freebsd-nq/include/sys/zil_impl.h

231 lines
9.1 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
* CDDL HEADER START
*
* The contents of this file are subject to the terms of the
* Common Development and Distribution License (the "License").
* You may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
*
* You can obtain a copy of the license at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE
* or http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions
* and limitations under the License.
*
* When distributing Covered Code, include this CDDL HEADER in each
* file and include the License file at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE.
* If applicable, add the following below this CDDL HEADER, with the
* fields enclosed by brackets "[]" replaced with your own identifying
* information: Portions Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
*
* CDDL HEADER END
*/
/*
* Copyright (c) 2005, 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2012, 2018 by Delphix. All rights reserved.
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
*/
/* Portions Copyright 2010 Robert Milkowski */
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
#ifndef _SYS_ZIL_IMPL_H
#define _SYS_ZIL_IMPL_H
#include <sys/zil.h>
#include <sys/dmu_objset.h>
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif
/*
OpenZFS 8909 - 8585 can cause a use-after-free kernel panic Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Kennedy <jwk404@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Ported-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> PROBLEM ======= There's a race condition that exists if `zil_free_lwb` races with either `zil_commit_waiter_timeout` and/or `zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done`. Here's an example panic due to this bug: > ::status debugging crash dump vmcore.0 (64-bit) from ip-10-110-205-40 operating system: 5.11 dlpx-5.2.2.0_2017-12-04-17-28-32b6ba51fb (i86pc) image uuid: 4af0edfb-e58e-6ed8-cafc-d3e9167c7513 panic message: BAD TRAP: type=e (#pf Page fault) rp=ffffff0010555970 addr=60 occurred in module "zfs" due to a NULL pointer dereference dump content: kernel pages only > $c zio_shrink+0x12() zil_lwb_write_issue+0x30d(ffffff03dcd15cc0, ffffff03e0730e20) zil_commit_waiter_timeout+0xa2(ffffff03dcd15cc0, ffffff03d97ffcf8) zil_commit_waiter+0xf3(ffffff03dcd15cc0, ffffff03d97ffcf8) zil_commit+0x80(ffffff03dcd15cc0, 9a9) zfs_write+0xc34(ffffff03dc38b140, ffffff0010555e60, 40, ffffff03e00fb758, 0) fop_write+0x5b(ffffff03dc38b140, ffffff0010555e60, 40, ffffff03e00fb758, 0) write+0x250(42, fffffd7ff4832000, 2000) sys_syscall+0x177() If there's an outstanding lwb that's in `zil_commit_waiter_timeout` waiting to timeout, waiting on it's waiter's CV, we must be sure not to call `zil_free_lwb`. If we end up calling `zil_free_lwb`, then that LWB may be freed and can result in a use-after-free situation where the stale lwb pointer stored in the `zil_commit_waiter_t` structure of the thread waiting on the waiter's CV is used. A similar situation can occur if an lwb is issued to disk, and thus in the `LWB_STATE_ISSUED` state, and `zil_free_lwb` is called while the disk is servicing that lwb. In this situation, the lwb will be freed by `zil_free_lwb`, which will result in a use-after-free situation when the lwb's zio completes, and `zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done` is called. This race condition is prevented in `zil_close` by calling `zil_commit` before `zil_free_lwb` is called, which will ensure all outstanding (i.e. all lwb's in the `LWB_STATE_OPEN` and/or `LWB_STATE_ISSUED` states) reach the `LWB_STATE_DONE` state before the lwb's are freed (`zil_commit` will not return untill all the lwb's are `LWB_STATE_DONE`). Further, this race condition is prevented in `zil_sync` by only calling `zil_free_lwb` for lwb's that do not have their `lwb_buf` pointer set. All lwb's not in the `LWB_STATE_DONE` state will have a non-null value for this pointer; the pointer is only cleared in `zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done`, at which point the lwb's state will be changed to `LWB_STATE_DONE`. This race *is* present in `zil_suspend`, leading to this bug. At first glance, it would appear as though this would not be true because `zil_suspend` will call `zil_commit`, just like `zil_close`, but the problem is that `zil_suspend` will set the zilog's `zl_suspend` field prior to calling `zil_commit`. Further, in `zil_commit`, if `zl_suspend` is set, `zil_commit` will take a special branch of logic and use `txg_wait_synced` instead of performing the normal `zil_commit` logic. This call to `txg_wait_synced` might be good enough for the data to reach disk safely before it returns, but it does not ensure that all outstanding lwb's reach the `LWB_STATE_DONE` state before it returns. This is because, if there's an lwb "stuck" in `zil_commit_waiter_timeout`, waiting for it's lwb to timeout, it will maintain a non-null value for it's `lwb_buf` field and thus `zil_sync` will not free that lwb. Thus, even though the lwb's data is already on disk, the lwb will be left lingering, waiting on the CV, and will eventually timeout and be issued to disk even though the write is unnecessary. So, after `zil_commit` is called from `zil_suspend`, we incorrectly assume that there are not outstanding lwb's, and proceed to free all lwb's found on the zilog's lwb list. As a result, we free the lwb that will later be used `zil_commit_waiter_timeout`. SOLUTION ======== The solution to this, is to ensure all outstanding lwb's complete before calling `zil_free_lwb` via `zil_destroy` in `zil_suspend`. This patch accomplishes this goal by forcing the normal `zil_commit` logic when called from `zil_sync`. Now, `zil_suspend` will call `zil_commit_impl` which will always use the normal logic of waiting/issuing lwb's to disk before it returns. As a result, any lwb's outstanding when `zil_commit_impl` is called will be guaranteed to reach the `LWB_STATE_DONE` state by the time it returns. Further, no new lwb's will be created via `zil_commit` since the zilog's `zl_suspend` flag will be set. This will force all new callers of `zil_commit` to use `txg_wait_synced` instead of creating and issuing new lwb's. Thus, all lwb's left on the zilog's lwb list when `zil_destroy` is called will be in the `LWB_STATE_DONE` state, and we'll avoid this race condition. OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8909 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/ece62b6f8d Closes #6940
2017-12-07 19:26:32 +00:00
* Possible states for a given lwb structure.
*
* An lwb will start out in the "closed" state, and then transition to
* the "opened" state via a call to zil_lwb_write_open(). When
* transitioning from "closed" to "opened" the zilog's "zl_issuer_lock"
* must be held.
*
* After the lwb is "opened", it can transition into the "issued" state
* via zil_lwb_write_issue(). Again, the zilog's "zl_issuer_lock" must
* be held when making this transition.
*
OpenZFS 9962 - zil_commit should omit cache thrash As a result of the changes made in 8585, it's possible for an excessive amount of vdev flush commands to be issued under some workloads. Specifically, when the workload consists of mostly async write activity, interspersed with some sync write and/or fsync activity, we can end up issuing more flush commands to the underlying storage than is actually necessary. As a result of these flush commands, the write latency and overall throughput of the pool can be poorly impacted (latency increases, throughput decreases). Currently, any time an lwb completes, the vdev(s) written to as a result of that lwb will be issued a flush command. The intenion is so the data written to that vdev is on stable storage, prior to communicating to any waiting threads that their data is safe on disk. The problem with this scheme, is that sometimes an lwb will not have any threads waiting for it to complete. This can occur when there's async activity that gets "converted" to sync requests, as a result of calling the zil_async_to_sync() function via zil_commit_impl(). When this occurs, the current code may issue many lwbs that don't have waiters associated with them, resulting in many flush commands, potentially to the same vdev(s). For example, given a pool with a single vdev, and a single fsync() call that results in 10 lwbs being written out (e.g. due to other async writes), that will result in 10 flush commands to that single vdev (a flush issued after each lwb write completes). Ideally, we'd only issue a single flush command to that vdev, after all 10 lwb writes completed. Further, and most important as it pertains to this change, since the flush commands are often very impactful to the performance of the pool's underlying storage, unnecessarily issuing these flush commands can poorly impact the performance of the lwb writes themselves. Thus, we need to avoid issuing flush commands when possible, in order to acheive the best possible performance out of the pool's underlying storage. This change attempts to address this problem by changing the ZIL's logic to only issue a vdev flush command when it detects an lwb that has a thread waiting for it to complete. When an lwb does not have threads waiting for it, the responsibility of issuing the flush command to the vdevs involved with that lwb's write is passed on to the "next" lwb. It's only once a write for an lwb with waiters completes, do we issue the vdev flush command(s). As a result, now when we issue the flush(s), we will issue them to the vdevs involved with that specific lwb's write, but potentially also to vdevs involved with "previous" lwb writes (i.e. if the previous lwbs did not have waiters associated with them). Thus, in our prior example with 10 lwbs, it's only once the last lwb completes (which will be the lwb containing the waiter for the thread that called fsync) will we issue the vdev flush command; all of the other lwbs will find they have no waiters, so they'll pass the responsibility of the flush to the "next" lwb (until reaching the last lwb that has the waiter). Porting Notes: * Reconciled conflicts with the fastwrite feature. Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Patrick Mooney <patrick.mooney@joyent.com> Reviewed by: Jerry Jelinek <jerry.jelinek@joyent.com> Approved by: Joshua M. Clulow <josh@sysmgr.org> Ported-by: Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9962 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/545190c6 Closes #8188
2018-10-23 21:14:27 +00:00
* After the lwb's write zio completes, it transitions into the "write
* done" state via zil_lwb_write_done(); and then into the "flush done"
* state via zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done(). When transitioning from
* "issued" to "write done", and then from "write done" to "flush done",
* the zilog's "zl_lock" must be held, *not* the "zl_issuer_lock".
