Let wchan names more closely match pre-MPSAFE TTY behaviour.

Right now the wchan strings "ttyinp" and "ttybgw" only differ one
character from the strings we used prior to MPSAFE TTY. Just rename them
back to their pre-MPSAFE TTY counterparts.

Also rename "ttylck" to "ttymtx", which should make it more clear that a
process is blocked on the TTY mutex, not some other form of locking.
This commit is contained in:
Ed Schouten 2008-12-20 09:36:40 +00:00
parent 43d44e8a31
commit 9d34a1338c

View File

@ -871,9 +871,9 @@ tty_alloc(struct ttydevsw *tsw, void *sc, struct mtx *mutex)
tty_init_termios(tp);
cv_init(&tp->t_inwait, "ttyinp");
cv_init(&tp->t_inwait, "ttyin");
cv_init(&tp->t_outwait, "ttyout");
cv_init(&tp->t_bgwait, "ttybgw");
cv_init(&tp->t_bgwait, "ttybg");
cv_init(&tp->t_dcdwait, "ttydcd");
ttyinq_init(&tp->t_inq);
@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ tty_alloc(struct ttydevsw *tsw, void *sc, struct mtx *mutex)
tp->t_mtx = mutex;
} else {
tp->t_mtx = &tp->t_mtxobj;
mtx_init(&tp->t_mtxobj, "ttylck", NULL, MTX_DEF);
mtx_init(&tp->t_mtxobj, "ttymtx", NULL, MTX_DEF);
}
knlist_init(&tp->t_inpoll.si_note, tp->t_mtx, NULL, NULL, NULL);