shift = 21;
Improve N-way mirror performance The read bandwidth of an N-way mirror can by increased by 50%, and the IOPs by 10%, by more carefully selecting the preferred leaf vdev. The existing algorthm selects a perferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the drives are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. Utilization can be improved by preferentially selecting the leaf vdev with the least pending IO. This prevents leaf vdevs from being starved and compensates for performance differences between disks in the mirror. Faster vdevs will be sent more work and the mirror performance will not be limitted by the slowest drive. In the common case where all the pending queues are full and there is no single least busy leaf vdev a batching stratagy is employed. Of the N least busy vdevs one is selected with equal probability to be the preferred vdev for T microseconds. Compared to randomly selecting a vdev to break the tie batching the requests greatly improves the odds of merging the requests in the Linux elevator. The testing results show a significant performance improvement for all four workloads tested. The workloads were generated using the fio benchmark and are as follows. 1) 1MB sequential reads from 16 threads to 16 files (MB/s). 2) 4KB sequential reads from 16 threads to 16 files (MB/s). 3) 1MB random reads from 16 threads to 16 files (IOP/s). 4) 4KB random reads from 16 threads to 16 files (IOP/s). | Pristine | With 1461 | | Sequential Random | Sequential Random | | 1MB 4KB 1MB 4KB | 1MB 4KB 1MB 4KB | | MB/s MB/s IO/s IO/s | MB/s MB/s IO/s IO/s | ---------------+-----------------------+------------------------+ 2 Striped | 226 243 11 304 | 222 255 11 299 | 2 2-Way Mirror | 302 324 16 534 | 433 448 23 571 | 2 3-Way Mirror | 429 458 24 714 | 648 648 41 808 | 2 4-Way Mirror | 562 601 36 849 | 816 828 82 926 | Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #1461
2013-05-31 19:07:59 +00:00
/*
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
* The load configuration settings below are tuned by default for
* the case where all devices are of the same rotational type.
Improve N-way mirror performance The read bandwidth of an N-way mirror can by increased by 50%, and the IOPs by 10%, by more carefully selecting the preferred leaf vdev. The existing algorthm selects a perferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the drives are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. Utilization can be improved by preferentially selecting the leaf vdev with the least pending IO. This prevents leaf vdevs from being starved and compensates for performance differences between disks in the mirror. Faster vdevs will be sent more work and the mirror performance will not be limitted by the slowest drive. In the common case where all the pending queues are full and there is no single least busy leaf vdev a batching stratagy is employed. Of the N least busy vdevs one is selected with equal probability to be the preferred vdev for T microseconds. Compared to randomly selecting a vdev to break the tie batching the requests greatly improves the odds of merging the requests in the Linux elevator. The testing results show a significant performance improvement for all four workloads tested. The workloads were generated using the fio benchmark and are as follows. 1) 1MB sequential reads from 16 threads to 16 files (MB/s). 2) 4KB sequential reads from 16 threads to 16 files (MB/s). 3) 1MB random reads from 16 threads to 16 files (IOP/s). 4) 4KB random reads from 16 threads to 16 files (IOP/s). | Pristine | With 1461 | | Sequential Random | Sequential Random | | 1MB 4KB 1MB 4KB | 1MB 4KB 1MB 4KB | | MB/s MB/s IO/s IO/s | MB/s MB/s IO/s IO/s | ---------------+-----------------------+------------------------+ 2 Striped | 226 243 11 304 | 222 255 11 299 | 2 2-Way Mirror | 302 324 16 534 | 433 448 23 571 | 2 3-Way Mirror | 429 458 24 714 | 648 648 41 808 | 2 4-Way Mirror | 562 601 36 849 | 816 828 82 926 | Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #1461
2013-05-31 19:07:59 +00:00
*
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
* If there is a mixture of rotating and non-rotating media, setting
* zfs_vdev_mirror_non_rotating_seek_inc to 0 may well provide better results
* as it will direct more reads to the non-rotating vdevs which are more likely
* to have a higher performance.
Improve N-way mirror performance The read bandwidth of an N-way mirror can by increased by 50%, and the IOPs by 10%, by more carefully selecting the preferred leaf vdev. The existing algorthm selects a perferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the drives are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. Utilization can be improved by preferentially selecting the leaf vdev with the least pending IO. This prevents leaf vdevs from being starved and compensates for performance differences between disks in the mirror. Faster vdevs will be sent more work and the mirror performance will not be limitted by the slowest drive. In the common case where all the pending queues are full and there is no single least busy leaf vdev a batching stratagy is employed. Of the N least busy vdevs one is selected with equal probability to be the preferred vdev for T microseconds. Compared to randomly selecting a vdev to break the tie batching the requests greatly improves the odds of merging the requests in the Linux elevator. The testing results show a significant performance improvement for all four workloads tested. The workloads were generated using the fio benchmark and are as follows. 1) 1MB sequential reads from 16 threads to 16 files (MB/s). 2) 4KB sequential reads from 16 threads to 16 files (MB/s). 3) 1MB random reads from 16 threads to 16 files (IOP/s). 4) 4KB random reads from 16 threads to 16 files (IOP/s). | Pristine | With 1461 | | Sequential Random | Sequential Random | | 1MB 4KB 1MB 4KB | 1MB 4KB 1MB 4KB | | MB/s MB/s IO/s IO/s | MB/s MB/s IO/s IO/s | ---------------+-----------------------+------------------------+ 2 Striped | 226 243 11 304 | 222 255 11 299 | 2 2-Way Mirror | 302 324 16 534 | 433 448 23 571 | 2 3-Way Mirror | 429 458 24 714 | 648 648 41 808 | 2 4-Way Mirror | 562 601 36 849 | 816 828 82 926 | Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #1461
2013-05-31 19:07:59 +00:00
*/
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
/* Rotating media load calculation configuration. */
static int zfs_vdev_mirror_rotating_inc = 0;
static int zfs_vdev_mirror_rotating_seek_inc = 5;
static int zfs_vdev_mirror_rotating_seek_offset = 1 * 1024 * 1024;
/* Non-rotating media load calculation configuration. */
static int zfs_vdev_mirror_non_rotating_inc = 0;
static int zfs_vdev_mirror_non_rotating_seek_inc = 1;
static inline size_t
vdev_mirror_map_size(int children)
{
return (offsetof(mirror_map_t, mm_child[children]) +
sizeof (int) * children);
}
static inline mirror_map_t *
OpenZFS 8473 - scrub does not detect errors on active spares Scrubbing is supposed to detect and repair all errors in the pool. However, it wrongly ignores active spare devices. The problem can easily be reproduced in OpenZFS at git rev 0ef125d with these commands: truncate -s 64m /tmp/a /tmp/b /tmp/c sudo zpool create testpool mirror /tmp/a /tmp/b spare /tmp/c sudo zpool replace testpool /tmp/a /tmp/c /bin/dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k count=63 oseek=1 conv=notrunc of=/tmp/c sync sudo zpool scrub testpool zpool status testpool # Will show 0 errors, which is wrong sudo zpool offline testpool /tmp/a sudo zpool scrub testpool zpool status testpool # Will show errors on /tmp/c, # which should've already been fixed FreeBSD head is partially affected: the first scrub will detect some errors, but the second scrub will detect more. This same test was run on Linux before applying the fix and the FreeBSD head behavior was observed. Authored by: asomers <asomers@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed by: Andy Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Sponsored by: Spectra Logic Corp OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8473 FreeBSD-commit: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/e20ec8879 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/554675ee Closes #8251
2017-09-20 16:31:00 +00:00
vdev_mirror_map_alloc(int children, boolean_t resilvering, boolean_t root)
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
{
mirror_map_t *mm;
mm = kmem_zalloc(vdev_mirror_map_size(children), KM_SLEEP);
mm->mm_children = children;
OpenZFS 8473 - scrub does not detect errors on active spares Scrubbing is supposed to detect and repair all errors in the pool. However, it wrongly ignores active spare devices. The problem can easily be reproduced in OpenZFS at git rev 0ef125d with these commands: truncate -s 64m /tmp/a /tmp/b /tmp/c sudo zpool create testpool mirror /tmp/a /tmp/b spare /tmp/c sudo zpool replace testpool /tmp/a /tmp/c /bin/dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k count=63 oseek=1 conv=notrunc of=/tmp/c sync sudo zpool scrub testpool zpool status testpool # Will show 0 errors, which is wrong sudo zpool offline testpool /tmp/a sudo zpool scrub testpool zpool status testpool # Will show errors on /tmp/c, # which should've already been fixed FreeBSD head is partially affected: the first scrub will detect some errors, but the second scrub will detect more. This same test was run on Linux before applying the fix and the FreeBSD head behavior was observed. Authored by: asomers <asomers@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed by: Andy Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Sponsored by: Spectra Logic Corp OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8473 FreeBSD-commit: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/e20ec8879 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/554675ee Closes #8251
2017-09-20 16:31:00 +00:00
mm->mm_resilvering = resilvering;
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
mm->mm_root = root;
mm->mm_preferred = (int *)((uintptr_t)mm +
offsetof(mirror_map_t, mm_child[children]));
return (mm);
}
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
static void
vdev_mirror_map_free(zio_t *zio)
{
mirror_map_t *mm = zio->io_vsd;
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
kmem_free(mm, vdev_mirror_map_size(mm->mm_children));
}
static const zio_vsd_ops_t vdev_mirror_vsd_ops = {
.vsd_free = vdev_mirror_map_free,
.vsd_cksum_report = zio_vsd_default_cksum_report
};
Improve N-way mirror performance The read bandwidth of an N-way mirror can by increased by 50%, and the IOPs by 10%, by more carefully selecting the preferred leaf vdev. The existing algorthm selects a perferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the drives are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. Utilization can be improved by preferentially selecting the leaf vdev with the least pending IO. This prevents leaf vdevs from being starved and compensates for performance differences between disks in the mirror. Faster vdevs will be sent more work and the mirror performance will not be limitted by the slowest drive. In the common case where all the pending queues are full and there is no single least busy leaf vdev a batching stratagy is employed. Of the N least busy vdevs one is selected with equal probability to be the preferred vdev for T microseconds. Compared to randomly selecting a vdev to break the tie batching the requests greatly improves the odds of merging the requests in the Linux elevator. The testing results show a significant performance improvement for all four workloads tested. The workloads were generated using the fio benchmark and are as follows. 1) 1MB sequential reads from 16 threads to 16 files (MB/s). 2) 4KB sequential reads from 16 threads to 16 files (MB/s). 3) 1MB random reads from 16 threads to 16 files (IOP/s). 4) 4KB random reads from 16 threads to 16 files (IOP/s). | Pristine | With 1461 | | Sequential Random | Sequential Random | | 1MB 4KB 1MB 4KB | 1MB 4KB 1MB 4KB | | MB/s MB/s IO/s IO/s | MB/s MB/s IO/s IO/s | ---------------+-----------------------+------------------------+ 2 Striped | 226 243 11 304 | 222 255 11 299 | 2 2-Way Mirror | 302 324 16 534 | 433 448 23 571 | 2 3-Way Mirror | 429 458 24 714 | 648 648 41 808 | 2 4-Way Mirror | 562 601 36 849 | 816 828 82 926 | Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #1461
2013-05-31 19:07:59 +00:00
static int
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
vdev_mirror_load(mirror_map_t *mm, vdev_t *vd, uint64_t zio_offset)
Improve N-way mirror performance The read bandwidth of an N-way mirror can by increased by 50%, and the IOPs by 10%, by more carefully selecting the preferred leaf vdev. The existing algorthm selects a perferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the drives are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. Utilization can be improved by preferentially selecting the leaf vdev with the least pending IO. This prevents leaf vdevs from being starved and compensates for performance differences between disks in the mirror. Faster vdevs will be sent more work and the mirror performance will not be limitted by the slowest drive. In the common case where all the pending queues are full and there is no single least busy leaf vdev a batching stratagy is employed. Of the N least busy vdevs one is selected with equal probability to be the preferred vdev for T microseconds. Compared to randomly selecting a vdev to break the tie batching the requests greatly improves the odds of merging the requests in the Linux elevator. The testing results show a significant performance improvement for all four workloads tested. The workloads were generated using the fio benchmark and are as follows. 1) 1MB sequential reads from 16 threads to 16 files (MB/s). 2) 4KB sequential reads from 16 threads to 16 files (MB/s). 3) 1MB random reads from 16 threads to 16 files (IOP/s). 4) 4KB random reads from 16 threads to 16 files (IOP/s). | Pristine | With 1461 | | Sequential Random | Sequential Random | | 1MB 4KB 1MB 4KB | 1MB 4KB 1MB 4KB | | MB/s MB/s IO/s IO/s | MB/s MB/s IO/s IO/s | ---------------+-----------------------+------------------------+ 2 Striped | 226 243 11 304 | 222 255 11 299 | 2 2-Way Mirror | 302 324 16 534 | 433 448 23 571 | 2 3-Way Mirror | 429 458 24 714 | 648 648 41 808 | 2 4-Way Mirror | 562 601 36 849 | 816 828 82 926 | Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #1461
2013-05-31 19:07:59 +00:00
{
uint64_t last_offset;
int64_t offset_diff;
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
int load;
/* All DVAs have equal weight at the root. */
if (mm->mm_root)
return (INT_MAX);
/*
* We don't return INT_MAX if the device is resilvering i.e.