OpenZFS 8909 - 8585 can cause a use-after-free kernel panic Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: John Kennedy <jwk404@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Ported-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> PROBLEM ======= There's a race condition that exists if `zil_free_lwb` races with either `zil_commit_waiter_timeout` and/or `zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done`. Here's an example panic due to this bug: > ::status debugging crash dump vmcore.0 (64-bit) from ip-10-110-205-40 operating system: 5.11 dlpx-5.2.2.0_2017-12-04-17-28-32b6ba51fb (i86pc) image uuid: 4af0edfb-e58e-6ed8-cafc-d3e9167c7513 panic message: BAD TRAP: type=e (#pf Page fault) rp=ffffff0010555970 addr=60 occurred in module "zfs" due to a NULL pointer dereference dump content: kernel pages only > $c zio_shrink+0x12() zil_lwb_write_issue+0x30d(ffffff03dcd15cc0, ffffff03e0730e20) zil_commit_waiter_timeout+0xa2(ffffff03dcd15cc0, ffffff03d97ffcf8) zil_commit_waiter+0xf3(ffffff03dcd15cc0, ffffff03d97ffcf8) zil_commit+0x80(ffffff03dcd15cc0, 9a9) zfs_write+0xc34(ffffff03dc38b140, ffffff0010555e60, 40, ffffff03e00fb758, 0) fop_write+0x5b(ffffff03dc38b140, ffffff0010555e60, 40, ffffff03e00fb758, 0) write+0x250(42, fffffd7ff4832000, 2000) sys_syscall+0x177() If there's an outstanding lwb that's in `zil_commit_waiter_timeout` waiting to timeout, waiting on it's waiter's CV, we must be sure not to call `zil_free_lwb`. If we end up calling `zil_free_lwb`, then that LWB may be freed and can result in a use-after-free situation where the stale lwb pointer stored in the `zil_commit_waiter_t` structure of the thread waiting on the waiter's CV is used. A similar situation can occur if an lwb is issued to disk, and thus in the `LWB_STATE_ISSUED` state, and `zil_free_lwb` is called while the disk is servicing that lwb. In this situation, the lwb will be freed by `zil_free_lwb`, which will result in a use-after-free situation when the lwb's zio completes, and `zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done` is called. This race condition is prevented in `zil_close` by calling `zil_commit` before `zil_free_lwb` is called, which will ensure all outstanding (i.e. all lwb's in the `LWB_STATE_OPEN` and/or `LWB_STATE_ISSUED` states) reach the `LWB_STATE_DONE` state before the lwb's are freed (`zil_commit` will not return untill all the lwb's are `LWB_STATE_DONE`). Further, this race condition is prevented in `zil_sync` by only calling `zil_free_lwb` for lwb's that do not have their `lwb_buf` pointer set. All lwb's not in the `LWB_STATE_DONE` state will have a non-null value for this pointer; the pointer is only cleared in `zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done`, at which point the lwb's state will be changed to `LWB_STATE_DONE`. This race *is* present in `zil_suspend`, leading to this bug. At first glance, it would appear as though this would not be true because `zil_suspend` will call `zil_commit`, just like `zil_close`, but the problem is that `zil_suspend` will set the zilog's `zl_suspend` field prior to calling `zil_commit`. Further, in `zil_commit`, if `zl_suspend` is set, `zil_commit` will take a special branch of logic and use `txg_wait_synced` instead of performing the normal `zil_commit` logic. This call to `txg_wait_synced` might be good enough for the data to reach disk safely before it returns, but it does not ensure that all outstanding lwb's reach the `LWB_STATE_DONE` state before it returns. This is because, if there's an lwb "stuck" in `zil_commit_waiter_timeout`, waiting for it's lwb to timeout, it will maintain a non-null value for it's `lwb_buf` field and thus `zil_sync` will not free that lwb. Thus, even though the lwb's data is already on disk, the lwb will be left lingering, waiting on the CV, and will eventually timeout and be issued to disk even though the write is unnecessary. So, after `zil_commit` is called from `zil_suspend`, we incorrectly assume that there are not outstanding lwb's, and proceed to free all lwb's found on the zilog's lwb list. As a result, we free the lwb that will later be used `zil_commit_waiter_timeout`. SOLUTION ======== The solution to this, is to ensure all outstanding lwb's complete before calling `zil_free_lwb` via `zil_destroy` in `zil_suspend`. This patch accomplishes this goal by forcing the normal `zil_commit` logic when called from `zil_sync`. Now, `zil_suspend` will call `zil_commit_impl` which will always use the normal logic of waiting/issuing lwb's to disk before it returns. As a result, any lwb's outstanding when `zil_commit_impl` is called will be guaranteed to reach the `LWB_STATE_DONE` state by the time it returns. Further, no new lwb's will be created via `zil_commit` since the zilog's `zl_suspend` flag will be set. This will force all new callers of `zil_commit` to use `txg_wait_synced` instead of creating and issuing new lwb's. Thus, all lwb's left on the zilog's lwb list when `zil_destroy` is called will be in the `LWB_STATE_DONE` state, and we'll avoid this race condition. OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8909 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/ece62b6f8d Closes #6940
2017-12-07 19:26:32 +00:00
*
* The zilog's "zl_issuer_lock" can become heavily contended in certain
* workloads, so we specifically avoid acquiring that lock when
* transitioning an lwb from "issued" to "done". This allows us to avoid
* having to acquire the "zl_issuer_lock" for each lwb ZIO completion,
* which would have added more lock contention on an already heavily
* contended lock.
*
* Additionally, correctness when reading an lwb's state is often
* achieved by exploiting the fact that these state transitions occur in
* this specific order; i.e. "closed" to "opened" to "issued" to "done".
*
* Thus, if an lwb is in the "closed" or "opened" state, holding the
* "zl_issuer_lock" will prevent a concurrent thread from transitioning
* that lwb to the "issued" state. Likewise, if an lwb is already in the
* "issued" state, holding the "zl_lock" will prevent a concurrent
OpenZFS 9962 - zil_commit should omit cache thrash As a result of the changes made in 8585, it's possible for an excessive amount of vdev flush commands to be issued under some workloads. Specifically, when the workload consists of mostly async write activity, interspersed with some sync write and/or fsync activity, we can end up issuing more flush commands to the underlying storage than is actually necessary. As a result of these flush commands, the write latency and overall throughput of the pool can be poorly impacted (latency increases, throughput decreases). Currently, any time an lwb completes, the vdev(s) written to as a result of that lwb will be issued a flush command. The intenion is so the data written to that vdev is on stable storage, prior to communicating to any waiting threads that their data is safe on disk. The problem with this scheme, is that sometimes an lwb will not have any threads waiting for it to complete. This can occur when there's async activity that gets "converted" to sync requests, as a result of calling the zil_async_to_sync() function via zil_commit_impl(). When this occurs, the current code may issue many lwbs that don't have waiters associated with them, resulting in many flush commands, potentially to the same vdev(s). For example, given a pool with a single vdev, and a single fsync() call that results in 10 lwbs being written out (e.g. due to other async writes), that will result in 10 flush commands to that single vdev (a flush issued after each lwb write completes). Ideally, we'd only issue a single flush command to that vdev, after all 10 lwb writes completed. Further, and most important as it pertains to this change, since the flush commands are often very impactful to the performance of the pool's underlying storage, unnecessarily issuing these flush commands can poorly impact the performance of the lwb writes themselves. Thus, we need to avoid issuing flush commands when possible, in order to acheive the best possible performance out of the pool's underlying storage. This change attempts to address this problem by changing the ZIL's logic to only issue a vdev flush command when it detects an lwb that has a thread waiting for it to complete. When an lwb does not have threads waiting for it, the responsibility of issuing the flush command to the vdevs involved with that lwb's write is passed on to the "next" lwb. It's only once a write for an lwb with waiters completes, do we issue the vdev flush command(s). As a result, now when we issue the flush(s), we will issue them to the vdevs involved with that specific lwb's write, but potentially also to vdevs involved with "previous" lwb writes (i.e. if the previous lwbs did not have waiters associated with them). Thus, in our prior example with 10 lwbs, it's only once the last lwb completes (which will be the lwb containing the waiter for the thread that called fsync) will we issue the vdev flush command; all of the other lwbs will find they have no waiters, so they'll pass the responsibility of the flush to the "next" lwb (until reaching the last lwb that has the waiter). Porting Notes: * Reconciled conflicts with the fastwrite feature. Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Patrick Mooney <patrick.mooney@joyent.com> Reviewed by: Jerry Jelinek <jerry.jelinek@joyent.com> Approved by: Joshua M. Clulow <josh@sysmgr.org> Ported-by: Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9962 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/545190c6 Closes #8188
2018-10-23 21:14:27 +00:00
* thread from transitioning that lwb to the "write done" state.
