I noticed that this part of the build was taking much longer than
expected. Turns out it's due to not running the subdirs in parallel.
Reduces `make all` inside lib/libclang_rt time from 63s to 20s with -j32.
Reviewed By: dim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26623
Assume gcc is at least 6.4, the oldest xtoolchain in the ports tree.
Assume clang is at least 6, which was in 11.2-RELEASE. Drop conditions
for older compilers.
Reviewed by: imp (earlier version), emaste, jhb
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24802
This uses the new layout of the upstream repository, which was recently
migrated to GitHub, and converted into a "monorepo". That is, most of
the earlier separate sub-projects with their own branches and tags were
consolidated into one top-level directory, and are now branched and
tagged together.
Updating the vendor area to match this layout is next.
Summary:
Enable on powerpc64 and in lib/libclang_rt/Makefile change
MACHINE_CPUARCH to MACHINE_ARCH because on powerpc64
MACHINE_ARCH==MACHINE_CPUARCH so the 32-bit library overwrites 64-bit
library during installworld.
This patch doesn't enable any other libclang_rt libraries because they
need to be separately ported.
I have verified that games/julius (which fails on powerpc64 elfv2
without this change because of no libclang_rt profiling library) builds.
Test Plan: Ship it, test on powerpc and powerpcspe
Submitted by: pkubaj
Reviewed by: dim, jhibbits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22425
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r353358
It turns out that parts of the common sanitizer code still do not
compile for arm and aarch64, at least not on FreeBSD, so for now those
are all limited to amd64, and sometimes i386.
libunwind and openmp to the upstream release_80 branch r363030
(effectively, 8.0.1 rc2). The 8.0.1 release should follow this within a
week or so.
MFC after: 2 weeks
There's no reason why a special case needs to be added specifically for amd64,
arm, and i386, as the code is written in machine architecture agnostic C/C++.
This will make it possible for all supporting clang architectures to produce
runtime coverage with `--coverage`.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: dim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20003
CXXSTD was added as the C++ analogue to CSTD.
CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.
This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.
As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.
Notes:
This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.
Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:
Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```
After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345203, r345704, r345705
Relnotes: yes
Tested with: make tinderbox
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732
When a review is closed via Phabricator it updates the patch attached to the
review. I downloaded the raw patch from Phabricator, applied it, and repeated
my mistake from r345704 by accident mixing content from D19732 and D19738.
For my own personal sanity, I will try not to mix reviews like this in the
future.
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345706
Approved by: emaste (mentor, implicit)
CXXSTD was added as the C++ analogue to CSTD.
CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.
This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.
As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.
Notes:
This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.
Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:
Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```
After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345203, r345704, r345705
Relnotes: yes
Tested with: make tinderbox
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732
I accidentally committed code from two reviews. I will reintroduce the code to
bsd.progs.mk as part of a separate commit from r345704.
Approved by: emaste (mentor, implicit)
MFC after: 2 months
MFC with: r345704
CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.
This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.
As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.
Notes:
This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.
Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:
Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```
After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
Relnotes: yes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732
For now, the libraries can be built and installed using:
cd /usr/src/lib/libclang_rt/fuzzer && \
make obj && \
make depend && \
make && \
sudo make install
cd /usr/src/lib/libclang_rt/fuzzer_no_main && \
make obj && \
make depend && \
make && \
sudo make install
See https://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html for more information.
The lib32 build was already building the i386 version of
the clang sanitizers (libclang_rt) but they were not being
installed. This enables the installation.
MK_TOOLCHAIN=no was originally added to the install make
environment to disable includes so that NO_INCS could be
removed. The MK_TOOLCHAIN in bsd.incs.mk was subsequently
renamed to MK_INCLUDES, but bsd.lib.mk doesn't even include
bsd.incs.mk when LIBRARIES_ONLY is defined which the install
make environment for compat libs now defines. However,
setting MK_TOOLCHAIN=no forced MK_CLANG=no which disabled
libclang_rt during the install32 phase. Remove MK_TOOLCHAIN=no
since LIBRARIES_ONLY is now sufficient.
Since the libcompat environment overrides both LIBDIR and
SHLIBDIR, libclang_rt/Makefile.inc has to set both variables
to force the libraries to be installed to the location
expected by the compiler.
Reviewed by: bdrewery, dim
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16574
* Don't test MACHINE, it's irrelevant to userland and should never be
used in userland Makefiles.
* If we match armv[67] and CPUTYPE is undefined OR it doesn't have
'soft' in it, choose armhf.
* Add a note that the soft float on armv[67] may be broken.
Sponsored by: Netflix
:U:Mfoo expands to :Mfoo, apparently. Explicit check for CPUTYPE being
defined, and test for it's value not containing *soft* before calling CRTARCH
armhf.
Tested, somewhat. Unfortunately recent changes appear to have affected
cross-builds where it no longer works, per my tests after universe12a being
upgraded from 07/2017 to 11/2017 sources (DESTDIR isn't being used in WORLDTMP;
MK_SYSTEM_COMPILER might be causing issues right now).
MFC after: 1 week
MFC with: r325502
Reported by: imp
CPUTYPE (apparently) isn't defined in non-cross-builds, which caused
arm/armv[67] hosted/targeted builds to fail when evaluating CPUTYPE.
Add the :U modifier to CPUTYPE so it evaluates to "". This allows armv[67] to
get past the conditional successfully.
MFC after: 1 week
Reported by: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>
- MK_PROFILE is controlled in bsd.opts.mk, which is pulled in via bsd.own.mk,
which is pulled in via bsd.init.mk . All upstream Makefiles which build off
of this one use bsd.init.mk.
- COMPILER_{TYPE,VERSION} is set via bsd.compiler.mk .
This reduces the namespace pollution/complexity somewhat.
MFC after: 1 week
Despite the fact that it's a working solution, it doesn't follow the design
philosophy of only doing TARGET_* in Makefile.inc1 and special locations in
the source tree.
PR: 222925
Requested by: imp
- Define TARGET_CPUARCH and use in libclang_rt as the basis for CRTARCH
When cross-compiling, the wrong architecture was being embedded in the
libclang_rt binary filenames. It should be based on TARGET_ARCH (target), not
MACHINE_ARCH (host).
If TARGET_ARCH isn't defined (host-builds), fallback to MACHINE_ARCH.
- Define CRTARCH to armhf when TARGET/TARGET_ARCH are set to arm/armv[67]
TARGET_ABI/TARGET_CPU in Makefile.inc1 sets the ABI to gnueabihf, which
affects the clang lookup path per `getArchNameForCompilerRTLib(..)` in
contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChain.cpp, so chase clang and
Linux's assumed naming convention for hard-float arm architectures.
CROSSENV (in Makefile.inc1) sets CPUTYPE/MACHINE(_ARCH)? to the
TARGET*-relevant values when building the `libraries` target, so test
those variables instead.
- Add OLD_FILES/OLD_LIBS entries for TARGET/TARGET_ARCH == arm/armv[67]. This
impacts only arm/armv6 and arm/armv7.
PR: 222925
Several of the flags were being treated as CFLAGS, when they were actually
technically CXXFLAGS. Move them there.
Only apply -fno-sanitize=safe-stack with clang.
PR: 223179
