i.e. partial line, but set __SERR and errno in the same time, which
is inconsistent.
Now both OpenBSD and NetBSD return failure, i.e. no line and set error
indicators for such case, so make our fgetln() and fgetwln()
(as its wide version) compatible with the rest of *BSD.
PR: 212033
MFC after: 7 days
functions.
__SERR is for user and the rest of stdio code do not check it
for error sensing internally, only set it.
In vf(w)printf.c here it is more easy to save __SERR, clear and restore it.
return partial line on any errors. See the comment in fgetln.c.
Add corresponding comment to fgetwln() too.
2) Rewrite r304607 case 1).
3) Remove "Fast path" from __fgetwc_mbs() since it can't detect encoding
errors and ignores them all.
PR: 212033
MFC after: 7 days
1) Don't forget to set __SERR on __slbexpand() error.
2) Check for __fgetwc() errors using errno. Don't check for __SERR
as PR suggested, it user-visible flag which can stick from previous
functions and stdio code don't check it for this purpose.
PR: 212033
MFC after: 3 days
When adding getline(3) and dprintf(3) into libc, those guards were added
to prevent breaking too many ports.
7 years later the ports tree have been fixed, it is time to remove this
FreeBSDism
While here remove the extra parenthesis surrounding dprintf(3)
locale (which cause core dump) by removing whole 'table' argument
by which it passed.
2) Restore __collate_range_cmp() in __sccl().
3) Collating [a-z] range in regcomp() only for single bytes locales
(we can't do it now for other ones). In previous state only first 256
wchars are considered and all others are just silently dropped from the
range.
Instead of changing whole course to another POSIX-permitted way
for consistency and uniformity I decide to completely ignore missing
regex fucntionality and concentrace on fixing bugs in what we have now,
too many small obstacles instead, counting ports.
Only first 256 wide chars are considered currently, all other are just
dropped from the range. Proper implementation require reverse tables
database lookup, since objects are really big as max UTF-8 (1114112
code points), so just the same scanning as it was for 256 chars will
slow things down.
POSIX does not require collation for [a-z] type ranges and does not
prohibit it for non-POSIX locales. POSIX require collation for ranges
only for POSIX (or C) locale which is equal to ASCII and binary for
other chars, so we already have it.
No other *BSD implements collation for [a-z] type ranges.
Restore ABI compatibility with unused now __collate_range_cmp() which
is visible from outside (will be removed later).
The fix to the __collate_range_cmp() ABI breakage missed some replacements
in libc's vfscanf(). Replace them with __wcollate_range_cmp() which
does what is expected.
This was breaking applications like xterm and pidgin when using wide
characters.
Reported by: Vitalij Satanivskij
Approved by: re
In such cases return ENOMEM. This is a limitation of our
implementation, alternatively you may consider getline(3).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D442 (Partial)
Obtained from: Apple Inc. (Libc 997.90.3)
Relnotes: yes
POSIX.1-2008 requires that successful completion simply return a
non-negative integer. We have regularly returned a constant value.
Another, equally valid, implementation convention implies returning
the number of bytes written.
Adopt this last convention to be in line with what Apple's libc
does. POSIX also explicitly notes:
Note that this implementation convention cannot be adhered to for strings
longer than {INT_MAX} bytes as the value would not be representable in the
return type of the function. For backwards-compatibility, implementations
can return the number of bytes for strings of up to {INT_MAX} bytes, and
return {INT_MAX} for all longer strings.
Developers shouldn't depend specifically on either convention but
the change may help port software from Apple.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D442 (Partial)
Obtained from: Apple Inc. (Libc 997.90.3 with changes)
Relnotes: yes
aligned on a int64_t boundary. However, when we allocate the array of
these structures, we use ALIGNBYTES which defaults to sizeof(int) on
arm, i386 and others. The i386 stuff can handle unaligned accesses
seemlessly. However, arm cannot. Take this into account when creating
the array of FILEs, and add some comments about why.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4708
immediatelly as old code does, now for append modes too.
Real use case for such fallback is impossible (unless specially crafted).
2) Remove now unneded include I forgot to remove in prev. commits.
MFC after: 1 week
are aliases for the syscall stubs and are plt-interposed, to the
libc-private aliases of internally interposed sigprocmask() etc.
Since e.g. _sigaction is not interposed by libthr, calling signal()
removes thr_sighandler() from the handler slot etc. The result was
breaking signal semantic and rtld locking.
The added __libc_sigprocmask and other symbols are hidden, they are
not exported and cannot be called through PLT. The setjmp/longjmp
functions for x86 were changed to use direct calls, and since
PIC_PROLOGUE only needed for functional PLT indirection on i386, it is
removed as well.
The PowerPC bug of calling the syscall directly in the setjmp/longjmp
implementation is kept as is.
Reported by: Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk>
Tested by: Michiel Boland <boland37@xs4all.nl>
Reviewed by: jilles (previous version)
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after: 1 week
This function is equivalent to fclose(3) function except that it
does not close the underlying file descriptor.
fdclose(3) is step forward to make FILE structure private.
Reviewed by: wblock, jilles, jhb, pjd
Approved by: pjd (mentor)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2697
* Add VCREAT flag to indicate when a new file is being created
* Add VVERIFY to indicate verification is required
* Both VCREAT and VVERIFY are only passed on the MAC method vnode_check_open
and are removed from the accmode after
* Add O_VERIFY flag to rtld open of objects
* Add 'v' flag to __sflags to set O_VERIFY flag.
Submitted by: Steve Kiernan <stevek@juniper.net>
Obtained from: Juniper Networks, Inc.
GitHub Pull Request: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/pull/27
Relnotes: yes
These were found by gcc 5.0 on Dragonfly BSD, however I
made no attempt to silence the false positives.
Obtained from: DragonFly (cf515c3a6f3a8964ad592e524442bc628f8ed63b)
_p and _w are adjusted to account for the partial write (if any).
However, _p and _w should not be unconditionally adjusted and should only
be changed when we actually wrote some bytes, or the accumulated accounting
error will eventually result in a heap buffer overflow.
Reported by: adrian and alfred (Norse Corporation)
Security: FreeBSD-SA-14:27.stdio
Security: CVE-2014-8611