OpenZFS 8585 - improve batching done in zil_commit() Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com> Ported-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Problem ======= The current implementation of zil_commit() can introduce significant latency, beyond what is inherent due to the latency of the underlying storage. The additional latency comes from two main problems: 1. When there's outstanding ZIL blocks being written (i.e. there's already a "writer thread" in progress), then any new calls to zil_commit() will block waiting for the currently oustanding ZIL blocks to complete. The blocks written for each "writer thread" is coined a "batch", and there can only ever be a single "batch" being written at a time. When a batch is being written, any new ZIL transactions will have to wait for the next batch to be written, which won't occur until the current batch finishes. As a result, the underlying storage may not be used as efficiently as possible. While "new" threads enter zil_commit() and are blocked waiting for the next batch, it's possible that the underlying storage isn't fully utilized by the current batch of ZIL blocks. In that case, it'd be better to allow these new threads to generate (and issue) a new ZIL block, such that it could be serviced by the underlying storage concurrently with the other ZIL blocks that are being serviced. 2. Any call to zil_commit() must wait for all ZIL blocks in its "batch" to complete, prior to zil_commit() returning. The size of any given batch is proportional to the number of ZIL transaction in the queue at the time that the batch starts processing the queue; which doesn't occur until the previous batch completes. Thus, if there's a lot of transactions in the queue, the batch could be composed of many ZIL blocks, and each call to zil_commit() will have to wait for all of these writes to complete (even if the thread calling zil_commit() only cared about one of the transactions in the batch). To further complicate the situation, these two issues result in the following side effect: 3. If a given batch takes longer to complete than normal, this results in larger batch sizes, which then take longer to complete and further drive up the latency of zil_commit(). This can occur for a number of reasons, including (but not limited to): transient changes in the workload, and storage latency irregularites. Solution ======== The solution attempted by this change has the following goals: 1. no on-disk changes; maintain current on-disk format. 2. modify the "batch size" to be equal to the "ZIL block size". 3. allow new batches to be generated and issued to disk, while there's already batches being serviced by the disk. 4. allow zil_commit() to wait for as few ZIL blocks as possible. 5. use as few ZIL blocks as possible, for the same amount of ZIL transactions, without introducing significant latency to any individual ZIL transaction. i.e. use fewer, but larger, ZIL blocks. In theory, with these goals met, the new allgorithm will allow the following improvements: 1. new ZIL blocks can be generated and issued, while there's already oustanding ZIL blocks being serviced by the storage. 2. the latency of zil_commit() should be proportional to the underlying storage latency, rather than the incoming synchronous workload. Porting Notes ============= Due to the changes made in commit 119a394ab0, the lifetime of an itx structure differs than in OpenZFS. Specifically, the itx structure is kept around until the data associated with the itx is considered to be safe on disk; this is so that the itx's callback can be called after the data is committed to stable storage. Since OpenZFS doesn't have this itx callback mechanism, it's able to destroy the itx structure immediately after the itx is committed to an lwb (before the lwb is written to disk). To support this difference, and to ensure the itx's callbacks can still be called after the itx's data is on disk, a few changes had to be made: * A list of itxs was added to the lwb structure. This list contains all of the itxs that have been committed to the lwb, such that the callbacks for these itxs can be called from zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done(), after the data for the itxs is committed to disk. * A list of itxs was added on the stack of the zil_process_commit_list() function; the "nolwb_itxs" list. In some circumstances, an itx may not be committed to an lwb (e.g. if allocating the "next" ZIL block on disk fails), so this list is used to keep track of which itxs fall into this state, such that their callbacks can be called after the ZIL's writer pipeline is "stalled". * The logic to actually call the itx's callback was moved into the zil_itx_destroy() function. Since all consumers of zil_itx_destroy() were effectively performing the same logic (i.e. if callback is non-null, call the callback), it seemed like useful code cleanup to consolidate this logic into a single function. Additionally, the existing Linux tracepoint infrastructure dealing with the ZIL's probes and structures had to be updated to reflect these code changes. Specifically: * The "zil__cw1" and "zil__cw2" probes were removed, so they had to be removed from "trace_zil.h" as well. * Some of the zilog structure's fields were removed, which affected the tracepoint definitions of the structure. * New tracepoints had to be added for the following 3 new probes: * zil__process__commit__itx * zil__process__normal__itx * zil__commit__io__error OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8585 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/5d95a3a Closes #6566
2017-12-05 17:39:16 +00:00
*/
typedef enum {
LWB_STATE_CLOSED,
LWB_STATE_OPENED,
LWB_STATE_ISSUED,
OpenZFS 9962 - zil_commit should omit cache thrash As a result of the changes made in 8585, it's possible for an excessive amount of vdev flush commands to be issued under some workloads. Specifically, when the workload consists of mostly async write activity, interspersed with some sync write and/or fsync activity, we can end up issuing more flush commands to the underlying storage than is actually necessary. As a result of these flush commands, the write latency and overall throughput of the pool can be poorly impacted (latency increases, throughput decreases). Currently, any time an lwb completes, the vdev(s) written to as a result of that lwb will be issued a flush command. The intenion is so the data written to that vdev is on stable storage, prior to communicating to any waiting threads that their data is safe on disk. The problem with this scheme, is that sometimes an lwb will not have any threads waiting for it to complete. This can occur when there's async activity that gets "converted" to sync requests, as a result of calling the zil_async_to_sync() function via zil_commit_impl(). When this occurs, the current code may issue many lwbs that don't have waiters associated with them, resulting in many flush commands, potentially to the same vdev(s). For example, given a pool with a single vdev, and a single fsync() call that results in 10 lwbs being written out (e.g. due to other async writes), that will result in 10 flush commands to that single vdev (a flush issued after each lwb write completes). Ideally, we'd only issue a single flush command to that vdev, after all 10 lwb writes completed. Further, and most important as it pertains to this change, since the flush commands are often very impactful to the performance of the pool's underlying storage, unnecessarily issuing these flush commands can poorly impact the performance of the lwb writes themselves. Thus, we need to avoid issuing flush commands when possible, in order to acheive the best possible performance out of the pool's underlying storage. This change attempts to address this problem by changing the ZIL's logic to only issue a vdev flush command when it detects an lwb that has a thread waiting for it to complete. When an lwb does not have threads waiting for it, the responsibility of issuing the flush command to the vdevs involved with that lwb's write is passed on to the "next" lwb. It's only once a write for an lwb with waiters completes, do we issue the vdev flush command(s). As a result, now when we issue the flush(s), we will issue them to the vdevs involved with that specific lwb's write, but potentially also to vdevs involved with "previous" lwb writes (i.e. if the previous lwbs did not have waiters associated with them). Thus, in our prior example with 10 lwbs, it's only once the last lwb completes (which will be the lwb containing the waiter for the thread that called fsync) will we issue the vdev flush command; all of the other lwbs will find they have no waiters, so they'll pass the responsibility of the flush to the "next" lwb (until reaching the last lwb that has the waiter). Porting Notes: * Reconciled conflicts with the fastwrite feature. Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Patrick Mooney <patrick.mooney@joyent.com> Reviewed by: Jerry Jelinek <jerry.jelinek@joyent.com> Approved by: Joshua M. Clulow <josh@sysmgr.org> Ported-by: Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9962 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/545190c6 Closes #8188
2018-10-23 21:14:27 +00:00
LWB_STATE_WRITE_DONE,
LWB_STATE_FLUSH_DONE,
OpenZFS 8585 - improve batching done in zil_commit() Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com> Ported-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Problem ======= The current implementation of zil_commit() can introduce significant latency, beyond what is inherent due to the latency of the underlying storage. The additional latency comes from two main problems: 1. When there's outstanding ZIL blocks being written (i.e. there's already a "writer thread" in progress), then any new calls to zil_commit() will block waiting for the currently oustanding ZIL blocks to complete. The blocks written for each "writer thread" is coined a "batch", and there can only ever be a single "batch" being written at a time. When a batch is being written, any new ZIL transactions will have to wait for the next batch to be written, which won't occur until the current batch finishes. As a result, the underlying storage may not be used as efficiently as possible. While "new" threads enter zil_commit() and are blocked waiting for the next batch, it's possible that the underlying storage isn't fully utilized by the current batch of ZIL blocks. In that case, it'd be better to allow these new threads to generate (and issue) a new ZIL block, such that it could be serviced by the underlying storage concurrently with the other ZIL blocks that are being serviced. 2. Any call to zil_commit() must wait for all ZIL blocks in its "batch" to complete, prior to zil_commit() returning. The size of any given batch is proportional to the number of ZIL transaction in the queue at the time that the batch starts processing the queue; which doesn't occur until the previous batch completes. Thus, if there's a lot of transactions in the queue, the batch could be composed of many ZIL blocks, and each call to zil_commit() will have to wait for all of these writes to complete (even if the thread calling zil_commit() only cared about one of the transactions in the batch). To further complicate the situation, these two issues result in the following side effect: 3. If a given batch takes longer to complete than normal, this results in larger batch sizes, which then take longer to complete and further drive up the latency of zil_commit(). This can occur for a number of reasons, including (but not limited to): transient changes in the workload, and storage latency irregularites. Solution ======== The solution attempted by this change has the following goals: 1. no on-disk changes; maintain current on-disk format. 2. modify the "batch size" to be equal to the "ZIL block size". 3. allow new batches to be generated and issued to disk, while there's already batches being serviced by the disk. 4. allow zil_commit() to wait for as few ZIL blocks as possible. 5. use as few ZIL blocks as possible, for the same amount of ZIL transactions, without introducing significant latency to any individual ZIL transaction. i.e. use fewer, but larger, ZIL blocks. In theory, with these goals met, the new allgorithm will allow the following improvements: 1. new ZIL blocks can be generated and issued, while there's already oustanding ZIL blocks being serviced by the storage. 2. the latency of zil_commit() should be proportional to the underlying storage latency, rather than the incoming synchronous workload. Porting Notes ============= Due to the changes made in commit 119a394ab0, the lifetime of an itx structure differs than in OpenZFS. Specifically, the itx structure is kept around until the data associated with the itx is considered to be safe on disk; this is so that the itx's callback can be called after the data is committed to stable storage. Since OpenZFS doesn't have this itx callback mechanism, it's able to destroy the itx structure immediately after the itx is committed to an lwb (before the lwb is written to disk). To support this difference, and to ensure the itx's callbacks can still be called after the itx's data is on disk, a few changes had to be made: * A list of itxs was added to the lwb structure. This list contains all of the itxs that have been committed to the lwb, such that the callbacks for these itxs can be called from zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done(), after the data for the itxs is committed to disk. * A list of itxs was added on the stack of the zil_process_commit_list() function; the "nolwb_itxs" list. In some circumstances, an itx may not be committed to an lwb (e.g. if allocating the "next" ZIL block on disk fails), so this list is used to keep track of which itxs fall into this state, such that their callbacks can be called after the ZIL's writer pipeline is "stalled". * The logic to actually call the itx's callback was moved into the zil_itx_destroy() function. Since all consumers of zil_itx_destroy() were effectively performing the same logic (i.e. if callback is non-null, call the callback), it seemed like useful code cleanup to consolidate this logic into a single function. Additionally, the existing Linux tracepoint infrastructure dealing with the ZIL's probes and structures had to be updated to reflect these code changes. Specifically: * The "zil__cw1" and "zil__cw2" probes were removed, so they had to be removed from "trace_zil.h" as well. * Some of the zilog structure's fields were removed, which affected the tracepoint definitions of the structure. * New tracepoints had to be added for the following 3 new probes: * zil__process__commit__itx * zil__process__normal__itx * zil__commit__io__error OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8585 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/5d95a3a Closes #6566
