There is no need to explicitly call ttwakeup() and ttwwakeup() after

ttyclose() has been called.  It's already been done once by ttyclose,
and probably once by the line-discipline too.
This commit is contained in:
Poul-Henning Kamp 2004-06-01 11:38:06 +00:00
parent 92b3fb2908
commit a1cda79464
6 changed files with 0 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@ -587,8 +587,6 @@ dcons_detach(int port)
printf("dcons: still opened\n");
(*linesw[tp->t_line].l_close)(tp, 0);
ttyclose(tp);
ttwakeup(tp);
ttwwakeup(tp);
}
/* XXX
* must wait until all device are closed.

View File

@ -456,8 +456,6 @@ siodetach(dev)
device_printf(dev, "still open, forcing close\n");
(*linesw[com->tp->t_line].l_close)(com->tp, 0);
ttyclose(com->tp);
ttwakeup(com->tp);
ttwwakeup(com->tp);
} else {
if (com->ibuf != NULL)
free(com->ibuf, M_DEVBUF);

View File

@ -442,8 +442,6 @@ bad:
if (tp->t_state & TS_ISOPEN) {
(*linesw[tp->t_line].l_close)(tp, 0);
ttyclose(tp);
ttwakeup(tp);
ttwwakeup(tp);
}
}
destroy_dev(sc->dev[i]);
@ -478,8 +476,6 @@ USB_DETACH(ubser)
if (tp->t_state & TS_ISOPEN) {
(*linesw[tp->t_line].l_close)(tp, 0);
ttyclose(tp);
ttwakeup(tp);
ttwwakeup(tp);
}
}
destroy_dev(sc->dev[i]);

View File

@ -215,8 +215,6 @@ ucom_detach(struct ucom_softc *sc)
"still open, forcing close\n");
(*linesw[tp->t_line].l_close)(tp, 0);
ttyclose(tp);
ttwakeup(tp);
ttwwakeup(tp);
}
} else {
DPRINTF(("ucom_detach: no tty\n"));

View File

@ -784,8 +784,6 @@ siodetach(dev)
device_printf(dev, "still open, forcing close\n");
(*linesw[com->tp->t_line].l_close)(com->tp, 0);
ttyclose(com->tp);
ttwakeup(com->tp);
ttwwakeup(com->tp);
} else {
if (com->ibuf != NULL)
free(com->ibuf, M_DEVBUF);

View File

@ -784,8 +784,6 @@ siodetach(dev)
device_printf(dev, "still open, forcing close\n");
(*linesw[com->tp->t_line].l_close)(com->tp, 0);
ttyclose(com->tp);
ttwakeup(com->tp);
ttwwakeup(com->tp);
} else {
if (com->ibuf != NULL)
free(com->ibuf, M_DEVBUF);