Fix expandsz 16.0E vals and vdev_min_asize of RAIDZ children

When a member of a RAIDZ has been replaced with a device smaller than the
original, then the top level vdev can report its expand size as 16.0E.

The reduced child asize causes the RAIDZ to have a vdev_asize lower than its
vdev_max_asize which then results in an underflow during the calculation of
the parents expand size.

Fix this by updating the vdev_asize if it shrinks, which is already
protected by a check against vdev_min_asize so should always be safe.

Also for RAIDZ vdevs, ensure that the sum of their child vdev_min_asize is
always greater than the parents vdev_min_size.

Fixes: https://www.illumos.org/issues/7885

MFC after:	2 weeks
Sponsored by:	Multiplay
This commit is contained in:
Steven Hartland 2017-04-03 13:11:28 +00:00
parent b60e1b8142
commit 3e856909b7

View File

@ -229,7 +229,8 @@ vdev_get_min_asize(vdev_t *vd)
* so each child must provide at least 1/Nth of its asize.
*/
if (pvd->vdev_ops == &vdev_raidz_ops)
return (pvd->vdev_min_asize / pvd->vdev_children);
return ((pvd->vdev_min_asize + pvd->vdev_children - 1) /
pvd->vdev_children);
return (pvd->vdev_min_asize);
}
@ -1377,7 +1378,7 @@ vdev_open(vdev_t *vd)
vd->vdev_psize = psize;
/*
* Make sure the allocatable size hasn't shrunk.
* Make sure the allocatable size hasn't shrunk too much.
*/
if (asize < vd->vdev_min_asize) {
vdev_set_state(vd, B_TRUE, VDEV_STATE_CANT_OPEN,
@ -1417,12 +1418,21 @@ vdev_open(vdev_t *vd)
}
/*
* If all children are healthy and the asize has increased,
* then we've experienced dynamic LUN growth. If automatic
* expansion is enabled then use the additional space.
* If all children are healthy we update asize if either:
* The asize has increased, due to a device expansion caused by dynamic
* LUN growth or vdev replacement, and automatic expansion is enabled;
* making the additional space available.
*
* The asize has decreased, due to a device shrink usually caused by a
* vdev replace with a smaller device. This ensures that calculations
* based of max_asize and asize e.g. esize are always valid. It's safe
* to do this as we've already validated that asize is greater than
* vdev_min_asize.
*/
if (vd->vdev_state == VDEV_STATE_HEALTHY && asize > vd->vdev_asize &&
(vd->vdev_expanding || spa->spa_autoexpand))
if (vd->vdev_state == VDEV_STATE_HEALTHY &&
((asize > vd->vdev_asize &&
(vd->vdev_expanding || spa->spa_autoexpand)) ||
(asize < vd->vdev_asize)))
vd->vdev_asize = asize;
vdev_set_min_asize(vd);