* vdev_resilver_txg != 0 as when tested performance was slightly
* worse overall when resilvering with compared to without.
*/
/* Fix zio_offset for leaf vdevs */
if (vd->vdev_ops->vdev_op_leaf)
zio_offset += VDEV_LABEL_START_SIZE;
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
/* Standard load based on pending queue length. */
load = vdev_queue_length(vd);
last_offset = vdev_queue_last_offset(vd);
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
if (vd->vdev_nonrot) {
/* Non-rotating media. */
if (last_offset == zio_offset) {
MIRROR_BUMP(vdev_mirror_stat_non_rotating_linear);
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
return (load + zfs_vdev_mirror_non_rotating_inc);
}
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
/*
* Apply a seek penalty even for non-rotating devices as
* sequential I/O's can be aggregated into fewer operations on
* the device, thus avoiding unnecessary per-command overhead
* and boosting performance.
*/
MIRROR_BUMP(vdev_mirror_stat_non_rotating_seek);
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
return (load + zfs_vdev_mirror_non_rotating_seek_inc);
}
/* Rotating media I/O's which directly follow the last I/O. */
if (last_offset == zio_offset) {
MIRROR_BUMP(vdev_mirror_stat_rotating_linear);
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
return (load + zfs_vdev_mirror_rotating_inc);
}
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
/*
* Apply half the seek increment to I/O's within seek offset
* of the last I/O issued to this vdev as they should incur less
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
* of a seek increment.
*/
offset_diff = (int64_t)(last_offset - zio_offset);
if (ABS(offset_diff) < zfs_vdev_mirror_rotating_seek_offset) {
MIRROR_BUMP(vdev_mirror_stat_rotating_offset);
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
return (load + (zfs_vdev_mirror_rotating_seek_inc / 2));
}
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
/* Apply the full seek increment to all other I/O's. */
MIRROR_BUMP(vdev_mirror_stat_rotating_seek);
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
return (load + zfs_vdev_mirror_rotating_seek_inc);
Improve N-way mirror performance The read bandwidth of an N-way mirror can by increased by 50%, and the IOPs by 10%, by more carefully selecting the preferred leaf vdev. The existing algorthm selects a perferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the drives are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. Utilization can be improved by preferentially selecting the leaf vdev with the least pending IO. This prevents leaf vdevs from being starved and compensates for performance differences between disks in the mirror. Faster vdevs will be sent more work and the mirror performance will not be limitted by the slowest drive. In the common case where all the pending queues are full and there is no single least busy leaf vdev a batching stratagy is employed. Of the N least busy vdevs one is selected with equal probability to be the preferred vdev for T microseconds. Compared to randomly selecting a vdev to break the tie batching the requests greatly improves the odds of merging the requests in the Linux elevator. The testing results show a significant performance improvement for all four workloads tested. The workloads were generated using the fio benchmark and are as follows. 1) 1MB sequential reads from 16 threads to 16 files (MB/s). 2) 4KB sequential reads from 16 threads to 16 files (MB/s). 3) 1MB random reads from 16 threads to 16 files (IOP/s). 4) 4KB random reads from 16 threads to 16 files (IOP/s). | Pristine | With 1461 | | Sequential Random | Sequential Random | | 1MB 4KB 1MB 4KB | 1MB 4KB 1MB 4KB | | MB/s MB/s IO/s IO/s | MB/s MB/s IO/s IO/s | ---------------+-----------------------+------------------------+ 2 Striped | 226 243 11 304 | 222 255 11 299 | 2 2-Way Mirror | 302 324 16 534 | 433 448 23 571 | 2 3-Way Mirror | 429 458 24 714 | 648 648 41 808 | 2 4-Way Mirror | 562 601 36 849 | 816 828 82 926 | Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #1461
2013-05-31 19:07:59 +00:00
}
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
static boolean_t
vdev_mirror_rebuilding(vdev_t *vd)
{
if (vd->vdev_ops->vdev_op_leaf && vd->vdev_rebuild_txg)
return (B_TRUE);
for (int i = 0; i < vd->vdev_children; i++) {
if (vdev_mirror_rebuilding(vd->vdev_child[i])) {
return (B_TRUE);
}
}
return (B_FALSE);
}
Reduce stack for traverse_visitbp() recursion During pool import stack overflows may still occur due to the potentially deep recursion of traverse_visitbp(). This is most likely to occur when additional layers are added to the block device stack such as DM multipath. To minimize the stack usage for this call path the following changes were made: 1) Added the keywork 'noinline' to the vdev_*_map_alloc() functions to prevent them from being inlined by gcc. This reduced the stack usage of vdev_raidz_io_start() from 208 to 128 bytes, and vdev_mirror_io_start() from 144 to 128 bytes. 2) The 'saved_poolname' charater array in zfsdev_ioctl() was moved from the stack to the heap. This reduced the stack usage of zfsdev_ioctl() from 368 to 112 bytes. 3) The major saving came from slimming down traverse_visitbp() from from 224 to 144 bytes. Since this function is called recursively the 80 bytes saved per invokation adds up. The following changes were made: a) The 'hard' local variable was replaced by a TD_HARD() macro. b) The 'pd' local variable was replaced by 'td->td_pfd' references. c) The zbookmark_t was moved to the heap. This does cost us an additional memory allocation per recursion by that cost should still be minimal. The cost could be further reduced by adding a dedicated zbookmark_t slab cache. d) The variable declarations in 'if (BP_GET_LEVEL()) { }' were restructured to use the minimum amount of stack. This includes removing the 'cbp' local variable. Overall for the offending use case roughly 1584 of total stack space has been saved. This is enough to avoid overflowing the stack on stock kernels with 8k stacks. See #1778 for additional details. Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Ned Bass <bass6@llnl.gov> Closes #1778
2013-11-13 19:05:17 +00:00
/*
* Avoid inlining the function to keep vdev_mirror_io_start(), which
* is this functions only caller, as small as possible on the stack.
*/
noinline static mirror_map_t *
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
vdev_mirror_map_init(zio_t *zio)
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
{
mirror_map_t *mm = NULL;
mirror_child_t *mc;
vdev_t *vd = zio->io_vd;
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
int c;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
if (vd == NULL) {
dva_t *dva = zio->io_bp->blk_dva;
spa_t *spa = zio->io_spa;
dsl_scan_t *scn = spa->spa_dsl_pool->dp_scan;
OpenZFS 9075 - Improve ZFS pool import/load process and corrupted pool recovery Some work has been done lately to improve the debugability of the ZFS pool load (and import) process. This includes: 7638 Refactor spa_load_impl into several functions 8961 SPA load/import should tell us why it failed 7277 zdb should be able to print zfs_dbgmsg's To iterate on top of that, there's a few changes that were made to make the import process more resilient and crash free. One of the first tasks during the pool load process is to parse a config provided from userland that describes what devices the pool is composed of. A vdev tree is generated from that config, and then all the vdevs are opened. The Meta Object Set (MOS) of the pool is accessed, and several metadata objects that are necessary to load the pool are read. The exact configuration of the pool is also stored inside the MOS. Since the configuration provided from userland is external and might not accurately describe the vdev tree of the pool at the txg that is being loaded, it cannot be relied upon to safely operate the pool. For that reason, the configuration in the MOS is read early on. In the past, the two configurations were compared together and if there was a mismatch then the load process was aborted and an error was returned. The latter was a good way to ensure a pool does not get corrupted, however it made the pool load process needlessly fragile in cases where the vdev configuration changed or the userland configuration was outdated. Since the MOS is stored in 3 copies, the configuration provided by userland doesn't have to be perfect in order to read its contents. Hence, a new approach has been adopted: The pool is first opened with the untrusted userland configuration just so that the real configuration can be read from the MOS. The trusted MOS configuration is then used to generate a new vdev tree and the pool is re-opened. When the pool is opened with an untrusted configuration, writes are disabled to avoid accidentally damaging it. During reads, some sanity checks are performed on block pointers to see if each DVA points to a known vdev; when the configuration is untrusted, instead of panicking the system if those checks fail we simply avoid issuing reads to the invalid DVAs. This new two-step pool load process now allows rewinding pools accross vdev tree changes such as device replacement, addition, etc. Loading a pool from an external config file in a clustering environment also becomes much safer now since the pool will import even if the config is outdated and didn't, for instance, register a recent device addition. With this code in place, it became relatively easy to implement a long-sought-after feature: the ability to import a pool with missing top level (i.e. non-redundant) devices. Note that since this almost guarantees some loss of data, this feature is for now restricted to a read-only import. Porting notes (ZTS): * Fix 'make dist' target in zpool_import * The maximum path length allowed by tar is 99 characters. Several of the new test cases exceeded this limit resulting in them not being included in the tarball. Shorten the names slightly. * Set/get tunables using accessor functions. * Get last synced txg via the "zfs_txg_history" mechanism. * Clear zinject handlers in cleanup for import_cache_device_replaced and import_rewind_device_replaced in order that the zpool can be exported if there is an error. * Increase FILESIZE to 8G in zfs-test.sh to allow for a larger ext4 file system to be created on ZFS_DISK2. Also, there's no need to partition ZFS_DISK2 at all. The partitioning had already been disabled for multipath devices. Among other things, the partitioning steals some space from the ext4 file system, makes it difficult to accurately calculate the paramters to parted and can make some of the tests fail. * Increase FS_SIZE and FILE_SIZE in the zpool_import test configuration now that FILESIZE is larger. * Write more data in order that device evacuation take lonnger in a couple tests. * Use mkdir -p to avoid errors when the directory already exists. * Remove use of sudo in import_rewind_config_changed. Authored by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com> Approved by: Hans Rosenfeld <rosenfeld@grumpf.hope-2000.org> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9075 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/619c0123 Closes #7459
2016-07-22 14:39:36 +00:00
dva_t dva_copy[SPA_DVAS_PER_BP];
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
* The sequential scrub code sorts and issues all DVAs
* of a bp separately. Each of these IOs includes all
* original DVA copies so that repairs can be performed
* in the event of an error, but we only actually want
* to check the first DVA since the others will be
* checked by their respective sorted IOs. Only if we
* hit an error will we try all DVAs upon retrying.
*
* Note: This check is safe even if the user switches
* from a legacy scrub to a sequential one in the middle
* of processing, since scn_is_sorted isn't updated until
* all outstanding IOs from the previous scrub pass
* complete.
*/
if ((zio->io_flags & ZIO_FLAG_SCRUB) &&
!(zio->io_flags & ZIO_FLAG_IO_RETRY) &&
dsl_scan_scrubbing(spa->spa_dsl_pool) &&
scn->scn_is_sorted) {
c = 1;
} else {
c = BP_GET_NDVAS(zio->io_bp);
}
OpenZFS 9075 - Improve ZFS pool import/load process and corrupted pool recovery Some work has been done lately to improve the debugability of the ZFS pool load (and import) process. This includes: 7638 Refactor spa_load_impl into several functions 8961 SPA load/import should tell us why it failed 7277 zdb should be able to print zfs_dbgmsg's To iterate on top of that, there's a few changes that were made to make the import process more resilient and crash free. One of the first tasks during the pool load process is to parse a config provided from userland that describes what devices the pool is composed of. A vdev tree is generated from that config, and then all the vdevs are opened. The Meta Object Set (MOS) of the pool is accessed, and several metadata objects that are necessary to load the pool are read. The exact configuration of the pool is also stored inside the MOS. Since the configuration provided from userland is external and might not accurately describe the vdev tree of the pool at the txg that is being loaded, it cannot be relied upon to safely operate the pool. For that reason, the configuration in the MOS is read early on. In the past, the two configurations were compared together and if there was a mismatch then the load process was aborted and an error was returned. The latter was a good way to ensure a pool does not get corrupted, however it made the pool load process needlessly fragile in cases where the vdev configuration changed or the userland configuration was outdated. Since the MOS is stored in 3 copies, the configuration provided by userland doesn't have to be perfect in order to read its contents. Hence, a new approach has been adopted: The pool is first opened with the untrusted userland configuration just so that the real configuration can be read from the MOS. The trusted MOS configuration is then used to generate a new vdev tree and the pool is re-opened. When the pool is opened with an untrusted configuration, writes are disabled to avoid accidentally damaging it. During reads, some sanity checks are performed on block pointers to see if each DVA points to a known vdev; when the configuration is untrusted, instead of panicking the system if those checks fail we simply avoid issuing reads to the invalid DVAs. This new two-step pool load process now allows rewinding pools accross vdev tree changes such as device replacement, addition, etc. Loading a pool from an external config file in a clustering environment also becomes much safer now since the pool will import even if the config is outdated and didn't, for instance, register a recent device addition. With this code in place, it became relatively easy to implement a long-sought-after feature: the ability to import a pool with missing top level (i.e. non-redundant) devices. Note that since this almost guarantees some loss of data, this feature is for now restricted to a read-only import. Porting notes (ZTS): * Fix 'make dist' target in zpool_import * The maximum path length allowed by tar is 99 characters. Several of the new test cases exceeded this limit resulting in them not being included in the tarball. Shorten the names slightly. * Set/get tunables using accessor functions. * Get last synced txg via the "zfs_txg_history" mechanism. * Clear zinject handlers in cleanup for import_cache_device_replaced and import_rewind_device_replaced in order that the zpool can be exported if there is an error. * Increase FILESIZE to 8G in zfs-test.sh to allow for a larger ext4 file system to be created on ZFS_DISK2. Also, there's no need to partition ZFS_DISK2 at all. The partitioning had already been disabled for multipath devices. Among other things, the partitioning steals some space from the ext4 file system, makes it difficult to accurately calculate the paramters to parted and can make some of the tests fail. * Increase FS_SIZE and FILE_SIZE in the zpool_import test configuration now that FILESIZE is larger. * Write more data in order that device evacuation take lonnger in a couple tests. * Use mkdir -p to avoid errors when the directory already exists. * Remove use of sudo in import_rewind_config_changed. Authored by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com> Approved by: Hans Rosenfeld <rosenfeld@grumpf.hope-2000.org> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9075 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/619c0123 Closes #7459
2016-07-22 14:39:36 +00:00
/*
* If the pool cannot be written to, then infer that some
* DVAs might be invalid or point to vdevs that do not exist.
