d/freebsd-nq
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Minor style tweaks: line wrap comments and lines more consistently.

Browse Source 
MFC after:	3 days
This commit is contained in:
Robert Watson 2005-02-18 18:49:44 +00:00
parent 627de7fa2c
commit 1ed716a149
1 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

18
sys/kern/uipc_accf.c
View File

@ -65,10 +65,9 @@ SYSCTL_INT(_net_inet_accf, OID_AUTO, unloadable, CTLFLAG_RW, &unloadable, 0,
"Allow unload of accept filters (not recommended)");
/*
* must be passed a malloc'd structure so we don't explode if the kld
* is unloaded, we leak the struct on deallocation to deal with this,
* but if a filter is loaded with the same name as a leaked one we re-use
* the entry.
* Must be passed a malloc'd structure so we don't explode if the kld is
* unloaded, we leak the struct on deallocation to deal with this, but if a
* filter is loaded with the same name as a leaked one we re-use the entry.
*/
int
accept_filt_add(struct accept_filter *filt)
@ -131,17 +130,18 @@ accept_filt_generic_mod_event(module_t mod, int event, void *data)
switch (event) {
case MOD_LOAD:
MALLOC(p, struct accept_filter *, sizeof(*p), M_ACCF, M_WAITOK);
MALLOC(p, struct accept_filter *, sizeof(*p), M_ACCF,
M_WAITOK);
bcopy(accfp, p, sizeof(*p));
error = accept_filt_add(p);
break;
case MOD_UNLOAD:
/*
* Do not support unloading yet. we don't keep track of refcounts
* and unloading an accept filter callback and then having it called
* is a bad thing. A simple fix would be to track the refcount
* in the struct accept_filter.
* Do not support unloading yet. we don't keep track of
* refcounts and unloading an accept filter callback and then
* having it called is a bad thing. A simple fix would be to
* track the refcount in the struct accept_filter.
*/
if (unloadable != 0) {
error = accept_filt_del(accfp->accf_name);