In some cases (such as LC_COLLATE), nb_NO and nn_NO are identical, and it
makes sense to have them both link to no_NO. In other cases (such as LC_TIME), they differ, and the correct solution is to have no_NO link to nb_NO, rather than the other way around.o MFC after: 2 weeks
This commit is contained in:
parent
12d3da872c
commit
5c86b693d6
@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ DE_LINKS= de_DE:de_CH
|
|||||||
FR_LINKS= fr_FR:fr_BE fr_FR:fr_CA fr_FR:fr_CH
|
FR_LINKS= fr_FR:fr_BE fr_FR:fr_CA fr_FR:fr_CH
|
||||||
IT_LINKS= it_IT:it_CH
|
IT_LINKS= it_IT:it_CH
|
||||||
NL_LINKS= nl_NL:nl_BE
|
NL_LINKS= nl_NL:nl_BE
|
||||||
NO_LINKS= no_NO:nb_NO
|
NO_LINKS= nb_NO:no_NO
|
||||||
GB_LINKS= en_GB:en_AU en_GB:en_CA en_GB:en_NZ
|
GB_LINKS= en_GB:en_AU en_GB:en_CA en_GB:en_NZ
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
eucKR_CP949= ko_KR
|
eucKR_CP949= ko_KR
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user