From bca0668a92f4ea6fcba91013c8fea7bc25f32cc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Henrion <mux@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:48:53 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] We can now properly return ENODEV in nommap(), so do it.
 Remove the now wrong comment which says we can't.

---
 sys/kern/subr_xxx.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sys/kern/subr_xxx.c b/sys/kern/subr_xxx.c
index 65e40965e2b9..85ec59b5256c 100644
--- a/sys/kern/subr_xxx.c
+++ b/sys/kern/subr_xxx.c
@@ -139,8 +139,7 @@ nommap(dev, offset, paddr, nprot)
 	int nprot;
 {
 
-	/* Don't return ENODEV.  That would allow mapping address ENODEV! */
-	return (-1);
+	return (ENODEV);
 }
 
 int