2017-12-05 17:39:16 +00:00
LWB_NUM_STATES
} lwb_state_t;
/*
* Log write block (lwb)
*
* Prior to an lwb being issued to disk via zil_lwb_write_issue(), it
* will be protected by the zilog's "zl_issuer_lock". Basically, prior
OpenZFS 8585 - improve batching done in zil_commit() Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com> Ported-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Problem ======= The current implementation of zil_commit() can introduce significant latency, beyond what is inherent due to the latency of the underlying storage. The additional latency comes from two main problems: 1. When there's outstanding ZIL blocks being written (i.e. there's already a "writer thread" in progress), then any new calls to zil_commit() will block waiting for the currently oustanding ZIL blocks to complete. The blocks written for each "writer thread" is coined a "batch", and there can only ever be a single "batch" being written at a time. When a batch is being written, any new ZIL transactions will have to wait for the next batch to be written, which won't occur until the current batch finishes. As a result, the underlying storage may not be used as efficiently as possible. While "new" threads enter zil_commit() and are blocked waiting for the next batch, it's possible that the underlying storage isn't fully utilized by the current batch of ZIL blocks. In that case, it'd be better to allow these new threads to generate (and issue) a new ZIL block, such that it could be serviced by the underlying storage concurrently with the other ZIL blocks that are being serviced. 2. Any call to zil_commit() must wait for all ZIL blocks in its "batch" to complete, prior to zil_commit() returning. The size of any given batch is proportional to the number of ZIL transaction in the queue at the time that the batch starts processing the queue; which doesn't occur until the previous batch completes. Thus, if there's a lot of transactions in the queue, the batch could be composed of many ZIL blocks, and each call to zil_commit() will have to wait for all of these writes to complete (even if the thread calling zil_commit() only cared about one of the transactions in the batch). To further complicate the situation, these two issues result in the following side effect: 3. If a given batch takes longer to complete than normal, this results in larger batch sizes, which then take longer to complete and further drive up the latency of zil_commit(). This can occur for a number of reasons, including (but not limited to): transient changes in the workload, and storage latency irregularites. Solution ======== The solution attempted by this change has the following goals: 1. no on-disk changes; maintain current on-disk format. 2. modify the "batch size" to be equal to the "ZIL block size". 3. allow new batches to be generated and issued to disk, while there's already batches being serviced by the disk. 4. allow zil_commit() to wait for as few ZIL blocks as possible. 5. use as few ZIL blocks as possible, for the same amount of ZIL transactions, without introducing significant latency to any individual ZIL transaction. i.e. use fewer, but larger, ZIL blocks. In theory, with these goals met, the new allgorithm will allow the following improvements: 1. new ZIL blocks can be generated and issued, while there's already oustanding ZIL blocks being serviced by the storage. 2. the latency of zil_commit() should be proportional to the underlying storage latency, rather than the incoming synchronous workload. Porting Notes ============= Due to the changes made in commit 119a394ab0, the lifetime of an itx structure differs than in OpenZFS. Specifically, the itx structure is kept around until the data associated with the itx is considered to be safe on disk; this is so that the itx's callback can be called after the data is committed to stable storage. Since OpenZFS doesn't have this itx callback mechanism, it's able to destroy the itx structure immediately after the itx is committed to an lwb (before the lwb is written to disk). To support this difference, and to ensure the itx's callbacks can still be called after the itx's data is on disk, a few changes had to be made: * A list of itxs was added to the lwb structure. This list contains all of the itxs that have been committed to the lwb, such that the callbacks for these itxs can be called from zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done(), after the data for the itxs is committed to disk. * A list of itxs was added on the stack of the zil_process_commit_list() function; the "nolwb_itxs" list. In some circumstances, an itx may not be committed to an lwb (e.g. if allocating the "next" ZIL block on disk fails), so this list is used to keep track of which itxs fall into this state, such that their callbacks can be called after the ZIL's writer pipeline is "stalled". * The logic to actually call the itx's callback was moved into the zil_itx_destroy() function. Since all consumers of zil_itx_destroy() were effectively performing the same logic (i.e. if callback is non-null, call the callback), it seemed like useful code cleanup to consolidate this logic into a single function. Additionally, the existing Linux tracepoint infrastructure dealing with the ZIL's probes and structures had to be updated to reflect these code changes. Specifically: * The "zil__cw1" and "zil__cw2" probes were removed, so they had to be removed from "trace_zil.h" as well. * Some of the zilog structure's fields were removed, which affected the tracepoint definitions of the structure. * New tracepoints had to be added for the following 3 new probes: * zil__process__commit__itx * zil__process__normal__itx * zil__commit__io__error OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8585 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/5d95a3a Closes #6566
2017-12-05 17:39:16 +00:00
* to it being issued, it will only be accessed by the thread that's
* holding the "zl_issuer_lock". After the lwb is issued, the zilog's
OpenZFS 8585 - improve batching done in zil_commit() Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com> Ported-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Problem ======= The current implementation of zil_commit() can introduce significant latency, beyond what is inherent due to the latency of the underlying storage. The additional latency comes from two main problems: 1. When there's outstanding ZIL blocks being written (i.e. there's already a "writer thread" in progress), then any new calls to zil_commit() will block waiting for the currently oustanding ZIL blocks to complete. The blocks written for each "writer thread" is coined a "batch", and there can only ever be a single "batch" being written at a time. When a batch is being written, any new ZIL transactions will have to wait for the next batch to be written, which won't occur until the current batch finishes. As a result, the underlying storage may not be used as efficiently as possible. While "new" threads enter zil_commit() and are blocked waiting for the next batch, it's possible that the underlying storage isn't fully utilized by the current batch of ZIL blocks. In that case, it'd be better to allow these new threads to generate (and issue) a new ZIL block, such that it could be serviced by the underlying storage concurrently with the other ZIL blocks that are being serviced. 2. Any call to zil_commit() must wait for all ZIL blocks in its "batch" to complete, prior to zil_commit() returning. The size of any given batch is proportional to the number of ZIL transaction in the queue at the time that the batch starts processing the queue; which doesn't occur until the previous batch completes. Thus, if there's a lot of transactions in the queue, the batch could be composed of many ZIL blocks, and each call to zil_commit() will have to wait for all of these writes to complete (even if the thread calling zil_commit() only cared about one of the transactions in the batch). To further complicate the situation, these two issues result in the following side effect: 3. If a given batch takes longer to complete than normal, this results in larger batch sizes, which then take longer to complete and further drive up the latency of zil_commit(). This can occur for a number of reasons, including (but not limited to): transient changes in the workload, and storage latency irregularites. Solution ======== The solution attempted by this change has the following goals: 1. no on-disk changes; maintain current on-disk format. 2. modify the "batch size" to be equal to the "ZIL block size". 3. allow new batches to be generated and issued to disk, while there's already batches being serviced by the disk. 4. allow zil_commit() to wait for as few ZIL blocks as possible. 5. use as few ZIL blocks as possible, for the same amount of ZIL transactions, without introducing significant latency to any individual ZIL transaction. i.e. use fewer, but larger, ZIL blocks. In theory, with these goals met, the new allgorithm will allow the following improvements: 1. new ZIL blocks can be generated and issued, while there's already oustanding ZIL blocks being serviced by the storage. 2. the latency of zil_commit() should be proportional to the underlying storage latency, rather than the incoming synchronous workload. Porting Notes ============= Due to the changes made in commit 119a394ab0, the lifetime of an itx structure differs than in OpenZFS. Specifically, the itx structure is kept around until the data associated with the itx is considered to be safe on disk; this is so that the itx's callback can be called after the data is committed to stable storage. Since OpenZFS doesn't have this itx callback mechanism, it's able to destroy the itx structure immediately after the itx is committed to an lwb (before the lwb is written to disk). To support this difference, and to ensure the itx's callbacks can still be called after the itx's data is on disk, a few changes had to be made: * A list of itxs was added to the lwb structure. This list contains all of the itxs that have been committed to the lwb, such that the callbacks for these itxs can be called from zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done(), after the data for the itxs is committed to disk. * A list of itxs was added on the stack of the zil_process_commit_list() function; the "nolwb_itxs" list. In some circumstances, an itx may not be committed to an lwb (e.g. if allocating the "next" ZIL block on disk fails), so this list is used to keep track of which itxs fall into this state, such that their callbacks can be called after the ZIL's writer pipeline is "stalled". * The logic to actually call the itx's callback was moved into the zil_itx_destroy() function. Since all consumers of zil_itx_destroy() were effectively performing the same logic (i.e. if callback is non-null, call the callback), it seemed like useful code cleanup to consolidate this logic into a single function. Additionally, the existing Linux tracepoint infrastructure dealing with the ZIL's probes and structures had to be updated to reflect these code changes. Specifically: * The "zil__cw1" and "zil__cw2" probes were removed, so they had to be removed from "trace_zil.h" as well. * Some of the zilog structure's fields were removed, which affected the tracepoint definitions of the structure. * New tracepoints had to be added for the following 3 new probes: * zil__process__commit__itx * zil__process__normal__itx * zil__commit__io__error OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8585 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/5d95a3a Closes #6566
2017-12-05 17:39:16 +00:00
* "zl_lock" is used to protect the lwb against concurrent access.
