move jenkins hash to its own header in libkern
This commit is contained in:
parent
119d24adab
commit
ee117d034c
149
sys/libkern/jenkins.h
Normal file
149
sys/libkern/jenkins.h
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
|
||||
#ifndef __LIBKERN_JENKINS_H__
|
||||
#define __LIBKERN_JENKINS_H__
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Taken from http://burtleburtle.net/bob/c/lookup3.c
|
||||
* $FreeBSD$
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#define rot(x,k) (((x)<<(k)) | ((x)>>(32-(k))))
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
mix -- mix 3 32-bit values reversibly.
|
||||
|
||||
This is reversible, so any information in (a,b,c) before mix() is
|
||||
still in (a,b,c) after mix().
|
||||
|
||||
If four pairs of (a,b,c) inputs are run through mix(), or through
|
||||
mix() in reverse, there are at least 32 bits of the output that
|
||||
are sometimes the same for one pair and different for another pair.
|
||||
This was tested for:
|
||||
* pairs that differed by one bit, by two bits, in any combination
|
||||
of top bits of (a,b,c), or in any combination of bottom bits of
|
||||
(a,b,c).
|
||||
* "differ" is defined as +, -, ^, or ~^. For + and -, I transformed
|
||||
the output delta to a Gray code (a^(a>>1)) so a string of 1's (as
|
||||
is commonly produced by subtraction) look like a single 1-bit
|
||||
difference.
|
||||
* the base values were pseudorandom, all zero but one bit set, or
|
||||
all zero plus a counter that starts at zero.
|
||||
|
||||
Some k values for my "a-=c; a^=rot(c,k); c+=b;" arrangement that
|
||||
satisfy this are
|
||||
4 6 8 16 19 4
|
||||
9 15 3 18 27 15
|
||||
14 9 3 7 17 3
|
||||
Well, "9 15 3 18 27 15" didn't quite get 32 bits diffing
|
||||
for "differ" defined as + with a one-bit base and a two-bit delta. I
|
||||
used http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/avalanche.html to choose
|
||||
the operations, constants, and arrangements of the variables.
|
||||
|
||||
This does not achieve avalanche. There are input bits of (a,b,c)
|
||||
that fail to affect some output bits of (a,b,c), especially of a. The
|
||||
most thoroughly mixed value is c, but it doesn't really even achieve
|
||||
avalanche in c.
|
||||
|
||||
This allows some parallelism. Read-after-writes are good at doubling
|
||||
the number of bits affected, so the goal of mixing pulls in the opposite
|
||||
direction as the goal of parallelism. I did what I could. Rotates
|
||||
seem to cost as much as shifts on every machine I could lay my hands
|
||||
on, and rotates are much kinder to the top and bottom bits, so I used
|
||||
rotates.
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define mix(a,b,c) \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
a -= c; a ^= rot(c, 4); c += b; \
|
||||
b -= a; b ^= rot(a, 6); a += c; \
|
||||
c -= b; c ^= rot(b, 8); b += a; \
|
||||
a -= c; a ^= rot(c,16); c += b; \
|
||||
b -= a; b ^= rot(a,19); a += c; \
|
||||
c -= b; c ^= rot(b, 4); b += a; \
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
final -- final mixing of 3 32-bit values (a,b,c) into c
|
||||
|
||||
Pairs of (a,b,c) values differing in only a few bits will usually
|
||||
produce values of c that look totally different. This was tested for
|
||||
* pairs that differed by one bit, by two bits, in any combination
|
||||
of top bits of (a,b,c), or in any combination of bottom bits of
|
||||
(a,b,c).
|
||||
* "differ" is defined as +, -, ^, or ~^. For + and -, I transformed
|
||||
the output delta to a Gray code (a^(a>>1)) so a string of 1's (as
|
||||
is commonly produced by subtraction) look like a single 1-bit
|
||||
difference.
|
||||
* the base values were pseudorandom, all zero but one bit set, or
|
||||
all zero plus a counter that starts at zero.
