Eliminate VI_LOCK()/VI_UNLOCK() pair from getattr and close code paths.

It's hard to measure performance improvement on my test machine, but the
change won't degrade performance for sure. I can measure slight improvement
for debugging kernel and it can also be a win for machines where atomic
operation is more expensive.

Reviewed by:	kib
This commit is contained in:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek 2007-05-23 11:06:09 +00:00
parent 400f772943
commit 64c40cdcb0

View File

@ -127,21 +127,19 @@ static struct odirtemplate omastertemplate = {
0, DIRBLKSIZ - 12, 2, ".."
};
void
ufs_itimes(vp)
struct vnode *vp;
static void
ufs_itimes_locked(struct vnode *vp)
{
struct inode *ip;
struct timespec ts;
ASSERT_VI_LOCKED(vp, __func__);
ip = VTOI(vp);
VI_LOCK(vp);
if ((vp->v_mount->mnt_flag & MNT_RDONLY) != 0)
goto out;
if ((ip->i_flag & (IN_ACCESS | IN_CHANGE | IN_UPDATE)) == 0) {
VI_UNLOCK(vp);
if ((ip->i_flag & (IN_ACCESS | IN_CHANGE | IN_UPDATE)) == 0)
return;
}
if ((vp->v_type == VBLK || vp->v_type == VCHR) && !DOINGSOFTDEP(vp))
ip->i_flag |= IN_LAZYMOD;
@ -168,6 +166,14 @@ ufs_itimes(vp)
out:
ip->i_flag &= ~(IN_ACCESS | IN_CHANGE | IN_UPDATE);
}
void
ufs_itimes(struct vnode *vp)
{
VI_LOCK(vp);
ufs_itimes_locked(vp);
VI_UNLOCK(vp);
}
@ -286,9 +292,9 @@ ufs_close(ap)
VI_LOCK(vp);
usecount = vp->v_usecount;
VI_UNLOCK(vp);
if (usecount > 1)
ufs_itimes(vp);
ufs_itimes_locked(vp);
VI_UNLOCK(vp);
return (0);
}
@ -379,7 +385,16 @@ ufs_getattr(ap)
struct inode *ip = VTOI(vp);
struct vattr *vap = ap->a_vap;
ufs_itimes(vp);
VI_LOCK(vp);
ufs_itimes_locked(vp);
if (ip->i_ump->um_fstype == UFS1) {
vap->va_atime.tv_sec = ip->i_din1->di_atime;
vap->va_atime.tv_nsec = ip->i_din1->di_atimensec;
} else {
vap->va_atime.tv_sec = ip->i_din2->di_atime;
vap->va_atime.tv_nsec = ip->i_din2->di_atimensec;
}
VI_UNLOCK(vp);
/*
* Copy from inode table
*/
@ -392,10 +407,6 @@ ufs_getattr(ap)
if (ip->i_ump->um_fstype == UFS1) {
vap->va_rdev = ip->i_din1->di_rdev;
vap->va_size = ip->i_din1->di_size;
VI_LOCK(vp);
vap->va_atime.tv_sec = ip->i_din1->di_atime;
vap->va_atime.tv_nsec = ip->i_din1->di_atimensec;
VI_UNLOCK(vp);
vap->va_mtime.tv_sec = ip->i_din1->di_mtime;
vap->va_mtime.tv_nsec = ip->i_din1->di_mtimensec;
vap->va_ctime.tv_sec = ip->i_din1->di_ctime;
@ -406,10 +417,6 @@ ufs_getattr(ap)
} else {
vap->va_rdev = ip->i_din2->di_rdev;
vap->va_size = ip->i_din2->di_size;
VI_LOCK(vp);
vap->va_atime.tv_sec = ip->i_din2->di_atime;
vap->va_atime.tv_nsec = ip->i_din2->di_atimensec;
VI_UNLOCK(vp);
vap->va_mtime.tv_sec = ip->i_din2->di_mtime;
vap->va_mtime.tv_nsec = ip->i_din2->di_mtimensec;
vap->va_ctime.tv_sec = ip->i_din2->di_ctime;
@ -2037,9 +2044,9 @@ ufsfifo_close(ap)
VI_LOCK(vp);
usecount = vp->v_usecount;
VI_UNLOCK(vp);
if (usecount > 1)
ufs_itimes(vp);
ufs_itimes_locked(vp);
VI_UNLOCK(vp);
return (fifo_specops.vop_close(ap));
}