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
*/
typedef struct lwb {
zilog_t *lwb_zilog; /* back pointer to log struct */
blkptr_t lwb_blk; /* on disk address of this log blk */
boolean_t lwb_fastwrite; /* is blk marked for fastwrite? */
OpenZFS 7578 - Fix/improve some aspects of ZIL writing - After some ZIL changes 6 years ago zil_slog_limit got partially broken due to zl_itx_list_sz not updated when async itx'es upgraded to sync. Actually because of other changes about that time zl_itx_list_sz is not really required to implement the functionality, so this patch removes some unneeded broken code and variables. - Original idea of zil_slog_limit was to reduce chance of SLOG abuse by single heavy logger, that increased latency for other (more latency critical) loggers, by pushing heavy log out into the main pool instead of SLOG. Beside huge latency increase for heavy writers, this implementation caused double write of all data, since the log records were explicitly prepared for SLOG. Since we now have I/O scheduler, I've found it can be much more efficient to reduce priority of heavy logger SLOG writes from ZIO_PRIORITY_SYNC_WRITE to ZIO_PRIORITY_ASYNC_WRITE, while still leave them on SLOG. - Existing ZIL implementation had problem with space efficiency when it has to write large chunks of data into log blocks of limited size. In some cases efficiency stopped to almost as low as 50%. In case of ZIL stored on spinning rust, that also reduced log write speed in half, since head had to uselessly fly over allocated but not written areas. This change improves the situation by offloading problematic operations from z*_log_write() to zil_lwb_commit(), which knows real situation of log blocks allocation and can split large requests into pieces much more efficiently. Also as side effect it removes one of two data copy operations done by ZIL code WR_COPIED case. - While there, untangle and unify code of z*_log_write() functions. Also zfs_log_write() alike to zvol_log_write() can now handle writes crossing block boundary, that may also improve efficiency if ZPL is made to do that. Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Authored by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed by: Steven Hartland <steven.hartland@multiplay.co.uk> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Richard Elling <Richard.Elling@RichardElling.com> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Ported-by: Giuseppe Di Natale <dinatale2@llnl.gov> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/7578 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/aeb13ac Closes #6191
2017-06-09 16:15:37 +00:00
boolean_t lwb_slog; /* lwb_blk is on SLOG device */
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
int lwb_nused; /* # used bytes in buffer */
int lwb_sz; /* size of block and buffer */
OpenZFS 8585 - improve batching done in zil_commit() Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com> Ported-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Problem ======= The current implementation of zil_commit() can introduce significant latency, beyond what is inherent due to the latency of the underlying storage. The additional latency comes from two main problems: 1. When there's outstanding ZIL blocks being written (i.e. there's already a "writer thread" in progress), then any new calls to zil_commit() will block waiting for the currently oustanding ZIL blocks to complete. The blocks written for each "writer thread" is coined a "batch", and there can only ever be a single "batch" being written at a time. When a batch is being written, any new ZIL transactions will have to wait for the next batch to be written, which won't occur until the current batch finishes. As a result, the underlying storage may not be used as efficiently as possible. While "new" threads enter zil_commit() and are blocked waiting for the next batch, it's possible that the underlying storage isn't fully utilized by the current batch of ZIL blocks. In that case, it'd be better to allow these new threads to generate (and issue) a new ZIL block, such that it could be serviced by the underlying storage concurrently with the other ZIL blocks that are being serviced. 2. Any call to zil_commit() must wait for all ZIL blocks in its "batch" to complete, prior to zil_commit() returning. The size of any given batch is proportional to the number of ZIL transaction in the queue at the time that the batch starts processing the queue; which doesn't occur until the previous batch completes. Thus, if there's a lot of transactions in the queue, the batch could be composed of many ZIL blocks, and each call to zil_commit() will have to wait for all of these writes to complete (even if the thread calling zil_commit() only cared about one of the transactions in the batch). To further complicate the situation, these two issues result in the following side effect: 3. If a given batch takes longer to complete than normal, this results in larger batch sizes, which then take longer to complete and further drive up the latency of zil_commit(). This can occur for a number of reasons, including (but not limited to): transient changes in the workload, and storage latency irregularites. Solution ======== The solution attempted by this change has the following goals: 1. no on-disk changes; maintain current on-disk format. 2. modify the "batch size" to be equal to the "ZIL block size". 3. allow new batches to be generated and issued to disk, while there's already batches being serviced by the disk. 4. allow zil_commit() to wait for as few ZIL blocks as possible. 5. use as few ZIL blocks as possible, for the same amount of ZIL transactions, without introducing significant latency to any individual ZIL transaction. i.e. use fewer, but larger, ZIL blocks. In theory, with these goals met, the new allgorithm will allow the following improvements: 1. new ZIL blocks can be generated and issued, while there's already oustanding ZIL blocks being serviced by the storage. 2. the latency of zil_commit() should be proportional to the underlying storage latency, rather than the incoming synchronous workload. Porting Notes ============= Due to the changes made in commit 119a394ab0, the lifetime of an itx structure differs than in OpenZFS. Specifically, the itx structure is kept around until the data associated with the itx is considered to be safe on disk; this is so that the itx's callback can be called after the data is committed to stable storage. Since OpenZFS doesn't have this itx callback mechanism, it's able to destroy the itx structure immediately after the itx is committed to an lwb (before the lwb is written to disk). To support this difference, and to ensure the itx's callbacks can still be called after the itx's data is on disk, a few changes had to be made: * A list of itxs was added to the lwb structure. This list contains all of the itxs that have been committed to the lwb, such that the callbacks for these itxs can be called from zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done(), after the data for the itxs is committed to disk. * A list of itxs was added on the stack of the zil_process_commit_list() function; the "nolwb_itxs" list. In some circumstances, an itx may not be committed to an lwb (e.g. if allocating the "next" ZIL block on disk fails), so this list is used to keep track of which itxs fall into this state, such that their callbacks can be called after the ZIL's writer pipeline is "stalled". * The logic to actually call the itx's callback was moved into the zil_itx_destroy() function. Since all consumers of zil_itx_destroy() were effectively performing the same logic (i.e. if callback is non-null, call the callback), it seemed like useful code cleanup to consolidate this logic into a single function. Additionally, the existing Linux tracepoint infrastructure dealing with the ZIL's probes and structures had to be updated to reflect these code changes. Specifically: * The "zil__cw1" and "zil__cw2" probes were removed, so they had to be removed from "trace_zil.h" as well. * Some of the zilog structure's fields were removed, which affected the tracepoint definitions of the structure. * New tracepoints had to be added for the following 3 new probes: * zil__process__commit__itx * zil__process__normal__itx * zil__commit__io__error OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8585 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/5d95a3a Closes #6566
2017-12-05 17:39:16 +00:00
lwb_state_t lwb_state; /* the state of this lwb */
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
char *lwb_buf; /* log write buffer */
OpenZFS 8585 - improve batching done in zil_commit() Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com> Ported-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Problem ======= The current implementation of zil_commit() can introduce significant latency, beyond what is inherent due to the latency of the underlying storage. The additional latency comes from two main problems: 1. When there's outstanding ZIL blocks being written (i.e. there's already a "writer thread" in progress), then any new calls to zil_commit() will block waiting for the currently oustanding ZIL blocks to complete. The blocks written for each "writer thread" is coined a "batch", and there can only ever be a single "batch" being written at a time. When a batch is being written, any new ZIL transactions will have to wait for the next batch to be written, which won't occur until the current batch finishes. As a result, the underlying storage may not be used as efficiently as possible. While "new" threads enter zil_commit() and are blocked waiting for the next batch, it's possible that the underlying storage isn't fully utilized by the current batch of ZIL blocks. In that case, it'd be better to allow these new threads to generate (and issue) a new ZIL block, such that it could be serviced by the underlying storage concurrently with the other ZIL blocks that are being serviced. 2. Any call to zil_commit() must wait for all ZIL blocks in its "batch" to complete, prior to zil_commit() returning. The size of any given batch is proportional to the number of ZIL transaction in the queue at the time that the batch starts processing the queue; which doesn't occur until the previous batch completes. Thus, if there's a lot of transactions in the queue, the batch could be composed of many ZIL blocks, and each call to zil_commit() will have to wait for all of these writes to complete (even if the thread calling zil_commit() only cared about one of the transactions in the batch). To further complicate the situation, these two issues result in the following side effect: 3. If a given batch takes longer to complete than normal, this results in larger batch sizes, which then take longer to complete and further drive up the latency of zil_commit(). This can occur for a number of reasons, including (but not limited to): transient changes in the workload, and storage latency irregularites. Solution ======== The solution attempted by this change has the following goals: 1. no on-disk changes; maintain current on-disk format. 2. modify the "batch size" to be equal to the "ZIL block size". 3. allow new batches to be generated and issued to disk, while there's already batches being serviced by the disk. 4. allow zil_commit() to wait for as few ZIL blocks as possible. 5. use as few ZIL blocks as possible, for the same amount of ZIL transactions, without introducing significant latency to any individual ZIL transaction. i.e. use fewer, but larger, ZIL blocks. In theory, with these goals met, the new allgorithm will allow the following improvements: 1. new ZIL blocks can be generated and issued, while there's already oustanding ZIL blocks being serviced by the storage. 2. the latency of zil_commit() should be proportional to the underlying storage latency, rather than the incoming synchronous workload. Porting Notes ============= Due to the changes made in commit 119a394ab0, the lifetime of an itx structure differs than in OpenZFS. Specifically, the itx structure is kept around until the data associated with the itx is considered to be safe on disk; this is so that the itx's callback can be called after the data is committed to stable storage. Since OpenZFS doesn't have this itx callback mechanism, it's able to destroy the itx structure immediately after the itx is committed to an lwb (before the lwb is written to disk). To support this difference, and to ensure the itx's callbacks can still be called after the itx's data is on disk, a few changes had to be made: * A list of itxs was added to the lwb structure. This list contains all of the itxs that have been committed to the lwb, such that the callbacks for these itxs can be called from zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done(), after the data for the itxs is committed to disk. * A list of itxs was added on the stack of the zil_process_commit_list() function; the "nolwb_itxs" list. In some circumstances, an itx may not be committed to an lwb (e.g. if allocating the "next" ZIL block on disk fails), so this list is used to keep track of which itxs fall into this state, such that their callbacks can be called after the ZIL's writer pipeline is "stalled". * The logic to actually call the itx's callback was moved into the zil_itx_destroy() function. Since all consumers of zil_itx_destroy() were effectively performing the same logic (i.e. if callback is non-null, call the callback), it seemed like useful code cleanup to consolidate this logic into a single function. Additionally, the existing Linux tracepoint infrastructure dealing with the ZIL's probes and structures had to be updated to reflect these code changes. Specifically: * The "zil__cw1" and "zil__cw2" probes were removed, so they had to be removed from "trace_zil.h" as well. * Some of the zilog structure's fields were removed, which affected the tracepoint definitions of the structure. * New tracepoints had to be added for the following 3 new probes: * zil__process__commit__itx * zil__process__normal__itx * zil__commit__io__error OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8585 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/5d95a3a Closes #6566
