Even though I'm not quite sure that the call_func stuff will work properly
in all the places/cases IPI messages will be generated, at least be consistent with how the call_data pointer is assigned and cleared (ie, all done inside the spinlock. Ensure that its NULL before continuing, just to try and identify situations where things are going horribly wrong.
This commit is contained in:
parent
1abcdbd127
commit
eee45687e9
@ -973,14 +973,14 @@ smp_tlb_shootdown(u_int vector, vm_offset_t addr1, vm_offset_t addr2)
|
||||
u_int ncpu;
|
||||
struct _call_data data;
|
||||
|
||||
call_data = &data;
|
||||
|
||||
ncpu = mp_ncpus - 1; /* does not shootdown self */
|
||||
if (ncpu < 1)
|
||||
return; /* no other cpus */
|
||||
if (!(read_eflags() & PSL_I))
|
||||
panic("%s: interrupts disabled", __func__);
|
||||
mtx_lock_spin(&smp_ipi_mtx);
|
||||
KASSERT(call_data == NULL, ("call_data isn't null?!"));
|
||||
call_data = &data;
|
||||
call_data->func_id = vector;
|
||||
call_data->arg1 = addr1;
|
||||
call_data->arg2 = addr2;
|
||||
@ -1021,6 +1021,7 @@ smp_targeted_tlb_shootdown(cpumask_t mask, u_int vector, vm_offset_t addr1, vm_o
|
||||
if (!(read_eflags() & PSL_I))
|
||||
panic("%s: interrupts disabled", __func__);
|
||||
mtx_lock_spin(&smp_ipi_mtx);
|
||||
KASSERT(call_data == NULL, ("call_data isn't null?!"));
|
||||
call_data = &data;
|
||||
call_data->func_id = vector;
|
||||
call_data->arg1 = addr1;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user