* We skip them.
OpenZFS 9075 - Improve ZFS pool import/load process and corrupted pool recovery Some work has been done lately to improve the debugability of the ZFS pool load (and import) process. This includes: 7638 Refactor spa_load_impl into several functions 8961 SPA load/import should tell us why it failed 7277 zdb should be able to print zfs_dbgmsg's To iterate on top of that, there's a few changes that were made to make the import process more resilient and crash free. One of the first tasks during the pool load process is to parse a config provided from userland that describes what devices the pool is composed of. A vdev tree is generated from that config, and then all the vdevs are opened. The Meta Object Set (MOS) of the pool is accessed, and several metadata objects that are necessary to load the pool are read. The exact configuration of the pool is also stored inside the MOS. Since the configuration provided from userland is external and might not accurately describe the vdev tree of the pool at the txg that is being loaded, it cannot be relied upon to safely operate the pool. For that reason, the configuration in the MOS is read early on. In the past, the two configurations were compared together and if there was a mismatch then the load process was aborted and an error was returned. The latter was a good way to ensure a pool does not get corrupted, however it made the pool load process needlessly fragile in cases where the vdev configuration changed or the userland configuration was outdated. Since the MOS is stored in 3 copies, the configuration provided by userland doesn't have to be perfect in order to read its contents. Hence, a new approach has been adopted: The pool is first opened with the untrusted userland configuration just so that the real configuration can be read from the MOS. The trusted MOS configuration is then used to generate a new vdev tree and the pool is re-opened. When the pool is opened with an untrusted configuration, writes are disabled to avoid accidentally damaging it. During reads, some sanity checks are performed on block pointers to see if each DVA points to a known vdev; when the configuration is untrusted, instead of panicking the system if those checks fail we simply avoid issuing reads to the invalid DVAs. This new two-step pool load process now allows rewinding pools accross vdev tree changes such as device replacement, addition, etc. Loading a pool from an external config file in a clustering environment also becomes much safer now since the pool will import even if the config is outdated and didn't, for instance, register a recent device addition. With this code in place, it became relatively easy to implement a long-sought-after feature: the ability to import a pool with missing top level (i.e. non-redundant) devices. Note that since this almost guarantees some loss of data, this feature is for now restricted to a read-only import. Porting notes (ZTS): * Fix 'make dist' target in zpool_import * The maximum path length allowed by tar is 99 characters. Several of the new test cases exceeded this limit resulting in them not being included in the tarball. Shorten the names slightly. * Set/get tunables using accessor functions. * Get last synced txg via the "zfs_txg_history" mechanism. * Clear zinject handlers in cleanup for import_cache_device_replaced and import_rewind_device_replaced in order that the zpool can be exported if there is an error. * Increase FILESIZE to 8G in zfs-test.sh to allow for a larger ext4 file system to be created on ZFS_DISK2. Also, there's no need to partition ZFS_DISK2 at all. The partitioning had already been disabled for multipath devices. Among other things, the partitioning steals some space from the ext4 file system, makes it difficult to accurately calculate the paramters to parted and can make some of the tests fail. * Increase FS_SIZE and FILE_SIZE in the zpool_import test configuration now that FILESIZE is larger. * Write more data in order that device evacuation take lonnger in a couple tests. * Use mkdir -p to avoid errors when the directory already exists. * Remove use of sudo in import_rewind_config_changed. Authored by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com> Approved by: Hans Rosenfeld <rosenfeld@grumpf.hope-2000.org> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9075 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/619c0123 Closes #7459
2016-07-22 14:39:36 +00:00
*/
if (!spa_writeable(spa)) {
OpenZFS 9075 - Improve ZFS pool import/load process and corrupted pool recovery Some work has been done lately to improve the debugability of the ZFS pool load (and import) process. This includes: 7638 Refactor spa_load_impl into several functions 8961 SPA load/import should tell us why it failed 7277 zdb should be able to print zfs_dbgmsg's To iterate on top of that, there's a few changes that were made to make the import process more resilient and crash free. One of the first tasks during the pool load process is to parse a config provided from userland that describes what devices the pool is composed of. A vdev tree is generated from that config, and then all the vdevs are opened. The Meta Object Set (MOS) of the pool is accessed, and several metadata objects that are necessary to load the pool are read. The exact configuration of the pool is also stored inside the MOS. Since the configuration provided from userland is external and might not accurately describe the vdev tree of the pool at the txg that is being loaded, it cannot be relied upon to safely operate the pool. For that reason, the configuration in the MOS is read early on. In the past, the two configurations were compared together and if there was a mismatch then the load process was aborted and an error was returned. The latter was a good way to ensure a pool does not get corrupted, however it made the pool load process needlessly fragile in cases where the vdev configuration changed or the userland configuration was outdated. Since the MOS is stored in 3 copies, the configuration provided by userland doesn't have to be perfect in order to read its contents. Hence, a new approach has been adopted: The pool is first opened with the untrusted userland configuration just so that the real configuration can be read from the MOS. The trusted MOS configuration is then used to generate a new vdev tree and the pool is re-opened. When the pool is opened with an untrusted configuration, writes are disabled to avoid accidentally damaging it. During reads, some sanity checks are performed on block pointers to see if each DVA points to a known vdev; when the configuration is untrusted, instead of panicking the system if those checks fail we simply avoid issuing reads to the invalid DVAs. This new two-step pool load process now allows rewinding pools accross vdev tree changes such as device replacement, addition, etc. Loading a pool from an external config file in a clustering environment also becomes much safer now since the pool will import even if the config is outdated and didn't, for instance, register a recent device addition. With this code in place, it became relatively easy to implement a long-sought-after feature: the ability to import a pool with missing top level (i.e. non-redundant) devices. Note that since this almost guarantees some loss of data, this feature is for now restricted to a read-only import. Porting notes (ZTS): * Fix 'make dist' target in zpool_import * The maximum path length allowed by tar is 99 characters. Several of the new test cases exceeded this limit resulting in them not being included in the tarball. Shorten the names slightly. * Set/get tunables using accessor functions. * Get last synced txg via the "zfs_txg_history" mechanism. * Clear zinject handlers in cleanup for import_cache_device_replaced and import_rewind_device_replaced in order that the zpool can be exported if there is an error. * Increase FILESIZE to 8G in zfs-test.sh to allow for a larger ext4 file system to be created on ZFS_DISK2. Also, there's no need to partition ZFS_DISK2 at all. The partitioning had already been disabled for multipath devices. Among other things, the partitioning steals some space from the ext4 file system, makes it difficult to accurately calculate the paramters to parted and can make some of the tests fail. * Increase FS_SIZE and FILE_SIZE in the zpool_import test configuration now that FILESIZE is larger. * Write more data in order that device evacuation take lonnger in a couple tests. * Use mkdir -p to avoid errors when the directory already exists. * Remove use of sudo in import_rewind_config_changed. Authored by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com> Approved by: Hans Rosenfeld <rosenfeld@grumpf.hope-2000.org> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9075 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/619c0123 Closes #7459
2016-07-22 14:39:36 +00:00
ASSERT3U(zio->io_type, ==, ZIO_TYPE_READ);
int j = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < c; i++) {
if (zfs_dva_valid(spa, &dva[i], zio->io_bp))
dva_copy[j++] = dva[i];
}
if (j == 0) {
zio->io_vsd = NULL;
zio->io_error = ENXIO;
return (NULL);
}
if (j < c) {
dva = dva_copy;
c = j;
}
}
mm = vdev_mirror_map_alloc(c, B_FALSE, B_TRUE);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
for (c = 0; c < mm->mm_children; c++) {
mc = &mm->mm_child[c];
mc->mc_vd = vdev_lookup_top(spa, DVA_GET_VDEV(&dva[c]));
mc->mc_offset = DVA_GET_OFFSET(&dva[c]);
if (mc->mc_vd == NULL) {
kmem_free(mm, vdev_mirror_map_size(
mm->mm_children));
zio->io_vsd = NULL;
zio->io_error = ENXIO;
return (NULL);
}
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
} else {
OpenZFS 8473 - scrub does not detect errors on active spares Scrubbing is supposed to detect and repair all errors in the pool. However, it wrongly ignores active spare devices. The problem can easily be reproduced in OpenZFS at git rev 0ef125d with these commands: truncate -s 64m /tmp/a /tmp/b /tmp/c sudo zpool create testpool mirror /tmp/a /tmp/b spare /tmp/c sudo zpool replace testpool /tmp/a /tmp/c /bin/dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k count=63 oseek=1 conv=notrunc of=/tmp/c sync sudo zpool scrub testpool zpool status testpool # Will show 0 errors, which is wrong sudo zpool offline testpool /tmp/a sudo zpool scrub testpool zpool status testpool # Will show errors on /tmp/c, # which should've already been fixed FreeBSD head is partially affected: the first scrub will detect some errors, but the second scrub will detect more. This same test was run on Linux before applying the fix and the FreeBSD head behavior was observed. Authored by: asomers <asomers@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed by: Andy Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Sponsored by: Spectra Logic Corp OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8473 FreeBSD-commit: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/e20ec8879 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/554675ee Closes #8251
2017-09-20 16:31:00 +00:00
/*
* If we are resilvering, then we should handle scrub reads
* differently; we shouldn't issue them to the resilvering
* device because it might not have those blocks.
*
* We are resilvering iff:
* 1) We are a replacing vdev (ie our name is "replacing-1" or
* "spare-1" or something like that), and
* 2) The pool is currently being resilvered.
*
* We cannot simply check vd->vdev_resilver_txg, because it's
* not set in this path.
*
* Nor can we just check our vdev_ops; there are cases (such as
* when a user types "zpool replace pool odev spare_dev" and
* spare_dev is in the spare list, or when a spare device is
* automatically used to replace a DEGRADED device) when
* resilvering is complete but both the original vdev and the
* spare vdev remain in the pool. That behavior is intentional.
* It helps implement the policy that a spare should be
* automatically removed from the pool after the user replaces
* the device that originally failed.
*
* If a spa load is in progress, then spa_dsl_pool may be
* uninitialized. But we shouldn't be resilvering during a spa
* load anyway.
