There's no reason to check the valence. This allows ciss to work
on the P600.
This commit is contained in:
parent
a2dc1f5021
commit
7a0c10de8d
@ -597,12 +597,6 @@ ciss_init_pci(struct ciss_softc *sc)
|
||||
sc->ciss_cfg->signature[2], sc->ciss_cfg->signature[3]);
|
||||
return(ENXIO);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ((sc->ciss_cfg->valence < CISS_MIN_VALENCE) ||
|
||||
(sc->ciss_cfg->valence > CISS_MAX_VALENCE)) {
|
||||
ciss_printf(sc, "adapter interface specification (%d) unsupported\n",
|
||||
sc->ciss_cfg->valence);
|
||||
return(ENXIO);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Put the board into simple mode, and tell it we're using the low
|
||||
|
@ -396,8 +396,6 @@ struct ciss_config_table
|
||||
{
|
||||
char signature[4]; /* "CISS" */
|
||||
u_int32_t valence;
|
||||
#define CISS_MIN_VALENCE 1 /* only value currently supported */
|
||||
#define CISS_MAX_VALENCE 1
|
||||
u_int32_t supported_methods;
|
||||
#define CISS_TRANSPORT_METHOD_READY (1<<0)
|
||||
#define CISS_TRANSPORT_METHOD_SIMPLE (1<<1)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user