netstat: reduce use of historical Internet classes
When attempting to characterize bound addresses, netstat was checking for host 0 on a (historical) net using inet_lnaof(). Such addresses are not normally bound, as they would not work, with the exception of the unspecified address, INADDR_ANY. Check for that explicitly. Similarly, don't check bound addresses for a match to a network name. MFC after: 1 month Reviewed by: tuexen Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32714
This commit is contained in:
parent
92aebdeaff
commit
bd27c71c45
@ -296,14 +296,14 @@ protopr(u_long off, const char *name, int af1, int proto)
|
||||
(
|
||||
(istcp && tp->t_state == TCPS_LISTEN)
|
||||
|| (af1 == AF_INET &&
|
||||
inet_lnaof(inp->inp_laddr) == INADDR_ANY)
|
||||
inp->inp_laddr.s_addr == INADDR_ANY)
|
||||
#ifdef INET6
|
||||
|| (af1 == AF_INET6 &&
|
||||
IN6_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED(&inp->in6p_laddr))
|
||||
#endif /* INET6 */
|
||||
|| (af1 == AF_UNSPEC &&
|
||||
(((inp->inp_vflag & INP_IPV4) != 0 &&
|
||||
inet_lnaof(inp->inp_laddr) == INADDR_ANY)
|
||||
inp->inp_laddr.s_addr == INADDR_ANY)
|
||||
#ifdef INET6
|
||||
|| ((inp->inp_vflag & INP_IPV6) != 0 &&
|
||||
IN6_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED(&inp->in6p_laddr))
|
||||
@ -1479,24 +1479,13 @@ inetname(struct in_addr *inp)
|
||||
char *cp;
|
||||
static char line[MAXHOSTNAMELEN];
|
||||
struct hostent *hp;
|
||||
struct netent *np;
|
||||
|
||||
cp = 0;
|
||||
if (!numeric_addr && inp->s_addr != INADDR_ANY) {
|
||||
int net = inet_netof(*inp);
|
||||
int lna = inet_lnaof(*inp);
|
||||
|
||||
if (lna == INADDR_ANY) {
|
||||
np = getnetbyaddr(net, AF_INET);
|
||||
if (np)
|
||||
cp = np->n_name;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (cp == NULL) {
|
||||
hp = gethostbyaddr((char *)inp, sizeof (*inp), AF_INET);
|
||||
if (hp) {
|
||||
cp = hp->h_name;
|
||||
trimdomain(cp, strlen(cp));
|
||||
}
|
||||
hp = gethostbyaddr((char *)inp, sizeof (*inp), AF_INET);
|
||||
if (hp) {
|
||||
cp = hp->h_name;
|
||||
trimdomain(cp, strlen(cp));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (inp->s_addr == INADDR_ANY)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user