*/
boolean_t replacing = (vd->vdev_ops == &vdev_replacing_ops ||
vd->vdev_ops == &vdev_spare_ops) &&
spa_load_state(vd->vdev_spa) == SPA_LOAD_NONE &&
dsl_scan_resilvering(vd->vdev_spa->spa_dsl_pool);
mm = vdev_mirror_map_alloc(vd->vdev_children, replacing,
B_FALSE);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
for (c = 0; c < mm->mm_children; c++) {
mc = &mm->mm_child[c];
mc->mc_vd = vd->vdev_child[c];
mc->mc_offset = zio->io_offset;
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
if (vdev_mirror_rebuilding(mc->mc_vd))
mm->mm_rebuilding = mc->mc_rebuilding = B_TRUE;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
}
zio->io_vsd = mm;
zio->io_vsd_ops = &vdev_mirror_vsd_ops;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
return (mm);
}
static int
vdev_mirror_open(vdev_t *vd, uint64_t *asize, uint64_t *max_asize,
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 19:53:17 +00:00
uint64_t *logical_ashift, uint64_t *physical_ashift)
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
{
int numerrors = 0;
2009-08-18 18:43:27 +00:00
int lasterror = 0;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
if (vd->vdev_children == 0) {
vd->vdev_stat.vs_aux = VDEV_AUX_BAD_LABEL;
return (SET_ERROR(EINVAL));
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
2009-08-18 18:43:27 +00:00
vdev_open_children(vd);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
for (int c = 0; c < vd->vdev_children; c++) {
2009-08-18 18:43:27 +00:00
vdev_t *cvd = vd->vdev_child[c];
if (cvd->vdev_open_error) {
lasterror = cvd->vdev_open_error;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
numerrors++;
continue;
}
*asize = MIN(*asize - 1, cvd->vdev_asize - 1) + 1;
*max_asize = MIN(*max_asize - 1, cvd->vdev_max_asize - 1) + 1;
Import vdev ashift optimization from FreeBSD Many modern devices use physical allocation units that are much larger than the minimum logical allocation size accessible by external commands. Two prevalent examples of this are 512e disk drives (512b logical sector, 4K physical sector) and flash devices (512b logical sector, 4K or larger allocation block size, and 128k or larger erase block size). Operations that modify less than the physical sector size result in a costly read-modify-write or garbage collection sequence on these devices. Simply exporting the true physical sector of the device to ZFS would yield optimal performance, but has two serious drawbacks: 1. Existing pools created with devices that have different logical and physical block sizes, but were configured to use the logical block size (e.g. because the OS version used for pool construction reported the logical block size instead of the physical block size) will suddenly find that the vdev allocation size has increased. This can be easily tolerated for active members of the array, but ZFS would prevent replacement of a vdev with another identical device because it now appears that the smaller allocation size required by the pool is not supported by the new device. 2. The device's physical block size may be too large to be supported by ZFS. The optimal allocation size for the vdev may be quite large. For example, a RAID controller may export a vdev that requires read-modify-write cycles unless accessed using 64k aligned/sized requests. ZFS currently has an 8k minimum block size limit. Reporting both the logical and physical allocation sizes for vdevs solves these problems. A device may be used so long as the logical block size is compatible with the configuration. By comparing the logical and physical block sizes, new configurations can be optimized and administrators can be notified of any existing pools that are sub-optimal. Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Macy <mmacy@FreeBSD.org> Closes #10619
2020-08-21 19:53:17 +00:00
*logical_ashift = MAX(*logical_ashift, cvd->vdev_ashift);
*physical_ashift = MAX(*physical_ashift,
cvd->vdev_physical_ashift);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
if (numerrors == vd->vdev_children) {
OpenZFS 9075 - Improve ZFS pool import/load process and corrupted pool recovery Some work has been done lately to improve the debugability of the ZFS pool load (and import) process. This includes: 7638 Refactor spa_load_impl into several functions 8961 SPA load/import should tell us why it failed 7277 zdb should be able to print zfs_dbgmsg's To iterate on top of that, there's a few changes that were made to make the import process more resilient and crash free. One of the first tasks during the pool load process is to parse a config provided from userland that describes what devices the pool is composed of. A vdev tree is generated from that config, and then all the vdevs are opened. The Meta Object Set (MOS) of the pool is accessed, and several metadata objects that are necessary to load the pool are read. The exact configuration of the pool is also stored inside the MOS. Since the configuration provided from userland is external and might not accurately describe the vdev tree of the pool at the txg that is being loaded, it cannot be relied upon to safely operate the pool. For that reason, the configuration in the MOS is read early on. In the past, the two configurations were compared together and if there was a mismatch then the load process was aborted and an error was returned. The latter was a good way to ensure a pool does not get corrupted, however it made the pool load process needlessly fragile in cases where the vdev configuration changed or the userland configuration was outdated. Since the MOS is stored in 3 copies, the configuration provided by userland doesn't have to be perfect in order to read its contents. Hence, a new approach has been adopted: The pool is first opened with the untrusted userland configuration just so that the real configuration can be read from the MOS. The trusted MOS configuration is then used to generate a new vdev tree and the pool is re-opened. When the pool is opened with an untrusted configuration, writes are disabled to avoid accidentally damaging it. During reads, some sanity checks are performed on block pointers to see if each DVA points to a known vdev; when the configuration is untrusted, instead of panicking the system if those checks fail we simply avoid issuing reads to the invalid DVAs. This new two-step pool load process now allows rewinding pools accross vdev tree changes such as device replacement, addition, etc. Loading a pool from an external config file in a clustering environment also becomes much safer now since the pool will import even if the config is outdated and didn't, for instance, register a recent device addition. With this code in place, it became relatively easy to implement a long-sought-after feature: the ability to import a pool with missing top level (i.e. non-redundant) devices. Note that since this almost guarantees some loss of data, this feature is for now restricted to a read-only import. Porting notes (ZTS): * Fix 'make dist' target in zpool_import * The maximum path length allowed by tar is 99 characters. Several of the new test cases exceeded this limit resulting in them not being included in the tarball. Shorten the names slightly. * Set/get tunables using accessor functions. * Get last synced txg via the "zfs_txg_history" mechanism. * Clear zinject handlers in cleanup for import_cache_device_replaced and import_rewind_device_replaced in order that the zpool can be exported if there is an error. * Increase FILESIZE to 8G in zfs-test.sh to allow for a larger ext4 file system to be created on ZFS_DISK2. Also, there's no need to partition ZFS_DISK2 at all. The partitioning had already been disabled for multipath devices. Among other things, the partitioning steals some space from the ext4 file system, makes it difficult to accurately calculate the paramters to parted and can make some of the tests fail. * Increase FS_SIZE and FILE_SIZE in the zpool_import test configuration now that FILESIZE is larger. * Write more data in order that device evacuation take lonnger in a couple tests. * Use mkdir -p to avoid errors when the directory already exists. * Remove use of sudo in import_rewind_config_changed. Authored by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com> Approved by: Hans Rosenfeld <rosenfeld@grumpf.hope-2000.org> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9075 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/619c0123 Closes #7459
2016-07-22 14:39:36 +00:00
if (vdev_children_are_offline(vd))
vd->vdev_stat.vs_aux = VDEV_AUX_CHILDREN_OFFLINE;
else
vd->vdev_stat.vs_aux = VDEV_AUX_NO_REPLICAS;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
return (lasterror);
}
return (0);
}
static void
vdev_mirror_close(vdev_t *vd)
{
for (int c = 0; c < vd->vdev_children; c++)
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
vdev_close(vd->vdev_child[c]);
}
static void
vdev_mirror_child_done(zio_t *zio)
{
mirror_child_t *mc = zio->io_private;
mc->mc_error = zio->io_error;
mc->mc_tried = 1;
mc->mc_skipped = 0;
}
static void
vdev_mirror_scrub_done(zio_t *zio)
{
mirror_child_t *mc = zio->io_private;
if (zio->io_error == 0) {
2009-02-18 20:51:31 +00:00
zio_t *pio;
OpenZFS 7090 - zfs should throttle allocations OpenZFS 7090 - zfs should throttle allocations Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Alex Reece <alex@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Christopher Siden <christopher.siden@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <paul.dagnelie@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Approved by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Ported-by: Don Brady <don.brady@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> When write I/Os are issued, they are issued in block order but the ZIO pipeline will drive them asynchronously through the allocation stage which can result in blocks being allocated out-of-order. It would be nice to preserve as much of the logical order as possible. In addition, the allocations are equally scattered across all top-level VDEVs but not all top-level VDEVs are created equally. The pipeline should be able to detect devices that are more capable of handling allocations and should allocate more blocks to those devices. This allows for dynamic allocation distribution when devices are imbalanced as fuller devices will tend to be slower than empty devices. The change includes a new pool-wide allocation queue which would throttle and order allocations in the ZIO pipeline. The queue would be ordered by issued time and offset and would provide an initial amount of allocation of work to each top-level vdev. The allocation logic utilizes a reservation system to reserve allocations that will be performed by the allocator. Once an allocation is successfully completed it's scheduled on a given top-level vdev. Each top-level vdev maintains a maximum number of allocations that it can handle (mg_alloc_queue_depth). The pool-wide reserved allocations (top-levels * mg_alloc_queue_depth) are distributed across the top-level vdevs metaslab groups and round robin across all eligible metaslab groups to distribute the work. As top-levels complete their work, they receive additional work from the pool-wide allocation queue until the allocation queue is emptied. OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/7090 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/4756c3d7 Closes #5258 Porting Notes: - Maintained minimal stack in zio_done - Preserve linux-specific io sizes in zio_write_compress - Added module params and documentation - Updated to use optimize AVL cmp macros
2016-10-14 00:59:18 +00:00
zio_link_t *zl = NULL;
2009-02-18 20:51:31 +00:00
mutex_enter(&zio->io_lock);
OpenZFS 7090 - zfs should throttle allocations OpenZFS 7090 - zfs should throttle allocations Authored by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Alex Reece <alex@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Christopher Siden <christopher.siden@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <paul.dagnelie@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com> Approved by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Ported-by: Don Brady <don.brady@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> When write I/Os are issued, they are issued in block order but the ZIO pipeline will drive them asynchronously through the allocation stage which can result in blocks being allocated out-of-order. It would be nice to preserve as much of the logical order as possible. In addition, the allocations are equally scattered across all top-level VDEVs but not all top-level VDEVs are created equally. The pipeline should be able to detect devices that are more capable of handling allocations and should allocate more blocks to those devices. This allows for dynamic allocation distribution when devices are imbalanced as fuller devices will tend to be slower than empty devices. The change includes a new pool-wide allocation queue which would throttle and order allocations in the ZIO pipeline. The queue would be ordered by issued time and offset and would provide an initial amount of allocation of work to each top-level vdev. The allocation logic utilizes a reservation system to reserve allocations that will be performed by the allocator. Once an allocation is successfully completed it's scheduled on a given top-level vdev. Each top-level vdev maintains a maximum number of allocations that it can handle (mg_alloc_queue_depth). The pool-wide reserved allocations (top-levels * mg_alloc_queue_depth) are distributed across the top-level vdevs metaslab groups and round robin across all eligible metaslab groups to distribute the work. As top-levels complete their work, they receive additional work from the pool-wide allocation queue until the allocation queue is emptied. OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/7090 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/4756c3d7 Closes #5258 Porting Notes: - Maintained minimal stack in zio_done - Preserve linux-specific io sizes in zio_write_compress - Added module params and documentation - Updated to use optimize AVL cmp macros
2016-10-14 00:59:18 +00:00
while ((pio = zio_walk_parents(zio, &zl)) != NULL) {
2009-02-18 20:51:31 +00:00
mutex_enter(&pio->io_lock);
ASSERT3U(zio->io_size, >=, pio->io_size);
abd_copy(pio->io_abd, zio->io_abd, pio->io_size);
2009-02-18 20:51:31 +00:00
mutex_exit(&pio->io_lock);
}
mutex_exit(&zio->io_lock);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
abd_free(zio->io_abd);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
mc->mc_error = zio->io_error;
mc->mc_tried = 1;
mc->mc_skipped = 0;
}
/*
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
* Check the other, lower-index DVAs to see if they're on the same
* vdev as the child we picked. If they are, use them since they
* are likely to have been allocated from the primary metaslab in
* use at the time, and hence are more likely to have locality with
* single-copy data.
*/
static int
vdev_mirror_dva_select(zio_t *zio, int p)
{
dva_t *dva = zio->io_bp->blk_dva;
mirror_map_t *mm = zio->io_vsd;
int preferred;
int c;
preferred = mm->mm_preferred[p];
for (p--; p >= 0; p--) {
c = mm->mm_preferred[p];
if (DVA_GET_VDEV(&dva[c]) == DVA_GET_VDEV(&dva[preferred]))
preferred = c;
}
return (preferred);
}
static int
vdev_mirror_preferred_child_randomize(zio_t *zio)
{
mirror_map_t *mm = zio->io_vsd;
int p;
if (mm->mm_root) {
p = spa_get_random(mm->mm_preferred_cnt);
return (vdev_mirror_dva_select(zio, p));
}
/*
* To ensure we don't always favour the first matching vdev,
* which could lead to wear leveling issues on SSD's, we
* use the I/O offset as a pseudo random seed into the vdevs
* which have the lowest load.
*/
p = (zio->io_offset >> vdev_mirror_shift) % mm->mm_preferred_cnt;
return (mm->mm_preferred[p]);
}
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
static boolean_t
vdev_mirror_child_readable(mirror_child_t *mc)
{
vdev_t *vd = mc->mc_vd;
if (vd->vdev_top != NULL && vd->vdev_top->vdev_ops == &vdev_draid_ops)
return (vdev_draid_readable(vd, mc->mc_offset));
else
return (vdev_readable(vd));
}
static boolean_t
vdev_mirror_child_missing(mirror_child_t *mc, uint64_t txg, uint64_t size)
{
vdev_t *vd = mc->mc_vd;
if (vd->vdev_top != NULL && vd->vdev_top->vdev_ops == &vdev_draid_ops)
return (vdev_draid_missing(vd, mc->mc_offset, txg, size));
else
return (vdev_dtl_contains(vd, DTL_MISSING, txg, size));
}
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
/*
* Try to find a vdev whose DTL doesn't contain the block we want to read
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
* preferring vdevs based on determined load. If we can't, try the read on
* any vdev we haven't already tried.
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
*
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
* Distributed spares are an exception to the above load rule. They are
* always preferred in order to detect gaps in the distributed spare which
* are created when another disk in the dRAID fails. In order to restore
* redundancy those gaps must be read to trigger the required repair IO.