|
||||
|
||||
These constants passed:
|
||||
14 11 25 16 4 14 24
|
||||
12 14 25 16 4 14 24
|
||||
and these came close:
|
||||
4 8 15 26 3 22 24
|
||||
10 8 15 26 3 22 24
|
||||
11 8 15 26 3 22 24
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define final(a,b,c) \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
c ^= b; c -= rot(b,14); \
|
||||
a ^= c; a -= rot(c,11); \
|
||||
b ^= a; b -= rot(a,25); \
|
||||
c ^= b; c -= rot(b,16); \
|
||||
a ^= c; a -= rot(c,4); \
|
||||
b ^= a; b -= rot(a,14); \
|
||||
c ^= b; c -= rot(b,24); \
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
This works on all machines. To be useful, it requires
|
||||
-- that the key be an array of uint32_t's, and
|
||||
-- that the length be the number of uint32_t's in the key
|
||||
|
||||
The function hashword() is identical to hashlittle() on little-endian
|
||||
machines, and identical to hashbig() on big-endian machines,
|
||||
except that the length has to be measured in uint32_ts rather than in
|
||||
bytes. hashlittle() is more complicated than hashword() only because
|
||||
hashlittle() has to dance around fitting the key bytes into registers.
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static uint32_t
|
||||
jenkins_hashword(
|
||||
const uint32_t *k, /* the key, an array of uint32_t values */
|
||||
size_t length, /* the length of the key, in uint32_ts */
|
||||
uint32_t initval /* the previous hash, or an arbitrary value */
|
||||
)
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint32_t a,b,c;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Set up the internal state */
|
||||
a = b = c = 0xdeadbeef + (((uint32_t)length)<<2) + initval;
|
||||
|
||||
/*------------------------------------------------- handle most of the key */
|
||||
while (length > 3)
|
||||
{
|
||||
a += k[0];
|
||||
b += k[1];
|
||||
c += k[2];
|
||||
mix(a,b,c);
|
||||
length -= 3;
|
||||
k += 3;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*------------------------------------------- handle the last 3 uint32_t's */
|
||||
switch(length) /* all the case statements fall through */
|
||||
{
|
||||
case 3 : c+=k[2];
|
||||
case 2 : b+=k[1];
|
||||
case 1 : a+=k[0];
|
||||
final(a,b,c);
|
||||
case 0: /* case 0: nothing left to add */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*------------------------------------------------------ report the result */
|
||||
return c;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
@ -67,150 +67,7 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
|
||||
#include <netinet/udp.h>
|
||||
#include <netinet/sctp.h>
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Taken from http://burtleburtle.net/bob/c/lookup3.c
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#define rot(x,k) (((x)<<(k)) | ((x)>>(32-(k))))
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
mix -- mix 3 32-bit values reversibly.
|
||||
|
||||
This is reversible, so any information in (a,b,c) before mix() is
|
||||
still in (a,b,c) after mix().
|
||||
|
||||
If four pairs of (a,b,c) inputs are run through mix(), or through
|
||||
mix() in reverse, there are at least 32 bits of the output that
|
||||
are sometimes the same for one pair and different for another pair.
|
||||
This was tested for:
|
||||
* pairs that differed by one bit, by two bits, in any combination
|
||||
of top bits of (a,b,c), or in any combination of bottom bits of
|
||||
(a,b,c).
|
||||
* "differ" is defined as +, -, ^, or ~^. For + and -, I transformed
|
||||
the output delta to a Gray code (a^(a>>1)) so a string of 1's (as
|
||||
is commonly produced by subtraction) look like a single 1-bit
|
||||
difference.
|
||||
* the base values were pseudorandom, all zero but one bit set, or
|
||||
all zero plus a counter that starts at zero.
|
||||
|
||||
Some k values for my "a-=c; a^=rot(c,k); c+=b;" arrangement that
|
||||
satisfy this are
|
||||
4 6 8 16 19 4
|
||||
9 15 3 18 27 15
|
||||
14 9 3 7 17 3
|
||||
Well, "9 15 3 18 27 15" didn't quite get 32 bits diffing
|
||||
for "differ" defined as + with a one-bit base and a two-bit delta. I
|
||||
used http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/avalanche.html to choose
|
||||
the operations, constants, and arrangements of the variables.
|
||||
|
||||
This does not achieve avalanche. There are input bits of (a,b,c)
|
||||
that fail to affect some output bits of (a,b,c), especially of a. The
|
||||
most thoroughly mixed value is c, but it doesn't really even achieve
|
||||
avalanche in c.
|
||||
|
||||
This allows some parallelism. Read-after-writes are good at doubling
|
||||
the number of bits affected, so the goal of mixing pulls in the opposite
|
||||
direction as the goal of parallelism. I did what I could. Rotates
|
||||
seem to cost as much as shifts on every machine I could lay my hands
|
||||
on, and rotates are much kinder to the top and bottom bits, so I used
|
||||
rotates.
