malloc(xxx, yyy, M_WAITOK) does not fail. This probably explains why

the bug in the check had never been discovered.
This commit is contained in:
Eivind Eklund 1998-12-09 02:18:53 +00:00
parent bf51e54f46
commit 98b5612b47
2 changed files with 4 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
* (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF
* THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*
* $Id: if_fea.c,v 1.9 1998/02/20 13:11:46 bde Exp $
* $Id: if_fea.c,v 1.10 1998/08/24 02:28:15 bde Exp $
*/
/*
@ -205,11 +205,7 @@ pdq_eisa_attach(
irq = TAILQ_FIRST(&ed->ioconf.irqs)->irq_no;
sc = (pdq_softc_t *) malloc(sizeof(*sc), M_DEVBUF, M_WAITOK);
if (sc == NULL) {
printf("fea%d: malloc failed!\n", sc->sc_if.if_unit);
return -1;
}
sc = malloc(sizeof(*sc), M_DEVBUF, M_WAITOK);
pdqs_eisa[ed->unit] = sc;
bzero(sc, sizeof(pdq_softc_t)); /* Zero out the softc*/

View File

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
* (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF
* THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*
* $Id: if_fea.c,v 1.9 1998/02/20 13:11:46 bde Exp $
* $Id: if_fea.c,v 1.10 1998/08/24 02:28:15 bde Exp $
*/
/*
@ -205,11 +205,7 @@ pdq_eisa_attach(
irq = TAILQ_FIRST(&ed->ioconf.irqs)->irq_no;
sc = (pdq_softc_t *) malloc(sizeof(*sc), M_DEVBUF, M_WAITOK);
if (sc == NULL) {
printf("fea%d: malloc failed!\n", sc->sc_if.if_unit);
return -1;
}
sc = malloc(sizeof(*sc), M_DEVBUF, M_WAITOK);
pdqs_eisa[ed->unit] = sc;
bzero(sc, sizeof(pdq_softc_t)); /* Zero out the softc*/