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
*/
static int
vdev_mirror_child_select(zio_t *zio)
{
mirror_map_t *mm = zio->io_vsd;
uint64_t txg = zio->io_txg;
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
int c, lowest_load;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
ASSERT(zio->io_bp == NULL || BP_PHYSICAL_BIRTH(zio->io_bp) == txg);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
lowest_load = INT_MAX;
mm->mm_preferred_cnt = 0;
for (c = 0; c < mm->mm_children; c++) {
mirror_child_t *mc;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
mc = &mm->mm_child[c];
if (mc->mc_tried || mc->mc_skipped)
continue;
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
if (mc->mc_vd == NULL ||
!vdev_mirror_child_readable(mc)) {
mc->mc_error = SET_ERROR(ENXIO);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
mc->mc_tried = 1; /* don't even try */
mc->mc_skipped = 1;
continue;
}
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
if (vdev_mirror_child_missing(mc, txg, 1)) {
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
mc->mc_error = SET_ERROR(ESTALE);
mc->mc_skipped = 1;
mc->mc_speculative = 1;
continue;
}
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
if (mc->mc_vd->vdev_ops == &vdev_draid_spare_ops) {
mm->mm_preferred[0] = c;
mm->mm_preferred_cnt = 1;
break;
}
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
mc->mc_load = vdev_mirror_load(mm, mc->mc_vd, mc->mc_offset);
if (mc->mc_load > lowest_load)
continue;
if (mc->mc_load < lowest_load) {
lowest_load = mc->mc_load;
mm->mm_preferred_cnt = 0;
}
mm->mm_preferred[mm->mm_preferred_cnt] = c;
mm->mm_preferred_cnt++;
}
if (mm->mm_preferred_cnt == 1) {
MIRROR_BUMP(vdev_mirror_stat_preferred_found);
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
return (mm->mm_preferred[0]);
}
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
if (mm->mm_preferred_cnt > 1) {
MIRROR_BUMP(vdev_mirror_stat_preferred_not_found);
return (vdev_mirror_preferred_child_randomize(zio));
}
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
* Every device is either missing or has this txg in its DTL.
* Look for any child we haven't already tried before giving up.
*/
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
for (c = 0; c < mm->mm_children; c++) {
if (!mm->mm_child[c].mc_tried)
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
return (c);
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
}
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
* Every child failed. There's no place left to look.
*/
return (-1);
}
static void
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
vdev_mirror_io_start(zio_t *zio)
{
mirror_map_t *mm;
mirror_child_t *mc;
int c, children;
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
mm = vdev_mirror_map_init(zio);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
OpenZFS 9075 - Improve ZFS pool import/load process and corrupted pool recovery Some work has been done lately to improve the debugability of the ZFS pool load (and import) process. This includes: 7638 Refactor spa_load_impl into several functions 8961 SPA load/import should tell us why it failed 7277 zdb should be able to print zfs_dbgmsg's To iterate on top of that, there's a few changes that were made to make the import process more resilient and crash free. One of the first tasks during the pool load process is to parse a config provided from userland that describes what devices the pool is composed of. A vdev tree is generated from that config, and then all the vdevs are opened. The Meta Object Set (MOS) of the pool is accessed, and several metadata objects that are necessary to load the pool are read. The exact configuration of the pool is also stored inside the MOS. Since the configuration provided from userland is external and might not accurately describe the vdev tree of the pool at the txg that is being loaded, it cannot be relied upon to safely operate the pool. For that reason, the configuration in the MOS is read early on. In the past, the two configurations were compared together and if there was a mismatch then the load process was aborted and an error was returned. The latter was a good way to ensure a pool does not get corrupted, however it made the pool load process needlessly fragile in cases where the vdev configuration changed or the userland configuration was outdated. Since the MOS is stored in 3 copies, the configuration provided by userland doesn't have to be perfect in order to read its contents. Hence, a new approach has been adopted: The pool is first opened with the untrusted userland configuration just so that the real configuration can be read from the MOS. The trusted MOS configuration is then used to generate a new vdev tree and the pool is re-opened. When the pool is opened with an untrusted configuration, writes are disabled to avoid accidentally damaging it. During reads, some sanity checks are performed on block pointers to see if each DVA points to a known vdev; when the configuration is untrusted, instead of panicking the system if those checks fail we simply avoid issuing reads to the invalid DVAs. This new two-step pool load process now allows rewinding pools accross vdev tree changes such as device replacement, addition, etc. Loading a pool from an external config file in a clustering environment also becomes much safer now since the pool will import even if the config is outdated and didn't, for instance, register a recent device addition. With this code in place, it became relatively easy to implement a long-sought-after feature: the ability to import a pool with missing top level (i.e. non-redundant) devices. Note that since this almost guarantees some loss of data, this feature is for now restricted to a read-only import. Porting notes (ZTS): * Fix 'make dist' target in zpool_import * The maximum path length allowed by tar is 99 characters. Several of the new test cases exceeded this limit resulting in them not being included in the tarball. Shorten the names slightly. * Set/get tunables using accessor functions. * Get last synced txg via the "zfs_txg_history" mechanism. * Clear zinject handlers in cleanup for import_cache_device_replaced and import_rewind_device_replaced in order that the zpool can be exported if there is an error. * Increase FILESIZE to 8G in zfs-test.sh to allow for a larger ext4 file system to be created on ZFS_DISK2. Also, there's no need to partition ZFS_DISK2 at all. The partitioning had already been disabled for multipath devices. Among other things, the partitioning steals some space from the ext4 file system, makes it difficult to accurately calculate the paramters to parted and can make some of the tests fail. * Increase FS_SIZE and FILE_SIZE in the zpool_import test configuration now that FILESIZE is larger. * Write more data in order that device evacuation take lonnger in a couple tests. * Use mkdir -p to avoid errors when the directory already exists. * Remove use of sudo in import_rewind_config_changed. Authored by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com> Approved by: Hans Rosenfeld <rosenfeld@grumpf.hope-2000.org> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9075 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/619c0123 Closes #7459
2016-07-22 14:39:36 +00:00
if (mm == NULL) {
ASSERT(!spa_trust_config(zio->io_spa));
ASSERT(zio->io_type == ZIO_TYPE_READ);
zio_execute(zio);
return;
}
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
if (zio->io_type == ZIO_TYPE_READ) {
OpenZFS 9290 - device removal reduces redundancy of mirrors Mirrors are supposed to provide redundancy in the face of whole-disk failure and silent damage (e.g. some data on disk is not right, but ZFS hasn't detected the whole device as being broken). However, the current device removal implementation bypasses some of the mirror's redundancy. Note that in no case is incorrect data returned, but we might get a checksum error when we should have been able to find the right data. There are two underlying problems: 1. When we remove a mirror device, we only read one side of the mirror. Since we can't verify the checksum, this side may be silently bad, but the good data is on the other side of the mirror (which we didn't read). This can cause the removal to "bake in" the busted data – all copies of the data in the new location are the same, busted version, while we left the good version behind. The fix for this is to read and copy both sides of the mirror. If the old and new vdevs are mirrors, we will read both sides of the old mirror, and write each copy to the corresponding side of the new mirror. (If the old and new vdevs have a different number of children, we will do this as best as possible.) Even though we aren't verifying checksums, this ensures that as long as there's a good copy of the data, we'll have a good copy after the removal, even if there's silent damage to one side of the mirror. If we're removing a mirror that has some silent damage, we'll have exactly the same damage in the new location (assuming that the new location is also a mirror). 2. When we read from an indirect vdev that points to a mirror vdev, we only consider one copy of the data. This can lead to reduced effective redundancy, because we might read a bad copy of the data from one side of the mirror, and not retry the other, good side of the mirror. Note that the problem is not with the removal process, but rather after the removal has completed (having copied correct data to both sides of the mirror), if one side of the new mirror is silently damaged, we encounter the problem when reading the relocated data via the indirect vdev. Also note that the problem doesn't occur when ZFS knows that one side of the mirror is bad, e.g. when a disk entirely fails or is offlined. The impact is that reads (from indirect vdevs that point to mirrors) may return a checksum error even though the good data exists on one side of the mirror, and scrub doesn't repair all data on the mirror (if some of it is pointed to via an indirect vdev). The fix for this is complicated by "split blocks" - one logical block may be split into two (or more) pieces with each piece moved to a different new location. In this case we need to read all versions of each split (one from each side of the mirror), and figure out which combination of versions results in the correct checksum, and then repair the incorrect versions. This ensures that we supply the same redundancy whether you use device removal or not. For example, if a mirror has small silent errors on all of its children, we can still reconstruct the correct data, as long as those errors are at sufficiently-separated offsets (specifically, separated by the largest block size - default of 128KB, but up to 16MB). Porting notes: * A new indirect vdev check was moved from dsl_scan_needs_resilver_cb() to dsl_scan_needs_resilver(), which was added to ZoL as part of the sequential scrub work. * Passed NULL for zfs_ereport_post_checksum()'s zbookmark_phys_t parameter. The extra parameter is unique to ZoL. * When posting indirect checksum errors the ABD can be passed directly, zfs_ereport_post_checksum() is not yet ABD-aware in OpenZFS. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9290 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/591 Closes #6900
2018-02-13 19:37:56 +00:00
if (zio->io_bp != NULL &&
OpenZFS 8473 - scrub does not detect errors on active spares Scrubbing is supposed to detect and repair all errors in the pool. However, it wrongly ignores active spare devices. The problem can easily be reproduced in OpenZFS at git rev 0ef125d with these commands: truncate -s 64m /tmp/a /tmp/b /tmp/c sudo zpool create testpool mirror /tmp/a /tmp/b spare /tmp/c sudo zpool replace testpool /tmp/a /tmp/c /bin/dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k count=63 oseek=1 conv=notrunc of=/tmp/c sync sudo zpool scrub testpool zpool status testpool # Will show 0 errors, which is wrong sudo zpool offline testpool /tmp/a sudo zpool scrub testpool zpool status testpool # Will show errors on /tmp/c, # which should've already been fixed FreeBSD head is partially affected: the first scrub will detect some errors, but the second scrub will detect more. This same test was run on Linux before applying the fix and the FreeBSD head behavior was observed. Authored by: asomers <asomers@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed by: Andy Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Sponsored by: Spectra Logic Corp OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8473 FreeBSD-commit: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/e20ec8879 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/554675ee Closes #8251
2017-09-20 16:31:00 +00:00
(zio->io_flags & ZIO_FLAG_SCRUB) && !mm->mm_resilvering) {
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
OpenZFS 9290 - device removal reduces redundancy of mirrors Mirrors are supposed to provide redundancy in the face of whole-disk failure and silent damage (e.g. some data on disk is not right, but ZFS hasn't detected the whole device as being broken). However, the current device removal implementation bypasses some of the mirror's redundancy. Note that in no case is incorrect data returned, but we might get a checksum error when we should have been able to find the right data. There are two underlying problems: 1. When we remove a mirror device, we only read one side of the mirror. Since we can't verify the checksum, this side may be silently bad, but the good data is on the other side of the mirror (which we didn't read). This can cause the removal to "bake in" the busted data – all copies of the data in the new location are the same, busted version, while we left the good version behind. The fix for this is to read and copy both sides of the mirror. If the old and new vdevs are mirrors, we will read both sides of the old mirror, and write each copy to the corresponding side of the new mirror. (If the old and new vdevs have a different number of children, we will do this as best as possible.) Even though we aren't verifying checksums, this ensures that as long as there's a good copy of the data, we'll have a good copy after the removal, even if there's silent damage to one side of the mirror. If we're removing a mirror that has some silent damage, we'll have exactly the same damage in the new location (assuming that the new location is also a mirror). 2. When we read from an indirect vdev that points to a mirror vdev, we only consider one copy of the data. This can lead to reduced effective redundancy, because we might read a bad copy of the data from one side of the mirror, and not retry the other, good side of the mirror. Note that the problem is not with the removal process, but rather after the removal has completed (having copied correct data to both sides of the mirror), if one side of the new mirror is silently damaged, we encounter the problem when reading the relocated data via the indirect vdev. Also note that the problem doesn't occur when ZFS knows that one side of the mirror is bad, e.g. when a disk entirely fails or is offlined. The impact is that reads (from indirect vdevs that point to mirrors) may return a checksum error even though the good data exists on one side of the mirror, and scrub doesn't repair all data on the mirror (if some of it is pointed to via an indirect vdev). The fix for this is complicated by "split blocks" - one logical block may be split into two (or more) pieces with each piece moved to a different new location. In this case we need to read all versions of each split (one from each side of the mirror), and figure out which combination of versions results in the correct checksum, and then repair the incorrect versions. This ensures that we supply the same redundancy whether you use device removal or not. For example, if a mirror has small silent errors on all of its children, we can still reconstruct the correct data, as long as those errors are at sufficiently-separated offsets (specifically, separated by the largest block size - default of 128KB, but up to 16MB). Porting notes: * A new indirect vdev check was moved from dsl_scan_needs_resilver_cb() to dsl_scan_needs_resilver(), which was added to ZoL as part of the sequential scrub work. * Passed NULL for zfs_ereport_post_checksum()'s zbookmark_phys_t parameter. The extra parameter is unique to ZoL. * When posting indirect checksum errors the ABD can be passed directly, zfs_ereport_post_checksum() is not yet ABD-aware in OpenZFS. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9290 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/591 Closes #6900
2018-02-13 19:37:56 +00:00
* For scrubbing reads (if we can verify the
* checksum here, as indicated by io_bp being
* non-NULL) we need to allocate a read buffer for
* each child and issue reads to all children. If
* any child succeeds, it will copy its data into
* zio->io_data in vdev_mirror_scrub_done.