2017-12-05 17:39:16 +00:00
zio_t *lwb_write_zio; /* zio for the lwb buffer */
zio_t *lwb_root_zio; /* root zio for lwb write and flushes */
dmu_tx_t *lwb_tx; /* tx for log block allocation */
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
uint64_t lwb_max_txg; /* highest txg in this lwb */
list_node_t lwb_node; /* zilog->zl_lwb_list linkage */
OpenZFS 8585 - improve batching done in zil_commit() Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com> Ported-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Problem ======= The current implementation of zil_commit() can introduce significant latency, beyond what is inherent due to the latency of the underlying storage. The additional latency comes from two main problems: 1. When there's outstanding ZIL blocks being written (i.e. there's already a "writer thread" in progress), then any new calls to zil_commit() will block waiting for the currently oustanding ZIL blocks to complete. The blocks written for each "writer thread" is coined a "batch", and there can only ever be a single "batch" being written at a time. When a batch is being written, any new ZIL transactions will have to wait for the next batch to be written, which won't occur until the current batch finishes. As a result, the underlying storage may not be used as efficiently as possible. While "new" threads enter zil_commit() and are blocked waiting for the next batch, it's possible that the underlying storage isn't fully utilized by the current batch of ZIL blocks. In that case, it'd be better to allow these new threads to generate (and issue) a new ZIL block, such that it could be serviced by the underlying storage concurrently with the other ZIL blocks that are being serviced. 2. Any call to zil_commit() must wait for all ZIL blocks in its "batch" to complete, prior to zil_commit() returning. The size of any given batch is proportional to the number of ZIL transaction in the queue at the time that the batch starts processing the queue; which doesn't occur until the previous batch completes. Thus, if there's a lot of transactions in the queue, the batch could be composed of many ZIL blocks, and each call to zil_commit() will have to wait for all of these writes to complete (even if the thread calling zil_commit() only cared about one of the transactions in the batch). To further complicate the situation, these two issues result in the following side effect: 3. If a given batch takes longer to complete than normal, this results in larger batch sizes, which then take longer to complete and further drive up the latency of zil_commit(). This can occur for a number of reasons, including (but not limited to): transient changes in the workload, and storage latency irregularites. Solution ======== The solution attempted by this change has the following goals: 1. no on-disk changes; maintain current on-disk format. 2. modify the "batch size" to be equal to the "ZIL block size". 3. allow new batches to be generated and issued to disk, while there's already batches being serviced by the disk. 4. allow zil_commit() to wait for as few ZIL blocks as possible. 5. use as few ZIL blocks as possible, for the same amount of ZIL transactions, without introducing significant latency to any individual ZIL transaction. i.e. use fewer, but larger, ZIL blocks. In theory, with these goals met, the new allgorithm will allow the following improvements: 1. new ZIL blocks can be generated and issued, while there's already oustanding ZIL blocks being serviced by the storage. 2. the latency of zil_commit() should be proportional to the underlying storage latency, rather than the incoming synchronous workload. Porting Notes ============= Due to the changes made in commit 119a394ab0, the lifetime of an itx structure differs than in OpenZFS. Specifically, the itx structure is kept around until the data associated with the itx is considered to be safe on disk; this is so that the itx's callback can be called after the data is committed to stable storage. Since OpenZFS doesn't have this itx callback mechanism, it's able to destroy the itx structure immediately after the itx is committed to an lwb (before the lwb is written to disk). To support this difference, and to ensure the itx's callbacks can still be called after the itx's data is on disk, a few changes had to be made: * A list of itxs was added to the lwb structure. This list contains all of the itxs that have been committed to the lwb, such that the callbacks for these itxs can be called from zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done(), after the data for the itxs is committed to disk. * A list of itxs was added on the stack of the zil_process_commit_list() function; the "nolwb_itxs" list. In some circumstances, an itx may not be committed to an lwb (e.g. if allocating the "next" ZIL block on disk fails), so this list is used to keep track of which itxs fall into this state, such that their callbacks can be called after the ZIL's writer pipeline is "stalled". * The logic to actually call the itx's callback was moved into the zil_itx_destroy() function. Since all consumers of zil_itx_destroy() were effectively performing the same logic (i.e. if callback is non-null, call the callback), it seemed like useful code cleanup to consolidate this logic into a single function. Additionally, the existing Linux tracepoint infrastructure dealing with the ZIL's probes and structures had to be updated to reflect these code changes. Specifically: * The "zil__cw1" and "zil__cw2" probes were removed, so they had to be removed from "trace_zil.h" as well. * Some of the zilog structure's fields were removed, which affected the tracepoint definitions of the structure. * New tracepoints had to be added for the following 3 new probes: * zil__process__commit__itx * zil__process__normal__itx * zil__commit__io__error OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8585 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/5d95a3a Closes #6566
2017-12-05 17:39:16 +00:00
list_t lwb_itxs; /* list of itx's */
list_t lwb_waiters; /* list of zil_commit_waiter's */
avl_tree_t lwb_vdev_tree; /* vdevs to flush after lwb write */
kmutex_t lwb_vdev_lock; /* protects lwb_vdev_tree */
hrtime_t lwb_issued_timestamp; /* when was the lwb issued? */
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
} lwb_t;
OpenZFS 8585 - improve batching done in zil_commit() Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com> Ported-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Problem ======= The current implementation of zil_commit() can introduce significant latency, beyond what is inherent due to the latency of the underlying storage. The additional latency comes from two main problems: 1. When there's outstanding ZIL blocks being written (i.e. there's already a "writer thread" in progress), then any new calls to zil_commit() will block waiting for the currently oustanding ZIL blocks to complete. The blocks written for each "writer thread" is coined a "batch", and there can only ever be a single "batch" being written at a time. When a batch is being written, any new ZIL transactions will have to wait for the next batch to be written, which won't occur until the current batch finishes. As a result, the underlying storage may not be used as efficiently as possible. While "new" threads enter zil_commit() and are blocked waiting for the next batch, it's possible that the underlying storage isn't fully utilized by the current batch of ZIL blocks. In that case, it'd be better to allow these new threads to generate (and issue) a new ZIL block, such that it could be serviced by the underlying storage concurrently with the other ZIL blocks that are being serviced. 2. Any call to zil_commit() must wait for all ZIL blocks in its "batch" to complete, prior to zil_commit() returning. The size of any given batch is proportional to the number of ZIL transaction in the queue at the time that the batch starts processing the queue; which doesn't occur until the previous batch completes. Thus, if there's a lot of transactions in the queue, the batch could be composed of many ZIL blocks, and each call to zil_commit() will have to wait for all of these writes to complete (even if the thread calling zil_commit() only cared about one of the transactions in the batch). To further complicate the situation, these two issues result in the following side effect: 3. If a given batch takes longer to complete than normal, this results in larger batch sizes, which then take longer to complete and further drive up the latency of zil_commit(). This can occur for a number of reasons, including (but not limited to): transient changes in the workload, and storage latency irregularites. Solution ======== The solution attempted by this change has the following goals: 1. no on-disk changes; maintain current on-disk format. 2. modify the "batch size" to be equal to the "ZIL block size". 3. allow new batches to be generated and issued to disk, while there's already batches being serviced by the disk. 4. allow zil_commit() to wait for as few ZIL blocks as possible. 5. use as few ZIL blocks as possible, for the same amount of ZIL transactions, without introducing significant latency to any individual ZIL transaction. i.e. use fewer, but larger, ZIL blocks. In theory, with these goals met, the new allgorithm will allow the following improvements: 1. new ZIL blocks can be generated and issued, while there's already oustanding ZIL blocks being serviced by the storage. 2. the latency of zil_commit() should be proportional to the underlying storage latency, rather than the incoming synchronous workload. Porting Notes ============= Due to the changes made in commit 119a394ab0, the lifetime of an itx structure differs than in OpenZFS. Specifically, the itx structure is kept around until the data associated with the itx is considered to be safe on disk; this is so that the itx's callback can be called after the data is committed to stable storage. Since OpenZFS doesn't have this itx callback mechanism, it's able to destroy the itx structure immediately after the itx is committed to an lwb (before the lwb is written to disk). To support this difference, and to ensure the itx's callbacks can still be called after the itx's data is on disk, a few changes had to be made: * A list of itxs was added to the lwb structure. This list contains all of the itxs that have been committed to the lwb, such that the callbacks for these itxs can be called from zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done(), after the data for the itxs is committed to disk. * A list of itxs was added on the stack of the zil_process_commit_list() function; the "nolwb_itxs" list. In some circumstances, an itx may not be committed to an lwb (e.g. if allocating the "next" ZIL block on disk fails), so this list is used to keep track of which itxs fall into this state, such that their callbacks can be called after the ZIL's writer pipeline is "stalled". * The logic to actually call the itx's callback was moved into the zil_itx_destroy() function. Since all consumers of zil_itx_destroy() were effectively performing the same logic (i.e. if callback is non-null, call the callback), it seemed like useful code cleanup to consolidate this logic into a single function. Additionally, the existing Linux tracepoint infrastructure dealing with the ZIL's probes and structures had to be updated to reflect these code changes. Specifically: * The "zil__cw1" and "zil__cw2" probes were removed, so they had to be removed from "trace_zil.h" as well. * Some of the zilog structure's fields were removed, which affected the tracepoint definitions of the structure. * New tracepoints had to be added for the following 3 new probes: * zil__process__commit__itx * zil__process__normal__itx * zil__commit__io__error OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8585 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/5d95a3a Closes #6566
2017-12-05 17:39:16 +00:00
/*
* ZIL commit waiter.
*
* This structure is allocated each time zil_commit() is called, and is
* used by zil_commit() to communicate with other parts of the ZIL, such
* that zil_commit() can know when it safe for it return. For more
* details, see the comment above zil_commit().
