Fix expandsz 16.0E vals and vdev_min_asize of RAIDZ children
When a member of a RAIDZ has been replaced with a device smaller than the original, then the top level vdev can report its expand size as 16.0E. The reduced child asize causes the RAIDZ to have a vdev_asize lower than its vdev_max_asize which then results in an underflow during the calculation of the parents expand size. Fix this by updating the vdev_asize if it shrinks, which is already protected by a check against vdev_min_asize so should always be safe. Also for RAIDZ vdevs, ensure that the sum of their child vdev_min_asize is always greater than the parents vdev_min_size. Fixes: https://www.illumos.org/issues/7885 MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay
This commit is contained in:
parent
b60e1b8142
commit
3e856909b7
@ -229,7 +229,8 @@ vdev_get_min_asize(vdev_t *vd)
|
||||
* so each child must provide at least 1/Nth of its asize.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (pvd->vdev_ops == &vdev_raidz_ops)
|
||||
return (pvd->vdev_min_asize / pvd->vdev_children);
|
||||
return ((pvd->vdev_min_asize + pvd->vdev_children - 1) /
|
||||
pvd->vdev_children);
|
||||
|
||||
return (pvd->vdev_min_asize);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1377,7 +1378,7 @@ vdev_open(vdev_t *vd)
|
||||
vd->vdev_psize = psize;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Make sure the allocatable size hasn't shrunk.
|
||||
* Make sure the allocatable size hasn't shrunk too much.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (asize < vd->vdev_min_asize) {
|
||||
vdev_set_state(vd, B_TRUE, VDEV_STATE_CANT_OPEN,
|
||||
@ -1417,12 +1418,21 @@ vdev_open(vdev_t *vd)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If all children are healthy and the asize has increased,
|
||||
* then we've experienced dynamic LUN growth. If automatic
|
||||
* expansion is enabled then use the additional space.
|
||||
* If all children are healthy we update asize if either:
|
||||
* The asize has increased, due to a device expansion caused by dynamic
|
||||
* LUN growth or vdev replacement, and automatic expansion is enabled;
|
||||
* making the additional space available.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The asize has decreased, due to a device shrink usually caused by a
|
||||
* vdev replace with a smaller device. This ensures that calculations
|
||||
* based of max_asize and asize e.g. esize are always valid. It's safe
|
||||
* to do this as we've already validated that asize is greater than
|
||||
* vdev_min_asize.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (vd->vdev_state == VDEV_STATE_HEALTHY && asize > vd->vdev_asize &&
|
||||
(vd->vdev_expanding || spa->spa_autoexpand))
|
||||
if (vd->vdev_state == VDEV_STATE_HEALTHY &&
|
||||
((asize > vd->vdev_asize &&
|
||||
(vd->vdev_expanding || spa->spa_autoexpand)) ||
|
||||
(asize < vd->vdev_asize)))
|
||||
vd->vdev_asize = asize;
|
||||
|
||||
vdev_set_min_asize(vd);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user