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
*/
for (c = 0; c < mm->mm_children; c++) {
mc = &mm->mm_child[c];
zio_nowait(zio_vdev_child_io(zio, zio->io_bp,
mc->mc_vd, mc->mc_offset,
abd_alloc_sametype(zio->io_abd,
zio->io_size), zio->io_size,
zio->io_type, zio->io_priority, 0,
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
vdev_mirror_scrub_done, mc));
}
zio_execute(zio);
return;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
/*
* For normal reads just pick one child.
*/
c = vdev_mirror_child_select(zio);
children = (c >= 0);
} else {
ASSERT(zio->io_type == ZIO_TYPE_WRITE);
/*
2009-01-15 21:59:39 +00:00
* Writes go to all children.
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
*/
2009-01-15 21:59:39 +00:00
c = 0;
children = mm->mm_children;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
while (children--) {
mc = &mm->mm_child[c];
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
c++;
/*
* When sequentially resilvering only issue write repair
* IOs to the vdev which is being rebuilt since performance
* is limited by the slowest child. This is an issue for
* faster replacement devices such as distributed spares.
*/
if ((zio->io_priority == ZIO_PRIORITY_REBUILD) &&
(zio->io_flags & ZIO_FLAG_IO_REPAIR) &&
!(zio->io_flags & ZIO_FLAG_SCRUB) &&
mm->mm_rebuilding && !mc->mc_rebuilding) {
continue;
}
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
zio_nowait(zio_vdev_child_io(zio, zio->io_bp,
mc->mc_vd, mc->mc_offset, zio->io_abd, zio->io_size,
zio->io_type, zio->io_priority, 0,
vdev_mirror_child_done, mc));
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
zio_execute(zio);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
static int
vdev_mirror_worst_error(mirror_map_t *mm)
{
int error[2] = { 0, 0 };
for (int c = 0; c < mm->mm_children; c++) {
mirror_child_t *mc = &mm->mm_child[c];
int s = mc->mc_speculative;
error[s] = zio_worst_error(error[s], mc->mc_error);
}
return (error[0] ? error[0] : error[1]);
}
static void
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
vdev_mirror_io_done(zio_t *zio)
{
mirror_map_t *mm = zio->io_vsd;
mirror_child_t *mc;
int c;
int good_copies = 0;
int unexpected_errors = 0;
OpenZFS 9075 - Improve ZFS pool import/load process and corrupted pool recovery Some work has been done lately to improve the debugability of the ZFS pool load (and import) process. This includes: 7638 Refactor spa_load_impl into several functions 8961 SPA load/import should tell us why it failed 7277 zdb should be able to print zfs_dbgmsg's To iterate on top of that, there's a few changes that were made to make the import process more resilient and crash free. One of the first tasks during the pool load process is to parse a config provided from userland that describes what devices the pool is composed of. A vdev tree is generated from that config, and then all the vdevs are opened. The Meta Object Set (MOS) of the pool is accessed, and several metadata objects that are necessary to load the pool are read. The exact configuration of the pool is also stored inside the MOS. Since the configuration provided from userland is external and might not accurately describe the vdev tree of the pool at the txg that is being loaded, it cannot be relied upon to safely operate the pool. For that reason, the configuration in the MOS is read early on. In the past, the two configurations were compared together and if there was a mismatch then the load process was aborted and an error was returned. The latter was a good way to ensure a pool does not get corrupted, however it made the pool load process needlessly fragile in cases where the vdev configuration changed or the userland configuration was outdated. Since the MOS is stored in 3 copies, the configuration provided by userland doesn't have to be perfect in order to read its contents. Hence, a new approach has been adopted: The pool is first opened with the untrusted userland configuration just so that the real configuration can be read from the MOS. The trusted MOS configuration is then used to generate a new vdev tree and the pool is re-opened. When the pool is opened with an untrusted configuration, writes are disabled to avoid accidentally damaging it. During reads, some sanity checks are performed on block pointers to see if each DVA points to a known vdev; when the configuration is untrusted, instead of panicking the system if those checks fail we simply avoid issuing reads to the invalid DVAs. This new two-step pool load process now allows rewinding pools accross vdev tree changes such as device replacement, addition, etc. Loading a pool from an external config file in a clustering environment also becomes much safer now since the pool will import even if the config is outdated and didn't, for instance, register a recent device addition. With this code in place, it became relatively easy to implement a long-sought-after feature: the ability to import a pool with missing top level (i.e. non-redundant) devices. Note that since this almost guarantees some loss of data, this feature is for now restricted to a read-only import. Porting notes (ZTS): * Fix 'make dist' target in zpool_import * The maximum path length allowed by tar is 99 characters. Several of the new test cases exceeded this limit resulting in them not being included in the tarball. Shorten the names slightly. * Set/get tunables using accessor functions. * Get last synced txg via the "zfs_txg_history" mechanism. * Clear zinject handlers in cleanup for import_cache_device_replaced and import_rewind_device_replaced in order that the zpool can be exported if there is an error. * Increase FILESIZE to 8G in zfs-test.sh to allow for a larger ext4 file system to be created on ZFS_DISK2. Also, there's no need to partition ZFS_DISK2 at all. The partitioning had already been disabled for multipath devices. Among other things, the partitioning steals some space from the ext4 file system, makes it difficult to accurately calculate the paramters to parted and can make some of the tests fail. * Increase FS_SIZE and FILE_SIZE in the zpool_import test configuration now that FILESIZE is larger. * Write more data in order that device evacuation take lonnger in a couple tests. * Use mkdir -p to avoid errors when the directory already exists. * Remove use of sudo in import_rewind_config_changed. Authored by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com> Approved by: Hans Rosenfeld <rosenfeld@grumpf.hope-2000.org> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9075 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/619c0123 Closes #7459
2016-07-22 14:39:36 +00:00
if (mm == NULL)
return;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
for (c = 0; c < mm->mm_children; c++) {
mc = &mm->mm_child[c];
if (mc->mc_error) {
if (!mc->mc_skipped)
unexpected_errors++;
} else if (mc->mc_tried) {
good_copies++;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
}
if (zio->io_type == ZIO_TYPE_WRITE) {
/*
* XXX -- for now, treat partial writes as success.
*
* Now that we support write reallocation, it would be better
* to treat partial failure as real failure unless there are
* no non-degraded top-level vdevs left, and not update DTLs
* if we intend to reallocate.
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
*/
/* XXPOLICY */
if (good_copies != mm->mm_children) {
/*
* Always require at least one good copy.
*
* For ditto blocks (io_vd == NULL), require
* all copies to be good.
*
* XXX -- for replacing vdevs, there's no great answer.
* If the old device is really dead, we may not even
* be able to access it -- so we only want to
* require good writes to the new device. But if
* the new device turns out to be flaky, we want
* to be able to detach it -- which requires all
* writes to the old device to have succeeded.
*/
if (good_copies == 0 || zio->io_vd == NULL)
zio->io_error = vdev_mirror_worst_error(mm);
}
return;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
ASSERT(zio->io_type == ZIO_TYPE_READ);
/*
* If we don't have a good copy yet, keep trying other children.
*/
/* XXPOLICY */
if (good_copies == 0 && (c = vdev_mirror_child_select(zio)) != -1) {
ASSERT(c >= 0 && c < mm->mm_children);
mc = &mm->mm_child[c];
zio_vdev_io_redone(zio);
zio_nowait(zio_vdev_child_io(zio, zio->io_bp,
mc->mc_vd, mc->mc_offset, zio->io_abd, zio->io_size,
ZIO_TYPE_READ, zio->io_priority, 0,
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
vdev_mirror_child_done, mc));
return;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
/* XXPOLICY */
if (good_copies == 0) {
zio->io_error = vdev_mirror_worst_error(mm);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
ASSERT(zio->io_error != 0);
}
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
2009-01-15 21:59:39 +00:00
if (good_copies && spa_writeable(zio->io_spa) &&
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
(unexpected_errors ||
(zio->io_flags & ZIO_FLAG_RESILVER) ||
OpenZFS 8473 - scrub does not detect errors on active spares Scrubbing is supposed to detect and repair all errors in the pool. However, it wrongly ignores active spare devices. The problem can easily be reproduced in OpenZFS at git rev 0ef125d with these commands: truncate -s 64m /tmp/a /tmp/b /tmp/c sudo zpool create testpool mirror /tmp/a /tmp/b spare /tmp/c sudo zpool replace testpool /tmp/a /tmp/c /bin/dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k count=63 oseek=1 conv=notrunc of=/tmp/c sync sudo zpool scrub testpool zpool status testpool # Will show 0 errors, which is wrong sudo zpool offline testpool /tmp/a sudo zpool scrub testpool zpool status testpool # Will show errors on /tmp/c, # which should've already been fixed FreeBSD head is partially affected: the first scrub will detect some errors, but the second scrub will detect more. This same test was run on Linux before applying the fix and the FreeBSD head behavior was observed. Authored by: asomers <asomers@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed by: Andy Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net> Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Sponsored by: Spectra Logic Corp OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8473 FreeBSD-commit: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/e20ec8879 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/554675ee Closes #8251
2017-09-20 16:31:00 +00:00
((zio->io_flags & ZIO_FLAG_SCRUB) && mm->mm_resilvering))) {
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
* Use the good data we have in hand to repair damaged children.
*/
for (c = 0; c < mm->mm_children; c++) {
/*
* Don't rewrite known good children.
* Not only is it unnecessary, it could
* actually be harmful: if the system lost
* power while rewriting the only good copy,
* there would be no good copies left!