*
* The "zcw_lock" field is used to protect the commit waiter against
* concurrent access. This lock is often acquired while already holding
* the zilog's "zl_issuer_lock" or "zl_lock"; see the functions
OpenZFS 8585 - improve batching done in zil_commit() Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com> Ported-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Problem ======= The current implementation of zil_commit() can introduce significant latency, beyond what is inherent due to the latency of the underlying storage. The additional latency comes from two main problems: 1. When there's outstanding ZIL blocks being written (i.e. there's already a "writer thread" in progress), then any new calls to zil_commit() will block waiting for the currently oustanding ZIL blocks to complete. The blocks written for each "writer thread" is coined a "batch", and there can only ever be a single "batch" being written at a time. When a batch is being written, any new ZIL transactions will have to wait for the next batch to be written, which won't occur until the current batch finishes. As a result, the underlying storage may not be used as efficiently as possible. While "new" threads enter zil_commit() and are blocked waiting for the next batch, it's possible that the underlying storage isn't fully utilized by the current batch of ZIL blocks. In that case, it'd be better to allow these new threads to generate (and issue) a new ZIL block, such that it could be serviced by the underlying storage concurrently with the other ZIL blocks that are being serviced. 2. Any call to zil_commit() must wait for all ZIL blocks in its "batch" to complete, prior to zil_commit() returning. The size of any given batch is proportional to the number of ZIL transaction in the queue at the time that the batch starts processing the queue; which doesn't occur until the previous batch completes. Thus, if there's a lot of transactions in the queue, the batch could be composed of many ZIL blocks, and each call to zil_commit() will have to wait for all of these writes to complete (even if the thread calling zil_commit() only cared about one of the transactions in the batch). To further complicate the situation, these two issues result in the following side effect: 3. If a given batch takes longer to complete than normal, this results in larger batch sizes, which then take longer to complete and further drive up the latency of zil_commit(). This can occur for a number of reasons, including (but not limited to): transient changes in the workload, and storage latency irregularites. Solution ======== The solution attempted by this change has the following goals: 1. no on-disk changes; maintain current on-disk format. 2. modify the "batch size" to be equal to the "ZIL block size". 3. allow new batches to be generated and issued to disk, while there's already batches being serviced by the disk. 4. allow zil_commit() to wait for as few ZIL blocks as possible. 5. use as few ZIL blocks as possible, for the same amount of ZIL transactions, without introducing significant latency to any individual ZIL transaction. i.e. use fewer, but larger, ZIL blocks. In theory, with these goals met, the new allgorithm will allow the following improvements: 1. new ZIL blocks can be generated and issued, while there's already oustanding ZIL blocks being serviced by the storage. 2. the latency of zil_commit() should be proportional to the underlying storage latency, rather than the incoming synchronous workload. Porting Notes ============= Due to the changes made in commit 119a394ab0, the lifetime of an itx structure differs than in OpenZFS. Specifically, the itx structure is kept around until the data associated with the itx is considered to be safe on disk; this is so that the itx's callback can be called after the data is committed to stable storage. Since OpenZFS doesn't have this itx callback mechanism, it's able to destroy the itx structure immediately after the itx is committed to an lwb (before the lwb is written to disk). To support this difference, and to ensure the itx's callbacks can still be called after the itx's data is on disk, a few changes had to be made: * A list of itxs was added to the lwb structure. This list contains all of the itxs that have been committed to the lwb, such that the callbacks for these itxs can be called from zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done(), after the data for the itxs is committed to disk. * A list of itxs was added on the stack of the zil_process_commit_list() function; the "nolwb_itxs" list. In some circumstances, an itx may not be committed to an lwb (e.g. if allocating the "next" ZIL block on disk fails), so this list is used to keep track of which itxs fall into this state, such that their callbacks can be called after the ZIL's writer pipeline is "stalled". * The logic to actually call the itx's callback was moved into the zil_itx_destroy() function. Since all consumers of zil_itx_destroy() were effectively performing the same logic (i.e. if callback is non-null, call the callback), it seemed like useful code cleanup to consolidate this logic into a single function. Additionally, the existing Linux tracepoint infrastructure dealing with the ZIL's probes and structures had to be updated to reflect these code changes. Specifically: * The "zil__cw1" and "zil__cw2" probes were removed, so they had to be removed from "trace_zil.h" as well. * Some of the zilog structure's fields were removed, which affected the tracepoint definitions of the structure. * New tracepoints had to be added for the following 3 new probes: * zil__process__commit__itx * zil__process__normal__itx * zil__commit__io__error OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8585 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/5d95a3a Closes #6566
2017-12-05 17:39:16 +00:00
* zil_process_commit_list() and zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done() as examples
* of this. Thus, one must be careful not to acquire the
* "zl_issuer_lock" or "zl_lock" when already holding the "zcw_lock";
OpenZFS 8585 - improve batching done in zil_commit() Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com> Ported-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Problem ======= The current implementation of zil_commit() can introduce significant latency, beyond what is inherent due to the latency of the underlying storage. The additional latency comes from two main problems: 1. When there's outstanding ZIL blocks being written (i.e. there's already a "writer thread" in progress), then any new calls to zil_commit() will block waiting for the currently oustanding ZIL blocks to complete. The blocks written for each "writer thread" is coined a "batch", and there can only ever be a single "batch" being written at a time. When a batch is being written, any new ZIL transactions will have to wait for the next batch to be written, which won't occur until the current batch finishes. As a result, the underlying storage may not be used as efficiently as possible. While "new" threads enter zil_commit() and are blocked waiting for the next batch, it's possible that the underlying storage isn't fully utilized by the current batch of ZIL blocks. In that case, it'd be better to allow these new threads to generate (and issue) a new ZIL block, such that it could be serviced by the underlying storage concurrently with the other ZIL blocks that are being serviced. 2. Any call to zil_commit() must wait for all ZIL blocks in its "batch" to complete, prior to zil_commit() returning. The size of any given batch is proportional to the number of ZIL transaction in the queue at the time that the batch starts processing the queue; which doesn't occur until the previous batch completes. Thus, if there's a lot of transactions in the queue, the batch could be composed of many ZIL blocks, and each call to zil_commit() will have to wait for all of these writes to complete (even if the thread calling zil_commit() only cared about one of the transactions in the batch). To further complicate the situation, these two issues result in the following side effect: 3. If a given batch takes longer to complete than normal, this results in larger batch sizes, which then take longer to complete and further drive up the latency of zil_commit(). This can occur for a number of reasons, including (but not limited to): transient changes in the workload, and storage latency irregularites. Solution ======== The solution attempted by this change has the following goals: 1. no on-disk changes; maintain current on-disk format. 2. modify the "batch size" to be equal to the "ZIL block size". 3. allow new batches to be generated and issued to disk, while there's already batches being serviced by the disk. 4. allow zil_commit() to wait for as few ZIL blocks as possible. 5. use as few ZIL blocks as possible, for the same amount of ZIL transactions, without introducing significant latency to any individual ZIL transaction. i.e. use fewer, but larger, ZIL blocks. In theory, with these goals met, the new allgorithm will allow the following improvements: 1. new ZIL blocks can be generated and issued, while there's already oustanding ZIL blocks being serviced by the storage. 2. the latency of zil_commit() should be proportional to the underlying storage latency, rather than the incoming synchronous workload. Porting Notes ============= Due to the changes made in commit 119a394ab0, the lifetime of an itx structure differs than in OpenZFS. Specifically, the itx structure is kept around until the data associated with the itx is considered to be safe on disk; this is so that the itx's callback can be called after the data is committed to stable storage. Since OpenZFS doesn't have this itx callback mechanism, it's able to destroy the itx structure immediately after the itx is committed to an lwb (before the lwb is written to disk). To support this difference, and to ensure the itx's callbacks can still be called after the itx's data is on disk, a few changes had to be made: * A list of itxs was added to the lwb structure. This list contains all of the itxs that have been committed to the lwb, such that the callbacks for these itxs can be called from zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done(), after the data for the itxs is committed to disk. * A list of itxs was added on the stack of the zil_process_commit_list() function; the "nolwb_itxs" list. In some circumstances, an itx may not be committed to an lwb (e.g. if allocating the "next" ZIL block on disk fails), so this list is used to keep track of which itxs fall into this state, such that their callbacks can be called after the ZIL's writer pipeline is "stalled". * The logic to actually call the itx's callback was moved into the zil_itx_destroy() function. Since all consumers of zil_itx_destroy() were effectively performing the same logic (i.e. if callback is non-null, call the callback), it seemed like useful code cleanup to consolidate this logic into a single function. Additionally, the existing Linux tracepoint infrastructure dealing with the ZIL's probes and structures had to be updated to reflect these code changes. Specifically: * The "zil__cw1" and "zil__cw2" probes were removed, so they had to be removed from "trace_zil.h" as well. * Some of the zilog structure's fields were removed, which affected the tracepoint definitions of the structure. * New tracepoints had to be added for the following 3 new probes: * zil__process__commit__itx * zil__process__normal__itx * zil__commit__io__error OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8585 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/5d95a3a Closes #6566
2017-12-05 17:39:16 +00:00
* e.g. see the zil_commit_waiter_timeout() function.
*/
typedef struct zil_commit_waiter {
kcondvar_t zcw_cv; /* signalled when "done" */
kmutex_t zcw_lock; /* protects fields of this struct */
list_node_t zcw_node; /* linkage in lwb_t:lwb_waiter list */
lwb_t *zcw_lwb; /* back pointer to lwb when linked */
boolean_t zcw_done; /* B_TRUE when "done", else B_FALSE */
int zcw_zio_error; /* contains the zio io_error value */
} zil_commit_waiter_t;
/*
* Intent log transaction lists
*/
typedef struct itxs {
list_t i_sync_list; /* list of synchronous itxs */
avl_tree_t i_async_tree; /* tree of foids for async itxs */
} itxs_t;
typedef struct itxg {
kmutex_t itxg_lock; /* lock for this structure */
uint64_t itxg_txg; /* txg for this chain */
itxs_t *itxg_itxs; /* sync and async itxs */
} itxg_t;
/* for async nodes we build up an AVL tree of lists of async itxs per file */
typedef struct itx_async_node {
uint64_t ia_foid; /* file object id */
list_t ia_list; /* list of async itxs for this foid */
avl_node_t ia_node; /* AVL tree linkage */
} itx_async_node_t;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
* Vdev flushing: during a zil_commit(), we build up an AVL tree of the vdevs
* we've touched so we know which ones need a write cache flush at the end.
*/
typedef struct zil_vdev_node {
uint64_t zv_vdev; /* vdev to be flushed */
avl_node_t zv_node; /* AVL tree linkage */
} zil_vdev_node_t;
#define ZIL_PREV_BLKS 16
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
* Stable storage intent log management structure. One per dataset.