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define mix(a,b,c) \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
a -= c; a ^= rot(c, 4); c += b; \
|
||||
b -= a; b ^= rot(a, 6); a += c; \
|
||||
c -= b; c ^= rot(b, 8); b += a; \
|
||||
a -= c; a ^= rot(c,16); c += b; \
|
||||
b -= a; b ^= rot(a,19); a += c; \
|
||||
c -= b; c ^= rot(b, 4); b += a; \
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
final -- final mixing of 3 32-bit values (a,b,c) into c
|
||||
|
||||
Pairs of (a,b,c) values differing in only a few bits will usually
|
||||
produce values of c that look totally different. This was tested for
|
||||
* pairs that differed by one bit, by two bits, in any combination
|
||||
of top bits of (a,b,c), or in any combination of bottom bits of
|
||||
(a,b,c).
|
||||
* "differ" is defined as +, -, ^, or ~^. For + and -, I transformed
|
||||
the output delta to a Gray code (a^(a>>1)) so a string of 1's (as
|
||||
is commonly produced by subtraction) look like a single 1-bit
|
||||
difference.
|
||||
* the base values were pseudorandom, all zero but one bit set, or
|
||||
all zero plus a counter that starts at zero.
|
||||
|
||||
These constants passed:
|
||||
14 11 25 16 4 14 24
|
||||
12 14 25 16 4 14 24
|
||||
and these came close:
|
||||
4 8 15 26 3 22 24
|
||||
10 8 15 26 3 22 24
|
||||
11 8 15 26 3 22 24
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define final(a,b,c) \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
c ^= b; c -= rot(b,14); \
|
||||
a ^= c; a -= rot(c,11); \
|
||||
b ^= a; b -= rot(a,25); \
|
||||
c ^= b; c -= rot(b,16); \
|
||||
a ^= c; a -= rot(c,4); \
|
||||
b ^= a; b -= rot(a,14); \
|
||||
c ^= b; c -= rot(b,24); \
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
This works on all machines. To be useful, it requires
|
||||
-- that the key be an array of uint32_t's, and
|
||||
-- that the length be the number of uint32_t's in the key
|
||||
|
||||
The function hashword() is identical to hashlittle() on little-endian
|
||||
machines, and identical to hashbig() on big-endian machines,
|
||||
except that the length has to be measured in uint32_ts rather than in
|
||||
bytes. hashlittle() is more complicated than hashword() only because
|
||||
hashlittle() has to dance around fitting the key bytes into registers.
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static uint32_t hashword(
|
||||
const uint32_t *k, /* the key, an array of uint32_t values */
|
||||
size_t length, /* the length of the key, in uint32_ts */
|
||||
uint32_t initval) /* the previous hash, or an arbitrary value */
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint32_t a,b,c;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Set up the internal state */
|
||||
a = b = c = 0xdeadbeef + (((uint32_t)length)<<2) + initval;
|
||||
|
||||
/*------------------------------------------------- handle most of the key */
|
||||
while (length > 3)
|
||||
{
|
||||
a += k[0];
|
||||
b += k[1];
|
||||
c += k[2];
|
||||
mix(a,b,c);
|
||||
length -= 3;
|
||||
k += 3;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*------------------------------------------- handle the last 3 uint32_t's */
|
||||
switch(length) /* all the case statements fall through */
|
||||
{
|
||||
case 3 : c+=k[2];
|
||||
case 2 : b+=k[1];
|
||||
case 1 : a+=k[0];
|
||||
final(a,b,c);
|
||||
case 0: /* case 0: nothing left to add */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*------------------------------------------------------ report the result */
|
||||
return c;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#include <libkern/jenkins.h>
|
||||
|
||||
struct ipv4_tuple {
|
||||
uint16_t ip_sport; /* source port */
|
||||
@ -525,7 +382,7 @@ ipv4_flow_lookup_hash_internal(struct mbuf *m, struct route *ro,
|
||||
((uint16_t *)key)[1] = dport;
|
||||
|
||||
skipports:
|
||||
hash = hashword(key, 3, hashjitter + proto);
|
||||
hash = jenkins_hashword(key, 3, hashjitter + proto);
|
||||
if (m != NULL && (m->m_flags & M_FLOWID) == 0) {
|
||||
m->m_flags |= M_FLOWID;
|
||||
m->m_pkthdr.flowid = hash;
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user