Lock receive socket buffer in soo_stat() rather than commenting that we
should lock it, which may marginally improve the consistency of the results. Remove comment. MFC after: 3 days
This commit is contained in:
parent
c94526e26d
commit
58f7ce962c
@ -246,17 +246,16 @@ soo_stat(struct file *fp, struct stat *ub, struct ucred *active_cred,
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If SBS_CANTRCVMORE is set, but there's still data left in the
|
||||
* receive buffer, the socket is still readable.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* XXXRW: perhaps should lock socket buffer so st_size result is
|
||||
* consistent.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/* Unlocked read. */
|
||||
SOCKBUF_LOCK(&so->so_rcv);
|
||||
if ((so->so_rcv.sb_state & SBS_CANTRCVMORE) == 0 ||
|
||||
so->so_rcv.sb_cc != 0)
|
||||
ub->st_mode |= S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH;
|
||||
ub->st_size = so->so_rcv.sb_cc - so->so_rcv.sb_ctl;
|
||||
SOCKBUF_UNLOCK(&so->so_rcv);
|
||||
/* Unlocked read. */
|
||||
if ((so->so_snd.sb_state & SBS_CANTSENDMORE) == 0)
|
||||
ub->st_mode |= S_IWUSR | S_IWGRP | S_IWOTH;
|
||||
ub->st_size = so->so_rcv.sb_cc - so->so_rcv.sb_ctl;
|
||||
ub->st_uid = so->so_cred->cr_uid;
|
||||
ub->st_gid = so->so_cred->cr_gid;
|
||||
return (*so->so_proto->pr_usrreqs->pru_sense)(so, ub);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user