try to recycle "snap" vnodes as soon as possible
Those vnodes should not linger. "Stale" nodes may get out of synchronization with actual snapshots. For example if we destroy a snapshot and create a new one with the same name. Or when we rename a snapshot. While there fix the argument type for zfsctl_snapshot_reclaim(). Also, its original argument can be passed to gfs_vop_reclaim() directly. Bug 209093 could be related although I have not specifically verified that. Referencing just in case. PR: 209093 MFC after: 5 weeks
This commit is contained in:
parent
30f6480075
commit
9c3e205296
@ -1490,17 +1490,28 @@ zfsctl_snapshot_mknode(vnode_t *pvp, uint64_t objset)
|
||||
return (vp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
zfsctl_snapshot_reclaim(ap)
|
||||
zfsctl_snapshot_inactive(ap)
|
||||
struct vop_inactive_args /* {
|
||||
struct vnode *a_vp;
|
||||
struct thread *a_td;
|
||||
} */ *ap;
|
||||
{
|
||||
vnode_t *vp = ap->a_vp;
|
||||
|
||||
vrecycle(vp);
|
||||
return (0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
zfsctl_snapshot_reclaim(ap)
|
||||
struct vop_reclaim_args /* {
|
||||
struct vnode *a_vp;
|
||||
struct thread *a_td;
|
||||
} */ *ap;
|
||||
{
|
||||
vnode_t *vp = ap->a_vp;
|
||||
cred_t *cr = ap->a_td->td_ucred;
|
||||
struct vop_reclaim_args iap;
|
||||
zfsctl_snapdir_t *sdp;
|
||||
zfs_snapentry_t *sep, *next;
|
||||
int locked;
|
||||
@ -1543,8 +1554,7 @@ zfsctl_snapshot_reclaim(ap)
|
||||
* "active". If we lookup the same name again we will end up
|
||||
* creating a new vnode.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
iap.a_vp = vp;
|
||||
gfs_vop_reclaim(&iap);
|
||||
gfs_vop_reclaim(ap);
|
||||
return (0);
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1597,7 +1607,7 @@ zfsctl_snapshot_vptocnp(struct vop_vptocnp_args *ap)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static struct vop_vector zfsctl_ops_snapshot = {
|
||||
.vop_default = &default_vnodeops,
|
||||
.vop_inactive = VOP_NULL,
|
||||
.vop_inactive = zfsctl_snapshot_inactive,
|
||||
.vop_reclaim = zfsctl_snapshot_reclaim,
|
||||
.vop_vptocnp = zfsctl_snapshot_vptocnp,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user