In r185557, the check for existing negative entry for the given name

did not compared nc_dvp with supplied parent directory vnode pointer.
Add the check and note that now branches for vp != NULL and vp == NULL
are the same, thus can be merged.

Reported and reviewed by:	kan
Tested by:	pho
MFC after:	2 weeks
This commit is contained in:
Konstantin Belousov 2008-12-30 12:51:14 +00:00
parent df52a87993
commit 83e73926ad

View File

@ -526,28 +526,18 @@ cache_enter(dvp, vp, cnp)
CACHE_LOCK();
/*
* See if this vnode is already in the cache with this name.
* This can happen with concurrent lookups of the same path
* name.
* See if this vnode or negative entry is already in the cache
* with this name. This can happen with concurrent lookups of
* the same path name.
*/
if (vp) {
TAILQ_FOREACH(n2, &vp->v_cache_dst, nc_dst) {
if (n2->nc_dvp == dvp &&
n2->nc_nlen == cnp->cn_namelen &&
!bcmp(n2->nc_name, cnp->cn_nameptr, n2->nc_nlen)) {
CACHE_UNLOCK();
cache_free(ncp);
return;
}
}
} else {
TAILQ_FOREACH(n2, &ncneg, nc_dst) {
if (n2->nc_nlen == cnp->cn_namelen &&
!bcmp(n2->nc_name, cnp->cn_nameptr, n2->nc_nlen)) {
CACHE_UNLOCK();
cache_free(ncp);
return;
}
ncpp = NCHHASH(hash);
LIST_FOREACH(n2, ncpp, nc_hash) {
if (n2->nc_dvp == dvp &&
n2->nc_nlen == cnp->cn_namelen &&
!bcmp(n2->nc_name, cnp->cn_nameptr, n2->nc_nlen)) {
CACHE_UNLOCK();
cache_free(ncp);
return;
}
}
@ -565,7 +555,6 @@ cache_enter(dvp, vp, cnp)
* Insert the new namecache entry into the appropriate chain
* within the cache entries table.
*/
ncpp = NCHHASH(hash);
LIST_INSERT_HEAD(ncpp, ncp, nc_hash);
if (LIST_EMPTY(&dvp->v_cache_src)) {
hold = 1;