Reflect realtime and idle priorities in ps(1) state flags, same like
we do for the usual nice values. It could be argued that they should use another set of indicators, since the underlying mechanism is different, but they match the description in the manual page, and so I think it's ok to not overcomplicate things. PR: 81757 MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
This commit is contained in:
parent
eed99cb81b
commit
e4d52dfd1b
@ -262,9 +262,9 @@ state(KINFO *k, VARENT *ve __unused)
|
||||
cp++;
|
||||
if (!(flag & P_INMEM))
|
||||
*cp++ = 'W';
|
||||
if (k->ki_p->ki_nice < NZERO)
|
||||
if (k->ki_p->ki_nice < NZERO || k->ki_p->ki_pri.pri_class == PRI_REALTIME)
|
||||
*cp++ = '<';
|
||||
else if (k->ki_p->ki_nice > NZERO)
|
||||
else if (k->ki_p->ki_nice > NZERO || k->ki_p->ki_pri.pri_class == PRI_IDLE)
|
||||
*cp++ = 'N';
|
||||
if (flag & P_TRACED)
|
||||
*cp++ = 'X';
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user