Revert r202447 by re-exposing the old uname(3) function.
It makes hardly any sense to expose a symbol which should only be provided for binary compatibility, but it seems we don't have a lot of choice here. There are many autoconf scripts out there that try to create a binary that links against the old symbol to see whether uname(3) is present. These scripts fail to detect uname(3) now. It should be noted that the behaviour we implement is not against the standards: | The following shall be declared as a function and may also be defined | as a macro: | | int uname(struct utsname *);
This commit is contained in:
parent
ab43eceb0d
commit
26f87cc6ff
@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ FBSD_1.0 {
|
||||
tcflow;
|
||||
ualarm;
|
||||
ulimit;
|
||||
uname;
|
||||
unvis;
|
||||
strunvis;
|
||||
strunvisx;
|
||||
|
@ -33,15 +33,15 @@ static char sccsid[] = "From: @(#)uname.c 8.1 (Berkeley) 1/4/94";
|
||||
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
|
||||
__FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
|
||||
|
||||
#define uname wrapped_uname
|
||||
#include <sys/param.h>
|
||||
#include <sys/sysctl.h>
|
||||
#include <sys/utsname.h>
|
||||
#include <errno.h>
|
||||
#undef uname
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
__uname(struct utsname *name)
|
||||
uname(struct utsname *name)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return __xuname(32, name);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__sym_compat(uname, __uname, FBSD_1.0);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user