*/
mc = &mm->mm_child[c];
if (mc->mc_error == 0) {
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
vdev_ops_t *ops = mc->mc_vd->vdev_ops;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
if (mc->mc_tried)
continue;
OpenZFS 9290 - device removal reduces redundancy of mirrors Mirrors are supposed to provide redundancy in the face of whole-disk failure and silent damage (e.g. some data on disk is not right, but ZFS hasn't detected the whole device as being broken). However, the current device removal implementation bypasses some of the mirror's redundancy. Note that in no case is incorrect data returned, but we might get a checksum error when we should have been able to find the right data. There are two underlying problems: 1. When we remove a mirror device, we only read one side of the mirror. Since we can't verify the checksum, this side may be silently bad, but the good data is on the other side of the mirror (which we didn't read). This can cause the removal to "bake in" the busted data – all copies of the data in the new location are the same, busted version, while we left the good version behind. The fix for this is to read and copy both sides of the mirror. If the old and new vdevs are mirrors, we will read both sides of the old mirror, and write each copy to the corresponding side of the new mirror. (If the old and new vdevs have a different number of children, we will do this as best as possible.) Even though we aren't verifying checksums, this ensures that as long as there's a good copy of the data, we'll have a good copy after the removal, even if there's silent damage to one side of the mirror. If we're removing a mirror that has some silent damage, we'll have exactly the same damage in the new location (assuming that the new location is also a mirror). 2. When we read from an indirect vdev that points to a mirror vdev, we only consider one copy of the data. This can lead to reduced effective redundancy, because we might read a bad copy of the data from one side of the mirror, and not retry the other, good side of the mirror. Note that the problem is not with the removal process, but rather after the removal has completed (having copied correct data to both sides of the mirror), if one side of the new mirror is silently damaged, we encounter the problem when reading the relocated data via the indirect vdev. Also note that the problem doesn't occur when ZFS knows that one side of the mirror is bad, e.g. when a disk entirely fails or is offlined. The impact is that reads (from indirect vdevs that point to mirrors) may return a checksum error even though the good data exists on one side of the mirror, and scrub doesn't repair all data on the mirror (if some of it is pointed to via an indirect vdev). The fix for this is complicated by "split blocks" - one logical block may be split into two (or more) pieces with each piece moved to a different new location. In this case we need to read all versions of each split (one from each side of the mirror), and figure out which combination of versions results in the correct checksum, and then repair the incorrect versions. This ensures that we supply the same redundancy whether you use device removal or not. For example, if a mirror has small silent errors on all of its children, we can still reconstruct the correct data, as long as those errors are at sufficiently-separated offsets (specifically, separated by the largest block size - default of 128KB, but up to 16MB). Porting notes: * A new indirect vdev check was moved from dsl_scan_needs_resilver_cb() to dsl_scan_needs_resilver(), which was added to ZoL as part of the sequential scrub work. * Passed NULL for zfs_ereport_post_checksum()'s zbookmark_phys_t parameter. The extra parameter is unique to ZoL. * When posting indirect checksum errors the ABD can be passed directly, zfs_ereport_post_checksum() is not yet ABD-aware in OpenZFS. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9290 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/591 Closes #6900
2018-02-13 19:37:56 +00:00
/*
* We didn't try this child. We need to
* repair it if:
* 1. it's a scrub (in which case we have
* tried everything that was healthy)
* - or -
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
* 2. it's an indirect or distributed spare
* vdev (in which case it could point to any
* other vdev, which might have a bad DTL)
OpenZFS 9290 - device removal reduces redundancy of mirrors Mirrors are supposed to provide redundancy in the face of whole-disk failure and silent damage (e.g. some data on disk is not right, but ZFS hasn't detected the whole device as being broken). However, the current device removal implementation bypasses some of the mirror's redundancy. Note that in no case is incorrect data returned, but we might get a checksum error when we should have been able to find the right data. There are two underlying problems: 1. When we remove a mirror device, we only read one side of the mirror. Since we can't verify the checksum, this side may be silently bad, but the good data is on the other side of the mirror (which we didn't read). This can cause the removal to "bake in" the busted data – all copies of the data in the new location are the same, busted version, while we left the good version behind. The fix for this is to read and copy both sides of the mirror. If the old and new vdevs are mirrors, we will read both sides of the old mirror, and write each copy to the corresponding side of the new mirror. (If the old and new vdevs have a different number of children, we will do this as best as possible.) Even though we aren't verifying checksums, this ensures that as long as there's a good copy of the data, we'll have a good copy after the removal, even if there's silent damage to one side of the mirror. If we're removing a mirror that has some silent damage, we'll have exactly the same damage in the new location (assuming that the new location is also a mirror). 2. When we read from an indirect vdev that points to a mirror vdev, we only consider one copy of the data. This can lead to reduced effective redundancy, because we might read a bad copy of the data from one side of the mirror, and not retry the other, good side of the mirror. Note that the problem is not with the removal process, but rather after the removal has completed (having copied correct data to both sides of the mirror), if one side of the new mirror is silently damaged, we encounter the problem when reading the relocated data via the indirect vdev. Also note that the problem doesn't occur when ZFS knows that one side of the mirror is bad, e.g. when a disk entirely fails or is offlined. The impact is that reads (from indirect vdevs that point to mirrors) may return a checksum error even though the good data exists on one side of the mirror, and scrub doesn't repair all data on the mirror (if some of it is pointed to via an indirect vdev). The fix for this is complicated by "split blocks" - one logical block may be split into two (or more) pieces with each piece moved to a different new location. In this case we need to read all versions of each split (one from each side of the mirror), and figure out which combination of versions results in the correct checksum, and then repair the incorrect versions. This ensures that we supply the same redundancy whether you use device removal or not. For example, if a mirror has small silent errors on all of its children, we can still reconstruct the correct data, as long as those errors are at sufficiently-separated offsets (specifically, separated by the largest block size - default of 128KB, but up to 16MB). Porting notes: * A new indirect vdev check was moved from dsl_scan_needs_resilver_cb() to dsl_scan_needs_resilver(), which was added to ZoL as part of the sequential scrub work. * Passed NULL for zfs_ereport_post_checksum()'s zbookmark_phys_t parameter. The extra parameter is unique to ZoL. * When posting indirect checksum errors the ABD can be passed directly, zfs_ereport_post_checksum() is not yet ABD-aware in OpenZFS. Authored by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9290 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/591 Closes #6900
2018-02-13 19:37:56 +00:00
* - or -
* 3. the DTL indicates that this data is
* missing from this vdev
*/
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
if (!(zio->io_flags & ZIO_FLAG_SCRUB) &&
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
ops != &vdev_indirect_ops &&
ops != &vdev_draid_spare_ops &&
2009-01-15 21:59:39 +00:00
!vdev_dtl_contains(mc->mc_vd, DTL_PARTIAL,
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
zio->io_txg, 1))
continue;
mc->mc_error = SET_ERROR(ESTALE);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
zio_nowait(zio_vdev_child_io(zio, zio->io_bp,
mc->mc_vd, mc->mc_offset,
Add device rebuild feature The device_rebuild feature enables sequential reconstruction when resilvering. Mirror vdevs can be rebuilt in LBA order which may more quickly restore redundancy depending on the pools average block size, overall fragmentation and the performance characteristics of the devices. However, block checksums cannot be verified as part of the rebuild thus a scrub is automatically started after the sequential resilver completes. The new '-s' option has been added to the `zpool attach` and `zpool replace` command to request sequential reconstruction instead of healing reconstruction when resilvering. zpool attach -s <pool> <existing vdev> <new vdev> zpool replace -s <pool> <old vdev> <new vdev> The `zpool status` output has been updated to report the progress of sequential resilvering in the same way as healing resilvering. The one notable difference is that multiple sequential resilvers may be in progress as long as they're operating on different top-level vdevs. The `zpool wait -t resilver` command was extended to wait on sequential resilvers. From this perspective they are no different than healing resilvers. Sequential resilvers cannot be supported for RAIDZ, but are compatible with the dRAID feature being developed. As part of this change the resilver_restart_* tests were moved in to the functional/replacement directory. Additionally, the replacement tests were renamed and extended to verify both resilvering and rebuilding. Original-patch-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: John Poduska <jpoduska@datto.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10349
2020-07-03 18:05:50 +00:00
zio->io_abd, zio->io_size, ZIO_TYPE_WRITE,
zio->io_priority == ZIO_PRIORITY_REBUILD ?
ZIO_PRIORITY_REBUILD : ZIO_PRIORITY_ASYNC_WRITE,
2009-01-15 21:59:39 +00:00
ZIO_FLAG_IO_REPAIR | (unexpected_errors ?
ZIO_FLAG_SELF_HEAL : 0), NULL, NULL));
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
}
}
static void
vdev_mirror_state_change(vdev_t *vd, int faulted, int degraded)
{
OpenZFS 9075 - Improve ZFS pool import/load process and corrupted pool recovery Some work has been done lately to improve the debugability of the ZFS pool load (and import) process. This includes: 7638 Refactor spa_load_impl into several functions 8961 SPA load/import should tell us why it failed 7277 zdb should be able to print zfs_dbgmsg's To iterate on top of that, there's a few changes that were made to make the import process more resilient and crash free. One of the first tasks during the pool load process is to parse a config provided from userland that describes what devices the pool is composed of. A vdev tree is generated from that config, and then all the vdevs are opened. The Meta Object Set (MOS) of the pool is accessed, and several metadata objects that are necessary to load the pool are read. The exact configuration of the pool is also stored inside the MOS. Since the configuration provided from userland is external and might not accurately describe the vdev tree of the pool at the txg that is being loaded, it cannot be relied upon to safely operate the pool. For that reason, the configuration in the MOS is read early on. In the past, the two configurations were compared together and if there was a mismatch then the load process was aborted and an error was returned. The latter was a good way to ensure a pool does not get corrupted, however it made the pool load process needlessly fragile in cases where the vdev configuration changed or the userland configuration was outdated. Since the MOS is stored in 3 copies, the configuration provided by userland doesn't have to be perfect in order to read its contents. Hence, a new approach has been adopted: The pool is first opened with the untrusted userland configuration just so that the real configuration can be read from the MOS. The trusted MOS configuration is then used to generate a new vdev tree and the pool is re-opened. When the pool is opened with an untrusted configuration, writes are disabled to avoid accidentally damaging it. During reads, some sanity checks are performed on block pointers to see if each DVA points to a known vdev; when the configuration is untrusted, instead of panicking the system if those checks fail we simply avoid issuing reads to the invalid DVAs. This new two-step pool load process now allows rewinding pools accross vdev tree changes such as device replacement, addition, etc. Loading a pool from an external config file in a clustering environment also becomes much safer now since the pool will import even if the config is outdated and didn't, for instance, register a recent device addition. With this code in place, it became relatively easy to implement a long-sought-after feature: the ability to import a pool with missing top level (i.e. non-redundant) devices. Note that since this almost guarantees some loss of data, this feature is for now restricted to a read-only import. Porting notes (ZTS): * Fix 'make dist' target in zpool_import * The maximum path length allowed by tar is 99 characters. Several of the new test cases exceeded this limit resulting in them not being included in the tarball. Shorten the names slightly. * Set/get tunables using accessor functions. * Get last synced txg via the "zfs_txg_history" mechanism. * Clear zinject handlers in cleanup for import_cache_device_replaced and import_rewind_device_replaced in order that the zpool can be exported if there is an error. * Increase FILESIZE to 8G in zfs-test.sh to allow for a larger ext4 file system to be created on ZFS_DISK2. Also, there's no need to partition ZFS_DISK2 at all. The partitioning had already been disabled for multipath devices. Among other things, the partitioning steals some space from the ext4 file system, makes it difficult to accurately calculate the paramters to parted and can make some of the tests fail. * Increase FS_SIZE and FILE_SIZE in the zpool_import test configuration now that FILESIZE is larger. * Write more data in order that device evacuation take lonnger in a couple tests. * Use mkdir -p to avoid errors when the directory already exists. * Remove use of sudo in import_rewind_config_changed. Authored by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com> Approved by: Hans Rosenfeld <rosenfeld@grumpf.hope-2000.org> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9075 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/619c0123 Closes #7459
2016-07-22 14:39:36 +00:00
if (faulted == vd->vdev_children) {
if (vdev_children_are_offline(vd)) {
vdev_set_state(vd, B_FALSE, VDEV_STATE_OFFLINE,
VDEV_AUX_CHILDREN_OFFLINE);
} else {
vdev_set_state(vd, B_FALSE, VDEV_STATE_CANT_OPEN,
VDEV_AUX_NO_REPLICAS);
}
} else if (degraded + faulted != 0) {
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
vdev_set_state(vd, B_FALSE, VDEV_STATE_DEGRADED, VDEV_AUX_NONE);
OpenZFS 9075 - Improve ZFS pool import/load process and corrupted pool recovery Some work has been done lately to improve the debugability of the ZFS pool load (and import) process. This includes: 7638 Refactor spa_load_impl into several functions 8961 SPA load/import should tell us why it failed 7277 zdb should be able to print zfs_dbgmsg's To iterate on top of that, there's a few changes that were made to make the import process more resilient and crash free. One of the first tasks during the pool load process is to parse a config provided from userland that describes what devices the pool is composed of. A vdev tree is generated from that config, and then all the vdevs are opened. The Meta Object Set (MOS) of the pool is accessed, and several metadata objects that are necessary to load the pool are read. The exact configuration of the pool is also stored inside the MOS. Since the configuration provided from userland is external and might not accurately describe the vdev tree of the pool at the txg that is being loaded, it cannot be relied upon to safely operate the pool. For that reason, the configuration in the MOS is read early on. In the past, the two configurations were compared together and if there was a mismatch then the load process was aborted and an error was returned. The latter was a good way to ensure a pool does not get corrupted, however it made the pool load process needlessly fragile in cases where the vdev configuration changed or the userland configuration was outdated. Since the MOS is stored in 3 copies, the configuration provided by userland doesn't have to be perfect in order to read its contents. Hence, a new approach has been adopted: The pool is first opened with the untrusted userland configuration just so that the real configuration can be read from the MOS. The trusted MOS configuration is then used to generate a new vdev tree and the pool is re-opened. When the pool is opened with an untrusted configuration, writes are disabled to avoid accidentally damaging it. During reads, some sanity checks are performed on block pointers to see if each DVA points to a known vdev; when the configuration is untrusted, instead of panicking the system if those checks fail we simply avoid issuing reads to the invalid DVAs. This new two-step pool load process now allows rewinding pools accross vdev tree changes such as device replacement, addition, etc. Loading a pool from an external config file in a clustering environment also becomes much safer now since the pool will import even if the config is outdated and didn't, for instance, register a recent device addition. With this code in place, it became relatively easy to implement a long-sought-after feature: the ability to import a pool with missing top level (i.e. non-redundant) devices. Note that since this almost guarantees some loss of data, this feature is for now restricted to a read-only import. Porting notes (ZTS): * Fix 'make dist' target in zpool_import * The maximum path length allowed by tar is 99 characters. Several of the new test cases exceeded this limit resulting in them not being included in the tarball. Shorten the names slightly. * Set/get tunables using accessor functions. * Get last synced txg via the "zfs_txg_history" mechanism. * Clear zinject handlers in cleanup for import_cache_device_replaced and import_rewind_device_replaced in order that the zpool can be exported if there is an error. * Increase FILESIZE to 8G in zfs-test.sh to allow for a larger ext4 file system to be created on ZFS_DISK2. Also, there's no need to partition ZFS_DISK2 at all. The partitioning had already been disabled for multipath devices. Among other things, the partitioning steals some space from the ext4 file system, makes it difficult to accurately calculate the paramters to parted and can make some of the tests fail. * Increase FS_SIZE and FILE_SIZE in the zpool_import test configuration now that FILESIZE is larger. * Write more data in order that device evacuation take lonnger in a couple tests. * Use mkdir -p to avoid errors when the directory already exists. * Remove use of sudo in import_rewind_config_changed. Authored by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com> Approved by: Hans Rosenfeld <rosenfeld@grumpf.hope-2000.org> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9075 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/619c0123 Closes #7459
2016-07-22 14:39:36 +00:00
} else {
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
vdev_set_state(vd, B_FALSE, VDEV_STATE_HEALTHY, VDEV_AUX_NONE);
OpenZFS 9075 - Improve ZFS pool import/load process and corrupted pool recovery Some work has been done lately to improve the debugability of the ZFS pool load (and import) process. This includes: 7638 Refactor spa_load_impl into several functions 8961 SPA load/import should tell us why it failed 7277 zdb should be able to print zfs_dbgmsg's To iterate on top of that, there's a few changes that were made to make the import process more resilient and crash free. One of the first tasks during the pool load process is to parse a config provided from userland that describes what devices the pool is composed of. A vdev tree is generated from that config, and then all the vdevs are opened. The Meta Object Set (MOS) of the pool is accessed, and several metadata objects that are necessary to load the pool are read. The exact configuration of the pool is also stored inside the MOS. Since the configuration provided from userland is external and might not accurately describe the vdev tree of the pool at the txg that is being loaded, it cannot be relied upon to safely operate the pool. For that reason, the configuration in the MOS is read early on. In the past, the two configurations were compared together and if there was a mismatch then the load process was aborted and an error was returned. The latter was a good way to ensure a pool does not get corrupted, however it made the pool load process needlessly fragile in cases where the vdev configuration changed or the userland configuration was outdated. Since the MOS is stored in 3 copies, the configuration provided by userland doesn't have to be perfect in order to read its contents. Hence, a new approach has been adopted: The pool is first opened with the untrusted userland configuration just so that the real configuration can be read from the MOS. The trusted MOS configuration is then used to generate a new vdev tree and the pool is re-opened. When the pool is opened with an untrusted configuration, writes are disabled to avoid accidentally damaging it. During reads, some sanity checks are performed on block pointers to see if each DVA points to a known vdev; when the configuration is untrusted, instead of panicking the system if those checks fail we simply avoid issuing reads to the invalid DVAs. This new two-step pool load process now allows rewinding pools accross vdev tree changes such as device replacement, addition, etc. Loading a pool from an external config file in a clustering environment also becomes much safer now since the pool will import even if the config is outdated and didn't, for instance, register a recent device addition. With this code in place, it became relatively easy to implement a long-sought-after feature: the ability to import a pool with missing top level (i.e. non-redundant) devices. Note that since this almost guarantees some loss of data, this feature is for now restricted to a read-only import. Porting notes (ZTS): * Fix 'make dist' target in zpool_import * The maximum path length allowed by tar is 99 characters. Several of the new test cases exceeded this limit resulting in them not being included in the tarball. Shorten the names slightly. * Set/get tunables using accessor functions. * Get last synced txg via the "zfs_txg_history" mechanism. * Clear zinject handlers in cleanup for import_cache_device_replaced and import_rewind_device_replaced in order that the zpool can be exported if there is an error. * Increase FILESIZE to 8G in zfs-test.sh to allow for a larger ext4 file system to be created on ZFS_DISK2. Also, there's no need to partition ZFS_DISK2 at all. The partitioning had already been disabled for multipath devices. Among other things, the partitioning steals some space from the ext4 file system, makes it difficult to accurately calculate the paramters to parted and can make some of the tests fail. * Increase FS_SIZE and FILE_SIZE in the zpool_import test configuration now that FILESIZE is larger. * Write more data in order that device evacuation take lonnger in a couple tests. * Use mkdir -p to avoid errors when the directory already exists. * Remove use of sudo in import_rewind_config_changed. Authored by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com> Approved by: Hans Rosenfeld <rosenfeld@grumpf.hope-2000.org> Ported-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com> OpenZFS-issue: https://illumos.org/issues/9075 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/619c0123 Closes #7459
2016-07-22 14:39:36 +00:00
}
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
/*
* Return the maximum asize for a rebuild zio in the provided range.