*/
struct zilog {
kmutex_t zl_lock; /* protects most zilog_t fields */
struct dsl_pool *zl_dmu_pool; /* DSL pool */
spa_t *zl_spa; /* handle for read/write log */
const zil_header_t *zl_header; /* log header buffer */
objset_t *zl_os; /* object set we're logging */
zil_get_data_t *zl_get_data; /* callback to get object content */
OpenZFS 8585 - improve batching done in zil_commit() Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com> Ported-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Problem ======= The current implementation of zil_commit() can introduce significant latency, beyond what is inherent due to the latency of the underlying storage. The additional latency comes from two main problems: 1. When there's outstanding ZIL blocks being written (i.e. there's already a "writer thread" in progress), then any new calls to zil_commit() will block waiting for the currently oustanding ZIL blocks to complete. The blocks written for each "writer thread" is coined a "batch", and there can only ever be a single "batch" being written at a time. When a batch is being written, any new ZIL transactions will have to wait for the next batch to be written, which won't occur until the current batch finishes. As a result, the underlying storage may not be used as efficiently as possible. While "new" threads enter zil_commit() and are blocked waiting for the next batch, it's possible that the underlying storage isn't fully utilized by the current batch of ZIL blocks. In that case, it'd be better to allow these new threads to generate (and issue) a new ZIL block, such that it could be serviced by the underlying storage concurrently with the other ZIL blocks that are being serviced. 2. Any call to zil_commit() must wait for all ZIL blocks in its "batch" to complete, prior to zil_commit() returning. The size of any given batch is proportional to the number of ZIL transaction in the queue at the time that the batch starts processing the queue; which doesn't occur until the previous batch completes. Thus, if there's a lot of transactions in the queue, the batch could be composed of many ZIL blocks, and each call to zil_commit() will have to wait for all of these writes to complete (even if the thread calling zil_commit() only cared about one of the transactions in the batch). To further complicate the situation, these two issues result in the following side effect: 3. If a given batch takes longer to complete than normal, this results in larger batch sizes, which then take longer to complete and further drive up the latency of zil_commit(). This can occur for a number of reasons, including (but not limited to): transient changes in the workload, and storage latency irregularites. Solution ======== The solution attempted by this change has the following goals: 1. no on-disk changes; maintain current on-disk format. 2. modify the "batch size" to be equal to the "ZIL block size". 3. allow new batches to be generated and issued to disk, while there's already batches being serviced by the disk. 4. allow zil_commit() to wait for as few ZIL blocks as possible. 5. use as few ZIL blocks as possible, for the same amount of ZIL transactions, without introducing significant latency to any individual ZIL transaction. i.e. use fewer, but larger, ZIL blocks. In theory, with these goals met, the new allgorithm will allow the following improvements: 1. new ZIL blocks can be generated and issued, while there's already oustanding ZIL blocks being serviced by the storage. 2. the latency of zil_commit() should be proportional to the underlying storage latency, rather than the incoming synchronous workload. Porting Notes ============= Due to the changes made in commit 119a394ab0, the lifetime of an itx structure differs than in OpenZFS. Specifically, the itx structure is kept around until the data associated with the itx is considered to be safe on disk; this is so that the itx's callback can be called after the data is committed to stable storage. Since OpenZFS doesn't have this itx callback mechanism, it's able to destroy the itx structure immediately after the itx is committed to an lwb (before the lwb is written to disk). To support this difference, and to ensure the itx's callbacks can still be called after the itx's data is on disk, a few changes had to be made: * A list of itxs was added to the lwb structure. This list contains all of the itxs that have been committed to the lwb, such that the callbacks for these itxs can be called from zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done(), after the data for the itxs is committed to disk. * A list of itxs was added on the stack of the zil_process_commit_list() function; the "nolwb_itxs" list. In some circumstances, an itx may not be committed to an lwb (e.g. if allocating the "next" ZIL block on disk fails), so this list is used to keep track of which itxs fall into this state, such that their callbacks can be called after the ZIL's writer pipeline is "stalled". * The logic to actually call the itx's callback was moved into the zil_itx_destroy() function. Since all consumers of zil_itx_destroy() were effectively performing the same logic (i.e. if callback is non-null, call the callback), it seemed like useful code cleanup to consolidate this logic into a single function. Additionally, the existing Linux tracepoint infrastructure dealing with the ZIL's probes and structures had to be updated to reflect these code changes. Specifically: * The "zil__cw1" and "zil__cw2" probes were removed, so they had to be removed from "trace_zil.h" as well. * Some of the zilog structure's fields were removed, which affected the tracepoint definitions of the structure. * New tracepoints had to be added for the following 3 new probes: * zil__process__commit__itx * zil__process__normal__itx * zil__commit__io__error OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8585 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/5d95a3a Closes #6566
2017-12-05 17:39:16 +00:00
lwb_t *zl_last_lwb_opened; /* most recent lwb opened */
hrtime_t zl_last_lwb_latency; /* zio latency of last lwb done */
uint64_t zl_lr_seq; /* on-disk log record sequence number */
uint64_t zl_commit_lr_seq; /* last committed on-disk lr seq */
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
uint64_t zl_destroy_txg; /* txg of last zil_destroy() */
2009-01-15 21:59:39 +00:00
uint64_t zl_replayed_seq[TXG_SIZE]; /* last replayed rec seq */
uint64_t zl_replaying_seq; /* current replay seq number */
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
uint32_t zl_suspend; /* log suspend count */
kcondvar_t zl_cv_suspend; /* log suspend completion */
uint8_t zl_suspending; /* log is currently suspending */
uint8_t zl_keep_first; /* keep first log block in destroy */
2009-01-15 21:59:39 +00:00
uint8_t zl_replay; /* replaying records while set */
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
uint8_t zl_stop_sync; /* for debugging */
kmutex_t zl_issuer_lock; /* single writer, per ZIL, at a time */
uint8_t zl_logbias; /* latency or throughput */
uint8_t zl_sync; /* synchronous or asynchronous */
int zl_parse_error; /* last zil_parse() error */
uint64_t zl_parse_blk_seq; /* highest blk seq on last parse */
uint64_t zl_parse_lr_seq; /* highest lr seq on last parse */
uint64_t zl_parse_blk_count; /* number of blocks parsed */
uint64_t zl_parse_lr_count; /* number of log records parsed */
itxg_t zl_itxg[TXG_SIZE]; /* intent log txg chains */
list_t zl_itx_commit_list; /* itx list to be committed */
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
uint64_t zl_cur_used; /* current commit log size used */
list_t zl_lwb_list; /* in-flight log write list */
avl_tree_t zl_bp_tree; /* track bps during log parse */
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
clock_t zl_replay_time; /* lbolt of when replay started */
uint64_t zl_replay_blks; /* number of log blocks replayed */
zil_header_t zl_old_header; /* debugging aid */
uint_t zl_prev_blks[ZIL_PREV_BLKS]; /* size - sector rounded */
uint_t zl_prev_rotor; /* rotor for zl_prev[] */
txg_node_t zl_dirty_link; /* protected by dp_dirty_zilogs list */
OpenZFS 8585 - improve batching done in zil_commit() Authored by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com> Ported-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Problem ======= The current implementation of zil_commit() can introduce significant latency, beyond what is inherent due to the latency of the underlying storage. The additional latency comes from two main problems: 1. When there's outstanding ZIL blocks being written (i.e. there's already a "writer thread" in progress), then any new calls to zil_commit() will block waiting for the currently oustanding ZIL blocks to complete. The blocks written for each "writer thread" is coined a "batch", and there can only ever be a single "batch" being written at a time. When a batch is being written, any new ZIL transactions will have to wait for the next batch to be written, which won't occur until the current batch finishes. As a result, the underlying storage may not be used as efficiently as possible. While "new" threads enter zil_commit() and are blocked waiting for the next batch, it's possible that the underlying storage isn't fully utilized by the current batch of ZIL blocks. In that case, it'd be better to allow these new threads to generate (and issue) a new ZIL block, such that it could be serviced by the underlying storage concurrently with the other ZIL blocks that are being serviced. 2. Any call to zil_commit() must wait for all ZIL blocks in its "batch" to complete, prior to zil_commit() returning. The size of any given batch is proportional to the number of ZIL transaction in the queue at the time that the batch starts processing the queue; which doesn't occur until the previous batch completes. Thus, if there's a lot of transactions in the queue, the batch could be composed of many ZIL blocks, and each call to zil_commit() will have to wait for all of these writes to complete (even if the thread calling zil_commit() only cared about one of the transactions in the batch). To further complicate the situation, these two issues result in the following side effect: 3. If a given batch takes longer to complete than normal, this results in larger batch sizes, which then take longer to complete and further drive up the latency of zil_commit(). This can occur for a number of reasons, including (but not limited to): transient changes in the workload, and storage latency irregularites. Solution ======== The solution attempted by this change has the following goals: 1. no on-disk changes; maintain current on-disk format. 2. modify the "batch size" to be equal to the "ZIL block size". 3. allow new batches to be generated and issued to disk, while there's already batches being serviced by the disk. 4. allow zil_commit() to wait for as few ZIL blocks as possible. 5. use as few ZIL blocks as possible, for the same amount of ZIL transactions, without introducing significant latency to any individual ZIL transaction. i.e. use fewer, but larger, ZIL blocks. In theory, with these goals met, the new allgorithm will allow the following improvements: 1. new ZIL blocks can be generated and issued, while there's already oustanding ZIL blocks being serviced by the storage. 2. the latency of zil_commit() should be proportional to the underlying storage latency, rather than the incoming synchronous workload. Porting Notes ============= Due to the changes made in commit 119a394ab0, the lifetime of an itx structure differs than in OpenZFS. Specifically, the itx structure is kept around until the data associated with the itx is considered to be safe on disk; this is so that the itx's callback can be called after the data is committed to stable storage. Since OpenZFS doesn't have this itx callback mechanism, it's able to destroy the itx structure immediately after the itx is committed to an lwb (before the lwb is written to disk). To support this difference, and to ensure the itx's callbacks can still be called after the itx's data is on disk, a few changes had to be made: * A list of itxs was added to the lwb structure. This list contains all of the itxs that have been committed to the lwb, such that the callbacks for these itxs can be called from zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done(), after the data for the itxs is committed to disk. * A list of itxs was added on the stack of the zil_process_commit_list() function; the "nolwb_itxs" list. In some circumstances, an itx may not be committed to an lwb (e.g. if allocating the "next" ZIL block on disk fails), so this list is used to keep track of which itxs fall into this state, such that their callbacks can be called after the ZIL's writer pipeline is "stalled". * The logic to actually call the itx's callback was moved into the zil_itx_destroy() function. Since all consumers of zil_itx_destroy() were effectively performing the same logic (i.e. if callback is non-null, call the callback), it seemed like useful code cleanup to consolidate this logic into a single function. Additionally, the existing Linux tracepoint infrastructure dealing with the ZIL's probes and structures had to be updated to reflect these code changes. Specifically: * The "zil__cw1" and "zil__cw2" probes were removed, so they had to be removed from "trace_zil.h" as well. * Some of the zilog structure's fields were removed, which affected the tracepoint definitions of the structure. * New tracepoints had to be added for the following 3 new probes: * zil__process__commit__itx * zil__process__normal__itx * zil__commit__io__error OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8585 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/5d95a3a Closes #6566
2017-12-05 17:39:16 +00:00
uint64_t zl_dirty_max_txg; /* highest txg used to dirty zilog */
/*
* Max block size for this ZIL. Note that this can not be changed
* while the ZIL is in use because consumers (ZPL/zvol) need to take
* this into account when deciding between WR_COPIED and WR_NEED_COPY
* (see zil_max_copied_data()).
*/
uint64_t zl_max_block_size;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
};
typedef struct zil_bp_node {
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
dva_t zn_dva;
avl_node_t zn_node;
} zil_bp_node_t;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif
#endif /* _SYS_ZIL_IMPL_H */