entry are documented in the page for route(8), not route(4).
Sponsored by: eXtensible Open Router Project <URL:http://www.xorp.org/>
MFC after: 3 weeks
socket so that routing daemons and other interested parties
know when an interface is attached/detached.
PR: kern/33747
Obtained from: NetBSD
MFC after: 2 weeks
cd src/share; find man[1-9] -type f|xargs perl -pi -e 's/[ \t]+$//'
BTW, what editors are the culprits? I'm using vim and it shows
me whitespace at EOL in troff files with a thick blue block...
Reviewed by: Silence from cvs diff -b
MFC after: 7 days
> The route(4) manpage says:
>
> User processes can obtain information about the routing entry to a spe-
> cific destination by using a RTM_GET message, or by reading the /dev/kmem
> device, or by issuing a getkerninfo(2) system call.
>
> IMHO, the above sentence should probably be altered by replacing the
> first comma with a period, and throwing away the rest of it.
No one's objected, so I've made this change. This sort of fixes docs/12220,
by removing the reference to the undocumented getkerninfo(2) call. So I'll
close the PR as well.
PR: docs/12220
This will make a number of things easier in the future, as well as (finally!)
avoiding the Id-smashing problem which has plagued developers for so long.
Boy, I'm glad we're not using sup anymore. This update would have been
insane otherwise.