*/
static uint64_t
vdev_mirror_rebuild_asize(vdev_t *vd, uint64_t start, uint64_t asize,
uint64_t max_segment)
{
uint64_t psize = MIN(P2ROUNDUP(max_segment, 1 << vd->vdev_ashift),
SPA_MAXBLOCKSIZE);
return (MIN(asize, vdev_psize_to_asize(vd, psize)));
}
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
vdev_ops_t vdev_mirror_ops = {
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
.vdev_op_init = NULL,
.vdev_op_fini = NULL,
.vdev_op_open = vdev_mirror_open,
.vdev_op_close = vdev_mirror_close,
.vdev_op_asize = vdev_default_asize,
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
.vdev_op_min_asize = vdev_default_min_asize,
.vdev_op_min_alloc = NULL,
.vdev_op_io_start = vdev_mirror_io_start,
.vdev_op_io_done = vdev_mirror_io_done,
.vdev_op_state_change = vdev_mirror_state_change,
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
.vdev_op_need_resilver = vdev_default_need_resilver,
.vdev_op_hold = NULL,
.vdev_op_rele = NULL,
.vdev_op_remap = NULL,
.vdev_op_xlate = vdev_default_xlate,
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
.vdev_op_rebuild_asize = vdev_mirror_rebuild_asize,
.vdev_op_metaslab_init = NULL,
.vdev_op_config_generate = NULL,
.vdev_op_nparity = NULL,
.vdev_op_ndisks = NULL,
.vdev_op_type = VDEV_TYPE_MIRROR, /* name of this vdev type */
.vdev_op_leaf = B_FALSE /* not a leaf vdev */
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
};
vdev_ops_t vdev_replacing_ops = {
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
.vdev_op_init = NULL,
.vdev_op_fini = NULL,
.vdev_op_open = vdev_mirror_open,
.vdev_op_close = vdev_mirror_close,
.vdev_op_asize = vdev_default_asize,
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
.vdev_op_min_asize = vdev_default_min_asize,
.vdev_op_min_alloc = NULL,
.vdev_op_io_start = vdev_mirror_io_start,
.vdev_op_io_done = vdev_mirror_io_done,
.vdev_op_state_change = vdev_mirror_state_change,
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
.vdev_op_need_resilver = vdev_default_need_resilver,
.vdev_op_hold = NULL,
.vdev_op_rele = NULL,
.vdev_op_remap = NULL,
.vdev_op_xlate = vdev_default_xlate,
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
.vdev_op_rebuild_asize = vdev_mirror_rebuild_asize,
.vdev_op_metaslab_init = NULL,
.vdev_op_config_generate = NULL,
.vdev_op_nparity = NULL,
.vdev_op_ndisks = NULL,
.vdev_op_type = VDEV_TYPE_REPLACING, /* name of this vdev type */
.vdev_op_leaf = B_FALSE /* not a leaf vdev */
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
};
vdev_ops_t vdev_spare_ops = {
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
.vdev_op_init = NULL,
.vdev_op_fini = NULL,
.vdev_op_open = vdev_mirror_open,
.vdev_op_close = vdev_mirror_close,
.vdev_op_asize = vdev_default_asize,
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
.vdev_op_min_asize = vdev_default_min_asize,
.vdev_op_min_alloc = NULL,
.vdev_op_io_start = vdev_mirror_io_start,
.vdev_op_io_done = vdev_mirror_io_done,
.vdev_op_state_change = vdev_mirror_state_change,
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
.vdev_op_need_resilver = vdev_default_need_resilver,
.vdev_op_hold = NULL,
.vdev_op_rele = NULL,
.vdev_op_remap = NULL,
.vdev_op_xlate = vdev_default_xlate,
Distributed Spare (dRAID) Feature This patch adds a new top-level vdev type called dRAID, which stands for Distributed parity RAID. This pool configuration allows all dRAID vdevs to participate when rebuilding to a distributed hot spare device. This can substantially reduce the total time required to restore full parity to pool with a failed device. A dRAID pool can be created using the new top-level `draid` type. Like `raidz`, the desired redundancy is specified after the type: `draid[1,2,3]`. No additional information is required to create the pool and reasonable default values will be chosen based on the number of child vdevs in the dRAID vdev. zpool create <pool> draid[1,2,3] <vdevs...> Unlike raidz, additional optional dRAID configuration values can be provided as part of the draid type as colon separated values. This allows administrators to fully specify a layout for either performance or capacity reasons. The supported options include: zpool create <pool> \ draid[<parity>][:<data>d][:<children>c][:<spares>s] \ <vdevs...> - draid[parity] - Parity level (default 1) - draid[:<data>d] - Data devices per group (default 8) - draid[:<children>c] - Expected number of child vdevs - draid[:<spares>s] - Distributed hot spares (default 0) Abbreviated example `zpool status` output for a 68 disk dRAID pool with two distributed spares using special allocation classes. ``` pool: tank state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM slag7 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2:8d:68c:2s-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L0 ONLINE 0 0 0 L1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U25 ONLINE 0 0 0 U26 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-53 ONLINE 0 0 0 U27 ONLINE 0 0 0 draid2-0-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 U28 ONLINE 0 0 0 U29 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... U42 ONLINE 0 0 0 U43 ONLINE 0 0 0 special mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 L5 ONLINE 0 0 0 U5 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 L6 ONLINE 0 0 0 U6 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares draid2-0-0 INUSE currently in use draid2-0-1 AVAIL ``` When adding test coverage for the new dRAID vdev type the following options were added to the ztest command. These options are leverages by zloop.sh to test a wide range of dRAID configurations. -K draid|raidz|random - kind of RAID to test -D <value> - dRAID data drives per group -S <value> - dRAID distributed hot spares -R <value> - RAID parity (raidz or dRAID) The zpool_create, zpool_import, redundancy, replacement and fault test groups have all been updated provide test coverage for the dRAID feature. Co-authored-by: Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Co-authored-by: Don Brady <don.brady@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Co-authored-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mmaybee@cray.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #10102
2020-11-13 21:51:51 +00:00
.vdev_op_rebuild_asize = vdev_mirror_rebuild_asize,
.vdev_op_metaslab_init = NULL,
.vdev_op_config_generate = NULL,
.vdev_op_nparity = NULL,
.vdev_op_ndisks = NULL,
.vdev_op_type = VDEV_TYPE_SPARE, /* name of this vdev type */
.vdev_op_leaf = B_FALSE /* not a leaf vdev */
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
};
Improve N-way mirror performance The read bandwidth of an N-way mirror can by increased by 50%, and the IOPs by 10%, by more carefully selecting the preferred leaf vdev. The existing algorthm selects a perferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the drives are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. Utilization can be improved by preferentially selecting the leaf vdev with the least pending IO. This prevents leaf vdevs from being starved and compensates for performance differences between disks in the mirror. Faster vdevs will be sent more work and the mirror performance will not be limitted by the slowest drive. In the common case where all the pending queues are full and there is no single least busy leaf vdev a batching stratagy is employed. Of the N least busy vdevs one is selected with equal probability to be the preferred vdev for T microseconds. Compared to randomly selecting a vdev to break the tie batching the requests greatly improves the odds of merging the requests in the Linux elevator. The testing results show a significant performance improvement for all four workloads tested. The workloads were generated using the fio benchmark and are as follows. 1) 1MB sequential reads from 16 threads to 16 files (MB/s). 2) 4KB sequential reads from 16 threads to 16 files (MB/s). 3) 1MB random reads from 16 threads to 16 files (IOP/s). 4) 4KB random reads from 16 threads to 16 files (IOP/s). | Pristine | With 1461 | | Sequential Random | Sequential Random | | 1MB 4KB 1MB 4KB | 1MB 4KB 1MB 4KB | | MB/s MB/s IO/s IO/s | MB/s MB/s IO/s IO/s | ---------------+-----------------------+------------------------+ 2 Striped | 226 243 11 304 | 222 255 11 299 | 2 2-Way Mirror | 302 324 16 534 | 433 448 23 571 | 2 3-Way Mirror | 429 458 24 714 | 648 648 41 808 | 2 4-Way Mirror | 562 601 36 849 | 816 828 82 926 | Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #1461
2013-05-31 19:07:59 +00:00
/* BEGIN CSTYLED */
ZFS_MODULE_PARAM(zfs_vdev_mirror, zfs_vdev_mirror_, rotating_inc, INT, ZMOD_RW,
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
"Rotating media load increment for non-seeking I/O's");
ZFS_MODULE_PARAM(zfs_vdev_mirror, zfs_vdev_mirror_, rotating_seek_inc, INT, ZMOD_RW,
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
"Rotating media load increment for seeking I/O's");
ZFS_MODULE_PARAM(zfs_vdev_mirror, zfs_vdev_mirror_, rotating_seek_offset, INT, ZMOD_RW,
"Offset in bytes from the last I/O which triggers "
"a reduced rotating media seek increment");
ZFS_MODULE_PARAM(zfs_vdev_mirror, zfs_vdev_mirror_, non_rotating_inc, INT, ZMOD_RW,
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
"Non-rotating media load increment for non-seeking I/O's");
ZFS_MODULE_PARAM(zfs_vdev_mirror, zfs_vdev_mirror_, non_rotating_seek_inc, INT, ZMOD_RW,
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using load and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/4334#issuecomment-189057141 Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd@e186f564bc946f82c76e0b34c2f0370ed9aea022 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011dbec2d10579819078559a77630fc559112 entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #4334
2016-02-13 01:47:22 +00:00
"Non-rotating media load increment for seeking I/O's");
/* END CSTYLED */